<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Hardened</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>13 Feb  2012 03:35:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Looks like &amp;#039;arch/amd64/no-multilib&amp;#039; profile inclusion is kept in &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; sync with &amp;#039;features/64bit-native&amp;#039; one: [1]. Exception is &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;#039;hardened/</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 10:15:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247720</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy</title>
<description>&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Looks like &amp;#039;arch/amd64/no-multilib&amp;#039; profile inclusion is kept in &amp;gt; &amp;gt; sync with &amp;#039;features/64bit-native&amp;#039; one: [1]. Exception is &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;#039;hardened/linux/</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 11:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247695</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy</title>
<description>[. CCed gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org  to warn against possible breakage. Touching  profiles make me nervous.  TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/ge</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 10:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Security Level: high/server/workstation/virtualization</title>
<description>Hi! On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:33:51PM +0200, Alex Efros wrote: &amp;gt; $ dumpcap &amp;gt; dumpcap: Can&amp;#039;t get list of interfaces: Can&amp;#039;t open netlink socket 93:Pr</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 23:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247636</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>El 06/02/12 08:59, Joseph C. Lininger escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3-r1/work/gcc-4.5.3/gcc/config/i386/i386.md: &amp;gt; In function &amp;#039;inte</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 04:54:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>On 02/06/2012 06:13 AM, Joseph C. Lininger wrote: &amp;gt; I looked for that and couldn&amp;#039;t find anything about it. Thank you. Any &amp;gt; idea when this might be in</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 03:46:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247471</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>On 02/06/2012 02:59 AM, Joseph C. Lininger wrote: &amp;gt; As promised, here&amp;#039;s the point in the build log where things fail. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; -I/var/tmp/portage/sys-deve</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 03:44:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247470</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>On 02/05/2012 10:28 PM, Joseph C. Lininger wrote: &amp;gt; Howdy folks, &amp;gt; I recently tried to recompile some packages and I discovered that GCC &amp;gt; 4.5.3, the</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 03:41:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>I looked for that and couldn&amp;#039;t find anything about it. Thank you. Any idea when this might be in stable x86? Stable still uses 4.5.3-r1. -- &amp;quot;All mod</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 03:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247468</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Ð&#039; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:59:55 -0700 &amp;quot;Joseph C. Lininger&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jbahm@pcdesk.net&amp;gt; Ð¿Ð¸ÑˆÐµÑ‚: &amp;gt; As promised, here&amp;#039;s the point in the build log where things</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 01:31:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>As promised, here&amp;#039;s the point in the build log where things fail. /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.5.3-r1/work/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/var/tmp/port</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 23:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247464</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Sure. I&amp;#039;ll generate it again (I cleaned the build dir) and send it on. Give me a little bit. -- &amp;quot;All models are wrong, but some are useful.&amp;quot; George</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 23:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ll double-check it on my systems. The relevant snippet of the build log would be nice. -- dr TÃ³th Attila, RadiolÃ³gus, 06-20-825-8057 Attila Toth</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 22:54:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>You&amp;#039;re right, less and less people do. But I still am required to offer an x86 image for a custom build we use. I can post a build log or something</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 22:42:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247461</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Less and less people uses x86 nowdays. On my Pentium M and Athlon MP system it builds OK. Please let us know how the build dies. -- dr TÃ³th Attila,</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 22:33:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247460</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Howdy folks, I recently tried to recompile some packages and I discovered that GCC 4.5.3, the current default version in the hardened profile will no</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 19:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247454</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>On 03/02/12 13:37, Tom Hendrikx wrote: &amp;gt; On 03/02/12 03:50, Brian Kroth wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Tom Hendrikx &amp;lt;tom@whyscream.net&amp;gt; 2012-02-02 21:42: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 27/01/12 1</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 06:11:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247342</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>On 03/02/12 03:50, Brian Kroth wrote: &amp;gt; Tom Hendrikx &amp;lt;tom@whyscream.net&amp;gt; 2012-02-02 21:42: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 27/01/12 14:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi every</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 04:37:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>Tom Hendrikx &amp;lt;tom@whyscream.net&amp;gt; 2012-02-02 21:42: &amp;gt; On 27/01/12 14:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi everyone, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I just added hardened-sources 2</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 18:50:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247330</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>El 02/02/12 21:42, Tom Hendrikx escribió: &amp;gt; However, I adopted the last working kernel (2.6.39-r8). After reading &amp;gt; the above, am I right to assume th</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 12:47:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247313</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>On 27/01/12 14:37, Anthony G. Basile wrote: &amp;gt; Hi everyone, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I just added hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 to the tree. They &amp;gt; address CVE-20</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 12:42:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New sudo format string vuln</title>
<description>On Tuesday 31 January 2012 16:19:53 Javier Juan MartÃ­nez CabezÃ³n wrote: &amp;gt; Systems compiled with -D_Fortify_source=2 are not vulnerable. If I&amp;#039;m not &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 09:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247212</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New sudo format string vuln</title>
<description>Systems compiled with -D_Fortify_source=2 are not vulnerable. If I&amp;#039;m not wrong it&amp;#039;s a format string vulnerability. 2012/1/31 RB &amp;lt;aoz.syn@gmail.com&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:19:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247210</link>
</item><item>
<title>New sudo format string vuln</title>
<description>Not sure how much testing anyone else has done (and it warrants more testing), but I just tested this on a rather out-of-date machine running hardened</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:12:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247209</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and3.2.2</title>
<description>On 01/29/12 05:38, Alex Efros wrote: &amp;gt; Hi! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:16:28PM -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; gcc. (I&amp;#039;m using vanilla because I&amp;#039;m al</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 09:33:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247054</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

