<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Doc</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:33:46 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 10:54:20AM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I disagree. It is actively being suggested on #gentoo, and we &amp;gt; &amp;gt; already document</description>
<pubDate>03 Jan  2012 09:33:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Sun, 1 Jan 2012 08:59:25 +0000 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 07:13:59PM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; per-</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2012 10:54:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245356</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>Joshua Saddler posted on Sat, 31 Dec 2011 19:13:59 -0800 as excerpted: &amp;gt; per-package cflags has never been an officially supported portage &amp;gt; feature.</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 01:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245164</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 07:13:59PM -0800, Joshua Saddler wrote: &amp;gt; per-package cflags has never been an officially supported portage &amp;gt; feature. in fact</description>
<pubDate>01 Jan  2012 00:59:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245159</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:14:49 +0100 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;sven.vermeulen@siphos.be&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 19:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245151</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>Sven Vermeulen posted on Sat, 31 Dec 2011 20:16:35 +0000 as excerpted: &amp;gt; On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; So, consi</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 15:41:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:07:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; * What about simply prepending the single word &amp;quot;Page&amp;quot; to the existing &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Updated &amp;lt;date&amp;gt;&amp;quot;?</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 13:28:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245139</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 06:18:07PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; So, considering the idea of having a section added to &amp;quot;Working with Portage&amp;quot; &amp;gt; calle</description>
<pubDate>31 Dec  2011 12:16:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245138</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:56:12AM +0000, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://dev.gentoo.org/~swift/docs/previews/hb-portage-advanced.xml &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Looks quite good t</description>
<pubDate>30 Dec  2011 04:29:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245078</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>Sven Vermeulen posted on Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:18:07 +0000 as excerpted: &amp;gt; On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I noticed</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 17:56:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245066</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:14:49AM +0100, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that Portage can have &amp;gt; per-package envi</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 10:18:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 04:07:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; * What about simply prepending the single word &amp;quot;Page&amp;quot; to the existing &amp;gt; &amp;quot;Updated &amp;lt;date&amp;gt;&amp;quot;?</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 09:15:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>Sven Vermeulen posted on Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:27:21 +0000 as excerpted: &amp;gt; Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions in #gentoo &amp;gt; or</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 08:07:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245052</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions i</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 06:35:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions i</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 06:35:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245043</link>
</item><item>
<title>Updated date in handbook</title>
<description>Hi guys, Something else I noticed is that we sometimes get questions in #gentoo or even #gentoo-doc about the &amp;quot;Updated&amp;quot; date of the Gentoo Handbook(s</description>
<pubDate>29 Dec  2011 06:27:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 05:47:18PM +0000, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; IIRC this (and /etc/portage/patches) was originally deliberately kept an &amp;gt; &amp;quot;undocumented fe</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 11:10:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245008</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;sven.vermeulen@siphos.be&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that Port</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 10:01:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245002</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>Sven Vermeulen posted on Wed, 28 Dec 2011 11:14:49 +0100 as excerpted: &amp;gt; I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that Portage can have &amp;gt; per-pack</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 09:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245001</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>On 12/28/11 05:14, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that Portage can have &amp;gt; per-package environment v</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 09:20:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/245000</link>
</item><item>
<title>Portage per-package environment/behavior</title>
<description>Hi guys, I noticed we don&amp;#039;t describe in the handbook that Portage can have per-package environment variables (like CFLAGS) through /etc/portage/env.</description>
<pubDate>28 Dec  2011 02:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244996</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Job Position: someone with a printer ;-)</title>
<description>On 12/10/11 4:39 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Bugs are: &amp;gt;  - #392743 &amp;quot;Implicit assumptions -&amp;gt; confusion when trying to use printer on &amp;gt;       a</description>
