grobian at gentoo
Aug 20, 2005, 8:25 AM
Post #1 of 2
(526 views)
Permalink
|
OSXians,
as you all might know, readline is not existant on your OSX box. At
least it looks like that. Apple supplies libedit and by default
symlinks it to readline in /usr/lib thereby triggering our collision
protect when emerging readline:
% la /usr/lib/libreadline.dylib
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13 Aug 20 14:17 /usr/lib/libreadline.dylib
-> libedit.dylib
Not very interesting are this link and the libedit library, as they
don't seem to care to link some readline.h file in
/usr/include/readline/readline.h too. So far, no big news I guess.
However:
% locate readline.h
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.2.8.sdk/usr/include/mysql/readline.h
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4.0.sdk/usr/include/readline/readline.h
/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/usr/include/readline/readline.h
This output looked very interesting, and scanning the readline.h file in
MacOSX10.4u.sdk it gave me the impression that this was dealing with
an up-to-date version of libedit: one that has a compatibility layer
with readline. At least the rl_* functions are declared out there. So
I stepped into those shoes and decided to patch up libxml to use
readline from /Developer/SDKs/MacOSX10.4u.sdk/. Well, ok, because the
configure script seems to plainly ignore whatever you tell it I just
compiled the single file that failed due to a readline dep by hand, and
it was a success, that is after that running make again, everything
finished happily to compile. "make check" was pretty happy too. Running:
% ./.libs/tester --shell test/slashdot.xml
/ >
even gave me an editable prompt with history (!).
Moral of the story: GNU is not Linux. Ehm, no.
- libedit appears to be a 'good enough' replacement for some tools, good
enough to make >=readline-4.1 applications compile
- libedit is in portage
- libedit is supplied with OSX
- libedit is even completer (with readline.h) supplied with Apple's SDKs.
- there unfortunately is no virtual/readline in town, so emerging
libedit doesn't give you readline, while in fact it does.
- assumming we would just lie some more to portage about what it has and
what it doesn't have, we would have to add the readline.h file to
/usr/include and make a package.provided.
I think all is dirty, but not being able to compile libxml because the
testing program -- which a regular user will never use -- uses readline
for its --shell mode which it doesn't even use in make check stinks too.
Besides that I'd like to go a bit broader here for a sec. GPL is
considered to be a virus by many people, and shouldn't this
virtual/readline be a part of portage instead of assuming you use GNU's
readline?
Feel free to tell me I should just wait till we can simply install
readline. (then still I'd like to use libedit I think)
--
Fabian Groffen
eBuild && Porting
Gentoo for Mac OS X
--
gentoo-osx [at] gentoo mailing list
|
