<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | OSX</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>23 Nov  2009 06:51:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: OSX only packages: where to store them?</title>
<description>Hi, On 2006-02-20, at 19:06, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; On 20-02-2006 18:07:34 +0100, Dirk SchÃ¶nberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I like this idea, but not necessary for the</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59267</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Back to trying PREFIX on Linux</title>
<description>Hi. On 2006-03-03, at 01:51, m h wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yeah, I started running it on my ppc/linux machine. The strict path &amp;gt;&amp;gt; handling from before is now optiona</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59275</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Current installation method</title>
<description>Hi. I&amp;#039;ve installed kito pkg on new mac. First, I&amp;#039;ve noticed that symlinks  are absolute. But why not relative? Changing $PREFIX makes bad dst of tho</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59238</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-15, at 09:27, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hm.. but why? I&amp;#039;d use symlinks eg. /usr/bin/wc -&amp;gt; /opt/gentoo/bin/ &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; wc, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; what reso</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59122</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-15, at 10:47, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Linking /usr/bin/wc into PREFIX root of Gentoo Portage, we dont hurt &amp;gt;&amp;gt; OSX. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; if /usr/b</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59124</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-15, at 00:42, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The MacOSX file system hierarchy is a mix of two subsystems. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I think that proper way</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59109</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-14, at 23:01, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt; The MacOSX file system hierarchy is a mix of two subsystems. I think that proper way is mak</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59103</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-14, at 10:10, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; A problem of such an approach is that mounted file systems are  &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; visible &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; globall</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-14, at 20:25, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Look in the future, iPods as mobile mounting devices with Gentoo. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Such geekness :&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t t</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59090</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-14, at 20:22, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; We should find a simple way to migrate. Users need it. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Maybe the simplest deinstall all packages</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59091</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-14, at 10:10, Dirk Schönberger wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; A problem of such an approach is that mounted file systems are  &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; visible &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; globall</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New document: Project targets</title>
<description>Hello, On 2005-12-12, at 19:21, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; For example (realizing that this is completely fictional as I&amp;#039;m just &amp;gt; on onlooker [but maybe sort o</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:42:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59085</link>
</item><item>
<title>ranlib problems still not fixed?</title>
<description>I get the following message when compiling ledit: ld: table of contents for archive: /usr/lib/ocaml/libunix.a is out of date; rerun ranlib(1) (can&amp;#039;t</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2008 01:41:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/58686</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] sed QA issues</title>
<description>(Please send follow-ups to the gentoo-alt mailing list instead.) Hi Nathan, In order to be able to say anything about this, can you answer these que</description>
<pubDate>14 Feb  2007 00:24:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59580</link>
</item><item>
<title>Prefix Dilemma</title>
<description>In the process of following the OS X prefix bootsrap guide ( http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/bootstrap-macos.xml) I run into a snag:</description>
<pubDate>13 Feb  2007 22:25:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59579</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Test</title>
<description>Looks like it worked. On 2/10/07, Mister Gibson &amp;lt;mistergibson@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Just a test ... had trouble posting &amp;gt; -- &amp;gt; gentoo-osx@gentoo.org ma</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2007 22:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59578</link>
</item><item>
<title>Test</title>
<description>Just a test ... had trouble posting -- gentoo-osx@gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2007 12:01:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59577</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: eapify and stuff</title>
<description>On 16.01.2007, at 00:42, Philipp Riegger wrote: [...] I picked the wrong list. I will resend the messages to gentoo-alt.  Please don&amp;#039;t answer here.</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2007 15:52:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59576</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: polluting the world file</title>
<description>On 16.01.2007, at 00:42, Alex Plank wrote: &amp;gt; I thought this list was dead. After sending the emails, i recognized that i picked the wrong list.  Th</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2007 15:50:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59575</link>
</item><item>
<title>eapify and stuff</title>
<description>Hi! As i already mentioned, i almost finished bootstraping on OS X. Next  thing i want to get to work is tinc, but i have now idea how to do  that.</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2007 15:42:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: polluting the world file</title>
