Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:48:48 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:13:05 -0700 Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've never used the Shift-Function keys myself. Here is what I'm 09 Oct 2011 13:20:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240271 On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 10:45 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > Hello, > > On an ordinary keyboard, the extended function keys, F13 09 Oct 2011 12:13:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240265 On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 21:44:38 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > > Same problem here. And downgrading to 2.3 fixes it. > Thanks. 09 Oct 2011 12:09:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240264 On 10/09/2011 09:15 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:45:07 -0400 > Frank Peters<frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > >> >> Well, up unti 09 Oct 2011 11:44:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240263 On Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:45:07 -0400 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > > Well, up until a few days ago, the Shift+Fn combination was wor 09 Oct 2011 11:15:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240262 Hello, On an ordinary keyboard, the extended function keys, F13 to F24, should be accessible as Shift + Fn, where Fn are the keys F1 to F12. Well, u 09 Oct 2011 10:45:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/240261 installing net-wireless/iwl6030-ucode was the missing part. Thank you all. I didn't see it on the page. Thank you Pascal. On last thing about the tou 07 Sep 2011 12:00:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237776 According to http://de.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki/Iwlwifi#Firmware you have the wrong firmware installed: Wireless-N 1030 needs net-wireless/iwl6030-ucode 07 Sep 2011 11:21:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237775 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Mansour Al Akeel <mansour.alakeel@gmail.com> wrote: > > It shows that I need the driver "iwlagn" : > 8086008a        Y 07 Sep 2011 11:20:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237774 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Mansour Al Akeel <mansour.alakeel@gmail.com> wrote: > I pasted the output of "lspci -n" in http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl 07 Sep 2011 11:20:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237773 On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Mansour Al Akeel <mansour.alakeel@gmail.com> wrote: > Dale, > atl1c is for ethernet and not for the wireless. What I 07 Sep 2011 11:07:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237772 I pasted the output of "lspci -n" in http://kmuto.jp/debian/hcl/ 00:00.0 0600: 8086:0104 (rev 09) 00:02.0 0300: 8086:0116 (rev 09) 00:16.0 0780: 8086 07 Sep 2011 11:06:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237771 Dale, atl1c is for ethernet and not for the wireless. What I looking for at this point is the wireless. On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mansour Al 07 Sep 2011 10:52:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237770 I am trying to install the driver for the wireless adopter. It looks like it's Intel based: lspci 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 2n 07 Sep 2011 10:20:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237763 Dale, thank you a lot. I did a lot of googling before posting and will continue looking at the links you gave me. Will post the results. On Wed, Sep 07 Sep 2011 09:46:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237765 Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I am trying to install the driver for the wireless adopter. It looks > like it's Intel based: > > > lspci > > 00:00.0 Host b 07 Sep 2011 09:41:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237764 Thank you Dale. That did the trick. I was not able to remove the service, as it doesn't exist, but it gave me an idea about turning the numlock off. F 06 Sep 2011 23:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237730 Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I got a newer laptop, and rather than installing gentoo, I just > swapped the hard disks. Now when I boot into the new one, 06 Sep 2011 19:31:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237728 On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 22:21 -0400, Mansour Al Akeel wrote: > I got a newer laptop, and rather than installing gentoo, I just > swapped the hard disks. 06 Sep 2011 19:27:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237727 I got a newer laptop, and rather than installing gentoo, I just swapped the hard disks. Now when I boot into the new one, it works up to the level I a 06 Sep 2011 19:21:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237726 Homer Parker posted on Thu, 25 Aug 2011 14:07:57 -0500 as excerpted: > That said, > I do use evolution for email.. After years of beating on salesdro 25 Aug 2011 19:05:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237135 On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 18:37 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote: > > Text based torrent clients are great for running on headless > > machines > > in tmux o 25 Aug 2011 12:07:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237123 On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> wrote: > Many popular torrent clients, uTorrent and Transmission for example, can run > 25 Aug 2011 05:24:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237099 On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Homer Parker <hparker@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 03:32 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote: > > So, yes, I think y 25 Aug 2011 01:37:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237095 On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 03:32 +1000, Lie Ryan wrote: > So, yes, I think you do have an