<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Gentoo | Alpha</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:49:37 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: KDE4 on Alpha</title>
<description>Hi Matt, thanks for the bad info - I actually like Koffice and this is the main reason why I am interested in KDE. So I will give another try but as</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2011 11:16:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/234150</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: KDE4 on Alpha</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Ian Las &amp;lt;ialas@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Dear Gentoo/Alpha geeks &amp;gt; &amp;gt; tried to build KDE4 on my Alpha. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Updated the sys</description>
<pubDate>29 Jun  2011 22:07:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/233746</link>
</item><item>
<title>KDE4 on Alpha</title>
<description>Dear Gentoo/Alpha geeks tried to build KDE4 on my Alpha.Updated the system first to the current version but it was still not posssible to solveall req</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2011 23:41:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/233609</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with SMP on Alpha UP2000+</title>
<description>On 06-05 00:23, Magnus Lindholm wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a UP2000+ system with dual 21264 @ 667MHz/4MB cache and 2GB RAM. The &amp;gt; system runs fine with</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2011 07:55:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/231938</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with SMP on Alpha UP2000+</title>
<description>On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:23 PM, Magnus Lindholm &amp;lt;linmag7@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have a UP2000+ system with dual 21264 @ 667MHz/4MB cache and 2G</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2011 22:44:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/231901</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems with SMP on Alpha UP2000+</title>
<description>Hi, I have a UP2000+ system with dual 21264 @ 667MHz/4MB cache and 2GB RAM. The system runs fine with RedHat 7.2 Linux (downloaded from hp website) w</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2011 15:23:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/231877</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ABOOT problem: Is the LiveCD the right method to install on Alpha</title>
<description>Hi Romuald, I just replied you on the forums. On 02/26/2011 12:30 PM, Romuald Lobet wrote: &amp;gt; Dear Gentoo/Alpha geeks &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Currently I am willing to</description>
<pubDate>26 Feb  2011 05:23:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/226621</link>
</item><item>
<title>ABOOT problem: Is the LiveCD the right method to install on Alpha</title>
<description>Dear Gentoo/Alpha geeks Currently I am willing to bring an API CS20D AlphaServer, fitted with two EV68AL, back to life. I can access this very compact</description>
<pubDate>26 Feb  2011 03:30:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/226611</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Looking for two pairs of DS10L rails</title>
<description>On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:08 PM, Matt Turner &amp;lt;mattst88@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Tom Linden &amp;lt;tom@kednos.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Tr</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2010 13:11:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/218569</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Looking for two pairs of DS10L rails</title>
<description>On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Carl Lowenstein &amp;lt;carl.lowenstein@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Matt Turner &amp;lt;mattst88@gmail.co</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2010 20:47:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/218109</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Looking for two pairs of DS10L rails</title>
<description>On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Tom Linden &amp;lt;tom@kednos.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Try Puget Sound Data Systems Thanks for the email. I guess these are the same</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2010 19:08:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/218107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Looking for two pairs of DS10L rails</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve got two DS10Ls sitting at OSUOSL [1] idle because they won&amp;#039;t rack them without rails. They&amp;#039;re going to be set up to help with Alpha developm</description>
<pubDate>12 Sep  2010 17:39:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/218102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: GCC-4.3.4 Build fails on new Install</title>
<description>On 03/18/2010 12:03 AM, Ian Las wrote: &amp;gt; As it is not possible to upgrade from older Gentoo versions I have installed the latest Stage3 Tarball on an</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2010 16:05:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/209138</link>
</item><item>
<title>GCC-4.3.4 Build fails on new Install</title>
<description>As it is not possible to upgrade from older Gentoo versions I have installed the latest Stage3 Tarball on an UP1100 Alpha system. But as I have tried</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2010 16:03:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/209137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Brian Parkhurst &amp;lt;brianp@spamcop.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; After several weeks I&amp;#039;ve managed to get my system consistent again.  The</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 17:55:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/200997</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Brian Parkhurst &amp;lt;brianp@spamcop.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Okay had some time today.  I&amp;#039;m working on the autounmask of &amp;gt; xorg-xser</description>
<pubDate>11 Oct  2009 09:14:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198777</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>Okay had some time today. I&amp;#039;m working on the autounmask of xorg-xserver-9999 (running now). What is your recommended kernel for this build? I&amp;#039;ve b</description>