<description>I thought this list was dead. -Alex ---------------------- Alex Plank Wrong Planet Media alex@wrongplanet.net P: 213.325.2152 F: 213.325.2153  On J</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2007 15:42:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59573</link>
</item><item>
<title>polluting the world file</title>
<description>Hi! I almost finished with bootstraping on OS X. It worked great. But one  thing i have to mention: I exchanged most of the emerge statements with</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2007 15:38:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59572</link>
</item><item>
<title>xmame/XMAME</title>
<description>Hi, It looks like the extra upper-case version of XMAME is back. I&amp;#039;ve been unsing gentoo prefix for a while now with no problems on my non case-sens</description>
<pubDate>03 Dec  2006 06:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59571</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>On 12-09-2006 07:27:27 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; perl also compiled, but at the end I get three mv questions I had to &amp;gt; answer: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; mv: overwrit</description>
<pubDate>19 Sep  2006 12:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59570</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 19:34:08 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; Okay, here&amp;#039;s the full test results from scratch with everything that &amp;gt; can be keyworded ~x86-mac</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2006 11:57:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59569</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: Closing gentoo-osx (Was: portage-prefix discussions)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:35, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; If gentoo-osx is really just part of gentoo-alt, maybe the</description>
<pubDate>15 Sep  2006 05:55:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59568</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage-prefix discussions</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve signed up for gentoo-alt...I&amp;#039;ll move my thread there. ~ Nathan On 9/14/06, Christopher Chan &amp;lt;cchan@spikesource.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; So, for the most p</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 14:55:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59567</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Re: [gentoo-alt] portage-prefix discussions</title>
<description>So, for the most part, portage-prefix discussions will go into gentoo-alt? I&amp;#039;m just making sure since most of my topics and interest are related to pr</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 14:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59566</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-alt] ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 14-09-2006 18:30:41 +0200, Diego &amp;#039;Flameeyes&amp;#039; PettenÃ² wrote: &amp;gt; On Thursday 14 September 2006 14:32, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; You know this is pretty not</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 13:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59565</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-alt] portage-prefix discussions</title>
<description>I feel this list is a bit of my dungeon ( :D ), but it probably is a good idea. After being beaten up by Flameeyes ( ;) ) I will stop mocking and beh</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 13:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59564</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>On 14-09-2006 13:00:17 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; Ok, I stopped the bootstrap that kurt linked to, downloaded the latest &amp;gt; alt snapshot, started that boot</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 13:13:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59563</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>Ok, I stopped the bootstrap that kurt linked to, downloaded the latest alt snapshot, started that bootstrap, and it failed downloading gcc-5341 (see b</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 12:00:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59562</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: portage-prefix discussions</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m ok with whatever. If gentoo-osx is really just part of gentoo-alt, maybe the mailing list and irc channel should merge back into gentoo-alt? ~ N</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 09:35:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59561</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-alt] ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On Thursday 14 September 2006 14:32, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; You know this is pretty not so true. We did a GWN message on it, and &amp;gt; got a lot of shit on tha</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 09:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59560</link>
</item><item>
<title>portage-prefix discussions</title>
<description>Hi everyone, I would like to suggest to move every discussion related to portage-prefix to the gentoo-alt mailing list; reason is simple, portage-pre</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 09:26:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59559</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>On 9/14/06, Kurt Hindenburg &amp;lt;kurt.hindenburg@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; The bootstrap script can be found here (perhaps a link on the wiki?) &amp;gt; http://sources</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 09:06:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59558</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>On 9/13/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Ok, I&amp;#039;d suggest to use the bootstrap script instead: :) &amp;gt; [snip] &amp;gt; A bit stupid, but it&amp;#039;s in the lat</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 09:00:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59557</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>On 9/14/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 13-09-2006 15:11:27 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ok, so I started on http://gentoo</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 07:29:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59556</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-alt] ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 14-09-2006 13:19:06 +0200, Diego &amp;#039;Flameeyes&amp;#039; PettenÃ² wrote: &amp;gt; I htought about this a while before answering, because at first I wasn&amp;#039;t &amp;gt; really s</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 05:32:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59555</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-alt] ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>I htought about this a while before answering, because at first I wasn&amp;#039;t really sure what to answer. On Monday 11 September 2006 21:50, Grobian wrot</description>
