<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Hardened</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>13 Feb  2012 03:57:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy</title>
<description>[. CCed gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org  to warn against possible breakage. Touching  profiles make me nervous.  TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/ge</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 10:48:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247694</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcc 4.5.3 doesn&amp;#039;t build on x86 hardened profile</title>
<description>Howdy folks, I recently tried to recompile some packages and I discovered that GCC 4.5.3, the current default version in the hardened profile will no</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2012 19:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247454</link>
</item><item>
<title>New sudo format string vuln</title>
<description>Not sure how much testing anyone else has done (and it warrants more testing), but I just tested this on a rather out-of-date machine running hardened</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2012 07:12:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247209</link>
</item><item>
<title>SELinux base policy rev 12 in hardened-dev</title>
<description>Hi guys, A small update to the SELinux policies in our favorite distribution. This one pulls in the following changes: bug #399113:  Be able to di</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 09:10:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Missmatch in digests</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;ve just made sync, and I got following errors during calulacting updates: * /usr/portage/sec-policy/selinux-base-policy/selinux-base-policy</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 05:38:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/247037</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and3.2.2</title>
<description>Dnia 27 stycznia 2012 17:06 &amp;quot;Tóth Attila&amp;quot; &amp;lt;atoth@atoth.sote.hu&amp;gt; napisał(a): &amp;gt; And this one is from my laptop: &amp;gt; vmalloc: allocation failure: 0 byte</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 09:38:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246890</link>
</item><item>
<title>Please test hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2</title>
<description>Hi everyone, I just added hardened-sources 2.6.32-r88 and 3.2.2 to the tree. They address CVE-2012-0056. I&amp;#039;ve tested and they do indeed resist the</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246864</link>
</item><item>
<title>Security Level: high/server/workstation/virtualization</title>
<description>Hi! If you ever wonder how exactly differs predefined security levels, you&amp;#039;ll find this information here. :) I&amp;#039;ve compared them, plus I did some benc</description>
<pubDate>27 Jan  2012 05:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246863</link>
</item><item>
<title>openrc-0.9.8.2 screwed up bonding config</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry for being offtopic, but this is the list I can rely on. I&amp;#039;ve just upgraded openrc from 0.9.4 to 0.9.8.2 and my server went offline. After st</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2012 17:15:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246771</link>
</item><item>
<title>Interesting: CVE-2012-0056</title>
<description>Please take a look at on this exploit: http://blog.zx2c4.com/749 It is interesting to think about /proc/pid/mem protection and about building su with</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 15:49:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/hardened/246715</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

