Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 16:56:17 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 12 February 2012 21:34, Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: >> And AFAICS 12 Feb 2012 13:43:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247731 On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 22:22 +0100, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > And AFAICS there's no 'nwn' in SRC_URI so it's just pointless to > abbreviate the name like 12 Feb 2012 13:34:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247730 On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:14:42 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:37 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > 12 Feb 2012 13:22:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247729 On Sun, 2012-02-12 at 20:37 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, PaweÅ‚ Hajdan, wrote: > > > On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani 12 Feb 2012 13:14:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247728 On 02/12/2012 10:15 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > Feature request: > Can we add a double-inclusion detector for profiles to repoman? If it's no 12 Feb 2012 12:40:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247727 >>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Pawe³ Hajdan, wrote: > On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> Other distros associate a more user-friendly package 12 Feb 2012 11:37:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247724 > > > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in > > > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is > > > 'hardened/ 12 Feb 2012 10:15:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247719 On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application > name) to packages. > Say, they b 12 Feb 2012 07:43:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247723 Somebody reworked nvidia-drivers and nvidia-settings ebuilds 2 years ago and left them in (IMHO) quite debatable state. See bug #336088. The ebuild s 12 Feb 2012 06:34:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247718 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained, segfaults, bug #353556 # Removal in 30 days net-im/skysentials # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gen 12 Feb 2012 04:37:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247717 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained for a long time, dead upstream and crashes, # bug #214545. Removal in 30 days. x11-terms 12 Feb 2012 03:38:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247713 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Completely unmaintained, broken and with different bugs # opened. Use kernel drivers instead or go ah 12 Feb 2012 03:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247712 Is there any special reason for not getting it maintained by the same nvidia-drivers maintainers :-/, looks like jlec is helping to get it bumped but, 12 Feb 2012 03:15:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247711 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the 'ayatana' use flag so I will add it to 12 Feb 2012 02:44:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247710 On 11-02-2012 19:02:12 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani > <lxnay@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I think this 12 Feb 2012 00:01:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247708 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 11/02/12 08:27 AM, MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani > <l 11 Feb 2012 16:02:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247702 > > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in > > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is > > 'hardened/linux/ 11 Feb 2012 11:41:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247692 # Ole Markus With <olemarkus@gentoo.org> (11 Feb 2012) # Made obsolete by PHP 5.3. Bugs #402862, #402865. # Masked for removal on 11 Mar 2012 dev-php/ 11 Feb 2012 11:41:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247693 [. CCed gentoo-hardened@lists.gentoo.org to warn against possible breakage. Touching profiles make me nervous. TS: http://archives.gentoo.org/ge 11 Feb 2012 10:48:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247691 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > AFAIK features/64bit-native is for other 64-bit arches too like ia64 > and ppc64. So we can't rea 11 Feb 2012 10:03:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247688 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/11/2012 02:38 PM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-o 11 Feb 2012 09:09:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247687 We have 2 files in gentoo-x86 with slightly out-of-sync data: profiles/arch/amd64/no-multilib/package.mask profiles/features/64bit-native/pac 11 Feb 2012 06:38:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247686 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:27 PM, MichaÅ‚ Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 > Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org> w 11 Feb 2012 06:03:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247683 On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani <lxnay@gentoo.org> wrote: > I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe 11 Feb 2012 05:27:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247682 I think this is not the first time it's been discussed here, but maybe I'm wrong. Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (applicati 11 Feb 2012 05:00:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247681 Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800 > Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: >>> On F 10 Feb 2012 21:00:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247673 On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800 Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 10 Feb 2012 20:54:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247672 On 02/10/2012 05:40 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: > # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2012) > # Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump 10 Feb 2012 19:45:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247671 On 02/10/2012 06:17 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 > Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The following U 10 Feb 2012 19:20:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247670 On 10 February 2012 18:17, Ryan Hill <dirtyepic@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 > Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> wr 10 Feb 2012 19:09:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247669 On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@gmail.com> wrote: > The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > #required 10 Feb 2012 18:17:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247668 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained. Does not build with recent kern 10 Feb 2012 14:48:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247666 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump it 10 Feb 2012 14:40:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247665 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (10 Feb 2012) # No maintainer. Does not build. Bug #402857 # 10 Feb 2012 14:33:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247664 On 10 February 2012 11:29, Zac Medico <zmedico@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 02/10/2012 11:23 AM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ros 10 Feb 2012 12:22:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247663 