<pubDate>14 Sep  2006 04:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59554</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>On 13-09-2006 15:11:27 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ok, so I started on http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage-prefix at the very &amp;gt; top of the page.</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 22:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59553</link>
</item><item>
<title>Starting on OS X...</title>
<description>&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;&amp;gt; Ok, so I started on http://gentoo-wiki.com/Portage-prefix at the very top of the page. I downloaded http://dev.gentoo.org/~kito/distfiles/p</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 14:11:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59552</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 9/13/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 13-09-2006 12:46:38 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 9/13/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 13:40:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59551</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 13-09-2006 12:46:38 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/13/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;Yes, test, test, test. Try to bootstrap a prefixed s</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 12:55:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59550</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 13:58:56 +0200, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; On 11-09-2006 07:51:12 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;One question though... on my ppc-macos box I d</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 12:52:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59549</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 9/13/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Yes, test, test, test. Try to bootstrap a prefixed system, ask for help &amp;gt; here, get it running, rep</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 11:46:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59548</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 13-09-2006 09:23:46 +0200, Dirk SchÃ¶nberger wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Just a bit confused, I thought that some prefixed-progress was finally &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; being made. &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 01:25:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59547</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Just a bit confused, I thought that some prefixed-progress was finally &amp;gt;&amp;gt; being made. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; It means that what&amp;#039;s in the Gentoo tree now, which was al</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2006 00:23:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59546</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 15:22:03 -0600, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;ppc-macos is dead, long live ppc-macos [snip] &amp;gt; Er,</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 23:16:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59545</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>Well, I am on ppc-macos, but when I experienced this, prefix was  still in its infancy, i.e. months ago. Maybe I&amp;#039;ll try another fresh  install of pr</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 05:43:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59544</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>On 9/12/06, Tobias Hahn &amp;lt;tobhahn@web.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I had similar issues once, my guess is the following: /usr/bin/ &amp;gt; libtool is the Darwin libtool, not</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 05:37:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59543</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>I had similar issues once, my guess is the following: /usr/bin/ libtool is the Darwin libtool, not the GNU libtool you emerged before. I don&amp;#039;t know en</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 05:04:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59542</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>Okay, by manually adding the USE flag userland_Darwin to /gentoo/etc/make.conf, I was able to get libperl installed. So it can be keyworded as well,</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 04:27:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59541</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>On 9/12/06, Michael Haubenwallner &amp;lt;michael.haubenwallner@salomon.at&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 19:34 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2006 03:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Results</title>
<description>On Mon, 2006-09-11 at 19:34 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;lt;snip&amp;gt; &amp;gt; libperl-5.8.8 fails: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; env MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=10.3 cc -o libperl.1.5.8.dyl</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 23:45:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59539</link>
</item><item>
<title>Results</title>
<description>Okay, here&amp;#039;s the full test results from scratch with everything that can be keyworded ~x86-macos. I hope the whole project doesn&amp;#039;t blow up! :)  sys</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 16:34:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59538</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; ppc-macos is dead, long live ppc-macos &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is ppc-macos a phoenix, that reborns from its own ashes?</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 14:22:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59537</link>
</item><item>
<title>ppc-macos est mort, vive ppc-macos?</title>