extreme irrational bias if you prefer > a > text-based email or t 24 Aug 2011 11:49:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237054 Frank Peters posted on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 11:27:50 -0400 as excerpted: > Pan is another wonder of the open source world. There is literally > nothing 24 Aug 2011 10:35:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237053 On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net>wrote: > It's not that I have some extreme irrational bias against graphical 24 Aug 2011 10:32:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237052 On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 06:39:45 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > pan actually has more people working on it now than it has in a > v 24 Aug 2011 08:27:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237047 Frank Peters posted on Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:51:59 -0400 as excerpted: > Sylpheed has undergone a lot of development over the years, but I really > hav 23 Aug 2011 23:39:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237015 On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 03:43:05 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > > So I've been wondering what the rest of the story might be, and wh 23 Aug 2011 22:51:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237014 Frank Peters posted on Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:46:29 -0400 as excerpted: > Actually I much prefer Sylpheed over all other email clients and I use > it al 23 Aug 2011 20:43:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237005 On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:07:41 -0400 Drake Donahue <donahue95@comcast.net> wrote: > > How else can you enjoy a singing email?? :-) > Good point, I s 23 Aug 2011 16:46:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237002 On Tuesday 23 August 2011 22:45:05 Frank Peters wrote: > I don't follow thunderbird development but there is a previous bug > report on this (https:// 23 Aug 2011 16:40:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237001 On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 16:45 -0400, Frank Peters wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:02:58 -0400 > Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > 23 Aug 2011 16:07:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/237000 On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:02:58 -0400 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > > Possibly these errors are related to USE="-alsa". > Thanks t 23 Aug 2011 13:45:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/236980 On 08/23/2011 11:02 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:05:42 +0200 > Agostino Sarubbo<ago@autistici.org> wrote: > >> You need more than 23 Aug 2011 13:13:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/236979 On Tuesday 23 August 2011 20:47:42 Frank Peters wrote: > When attempting to emerge either thunderbird-5 or thunderbird-6 > the build fails. > > The b 23 Aug 2011 12:05:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/236978 On 08/23/2011 09:47 PM, Frank Peters wrote: > When attempting to emerge either thunderbird-5 or thunderbird-6 > the build fails. > > The build log, in 23 Aug 2011 11:55:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/236969 When attempting to emerge either thunderbird-5 or thunderbird-6 the build fails. The build log, in both cases, shows this at the end: rm -f libxul.s 23 Aug 2011 11:47:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/236968 On 6/19/11, Daiajo Tibdixious <daiajo@gmail.com> wrote: > On 6/19/11, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: >> Daiajo Tibdixious posted on Sun, 19 Jun 31 Jul 2011 15:42:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/235669 On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:46:38 -0400 DJ Cozatt <ygdrasil@comcast.net> wrote: > > Is a discussion/flame about the report upstream qa messages. > Help m 08 Jul 2011 16:56:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234340 DJ Cozatt posted on Fri, 08 Jul 2011 16:46:38 -0400 as excerpted: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=339485 > > Is a discussion/flame about t 08 Jul 2011 16:35:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234341 >>>>> "FP" == Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> writes: FP> But is there a way to override the emerge refusal to allow FP> a downgrade to glibc 08 Jul 2011 14:06:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234332 On Tue, 2011-07-05 at 13:02 +0000, gentoo-amd64+help@lists.gentoo.org wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:36:38 -0700 > Mark Knecht <markk 08 Jul 2011 13:46:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234325 On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 23:11:28 -0400, Frank Peters wrote: > But is there a way to override the emerge refusal to allow > a downgrade to glibc? That is 06 Jul 2011 15:20:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234174 On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 19:40:58 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: > > one is compiled by the ooo guys for some setup they 06 Jul 2011 11:57:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234153 On Wednesday 06 July 2011 12:08:45 Frank Peters wrote: > On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:22:33 -0500 > Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote: > > T 06 Jul 2011 10:40:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234152 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis: > What a mess! In my case there would be no problem because > absolutely nothing was built against t 06 Jul 2011 10:26:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234151 On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 00:22:33 -0500 Paul Hartman <paul.hartman+gentoo@gmail.com> wrote: > > Take a look at this page: > http://en.gentoo-wiki.com/wiki 06 Jul 2011 09:08:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234146 On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > But