Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 12:37:50 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg >>>>> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Paweł Hajdan, wrote: > On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: >> Other distros associate a more user-friendly package 12 Feb 2012 11:37:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247724 > > > Looks like 'arch/amd64/no-multilib' profile inclusion is kept in > > > sync with 'features/64bit-native' one: [1]. Exception is > > > 'hardened/ 12 Feb 2012 10:15:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247719 On 2/11/12 2:00 PM, Fabio Erculiani wrote: > Other distros associate a more user-friendly package name (application > name) to packages. > Say, they b 12 Feb 2012 07:43:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247723 Somebody reworked nvidia-drivers and nvidia-settings ebuilds 2 years ago and left them in (IMHO) quite debatable state. See bug #336088. The ebuild s 12 Feb 2012 06:34:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247718 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained, segfaults, bug #353556 # Removal in 30 days net-im/skysentials # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gen 12 Feb 2012 04:37:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247717 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Unmaintained for a long time, dead upstream and crashes, # bug #214545. Removal in 30 days. x11-terms 12 Feb 2012 03:38:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247713 # Pacho Ramos <pacho@gentoo.org> (12 Feb 2012) # Completely unmaintained, broken and with different bugs # opened. Use kernel drivers instead or go ah 12 Feb 2012 03:20:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247712 Is there any special reason for not getting it maintained by the same nvidia-drivers maintainers :-/, looks like jlec is helping to get it bumped but, 12 Feb 2012 03:15:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247711 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the 'ayatana' use flag so I will add it to 12 Feb 2012 02:44:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247710 On 11-02-2012 19:02:12 -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:00:38 +0100 Fabio Erculiani > <lxnay@gentoo.org> wrote: >> I think this 12 Feb 2012 00:01:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/247708