Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Gentoo: Dev

dropping support for <linux-2.6.16 on glibc systems

 

 

Gentoo dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


vapier at gentoo

May 9, 2012, 6:47 AM

Post #1 of 3 (100 views)
Permalink
dropping support for <linux-2.6.16 on glibc systems

our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL being
required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9 in the
ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16 isn't a stretch.

the driving force here is that glibc upstream is looking to set the min kernel
version to 2.6.16. if there's no real incentive for us to support anything
older, then we'll follow suite.
-mike
Attachments: signature.asc (0.82 KB)


lists at binarywings

May 10, 2012, 12:01 PM

Post #2 of 3 (94 views)
Permalink
Re: dropping support for <linux-2.6.16 on glibc systems [In reply to]

Am 09.05.2012 15:47, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL being
> required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9 in the
> ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16 isn't a stretch.
>
> the driving force here is that glibc upstream is looking to set the min kernel
> version to 2.6.16. if there's no real incentive for us to support anything
> older, then we'll follow suite.
> -mike

Can you please keep an old version in the tree? Masked if necessary.
There are still virtual private server hosts out there using 2.6.9
(usually old Red Hat or SuSE servers) and with OpenVZ you cannot deploy
your own kernel.

Regards,
Florian Philipp
Attachments: signature.asc (0.26 KB)


vapier at gentoo

May 10, 2012, 2:50 PM

Post #3 of 3 (93 views)
Permalink
Re: dropping support for <linux-2.6.16 on glibc systems [In reply to]

On Thursday 10 May 2012 15:01:06 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 09.05.2012 15:47, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> > our glibc versions long ago stopped working with linux-2.4 due to NPTL
> > being required. further, we've long set the min kernel version to 2.6.9
> > in the ebuild itself. so bumping it to 2.6.16 isn't a stretch.
> >
> > the driving force here is that glibc upstream is looking to set the min
> > kernel version to 2.6.16. if there's no real incentive for us to
> > support anything older, then we'll follow suite.
>
> Can you please keep an old version in the tree? Masked if necessary.
> There are still virtual private server hosts out there using 2.6.9
> (usually old Red Hat or SuSE servers) and with OpenVZ you cannot deploy
> your own kernel.

it takes a while for older versions to expire from the main tree, and when
they do, they just get shifted to the toolchain overlay. so it should be easy
for you to add that overlay and pull older glibcs from there.

for example, there's a glibc-2.9 ebuild still which has been around for 3
years at this point, so consider this a 3 year notice :P.
-mike
Attachments: signature.asc (0.82 KB)

Gentoo dev RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.