is there a way to override the emerge refusal to allow > a downg 05 Jul 2011 22:22:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234123 On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 04:28:34 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: > > no need for that, a simple revdep-rebuilt solves thi 05 Jul 2011 20:11:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234117 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis: > * Sanity check to keep you from breaking your system: > * Downgrading glibc is not supported and 05 Jul 2011 20:10:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234116 On Tuesday 05 July 2011 21:31:48 Frank Peters wrote: > Hello, > Today my system automatically updated glibc from 2.12-rc2 to 2.12- rc3.Shortly afterwa 05 Jul 2011 19:28:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234114 Hello, Today my system automatically updated glibc from 2.12-rc2 to 2.12-rc3. Shortly afterwards I tried to start OpenOffice and it would not start. 05 Jul 2011 18:31:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/234113 On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 14:53:45 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > > You can alias them with a char* (a char pointer can alias everythi 01 Jul 2011 09:53:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233852 On 07/01/2011 04:04 AM, Frank Peters wrote: > A few days ago I posted about a possible problem with a floating > point test called the UCBTEST. After 01 Jul 2011 04:53:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233836 Ð' Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 16:49 +0200, justin пишет: > On 6/30/11 12:00 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: > > Ð' Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 12:44 +0300, Thanasis 01 Jul 2011 04:25:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233835 On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:36:38 -0700 Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > I think it's completely appropriate for this list. This distro expe 30 Jun 2011 22:22:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233817 On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:58:46 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.n 30 Jun 2011 21:36:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233816 On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:22:39 -0500 Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org> wrote: > > C is essentially a glorified assembly language > IMO 30 Jun 2011 19:43:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233813 On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Frank Peters wrote: 30 Jun 2011 19:30:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233812 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis: > A few days ago I posted about a possible problem with a floating > point test called the UCBTEST. 30 Jun 2011 19:22:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233811 Frank Peters posted on Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:04:29 -0400 as excerpted: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44:36 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> > wrote 30 Jun 2011 19:18:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233810 On Fri, 1 Jul 2011, Frank Peters wrote: > On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:58:46 +0000 (UTC) > Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > >> >> I had wondered if th 30 Jun 2011 19:15:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233815 Frank Peters posted on Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:23:21 -0400 as excerpted: > Anyway, I'm glad I presented this issue. It has definitely improved my > unde 30 Jun 2011 18:52:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233809 On Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net> wrote: > > I had wondered if this might be an "undefined behavior" optimizatio 30 Jun 2011 18:23:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233808 On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44:36 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > > And here you can read more thorough information about strict alias 30 Jun 2011 18:04:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233806 Nikos Chantziaras posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:11:09 +0300 as excerpted: > On 07/01/2011 03:04 AM, Frank Peters wrote: >> On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44: 30 Jun 2011 17:58:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233805 On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44:36 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > >> unsigned long int *px = (unsigned long int*)&x; > And here you ca 30 Jun 2011 17:25:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233804 On 07/01/2011 03:04 AM, Frank Peters wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44:36 +0300 > Nikos Chantziaras<realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > >>> >>> Your code is b 30 Jun 2011 17:11:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233803 On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 02:44:36 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@arcor.de> wrote: > > > > Your code is buggy, because you're breaking C's aliasing rules. 30 Jun 2011 17:04:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233802 On 07/01/2011 02:35 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 07/01/2011 12:45 AM, Frank Peters wrote: >> Hello, >> >> After banging my head for a while over 30 Jun 2011 16:44:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233801 On 07/01/2011 12:45 AM, Frank Peters wrote: > Hello, > > After banging my head for a while over some strange results, I began > to suspect GCC-4.5.2, 30 Jun 2011 16:35:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233800 On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 00:30:57 +0200 Alex Schuster <wonko@wonkology.org> wrote: > > Who will file the bug report now? > Thanks for the confirmation. 