<pubDate>11 Dec  2011 06:41:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244195</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Job Position: someone with a printer ;-)</title>
<description>On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 03:39:19PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; No, it&amp;#039;s not a real vacancy. But we have a couple of bugreports about</description>
<pubDate>10 Dec  2011 09:11:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Job Position: someone with a printer ;-)</title>
<description>Hi guys, No, it&amp;#039;s not a real vacancy. But we have a couple of bugreports about CUPS or printing that could need a hand from someone who has at least</description>
<pubDate>10 Dec  2011 07:39:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/244144</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Corrections</title>
<description>On Sunday, November 27, 2011 09:34:30 AM Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:05:58PM -0800, Thomas M wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Before filing a bug rep</description>
<pubDate>02 Dec  2011 03:03:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243603</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>wireless posted on Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:19:58 -0500 as excerpted: &amp;gt; On 11/29/11 08:01, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t consider this as a &amp;quot;problem</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 18:19:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Sun, 27 Nov 2011 17:41:37 +0000 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi &amp;gt; guys, &amp;gt; With http://wiki.gentoo.org having their documents as CC-</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 13:00:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243456</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:19:58AM -0500, wireless wrote: &amp;gt; This issue is even simpler than that. Just assume the authors (owners?) &amp;gt; are not going to</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 07:39:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On 11/29/11 08:01, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t consider this as a &amp;quot;problem&amp;quot; per se, so I don&amp;#039;t think we need to put &amp;gt; much effort in these things</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 07:19:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243431</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 01:11:41AM +0000, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; What about a mechanism (in-doc comments or the like) that would allow &amp;gt; existing authors to</description>
<pubDate>29 Nov  2011 05:01:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243425</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>Chema Alonso posted on Mon, 28 Nov 2011 21:21:24 +0100 as excerpted: &amp;gt; On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; In other w</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 17:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys,</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 12:21:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243389</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:11:28PM -0500, Mr. Aaron W. Swenson wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m for it, but what&amp;#039;s keeping the docs team from just bumping the license &amp;gt; v</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 10:05:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243350</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; With http://wiki.gentoo.org having their documents as CC-BY-SA 3.0, I &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 19:11:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243314</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 05:41:37PM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; With http://wiki.gentoo.org having their documents as CC-BY-SA 3.0, I &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 19:11:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243315</link>
</item><item>
<title>Supporting CC-BY-SA 3.0 and later versions</title>
<description>Hi guys,</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 09:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243258</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Corrections</title>
<description>On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 06:05:58PM -0800, Thomas M wrote: &amp;gt; Before filing a bug report, I wanted to make sure what I saw was correct. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The webpage</description>
<pubDate>27 Nov  2011 09:34:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243257</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Corrections</title>
<description>On 11/26/2011 05:00 PM, Duncan wrote: &amp;gt; Thomas posted on Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:30:57 -0800 as excerpted: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I found a typo in the Documentation. This</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2011 18:05:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243211</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Corrections</title>
<description>Thomas posted on Sat, 26 Nov 2011 06:30:57 -0800 as excerpted: &amp;gt; I found a typo in the Documentation. This is for amd64 and x86. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The error is in</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2011 17:00:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243210</link>
</item><item>
<title>Corrections</title>
<description>Hello gentoo-doc, I found a typo in the Documentation. This is for amd64 and x86. The error is in the code, &amp;quot;mount --rbind /dev /mnt/gentoo/dev&amp;quot; Th</description>
<pubDate>26 Nov  2011 06:30:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/243162</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: documenting emerge-webrsync GPG verification</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:56:57AM +0200, &amp;quot;Pawe?? Hajdan, Jr.&amp;quot; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve noticed excellent blog post &amp;gt; &amp;lt;http://blog.siphos.be/2011/07/emerge-webrs</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2011 13:04:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/241463</link>
</item><item>