On 02/10/2012 11:23 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith <gaurdro@gmail.com> wrote: >> The line above is not prompting 10 Feb 2012 11:29:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247654 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/10/2012 06:50 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > Hi all, > > I am about to upgrade gnutls. Given the 10 Feb 2012 11:29:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247653 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith <gaurdro@gmail.com> wrote: > The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which > a 10 Feb 2012 11:23:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247652 > The following USE changes are necessary to proceed: > #required by net-libs/gnutls-2.12.16[nettle], required by gnutls (argument) > >=dev-libs/nettl 10 Feb 2012 11:17:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247651 Hi all, I am about to upgrade gnutls. Given the output below: centaur ~ # emerge gnutls -vp These are the packages that would be merged, in order: 10 Feb 2012 10:50:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247650 On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 11:49 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due dertobi123 retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > app-portage/etc-pro 09 Feb 2012 08:26:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247625 On 02/09/2012 11:49 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > Due dertobi123 retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: > dev-db/oracle-instantclient-ba 09 Feb 2012 06:10:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247614 Le 09/02/2012 11:49, Pacho Ramos a écrit : > Due dertobi123 retirement the following packages need a new > maintainer: > net-ftp/gproftpd Upstream 09 Feb 2012 05:23:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247613 I see no maintainer under it, if anybody wants to take it... Thanks 09 Feb 2012 04:26:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247612 Hello Looks like our net-misc/mDNSResponder packages are orphan and unmaintained for a looong time, they also have some opened bugs (with hangs, buil 09 Feb 2012 03:41:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247609 Due dertobi123 retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: app-admin/fsvs app-admin/gtkdiskfree app-backup/tsm app-misc/discomatic app-mi 09 Feb 2012 02:49:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247608 On K, 2012-02-08 at 11:32 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I just want to sanity-check my brain here. > > LINGUAS seems to be mainly a variable to contro 08 Feb 2012 09:04:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247580 I just want to sanity-check my brain here. LINGUAS seems to be mainly a variable to control the behavior of gettext's autoconf code, installed as /us 08 Feb 2012 08:32:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247579 On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:33 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > > 1) Separate net.lo service for s 07 Feb 2012 10:31:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247548 On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 04:46:58PM +0000, Duncan wrote: > 1) Separate net.lo service for stuff that doesn't have to have an > external connection at 07 Feb 2012 09:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247539 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/02/12 11:46 AM, Duncan wrote: > Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:39:14 -0500 as > 07 Feb 2012 09:12:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247538 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:44 AM, William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:39:14AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 0 07 Feb 2012 08:58:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247537 Ian Stakenvicius posted on Tue, 07 Feb 2012 09:39:14 -0500 as excerpted: > I think that "Category 2" needs to be separated into "2a - any network", > 07 Feb 2012 08:46:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247536 On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:39:14AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 07/02/12 03:28 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > > > If I want to connect to 07 Feb 2012 08:44:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247535 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 07/02/12 03:28 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > If I want to connect to pool.ntp.org to sync t 07 Feb 2012 06:39:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247533 On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 00:43 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > My understanding of networking is that you can't have two interfaces > with ip addresses in 07 Feb 2012 00:28:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247531 Hi again Alexander, another question for you. On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:15:13PM -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > 1. Services that connect to rem 06 Feb 2012 22:43:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247527 Alexandre Rostovtsev posted on Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:33:39 -0500 as excerpted: > On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:41 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: >> > My counte 06 Feb 2012 19:21:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247521 On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 19:41 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > My counterproposal is to > > (a) fix init scripts for Category 2 so that instead of "use 06 Feb 2012 18:33:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247520 Hi Alexander, On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 06:15:13PM -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > I agree with the existence of the problem, but strongly disagre 06 Feb 2012 17:41:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247516 On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 15:04 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I've been pondering for a while why All of OpenRC's network interfaces > provide n 06 Feb 2012 15:15:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247513 On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:17:56AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 30 January 2012 19:39:03 »Q« wrote: > > AIUI, LINGUAS is the only variab 06 Feb 2012 14:38:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247512 On 02/06/2012 01:04 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I've been pondering for a while why All of OpenRC's network interfaces > provide net. > > My 06 Feb 2012 13:36:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247506 All, I've been pondering for a while why All of OpenRC's network interfaces provide net. My understanding of the "net" service is that it is there t 06 Feb 2012 13:04:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247505 El vie, 03-02-2012 a las 15:19 +0100, Andreas K. Huettel escribió: > Dear all, > > Right now, noone is taking care of named packages and/or their bu 06 Feb 2012 11:40:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247498 This news item is to announce the end of supporting migration from baselayout-1 to baselayout-2 and OpenRC. I want to commit this on 2012-02-10, so a 05 Feb 2012 16:42:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247453 The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2012-02-05 23h59 UTC. Removals: app-accessi 05 Feb 2012 16:25:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247452 follow