<description>While French is high in my personal hit list of languages I hate the most, I chose the language for this mail subject as I think it fits here. ppc-ma</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 12:50:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59536</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 07:51:12 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;On 11-09-2006 13:39:30 +0200, Grobian wrote:</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 04:58:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59535</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 11-09-2006 13:39:30 +0200, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Coreutils 6.1 indeed is masked, because I figured o</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 04:51:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 13:39:30 +0200, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; Coreutils 6.1 indeed is masked, because I figured out it does all but &amp;gt; work. Maybe backport the condi</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 04:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59533</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 07:30:18 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;   [[. ${ELIBC} == &amp;quot;glibc&amp;quot; || ${ELIB</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 04:39:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59532</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 9/11/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   [[. ${ELIBC} == &amp;quot;glibc&amp;quot; || ${ELIBC} == &amp;quot;uclibc&amp;quot; ]] \ &amp;gt; &amp;gt;       &amp;amp;&amp;amp; myconf=&amp;quot;${myconf}</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 04:30:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59531</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 11-09-2006 10:00:45 +0000, Emanuele Giaquinta wrote: &amp;gt; Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 10-09-2006 11:20:26 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 9/10/06, Chr</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 03:49:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59530</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; On 10-09-2006 11:20:26 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 9/10/06, Chris L. Mason &amp;lt;clmason@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;[...] Then</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 03:00:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59529</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On Sep 11, 2006, at 10:52 AM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m not quite shure about the internals of OS X, but how different is &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Darwin (or Opendarwin, whate</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 02:23:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59528</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On 10-09-2006 23:56:22 +0300, Philipp Riegger wrote: &amp;gt; On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;Thanks guys! If someone has a shell account</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2006 00:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59527</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On Sep 10, 2006, at 11:03 PM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks guys! If someone has a shell account to an x86-macos box that &amp;gt; would allow me to check myself</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 13:56:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59526</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 9/10/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thank you for diving into it. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Can you produce a list of ebuilds that you keyworded so I ca</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 13:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 10-09-2006 11:20:26 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/10/06, Chris L. Mason &amp;lt;clmason@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;[...] Then it compiles a bunch of</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 13:07:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 10-09-2006 10:10:22 -0400, Chris L. Mason wrote: &amp;gt; Okay, after my one-line fix to the bootstrap script, I got stuff &amp;gt; installed and then I followed</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 13:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>Thanks guys! If someone has a shell account to an x86-macos box that would allow me to check myself a bit (to tweak the boostrap script at least). S</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 13:03:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>On 9/10/06, Chris L. Mason &amp;lt;clmason@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: ... &amp;gt;[...] Then it compiles a bunch of stuff and fails with: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; gcc -g -O2  -o csplit csplit</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 08:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Test results from x86-macos</title>
<description>Okay, after my one-line fix to the bootstrap script, I got stuff installed and then I followed the steps in the wiki, manually adding a &amp;quot;~x86-macos&amp;quot; k</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 07:10:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On 9/9/06, Grobian &amp;lt;grobian@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks all for the support. I&amp;#039;m very happy to be able to tell that I &amp;gt; was able to emerge system on</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2006 05:00:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On Sep 9, 2006, at 5:10 PM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks all for the support. I&amp;#039;m very happy to be able to tell that I &amp;gt; was able to emerge system on my</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2006 15:09:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59518</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>Thanks all for the support. I&amp;#039;m very happy to be able to tell that I was able to emerge system on my OSX box (ppc) as well. I bumped the apple-gcc t</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2006 14:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On Sep 8, 2006, at 9:25 PM, Nathan wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yes, I&amp;#039;d love to get rid of fink and darwinports and just use gentoo &amp;gt;&amp;gt; for everything. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ditto. Same</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2006 03:09:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59516</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On 9/8/06, Chris L. Mason &amp;lt;clmason@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 9/8/06, Zac &amp;lt;drivintin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; thanks for all your work. there are a lot of u</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2006 11:25:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59515</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On 9/8/06, Zac &amp;lt;drivintin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; thanks for all your work. there are a lot of us here that are mostly silent &amp;gt; but are excited about run</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2006 11:22:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59514</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>thanks for all your work. there are a lot of us here that are mostly silent but are excited about running gentoo on OS X, REALLY excited. Zac On 9/</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2006 11:18:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59513</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PREFIX] status update for this week</title>