<title>documenting emerge-webrsync GPG verification</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve noticed excellent blog post &amp;lt;http://blog.siphos.be/2011/07/emerge-webrsync-and-gpg-verification/&amp;gt; but it seems it&amp;#039;s still not part of official do</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2011 01:56:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/241062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: Re: Arm Gentoo Handbook</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:29:28AM -0400, wireless wrote: &amp;gt; I think that if we develop/write up the intro for ARM in the &amp;gt; handbook and express what R</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2011 12:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240611</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.</title>
<description>On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) &amp;lt;klondike@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; That makes sense but then the problem is on</description>
<pubDate>13 Oct  2011 11:07:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240610</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fwd: Re: Arm Gentoo Handbook</title>
<description>On 10/12/11 09:52, Raúl Porcel wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 10/05/2011 11:43 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:46:54PM -0400, wireless wrote:</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2011 08:29:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240488</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: Re: Arm Gentoo Handbook</title>
<description>On 10/05/2011 11:43 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:46:54PM -0400, wireless wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; What currently links to the Gentoo handbo</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2011 06:52:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240483</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.</title>
<description>El 11/10/11 21:36, Alec Warner escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera &amp;gt; (klondike) &amp;lt;klondike@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote:</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2011 13:08:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.</title>
<description>On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) &amp;lt;klondike@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; El 11/10/11 20:55, Markos Chandras escribiÃ³</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2011 12:29:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240420</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [gentoo-dev] Build dependencies and upgrades.</title>
<description>El 11/10/11 20:55, Markos Chandras escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; On 10/11/11 19:50, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Today I have found t</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2011 12:23:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Arm Gentoo Handbook</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 02:46:54PM -0400, wireless wrote: &amp;gt; What currently links to the Gentoo handbook for ARM &amp;gt; is deprecated! &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://www.gento</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2011 14:43:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240025</link>
</item><item>
<title>Arm Gentoo Handbook</title>
<description>Hello Team_doc What currently links to the Gentoo handbook for ARM is deprecated! http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-arm.xml?part=1&amp;amp;chap</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2011 11:46:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/240006</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: idea for more docs: document new portage features</title>
<description>On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:52 AM, &amp;quot;PaweÅ‚ Hajdan, Jr.&amp;quot; &amp;lt;phajdan.jr@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I just noticed &amp;gt; &amp;lt;http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-896728-hi</description>
<pubDate>03 Oct  2011 12:11:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239835</link>
</item><item>
<title>idea for more docs: document new portage features</title>
<description>I just noticed &amp;lt;http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-896728-highlight-.html&amp;gt; and thought it would be cool to document some of the new portage features</description>
<pubDate>02 Oct  2011 20:52:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239825</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:13:00PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Camille Huot wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hey, sorry for my</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2011 11:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239578</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) &amp;lt; klondike@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; El 24/09/11 08:39, Sven Vermeulen escribiÃ</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2011 11:36:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239577</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>El 24/09/11 08:39, Sven Vermeulen escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; If we need a more objective metric to start with, I&amp;#039;d rather do it on &amp;gt; timeframe (&amp;quot;... sufficient docu</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2011 11:32:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239576</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 04:49:53PM +0200, Camille Huot wrote: &amp;gt; Hey, sorry for my late feedback, No problem. &amp;gt; &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;quot; &amp;gt; The Gentoo Documentation Projec</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2011 11:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239575</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>Hey, sorry for my late feedback, &amp;quot;&amp;quot;&amp;quot; The Gentoo Documentation Project Team consists of editors and authors, working on our main documentation and its</description>
<pubDate>28 Sep  2011 07:49:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239560</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>Thank you all for reviewing. I&amp;#039;ve committed the document in CVS. Wkr,     Sven Vermeulen</description>
