Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 16:45:31 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 12 February 2012 21:34, Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: >> And AFAICS 12 Feb 2012 13:43:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247731 On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > And AFAICS there's no 'nwn' in SRC_URI so it's just pointless to > abbreviate the name like 12 Feb 2012 13:34:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247730 On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:14:42 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:37 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > 12 Feb 2012 13:22:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247729 On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:37 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, PaweÅ‚ Hajdan, wrote: > > > On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani 12 Feb 2012 13:14:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247728 On 02/12/2012 10:15 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > Feature request: > Can we add a double-inclusion detector for profiles to repoman? If it's no 12 Feb 2012 12:40:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247727 >>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Pawe³ Hajdan, wrote: > On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> Other distros associate a more user-friendly package 12 Feb 2012 11:37:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247724 > > > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in > > > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is > > > 'hardened/ 12 Feb 2012 10:15:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247719 On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application > name) to packages. > Say, they b 12 Feb 2012 07:43:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247723 Somebody reworked nvidia-drivers and nvidia-settings ebuilds 2 years ago and left them in (IMHO) quite debatable state. See bug #336088. The ebuild s 12 Feb 2012 06:34:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247718 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained, segfaults, bug #353556 # Removal in 30 days net-im/skysentials # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gen 12 Feb 2012 04:37:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247717 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained for a long time, dead upstream and crashes, # bug #214545. Removal in 30 days. x11-terms 12 Feb 2012 03:38:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247713 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Completely unmaintained, broken and with different bugs # opened. Use kernel drivers instead or go ah 12 Feb 2012 03:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247712 Is there any special reason for not getting it maintained by the same nvidia-drivers maintainers :-/, looks like jlec is helping to get it bumped but, 12 Feb 2012 03:15:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247711 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the 'ayatana' use flag so I will add it to 12 Feb 2012 02:44:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247710 On 11-02-2012 19:02:12 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani > <lxnay@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I think this 12 Feb 2012 00:01:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247708 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/02/12 08:27 AM, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani > <l 11 Feb 2012 16:02:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247702 > > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in > > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is > > 'hardened/linux/ 11 Feb 2012 11:41:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247692 # Ole Markus With <olemarkus@gentoo.org> (11 Feb 2012) # Made obsolete by PHP 5.3. Bugs #402862, #402865. # Masked for removal on 11 Mar 2012 dev-php/ 11 Feb 2012 11:41:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247693 [. CCed gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org to warn against possible breakage. Touching profiles make me nervous. TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/ge 11 Feb 2012 10:48:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247691 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > AFAIK features/64bit-native is for other 64-bit arches too like ia64 > and ppc64. So we can't rea 11 Feb 2012 10:03:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247688 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/2012 02:38 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-o 11 Feb 2012 09:09:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247687 We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data: profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask profiles/features/64bit-native/pac 11 Feb 2012 06:38:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247686 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, MichaÅ‚ Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 > Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org> w 11 Feb 2012 06:03:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247683 On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org> wrote: > I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe 11 Feb 2012 05:27:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247682 I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (applicati 11 Feb 2012 05:00:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247681