30 Jun 2011 16:34:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233799 Frank Peters writes: > After banging my head for a while over some strange results, I began > to suspect GCC-4.5.2, the latest version in portage, wa 30 Jun 2011 15:30:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233794 Hello, After banging my head for a while over some strange results, I began to suspect GCC-4.5.2, the latest version in portage, was creating faulty 30 Jun 2011 14:45:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233793 On 6/30/11 12:00 PM, Peter Volkov wrote: > Ð' Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 12:44 +0300, Thanasis пишет: >> on 06/30/2011 12:10 PM Thanasis wrote the fol 30 Jun 2011 07:49:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233767 on 06/30/2011 01:00 PM Peter Volkov wrote the following: >> It must be some kind of transient emerge side effect, but it happens no >> matter if at t 30 Jun 2011 04:17:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233760 Ð' Чтв, 30/06/2011 в 12:44 +0300, Thanasis пишет: > on 06/30/2011 12:10 PM Thanasis wrote the following: > > When I run eix-test-obsolete it 30 Jun 2011 03:00:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233759 on 06/30/2011 12:10 PM Thanasis wrote the following: > When I run eix-test-obsolete it reports a strange package: > > ... > The following installed p 30 Jun 2011 02:44:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233758 When I run eix-test-obsolete it reports a strange package: ... The following installed packages are not in the database: sys-kernel/-MERGING-gentoo- 30 Jun 2011 02:10:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233757 Volker Armin Hemmann posted on Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:31:27 +0200 as excerpted: > On Monday 27 June 2011 03:26:59 Lie Ryan wrote: >> Anyone noticed tha 26 Jun 2011 20:22:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233534 On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 12:49:03 -0700 Mark Knecht <markknecht@gmail.com> wrote: > > Do you have any info about _any_ system passing this 100% successfu 26 Jun 2011 13:33:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233518 On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Barry Schwartz <chemoelectric@chemoelectric.org> wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> skribis: 26 Jun 2011 12:49:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233517 On Sunday 26 June 2011 14:21:11 Barry Schwartz wrote: > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> skribis: > > ok, I tried ekopath: > > > > U 26 Jun 2011 12:31:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233516 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> skribis: > ok, I tried ekopath: > > UCBFAIL indicates problems! > /tmp/usbtest/ccos_DP.output: ucbt 26 Jun 2011 12:21:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233515 On Sunday 26 June 2011 13:36:22 Frank Peters wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:04:48 +0200 > > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: 26 Jun 2011 12:01:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233502 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis: > Then there is LLVM which I am not sure about. I'll have to research > this one. Hmm. I see it has 26 Jun 2011 10:54:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233501 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Monday 27 June 2011 03:26:59 Lie Ryan wrote: > >> 2011/6/27 Dale<rdalek1967@gmail.com> >> >> >>> Piotr Hoso 26 Jun 2011 10:52:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233500 On Sunday 26 June 2011 13:36:22 Frank Peters wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:04:48 +0200 > > Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: 26 Jun 2011 10:45:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233499 Lie Ryan wrote: > 2011/6/27 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com <mailto:rdalek1967@gmail.com>> > > Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > > unsubscribe > > > > 26 Jun 2011 10:43:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233498 On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:04:48 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: > > btw, have you tried ekopath? The compiler entered po 26 Jun 2011 10:36:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233496 On Monday 27 June 2011 03:26:59 Lie Ryan wrote: > 2011/6/27 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> > > > Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > >> unsubscribe > > > > NO !!! 26 Jun 2011 10:31:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233497 2011/6/27 Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com> > Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > >> unsubscribe >> >> >> > NO !!! You can't leave. :-P > > List-Unsubscribe:<mailto: 26 Jun 2011 10:26:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233495 On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: <SNIP> > > btw, have you tried ekopath? The compiler entere 26 Jun 2011 10:17:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233483 On Saturday 25 June 2011 13:41:11 Frank Peters wrote: > Hello, > > Believe it or not, at the very beginning, Linux/GNU had some math problems. > In p 26 Jun 2011 10:04:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233482 Frank Peters <frank.peters@comcast.net> skribis: > I was using gcc-4.5.2, which is the latest on Gentoo. Installing gcc-4.4.5, > the previous version 26 Jun 2011 09:30:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233481 On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 13:30:41 +0200 Volker Armin Hemmann <volkerarmin@googlemail.com> wrote: > Believe it or not, this tarball is straight from hell. 26 Jun 2011 09:27:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233480 Piotr Hosowicz wrote: > unsubscribe > > NO !!! You can't leave. :-P List-Unsubscribe:<mailto:gentoo-amd64+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> That may 26 Jun 2011 08:40:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233479 unsubscribe 26 Jun 2011 06:17:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/amd64/233467