<pubDate>27 Sep  2011 11:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 06:22:34PM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:39:41 +0200 &amp;gt; Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>25 Sep  2011 11:41:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239378</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:39:41 +0200 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 2. Translation project leads and &amp;quot;official&amp;quot; language status. Any &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2011 18:22:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 05:22:37PM -0700, Joshua Saddler wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks for the draft! From a quick run-through of the patch (much &amp;gt; obliged for that</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2011 23:39:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 19:49:25 +0000 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Okay, I have a suggestion for the Gentoo Documentation Project &amp;gt; Policy</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2011 17:22:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239327</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 08:52:46AM +0000, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; Documentation developers are also developers, but they do not need to be an &amp;gt; ebuild</description>
<pubDate>23 Sep  2011 12:49:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/239311</link>
</item><item>
<title>OpenRC tracker &amp;quot;empty&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Guys, The OpenRC tracker bug (#213988) is currently without open depending bugs. I&amp;#039;m sure there are still OpenRC &amp;quot;delta&amp;#039;s&amp;quot; afloat here and there, so</description>
<pubDate>17 Sep  2011 05:48:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/238782</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: /etc/conf.d/hwclock and /etc/conf.d/adjkerntz</title>
<description>On Sep 13, 2011 12:44 AM, &amp;quot;Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike)&amp;quot; &amp;gt; El 12/09/11 16:29, Sven Vermeulen escribió: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; My main concern here is that t</description>
<pubDate>13 Sep  2011 05:11:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/238298</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: /etc/conf.d/hwclock and /etc/conf.d/adjkerntz</title>
<description>El 12/09/11 16:29, Sven Vermeulen escribió: &amp;gt; My main concern here is that there will be a place where the number of &amp;gt; choices is too big. When that h</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2011 15:42:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/238251</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: /etc/conf.d/hwclock and /etc/conf.d/adjkerntz</title>
<description>On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) &amp;lt;klondike@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Well what I want to ask here is how should</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2011 07:29:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/238184</link>
</item><item>
<title>/etc/conf.d/hwclock and /etc/conf.d/adjkerntz</title>
<description>Well what I want to ask here is how should we aproach this. As things stand now: The open rc upgrade guide mentions both (which is ok) The gentoo bsd</description>
<pubDate>11 Sep  2011 15:26:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/238124</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>El 26/08/11 04:45, Matt Turner escribió: &amp;gt; On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Joshua Saddler &amp;lt;nightmorph@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:43</description>
<pubDate>31 Aug  2011 14:59:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/237371</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:41 AM, Joshua Saddler &amp;lt;nightmorph@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:43:51 -0400 &amp;gt; Matt Turner &amp;lt;mattst88@gentoo.org</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2011 19:45:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/237136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 09:43:51 -0400 Matt Turner &amp;lt;mattst88@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; &amp;gt; wr</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2011 22:41:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/237085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:16:59PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The inform</description>
<pubDate>23 Aug  2011 06:43:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236960</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 08:16:59PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: &amp;gt; The information on this page is very irrelevant and confusing to me, &amp;gt; as a developer.</description>
<pubDate>23 Aug  2011 01:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236952</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; ... to inform the contributor about the time-consuming position and pre</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 17:16:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236944</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Use of link attribute in &amp;lt;guide&amp;gt; tag</title>
<description>Sven Vermeulen wrote, on 08/19/2011 07:33 PM: &amp;gt; Can anyone check if they require this tag to be filled in (in the English &amp;gt; guides)? If not, I&amp;#039;ll be r</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 11:46:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236918</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Use of link attribute in &amp;lt;guide&amp;gt; tag</title>
<description>Hi Sven There is no reference to the link attribute in neysx&amp;#039;s trads.rb script that I and some (I guess) of the translation teams use. Best regards,</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2011 07:58:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236908</link>
</item><item>
<title>Use of link attribute in &amp;lt;guide&amp;gt; tag</title>
<description>Hi guys, If I look at the XSL files, we do not seem to have a dependency on the &amp;lt;guide link=&amp;quot;...&amp;quot; /&amp;gt; usage anymore (I&amp;#039;m talking about the @link attri</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2011 10:33:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236742</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 05:46:01PM -0400, Matt Turner wrote: &amp;gt; The recruiting information seems strange and unnecessarily structured. &amp;gt; It all seems t</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2011 10:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236741</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Sorry to barge in like this here, but why not start a nice di</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 14:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236397</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Sorry to barge in like this here, but why not start a nice di</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 14:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236398</link>
</item><item>
<title>Review of Documentation Policy</title>
<description>Hi guys, Sorry to barge in like this here, but why not start a nice discussion on things... Keeps the minds fresh and the activity high (heh, almost</description>