<pubDate>10 Oct  2009 23:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198748</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:59 AM, Jarod Wilson &amp;lt;jarod@redhat.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 10/8/09 9:56 AM, Matt Turner wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:49 AM,</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 07:05:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198572</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 8:49 AM, Geoff Martin &amp;lt;geoffmartin@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;      I have a 164LX with a Matrox Millennium II and a &amp;quot;just installed&amp;quot; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 06:56:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198571</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 9:35 AM, Brian Parkhurst &amp;lt;brianp@spamcop.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; How do you recommend I download your repo for compiling under gentoo? T</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 06:52:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198570</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>How do you recommend I download your repo for compiling under gentoo? Matt Turner wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I need a few people to test X on Alpha. Michael Cree</description>
<pubDate>08 Oct  2009 06:35:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198569</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Brian Parkhurst &amp;lt;brianp@spamcop.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I have an alpha DS-20e at home with a permedia i2pv card, however I can</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2009 16:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198532</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>I have an alpha DS-20e at home with a permedia i2pv card, however I can pull it and put in a older PCI radeon card to test with. I also have an older</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2009 16:06:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Need X testers on Alpha. I think we&amp;#039;ve got it this time.</title>
<description>Hi, I need a few people to test X on Alpha. Michael Cree found what we believe is the commit that broke X and also provided a patch to fix some undefi</description>
<pubDate>07 Oct  2009 15:52:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/198522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Glibc-2.6.1 and binutils-2.18-r1</title>
<description>THX. Compil OK. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Glibc-2.6.1-and-binutils-2.18-r1-tp15852363p15891220.html Sent from the gento</description>
<pubDate>07 Mar  2008 05:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/375</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Glibc-2.6.1 and binutils-2.18-r1</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 11:02:40AM -0800, Mathieu Chauvel wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve a big problem to compile glibc-2.6.1 and binutils-2.18.r1 on my alp</description>
<pubDate>05 Mar  2008 16:10:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/374</link>
</item><item>
<title>Glibc-2.6.1 and binutils-2.18-r1</title>
<description>Hello I&amp;#039;ve a big problem to compile glibc-2.6.1 and binutils-2.18.r1 on my alpha (SX164) for glibc i&amp;#039;ve this error : /tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.6.</description>
<pubDate>05 Mar  2008 12:02:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/373</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: df: Value too large for defined data type</title>
<description>Dear Jose On Jan 23, 2008, at 6:18 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: &amp;gt; Hi: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:02:26AM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, I&amp;#039;m</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2008 12:35:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/372</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: df: Value too large for defined data type</title>
<description>Hi: On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:02:26AM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to mount a 3.2 Tb space over NFS on my alpha... this is the &amp;gt; o</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2008 10:18:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/371</link>
</item><item>
<title>df: Value too large for defined data type</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m trying to mount a 3.2 Tb space over NFS on my alpha... this is  the only machine that cannot handle the space (I have ia64, amd64 and  x86).</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2008 02:02:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: it works!</title>
<description>Hi Davide: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 11:13:59AM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi pals, this mail just to tell that I&amp;#039;m not the last 2.4 kernel user! &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2008 16:09:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/369</link>
</item><item>
<title>it works!</title>
<description>Hi pals, this mail just to tell that I&amp;#039;m not the last 2.4 kernel user! # uname -a Linux alpha2.bioinfo 2.6.22-gentoo-r10-titan-smp #4 SMP Tue Jan 22</description>
<pubDate>22 Jan  2008 03:13:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/368</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: kernel version and binutils issues</title>
<description>On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: &amp;gt; Whatever you prefer. We recommend gentoo-sources which recieve full &amp;gt; support from the Gentoo</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 13:19:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/367</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: kernel version and binutils issues</title>
<description>On Jan 21, 2008, at 5:54 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi again, since 2.4 has bee</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 12:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/366</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: kernel version and binutils issues</title>
<description>On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi again, since 2.4 has been deprecated, which is the latest 2.6.x kernel &amp;gt; with fu</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 09:54:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/365</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: stage1 and stage2 errors?</title>
<description>On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:12:09PM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Ok, emerged portage, emerge --sync and everything seems to be fixed. Also, &amp;gt; chan</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 09:44:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/364</link>
</item><item>
<title>kernel version and binutils issues</title>