up: have base.eclass leverage unpacker.eclass when it's available -mike --- base.eclass 14 Dec 2011 23:38:09 -0000 1.55 +++ base.eclass 5 04 Feb 2012 21:21:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247408 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Alexey Shvetsov <alexxy@gentoo.org> wrote: > So this setup is working and boots fine here. We might want to recomend 04 Feb 2012 09:27:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247401 Hi all! Today I tryed masked version of udev and kmod. My setup has all on lvm2 and i have sepparate usr patrition. To generate initrd i use dracut 04 Feb 2012 08:31:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247400 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (04 Feb 2012) # Dead upstream # Bug #276412. Removal in 30 da 03 Feb 2012 17:28:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247383 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (04 Feb 2012) # No maintainer. Functionality is now embedded 03 Feb 2012 17:20:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247382 On Friday, February 03, 2012 10:14:42 PM Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > >> if [[. ${x} = en ]] || [[. ${x} = en-US ]]; then > > > > should b 03 Feb 2012 14:14:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247370 On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Friday 03 February 2012 11:44:42 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > > On Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:10:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247369 On Friday 03 February 2012 11:44:42 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> mozlingua 03 Feb 2012 11:27:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247368 On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:26 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > please post it inline to make review easier > >> # @MAINTAINER: mozilla@ge 03 Feb 2012 08:44:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247349 Dear all, Right now, noone is taking care of named packages and/or their bugs, after the most active dev left the herd. I've asked on the herd alias 03 Feb 2012 06:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247343 please post it inline to make review easier > # @MAINTAINER: mozilla@gentoo.org > # @AUTHOR: Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> goes on newline, 03 Feb 2012 01:56:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247339 2012/2/2 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyá»…n <chithanh@gentoo.org>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Frysinger schrieb: >> On Th 03 Feb 2012 01:31:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247338 On 02/03/2012 03:10 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyá»…n wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Mike Frysinger schrieb: >> On Thu 03 Feb 2012 00:49:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247337 Le jeudi 02 février 2012 à 01:44 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit : > ECLASS-VARIABLE: FTP_URI > # @DEFAULT-UNSET > # @DESCRIPTION: The ftp URI pref 03 Feb 2012 00:28:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247336 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger schrieb: > On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyá»…n > wrote 02 Feb 2012 17:10:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247327 On Thursday 02 February 2012 17:56:16 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyá»…n wrote: > there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of > mai 02 Feb 2012 15:44:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247321 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 02/02/2012 10:56 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyá»…n wrote: > Dear all, > > there have been a num 02 Feb 2012 15:21:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247320 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, there have been a number of packages masked lately due to lack of maintainer. However, their 02 Feb 2012 14:56:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247319 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (02 Feb 2012) # Multiple security bugs: 284356, 341085, 36913 02 Feb 2012 14:09:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247310 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 # Markos Chandras <hwoarang@gentoo.org> (02 Feb 2012) # Multiple security bugs: 284356, 341085, 36913 02 Feb 2012 14:09:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247311 here's v2 -mike # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # $Header: /var/cvsroot/ge 02 Feb 2012 09:24:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247303 On Thursday 02 February 2012 03:06:46 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > #v+ > SRC_URI="foo-bar-baz.rar" > > inherit unpacker inherit goes before SRC_URI -mike 02 Feb 2012 08:18:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247300 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:33:54 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2012 18:12:02 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > > On Wed 02 Feb 2012 00:06:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247289 On Wednesday 01 February 2012 18:12:02 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:55:46 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Wednesday 01 February 20 01 Feb 2012 16:33:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247271 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:55:46 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:51:52 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > > On Wed 01 Feb 2012 15:12:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247264 On Wed, 2012-02-01 at 15:05 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > # @BLURB: helpers for extraneous file formats and consistent behavior across EAPI's > # @DE 01 Feb 2012 13:11:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247259 On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:51:52 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:44:14 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > # @USAGE: [archives tha 01 Feb 2012 12:55:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247258 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:44:14 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > # @USAGE: [archives that we will unpack] > > > # @RETURN: Dependenc 01 Feb 2012 12:51:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247257 On Wednesday 01 February 2012 15:30:16 MichaÅ‚ Górny wrote: > On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:05:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > # You have to specify the o 01 Feb 2012 12:44:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247256 On Wed, 1 Feb 2012 15:05:40 -0500 Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote: > # You have to specify the off_t size ... I have no idea how to > extrac 01 Feb 2012 12:30:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247255 On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan <nirbheek@gentoo.org> wrote: > I'd love to have the attached eclass reviewed before I commit it. For 01 Feb 2012 12:14:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247254 On Tuesday 31 January 2012 19:58:32 Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 01/29/2012 02:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 28 January 2012 07:26:59 01 Feb 2012 12:08:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247253 any feedback before merging this initial version ? https://bugs.gentoo.org/399019 -mike # Copyright 1999-2012 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed 01 Feb 2012 12:05:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247252