flameeyes at gentoo
Feb 24, 2006, 2:59 AM
On Friday 24 February 2006 10:49, Grobian wrote:
Re: OSX only packages: where to store them?
[In reply to]
> I don't really understand your (over) reaction here. But alas.
Er, I just said that we discussed that back with kito iirc, about not adding
to the tree more ebuilds until the situation is cleared up.
> I don't think anyone implied that we should do that immediately. I was
> just asking for opinions. Not sure how I want to do it in the end.
I was just remembering which kind of problems you/we have to cope with ;)
> True. Defenitely a better place for it. Problem remains with the
> package still on micro level, that it "provides" qt somehow.
A (versioned) virtual/qt wouldn't be a bad idea; remains the problem that many
things requires to use _X11_ Qt (especially for Qt3), so deps has to be
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeyes/
Gentoo/ALT lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, AMD64, Sound, PAM, KDE