<description>Hi again, since 2.4 has been deprecated, which is the latest 2.6.x  kernel with full support for SMP on alpha (titan)? Also, is written  that gentoo</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 06:17:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/363</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: stage1 and stage2 errors?</title>
<description>On Jan 21, 2008, at 2:08 PM, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; [stage 2] &amp;gt; emerge -e system &amp;gt; &amp;gt; (many ebuilds to emerge) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [blocks B   ] dev-perl/Locale-get</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 06:12:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/362</link>
</item><item>
<title>stage1 and stage2 errors?</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to install a new system on alpha, I have some errors: [stage1] while bootstrapping the system it fails in emerging GCC-4.2.2 since</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2008 06:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/361</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: End of 2.4 support in Gentoo/Alpha</title>
<description>Hi! I&amp;#039;m worried about these news... On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: &amp;gt; If there is someone still using 2.4 with Gentoo, please le</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2008 12:17:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/359</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: End of 2.4 support in Gentoo/Alpha</title>
<description>Hi! I&amp;#039;m worried about these news... On Jan 19, 2008, at 5:35 PM, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: &amp;gt; If there is someone still using 2.4 with Gentoo, please le</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2008 12:17:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/360</link>
</item><item>
<title>End of 2.4 support in Gentoo/Alpha</title>
<description>Hi all: Gentoo/Alpha announces the end of 2.4 alpha support in our distribution.  All other architecture teams have already dropped the 2.4 support</description>
<pubDate>19 Jan  2008 09:35:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/358</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gentoo/Alpha status report 2007</title>
<description>Note: this doc can be found on the web at the following URLs... http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/alpha/status/status-20060621.xml (HTML) http://www</description>
<pubDate>21 Jul  2007 12:17:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/357</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc2.5 build failed on alpha platform(both r2 and r3) with ntpl</title>
<description>Hi all:  El Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:08:29 +0800 &amp;quot;Wang, Baojun&amp;quot; &amp;lt;wangbj@lzu.edu.cn&amp;gt; escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; Assembler messages: ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/sig</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2007 15:26:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/356</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc2.5 build failed on alpha platform(both r2 and r3) with ntpl</title>
<description>On Monday 25 June 2007 17:46, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, as Bryan suggested me some time ago, you can try to &amp;quot;upgrade to &amp;gt; binutils &amp;gt;=2.17.50.0.15 an</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2007 05:01:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/355</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc2.5 build failed on alpha platform(both r2 and r3) with ntpl</title>
<description>Hi, as Bryan suggested me some time ago, you can try to &amp;quot;upgrade to  binutils &amp;gt;=2.17.50.0.15 and risk possible unknown bugs from doing so.&amp;quot; I&amp;#039;ve trie</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2007 02:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/354</link>
</item><item>
<title>glibc2.5 build failed on alpha platform(both r2 and r3) with ntpl</title>
<description>hi, list: I got the following problem while emerge world (--update --deep --newuse): gentoo 2007.0 USE FLAGS:  USE=&amp;quot;-X -gtk -gnome -qt3 -qt4 -kde</description>
<pubDate>25 Jun  2007 02:08:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/353</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc 2.5+</title>
<description>Hi again On May 28, 2007, at 5:49 PM, Bryan Østergaard wrote: &amp;gt; That said, if you really really want to go through with this then &amp;gt; 2.17.50.16 does s</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2007 02:49:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/352</link>
</item><item>
<title>installcd aboot.conf issues</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to boot with gentoo alpha install cd on a DS25  (titan). It seems that all images (minimal, universal-2006.1, minimal-2006.1)  ha</description>
<pubDate>01 Jun  2007 01:33:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/351</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc 2.5+</title>
<description>On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 05:11:56PM +0200, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On May 28, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Bryan Ã˜stergaard wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;On Mon, May 28, 2007</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2007 08:49:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/350</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc 2.5+</title>
<description>On May 28, 2007, at 5:06 PM, Bryan Østergaard wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi all, I&amp;#039;ve found that gli</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2007 08:11:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/349</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: glibc 2.5+</title>
<description>On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:01:15PM +0200, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all, I&amp;#039;ve found that glibc 2.5+ cannot be compiled on my alpha, as  &amp;gt; reported o</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2007 08:06:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/348</link>
</item><item>
<title>glibc 2.5+</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;ve found that glibc 2.5+ cannot be compiled on my alpha, as  reported on gentoo bugzilla by another person. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bu</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2007 07:01:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/347</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3? [last update]</title>
