Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Gentoo: OSX

[PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass

 

 

Gentoo osx RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


sesquile at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 12:00 PM

Post #1 of 11 (1547 views)
Permalink
[PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass

While trying to emerge gcc I got the following error:

!!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 failed.
Call stack:
ebuild.sh, line 1585: Called source
'/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild'
gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild, line 36: Called inherit 'toolchain' 'eutils'
ebuild.sh, line 1342: Called die

!!! died sourcing
/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass in
inherit()
!!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
stack if relevant.


aux_get(): (0) Error in sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 ebuild. (1)
Check for syntax error or corruption in the ebuild. (--debug)

!!! EBUILD_PHASE=depend
!!! D=/opt/portage/Apr7/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2-r3/image/opt/portage/Apr7
!!! DEST=
!!! PREFIX=
!!! ROOT=/opt/portage/Apr7
/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
1540: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
1540: ` fi'

Another regression?

-matt

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


sesquile at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 12:03 PM

Post #2 of 11 (1501 views)
Permalink
Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

Think I found the issue.

Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.

-matt

On 4/11/06, m h <sesquile [at] gmail> wrote:
> While trying to emerge gcc I got the following error:
>
> !!! ERROR: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 failed.
> Call stack:
> ebuild.sh, line 1585: Called source
> '/opt/portage/Apr7/usr/portage/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild'
> gcc-3.4.5-r1.ebuild, line 36: Called inherit 'toolchain' 'eutils'
> ebuild.sh, line 1342: Called die
>
> !!! died sourcing
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass in
> inherit()
> !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call
> stack if relevant.
>
>
> aux_get(): (0) Error in sys-devel/gcc-3.4.5-r1 ebuild. (1)
> Check for syntax error or corruption in the ebuild. (--debug)
>
> !!! EBUILD_PHASE=depend
> !!! D=/opt/portage/Apr7/var/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.2-r3/image/opt/portage/Apr7
> !!! DEST=
> !!! PREFIX=
> !!! ROOT=/opt/portage/Apr7
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
> 1540: syntax error near unexpected token `fi'
> /opt/portage/Apr7/usr/local/portage/eclass/toolchain.eclass: line
> 1540: ` fi'
>
> Another regression?
>
> -matt
>

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


grobian at gentoo

Apr 11, 2006, 12:14 PM

Post #3 of 11 (1501 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> Think I found the issue.
>
> Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.

Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)


--
Fabian Groffen

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


sesquile at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 12:20 PM

Post #4 of 11 (1505 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

Is this SVN tree available publicly?

On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian [at] gentoo> wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Think I found the issue.
> >
> > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
>
> Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)
>
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
>
> --
> gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


grobian at gentoo

Apr 11, 2006, 12:39 PM

Post #5 of 11 (1503 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On 11-04-2006 13:20:27 -0700, m h wrote:
> Is this SVN tree available publicly?

Not that I know. Only through the snapshots.


> On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian [at] gentoo> wrote:
> > On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > Think I found the issue.
> > >
> > > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
> >
> > Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)

--
Fabian Groffen
--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


sesquile at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 12:44 PM

Post #6 of 11 (1504 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).

(Note that we want to roll back everything we can....)

On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian [at] gentoo> wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:20:27 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Is this SVN tree available publicly?
>
> Not that I know. Only through the snapshots.
>
>
> > On 4/11/06, Grobian <grobian [at] gentoo> wrote:
> > > On 11-04-2006 13:03:38 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > > Think I found the issue.
> > > >
> > > > Appears to be missing a " on line 1262.
> > >
> > > Yep, thanks. Committed to svn. (!!!)
>
> --
> Fabian Groffen
> --
> gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list
>
>

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


grobian at gentoo

Apr 11, 2006, 1:04 PM

Post #7 of 11 (1502 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).

I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.
--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


ferringb at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 8:23 PM

Post #8 of 11 (1500 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
> On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> > Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> > guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).
>
> I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
> should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.

Distributed would be a bit better here...

Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
so merge history can be preserved...

(that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
~harring


sesquile at gmail

Apr 11, 2006, 9:35 PM

Post #9 of 11 (1501 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb [at] gmail> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 10:04:33PM +0200, Grobian wrote:
> > On 11-04-2006 13:44:50 -0700, m h wrote:
> > > Ok, two of my coworkers are also messing with PREFIX/linux now. I
> > > guess we will make our own branch/fork(???).
> >
> > I'm looking for a similar solution, and I'm not sure yet. Ideally all
> > should be centralised, but I'm affraid that's not going to happen.
>
> Distributed would be a bit better here...
>
> Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
> so merge history can be preserved...
>
> (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).

Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs and be
able to browse changes to the source tree.

--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


grobian at gentoo

Apr 12, 2006, 12:11 AM

Post #10 of 11 (1505 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

On 11-04-2006 22:35:06 -0700, m h wrote:
> On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb [at] gmail> wrote:
> > Distributed would be a bit better here...
> >
> > Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to subversion
> > so merge history can be preserved...
> >
> > (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
>
> Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
> think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs and be
> able to browse changes to the source tree.

I would favour sourceforge. They have SVN, and I probably will keep on
having access to it then as well as any other non-gentoo developer that
wants to join.


--
Fabian Groffen
--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list


kito at gentoo

Apr 15, 2006, 6:48 PM

Post #11 of 11 (1498 views)
Permalink
Re: Re: [PREFIX] Syntax error in toolchain.eclass [In reply to]

Hey everyone, sorry I'll be out of the loop until about the 7th of
may. Work, moving, and family are keeping me waaaaay to busy until then.

On Apr 12, 2006, at 2:11 AM, Grobian wrote:

> On 11-04-2006 22:35:06 -0700, m h wrote:
>> On 4/11/06, Brian Harring <ferringb [at] gmail> wrote:
>>> Distributed would be a bit better here...
>>>
>>> Would suggest if folks set up their own branches, stick to
>>> subversion
>>> so merge history can be preserved...
>>>
>>> (that and someone nudge over the missing anon* still).
>>
>> Would it be worthwhile to set up a berlios or sourceforge project? I
>> think something like trac would be nice. I'd like to file bugs
>> and be
>> able to browse changes to the source tree.
>
> I would favour sourceforge. They have SVN, and I probably will
> keep on
> having access to it then as well as any other non-gentoo developer
> that
> wants to join.

I just finished setting up svn and trac on one of my colo machines
for work. After work calms down, I'd be happy to set something up
there if everyone wants that. I'm really starting to like trac(and
coincidentally hate bugzilla), and for our humble few users I have no
problem footing the bill for bandwidth. It would also be nice and
probably more efficient to be able to give people like matt commit
access without having to go through the rigamorole of becoming a
Gentoo dev.

I'll catch up on bugs and mails when I get back, I know there are
tons and exg and myself left the svn in a broken state. I promise
I'll fix them all up ASAP.


--Kito




--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list

Gentoo osx RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.