<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Hardened</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>13 Feb  2012 03:51:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy</title>
<description>[. CCed gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org  to warn against possible breakage. Touching  profiles make me nervous.  TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/ge</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 10:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247694</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Howdy folks, I recently tried to recompile some packages and I discovered that GCC 4.5.3, the current default version in the hardened profile will no</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 19:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247454</link>
</item><item>
<title>New sudo format string vuln</title>
<description>Not sure how much testing anyone else has done (and it warrants more testing), but I just tested this on a rather out-of-date machine running hardened</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:12:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247209</link>
</item><item>
<title>SELinux base policy rev 12 in hardened-dev</title>
<description>Hi guys, A small update to the SELinux policies in our favorite distribution. This one pulls in the following changes: bug #399113:  Be able to di</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 09:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Missmatch in digests</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve just made sync, and I got following errors during calulacting updates: * /usr/portage/sec-policy/selinux-base-policy/selinux-base-policy</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 05:38:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247037</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and3.2.2</title>
<description>Dnia 27 stycznia 2012 17:06 &amp;quot;Tóth Attila&amp;quot; &amp;lt;atoth@atoth.sote.hu&amp;gt; napisał(a): &amp;gt; And this one is from my laptop: &amp;gt; vmalloc: allocation failure: 0 byte</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246890</link>
</item><item>
<title>Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>Hi everyone, I just added hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 to the tree. They address CVE-2012-0056. I&amp;#039;ve tested and they do indeed resist the</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246864</link>
</item><item>
<title>Security Level: high/server/workstation/virtualization</title>
<description>Hi! If you ever wonder how exactly differs predefined security levels, you&amp;#039;ll find this information here. :) I&amp;#039;ve compared them, plus I did some benc</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246863</link>
</item><item>
<title>openrc-0.9.8.2 screwed up bonding config</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry for being offtopic, but this is the list I can rely on. I&amp;#039;ve just upgraded openrc from 0.9.4 to 0.9.8.2 and my server went offline. After st</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 17:15:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246771</link>
</item><item>
<title>Interesting: CVE-2012-0056</title>
<description>Please take a look at on this exploit: http://blog.zx2c4.com/749 It is interesting to think about /proc/pid/mem protection and about building su with</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 15:49:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246715</link>
</item><item>
<title>Meeting log 2012-01-18 20:00UTC</title>
<description>Hi Log from the meeting /Magnus (Zorry)</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 12:11:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246701</link>
</item><item>
<title>New amd64 install</title>
<description>I have two hardened gentoo systems I&amp;#039;m running for many years now. I&amp;#039;ve installed the personal server in 2004. The laptop started in 2005. Now the tim</description>
<pubDate>14 Jan  2012 12:22:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246177</link>
</item><item>
<title>SELinux base policy rev 11 in hardened-dev</title>
<description>Hi guys, I haven&amp;#039;t merged hardened-development overlay with the main tree yet because I had to make sure that the changes in the policycoreutils woul</description>
<pubDate>10 Jan  2012 11:53:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246018</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gentoo reintroduction of rsbac-sources</title>
<description>Hi everyone, A long time ago, Gentoo used to provide RSBAC sources. For those of you unfamiliar with RSBAC = rules set based access control, it prov</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 13:08:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245898</link>
</item><item>
<title>New glibc feature caught sed in action while revdep-rebuild?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve just installed a new glibc, since the latest dev-lang/R now doesn&amp;#039;t have any requirements about it. On two systems I got the following messages</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 14:12:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245623</link>
</item><item>
<title>mount: unknown filesystem type &amp;#039;selinuxfs&amp;#039;</title>
<description>Hi: I try to make my system selinux enabled and followed the steps from http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/hardened/selinux/selinux-handbook.xml?part=2&amp;amp;ch</description>
<pubDate>04 Jan  2012 08:09:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245572</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: aufs3.0 fails to emerge on Gentoo hardened and kernel 3.0.4</title>
<description>On 3 Jan 2012 at 18:34, Andrea Zuccherelli wrote: &amp;gt; hfsnotify.c:208:2: error: assignment of read-only member &amp;#039;br_hfsn_ops&amp;#039; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I found this to be ca</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 10:02:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245503</link>
</item><item>
<title>i386 uclibc stages based on 0.9.32.1, both hardened and vanilla</title>
<description>Hi, I know some people were interested in this, so here it is. I&amp;#039;ve built two stage4 tarballs (stage3 + other stuff for a full development env). The</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 07:53:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245452</link>
</item><item>
<title>SELinux base policy rev 10 in hardened-dev</title>
<description>Hi guys, Assuming you don&amp;#039;t kill me for not using hexadecimal notations, rev 10 is now out right after rev 9. Revision 10 of selinux-base-policy come</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 12:02:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245102</link>
</item><item>
<title>hardened-sources &amp;amp; tp_smapi, firefox-9.0 install stucks</title>
<description>Positive feedback: New tp_smapi ebuild (0.41) based on the forked Debian source compiles fine with hardened-sources-3.1.5 and hardened-sources-3.1.6,</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 15:09:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/245060</link>
</item><item>
<title>SELinux base policy rev 9 in hardened-dev</title>
<description>Hi guys, In the hardened-dev overlay you can now find the SELinux policy revision 9 (and its affiliated modules). The included changes are: - &amp;lt;bug #</description>
<pubDate>27 Dec  2011 10:05:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/244974</link>
</item><item>
<title>Changes to the predefined grsec profiles: GRKERNSEC_HARDENED_{SERVER,WORKSTATION,VIRTUALIZATION}</title>
<description>Hi everyone, For a while now, we&amp;#039;ve been supporting three predefined grsec profiles in the hardened-sources kernel. Upstream provides four. These a</description>
<pubDate>26 Dec  2011 10:57:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/244942</link>
</item><item>
<title>Meeting 2011-12-14 20:00UTC log</title>
<description>Hi Here is the meeting log. /Magnus (Zorry)</description>
<pubDate>18 Dec  2011 14:48:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/244612</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcc-4.4.6 - says &amp;quot;arch is not supported&amp;quot; &amp;quot;hope you know what you are doing&amp;quot;?</title>
<description>So I am building in a chroot an x86 system: CFLAGS=&amp;quot;-march=k6-2 -Os -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer&amp;quot; CXXFLAGS=&amp;quot;${CFLAGS}&amp;quot; LDFLAGS=&amp;quot;-Wl,-z,relro&amp;quot; CHOST=&amp;quot;i</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 16:08:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/244289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re:</title>
<description>huh?  ________________________________ From: &amp;quot;simon.cruddas@othermedia.com&amp;quot; &amp;lt;simon@othermedia.com&amp;gt; To: gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org Sent: Monda</description>
<pubDate>12 Dec  2011 12:26:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/244272</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