<description>On May 14, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Bryan Østergaard wrote: &amp;gt; First, adding -Wa,-mev6 to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS is definitely not  &amp;gt; needed &amp;gt; and I would expec</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 08:35:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/346</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3? [last update]</title>
<description>On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:57:08PM +0200, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all again! I&amp;#039;m sorry for this but I would like to give you an  &amp;gt; update on what&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 08:09:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/345</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3? [last update]</title>
<description>Hi all again! I&amp;#039;m sorry for this but I would like to give you an  update on what&amp;#039;s happening here. I&amp;#039;ve done with gcc emerging, at least. I had to co</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 05:57:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/344</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3?</title>
<description>On May 14, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi again, I&amp;#039;m trying to compile it on my own, without portage and  &amp;gt; following portage &amp;quot;econf&amp;quot;</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 05:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/343</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3?</title>
<description>Hi again, I&amp;#039;m trying to compile it on my own, without portage and  following portage &amp;quot;econf&amp;quot; value. So, it seems I can compile (well, it hasn&amp;#039;t ended</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 03:26:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/342</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3?</title>
<description>Hi On May 14, 2007, at 11:42 AM, José Luis Rivero (yoswink) wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Davide: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Davide Cittaro escribió: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to upgrade to</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 02:58:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/341</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: gcc 4.1.1-r3?</title>
<description>Hello Davide: Davide Cittaro escribió: &amp;gt; Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to upgrade to alpha profile for gentoo 2007. Since &amp;gt; gcc 4.1.1 has been considered stabl</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 02:42:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/340</link>
</item><item>
<title>gcc 4.1.1-r3?</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m trying to upgrade to alpha profile for gentoo 2007. Since  gcc 4.1.1 has been considered stable, it is included in my system  emerge pro</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2007 02:26:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/339</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: alphaserver 1000 4/266M</title>
<description>nick thompson &amp;lt;nicholas.thompson1@mchsi.com&amp;gt; wrote on 04/01/2007 05:03:40 PM: &amp;gt; Thomas Cort wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Welcome Nick, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Anyone who has one</description>
<pubDate>13 Apr  2007 08:56:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/338</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: alphaserver 1000 4/266M</title>
<description>Thomas Cort wrote: &amp;gt; Welcome Nick, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Anyone who has one of these machines, or knows anything about them, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; please let me know the goings on.</description>
<pubDate>01 Apr  2007 15:03:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/337</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with Squid</title>
<description>Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK) escribió: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; BTW, back on topic, bug #160637[1] for those who are interested is the &amp;gt; workspace for the epoll squid bug.</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2007 05:28:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/335</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with Squid</title>
<description>On 2/2/07, &amp;quot;José Luis Rivero (yoswink)&amp;quot; &amp;lt;yoswink@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK) escribió: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; BTW, back on topic, bug #160637[1</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2007 04:42:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/336</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with Squid</title>
<description>Andrew Gaylard wrote: &amp;gt; On 1/30/07, *&amp;quot;José Luis Rivero (yoswink)&amp;quot;* &amp;lt;yoswink@gentoo.org &amp;gt; &amp;lt;mailto:yoswink@gentoo.org&amp;gt;&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;   As a workaro</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2007 10:30:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/334</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with Squid</title>
<description>On 1/30/07, &amp;quot;José Luis Rivero (yoswink)&amp;quot; &amp;lt;yoswink@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As a workaround, you can disable the epoll support commenting out the &amp;gt; &amp;quot;my</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2007 00:08:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/333</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with Squid</title>
<description>Andrew Gaylard escribiÃ³: &amp;gt; Hello gentoo alpha people, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve noticed a problem starting up squid on my Miata box: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Jan 30 02:47:01 supper squi</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2007 12:08:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/332</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems with Squid</title>
<description>Hello gentoo alpha people, I&amp;#039;ve noticed a problem starting up squid on my Miata box: Jan 30 02:47:01 supper squid[6558]: Squid Parent: child process</description>
<pubDate>30 Jan  2007 00:05:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/331</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>I found that 2.6 kernel can&amp;#039;t run on DS25 with SMP support. Only one  CPU is supported d -- gentoo-alpha@gentoo.org mailing list</description>
<pubDate>02 Jan  2007 23:04:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/330</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>Amos,  Unfortunately, it is not that simple. MILO is model specific, so unless you know what machine type you have, I might be sending you the wrong</description>
