neysx at gentoo
Apr 4, 2005, 11:44 AM
Post #3 of 7
(349 views)
Permalink
|
Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Xavier Neys wrote:
>
>>guide.xsl will still handle <codenote>'s so that we do not have to fix a
>>bunch of old GWN's.
>
> So you'll have to maintain one useless language construct. Why not do
> some sed-ing and avoid possible troubles in future - "hey, this tag is
> neither documented nor used, let's remove it"...
>
> If there's an easy way to get all the XML source files, I could create
> patches :-).
If all it took was s/codenote/comment/g, it would be trivial and I would not
even suggest leaving it in guide.xsl. FYI, it only takes a few lines right
before the bit that handles <comment>. It really does not cost anything to
keep it in there.
Unfortunately, there are currently 272 xml files containing a <codenote> that
are not DTD-compliant, most of them old GWNs.
If you feel like fixing all the files that are not DTD-compliant, be me guest.
I'll give you the list of files.
For those interested:
htdocs $ for x in `find . -iname '*xml' -exec grep -l codenote {} \;`;do
xmllint --noout --valid $x 2>&1;done|grep '^\./'|cut -d: -f1|sort|uniq|wc -l
272
Cheers,
--
/ Xavier Neys
\_ Gentoo Documentation Project
/ French & Internationalisation Lead
\ http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en
/\
|
signature.asc