<description>On 06-09-2006 11:20:26 +0200, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; I updated some stuff in the tree, and I hope to have a running x86 linux &amp;gt; system again (with Vim 7!) a</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2006 08:52:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59512</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>(Apologies if you get this mail a second time - first i tried with baselayout-prefix/files attached as a tar.gz-ball and did not see this mail in gman</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2006 05:43:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59511</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 21:20 +0200, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; On 06-09-2006 15:37:31 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: &amp;gt; With respect, but I think the reason</description>
<pubDate>07 Sep  2006 02:26:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59510</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: [PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>Looking forward to the patches, I&amp;#039;m just sourcing environment scripts as well. -----Original Message----- From: Michael Haubenwallner [mailto:michael</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2006 12:45:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59509</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>On 06-09-2006 15:37:31 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; this is one reason why i never stopped using my toolsbox to bootstrap &amp;gt; portage:</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2006 12:20:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59508</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>Hi, this is one reason why i never stopped using my toolsbox to bootstrap portage: it creates environment-scripts, besides others containing those LD</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2006 06:37:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59507</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PREFIX] LD_LIBRARY_PATH issue</title>
<description>Hi all, While trying to get &amp;quot;system&amp;quot; emerged, I ran into a problem with perl. For a change, perl doesn&amp;#039;t seem to be the problem itself to me :D The</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2006 05:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59506</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>Ok, some update on the GIT stuff. Linus needs to work a bit on GIT, I think. It is so slow that for our tree it easily takes three days to commit or</description>
<pubDate>06 Sep  2006 02:20:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59505</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Current Projects</title>
<description>On 27-08-2006 02:01:17 -0500, Zac wrote: &amp;gt; So what is ths status and some current projects underway? i have a new &amp;gt; macbook with the x86 and would re</description>
<pubDate>28 Aug  2006 01:16:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59504</link>
</item><item>
<title>Current Projects</title>
<description>So what is ths status and some current projects underway? i have a new macbook with the x86 and would really like to help out. Zac</description>
<pubDate>27 Aug  2006 00:01:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59503</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>On 25-08-2006 13:50:24 -0700, Christopher Chan wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ll ask a dumb question, what&amp;#039;s a git repo? GIT is yet another version control system. Howe</description>
<pubDate>26 Aug  2006 01:03:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59502</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll ask a dumb question, what&amp;#039;s a git repo? Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; Some update on this stuff; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Last weekend I loaded the svn sources of the prefix tree</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2006 13:50:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59501</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>Some update on this stuff; Last weekend I loaded the svn sources of the prefix tree, and a CVS snapshot of the mainline tree in a git repo. I haven&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2006 13:19:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59500</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: USERLAND thoughts for gentoo on osx</title>
<description>On 24-08-2006 15:06:42 -0400, Armando Di Cianno wrote: &amp;gt; fafhrd: anyone out there see my message on this channel yesterday? &amp;gt; [3:00pm] fafhrd: I&amp;#039;m cur</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2006 12:26:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59499</link>
</item><item>
<title>USERLAND thoughts for gentoo on osx</title>
<description>Please ignore that I c&amp;amp;p&amp;#039;d this from my irc client window. I  realized leaving little messages on #gentoo-osx isn&amp;#039;t the best way to  get in touch w</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2006 12:06:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59498</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>On Aug 18, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; We have daily snapshots here: &amp;gt; http://gentoo.osuosl.org/experimental/snapshots/portage-alt-prefix- &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2006 09:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>On 18-08-2006 11:43:24 -0400, Armando Di Cianno wrote: &amp;gt; ... oh, did you take over the GNUstep ebuilds? If so, good. It&amp;#039;s  &amp;gt; not something I wanted</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2006 08:56:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59496</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>On Aug 17, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Grobian wrote: &amp;gt; On 17-08-2006 13:25:14 -0400, Armando Di Cianno wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Armando!!!!!!!!!! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; (you don&amp;#039;t know me, bu</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2006 08:43:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59495</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Re: Prefix tree locaiton</title>
<description>&amp;gt;I&amp;#039;d be very very very happy if we could get some movement here, so if &amp;gt;you folks can start, please do! I will help wherever that is possible. I thi</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2006 13:05:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/osx/59494</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
