Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 12:23:09 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:54:20AM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > I disagree. It is actively being suggested on #gentoo, and we > > already document 03 Jan 2012 09:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245478 On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 08:59:25 +0000 Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 07:13:59PM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: > > per- 02 Jan 2012 10:54:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245356 Joshua Saddler posted on Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:13:59 -0800 as excerpted: > per-package cflags has never been an officially supported portage > feature. 01 Jan 2012 01:30:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245164 On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 07:13:59PM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: > per-package cflags has never been an officially supported portage > feature. in fact 01 Jan 2012 00:59:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245159 On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:14:49 +0100 Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that 31 Dec 2011 19:13:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245151 Sven Vermeulen posted on Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:16:35 +0000 as excerpted: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> So, consi 31 Dec 2011 15:41:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245146 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:07:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > * What about simply prepending the single word "Page" to the existing > "Updated <date>"? 31 Dec 2011 13:28:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245139 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > So, considering the idea of having a section added to "Working with Portage" > calle 31 Dec 2011 12:16:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245138 On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:56:12AM +0000, Duncan wrote: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml > > Looks quite good t 30 Dec 2011 04:29:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245078 Sven Vermeulen posted on Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:18:07 +0000 as excerpted: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: >> I noticed 29 Dec 2011 17:56:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245066 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that Portage can have > per-package envi 29 Dec 2011 10:18:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245054 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:07:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > * What about simply prepending the single word "Page" to the existing > "Updated <date>"? 29 Dec 2011 09:15:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245053 Sven Vermeulen posted on Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:27:21 +0000 as excerpted: > Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions in #gentoo > or 29 Dec 2011 08:07:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245052 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions i 29 Dec 2011 06:35:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245042 On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sven Vermeulen <swift@gentoo.org> wrote: > Hi guys, > > Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions i 29 Dec 2011 06:35:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245043 Hi guys, Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions in #gentoo or even #gentoo-doc about the "Updated" date of the Gentoo Handbook(s 29 Dec 2011 06:27:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245041 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:47:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > IIRC this (and /etc/portage/patches) was originally deliberately kept an > "undocumented fe 28 Dec 2011 11:10:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245008 On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Sven Vermeulen <sven.vermeulen@siphos.be> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that Port 28 Dec 2011 10:01:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245002 Sven Vermeulen posted on Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:14:49 +0100 as excerpted: > I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that Portage can have > per-pack 28 Dec 2011 09:47:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245001 On 12/28/11 05:14, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Hi guys, > > I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that Portage can have > per-package environment v 28 Dec 2011 09:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245000 Hi guys, I noticed we don't describe in the handbook that Portage can have per-package environment variables (like CFLAGS) through /etc/portage/env. 28 Dec 2011 02:14:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244996 On 12/10/11 4:39 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Bugs are: > - #392743 "Implicit assumptions -> confusion when trying to use printer on > a 11 Dec 2011 06:41:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244195 On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:39:19PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > Hi guys, > > No, it's not a real vacancy. But we have a couple of bugreports about 10 Dec 2011 09:11:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244146 Hi guys, No, it's not a real vacancy. But we have a couple of bugreports about CUPS or printing that could need a hand from someone who has at least 10 Dec 2011 07:39:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244144 On Sunday, November 27, 2011 09:34:30 AM Sven Vermeulen wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:05:58PM -0800, Thomas M wrote: > > Before filing a bug rep 02 Dec 2011 03:03:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243603