<pubDate>15 Aug  2011 14:23:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236396</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dropping in to say hi!</title>
<description>Hi, Sven! Ð&#039; ÐŸÑ‚Ð½, 12/08/2011 Ð² 18:10 +0000, Sven Vermeulen Ð¿Ð¸ÑˆÐµÑ‚: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m dropping in to say &amp;quot;hi&amp;quot;. As you probably know by now, I&amp;#039;ve rejoined</description>
<pubDate>13 Aug  2011 06:36:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dropping in to say hi!</title>
<description>On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 18:10:48 +0000 Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;swift@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi guys &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m dropping in to say &amp;quot;hi&amp;quot;. As you probably know by now,</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 23:04:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236272</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dropping in to say hi!</title>
<description>Yeah swift, welcome back! Please don&amp;#039;t hesitate to kick our asses to help! Camille Huot  On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Tobias Heinlein &amp;lt;keytoaste</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 13:31:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236260</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Dropping in to say hi!</title>
<description>Welcome back! It&amp;#039;s nice to have you around again. :) Regards, Sven Vermeulen wrote, on 08/12/2011 08:10 PM: &amp;gt; Hi guys &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m dropping in to say &amp;quot;h</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 11:22:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236258</link>
</item><item>
<title>Dropping in to say hi!</title>
<description>Hi guys I&amp;#039;m dropping in to say &amp;quot;hi&amp;quot;. As you probably know by now, I&amp;#039;ve rejoined Gentoo to help out with documentation (yes, you guys) and hardened (t</description>
<pubDate>12 Aug  2011 11:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/236257</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/23/2011 03:56 PM, David Abbott wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, David Abbott &amp;lt;dabbott@</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 13:18:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235206</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, David Abbott &amp;lt;dabbott@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Aaron W. Swenson &amp;lt;titanofold@gentoo.org&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 12:56:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235205</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Aaron W. Swenson &amp;lt;titanofold@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA256 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I think the d</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 12:44:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235204</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Aaron W. Swenson &amp;lt;titanofold@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA256 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 07/22/201</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 11:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235193</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/22/2011 02:29 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: &amp;gt; On 07/22/2011 11:17 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 09:43:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235186</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Few pending handbook updates</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:45:43PM +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; If okay, i&amp;#039;ll focus on the bugs associated with the openrc/baselayout-2 &amp;gt; tracker [2</description>
<pubDate>23 Jul  2011 04:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235168</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/22/2011 11:17 AM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:57:17AM -0400, Aaron W. Sw</description>
<pubDate>22 Jul  2011 11:29:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235117</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 08:57:17AM -0400, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: &amp;gt; I think the documentation I&amp;#039;ve written[1] for PostgreSQL is pretty well &amp;gt; set to b</description>
<pubDate>22 Jul  2011 08:17:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235103</link>
</item><item>
<title>RFC: PostgreSQL Documentation</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I think the documentation I&amp;#039;ve written[1] for PostgreSQL is pretty well set to be published. I&amp;#039;m subm</description>
<pubDate>22 Jul  2011 05:57:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/235096</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Few pending handbook updates</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Sven Vermeulen &amp;lt;sven.vermeulen@siphos.be&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; If okay, i&amp;#039;ll focus on the bugs associated with the openrc/basela</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2011 07:25:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/233940</link>
</item><item>
<title>Few pending handbook updates</title>
<description>Hi guys, In bug #369841 [1] I have a set of updates to the handbook ready in a single patch. The patch does include quite a few changes based on end-</description>
<pubDate>21 Jun  2011 13:45:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/232957</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: okupy, a Django rewrite of www.g.o</title>
<description>On Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:47:09 +0200 Jan KundrÃ¡t &amp;lt;jkt@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 06/02/11 12:29, Theo Chatzimichos wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Sure, I contacted Josh who</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2011 02:35:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/232101</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Domainkey/DKIM</title>
<description>On 01/10/11 02:44, Jason Carson wrote: &amp;gt; I was wondering how/if I can get it added to the &amp;quot;Gentoo mailfiltering &amp;gt; gateway guide&amp;quot; located here... &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2011 16:01:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/doc/231976</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