<pubDate>25 Dec  2006 18:35:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/329</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>Hello Mr. Donsbach. Sorry that it took so long to get back to you. All I know about the machine without digging up some RAM and turning it on is tha</description>
<pubDate>22 Dec  2006 22:40:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/328</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fwd: Alpha Wiki</title>
<description>From the Red Hat list. Other people have volunteered to post info related to other OSs on Alpha (NT/Win2K and FreeBSD). Might be a good place to post</description>
<pubDate>19 Dec  2006 14:53:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/327</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>Which machine do you have? I have an XLT (Milo only machine) and it works fine with 2.6 kernels. Admittedly, I haven&amp;#039;t upgraded in a while. I think I</description>
<pubDate>17 Dec  2006 21:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/326</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>Hi, On Dec 15, 2006, at 3:48 PM, Bryan Østergaard wrote: &amp;gt; Please contact me if 2.6 kernels doesn&amp;#039;t work on your alpha so we can &amp;gt; try to work out an</description>
<pubDate>17 Dec  2006 16:04:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/325</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>If you want to ditch 2.4 kernal support someone will need to modify MILO to work with 2.6 series kernals. The only reason that I am not currently usi</description>
<pubDate>17 Dec  2006 13:52:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/324</link>
</item><item>
<title>Ditching 2.4 kernel support?</title>
<description>Hi all. 2.4 kernels is generally the biggest problem when building new releases and most, if not all should be able to use 2.6 kernels by now. Consid</description>
<pubDate>15 Dec  2006 07:48:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/323</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: java on alpha?</title>
<description>On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:28:37AM +0100, Davide Cittaro wrote: &amp;gt; Hi there, since Java has been released now with a open license, do  &amp;gt; you think it</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2006 02:46:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/322</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: java on alpha?</title>
<description>Hi, Yes, I was wrong. AFAIR the only java compiler and the HotSpot VM  have been just released under GPL (http://www.sun.com/software/ opensource/ja</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2006 02:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/321</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: java on alpha?</title>
<description>Hi, Java have not been released under GPL yet - SUN just promissed to release it in March 2007. Some parts of the code are licensed under proprietary</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2006 02:14:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/320</link>
</item><item>
<title>java on alpha?</title>
<description>Hi there, since Java has been released now with a open license, do  you think it will be possible to have a recent (and decent) java VM  on our gent</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2006 01:28:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/319</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I understand x86 binaries, but...</title>
<description>I haven&amp;#039;t seen anything about running ia64 binaries on alpha. However, there is an application called bochs ( http://bochs.sourceforge.net/ ) which wi</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2006 17:22:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/318</link>
</item><item>
<title>I understand x86 binaries, but...</title>
<description>Hi there, I&amp;#039;m running on a small mixed cluster made of 1 x86 (dual xeon) machine 2 ia64 (quad itanium2) machines and 2 alpha (dual ev68) machines all</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2006 14:03:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/317</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: difficulties with glibc and GCC</title>
<description>Which error do you have? I&amp;#039;ve recently emerge/update system to default-linux/alpha/no-nptl/2.4, gcc-3.4.6, glibc-2.3.5-r3, 2.4.30 alpha and, as far as</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2006 09:07:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/316</link>
</item><item>
<title>difficulties with glibc and GCC</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m currently using: glibc-2.3.2-r1 gcc-3.2.3-r2 linux 2.4 I&amp;#039;m not able to compile a newer glibc with this setup, but newer versions of gcc require</description>
<pubDate>18 Aug  2006 10:07:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/315</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: alphaserver 1000 4/266M</title>
<description>Welcome Nick, &amp;gt; Anyone who has one of these machines, or knows anything about them, &amp;gt; please let me know the goings on. I have an AlphaServer 1000</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2006 18:24:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/313</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: alphaserver 1000 4/266M</title>
<description>Thomas Cort wrote: &amp;gt; Welcome Nick, &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Anyone who has one of these machines, or knows anything about them, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; please let me know the goings on. &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2006 12:18:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/314</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Emerge of glibc fails</title>
<description>On Wed, 09 Aug 2006 19:47:57 +0200 Andrew Gaylard &amp;lt;ag@computer.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve just tried to &amp;quot;emerge -u world&amp;quot;, which I do every month, &amp;gt; and foun</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2006 10:54:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/311</link>
</item><item>
<title>alphaserver 1000 4/266M</title>
<description>hi. I was lucky enough to receive an alphaserver 1000 4/266RM (what it says on the front) and I was wondering if anyone on the list has installed on</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2006 10:53:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/312</link>
</item><item>
<title>Emerge of glibc fails</title>
<description>Hello all, I&amp;#039;ve just tried to &amp;quot;emerge -u world&amp;quot;, which I do every month, and found that glibc fails as follows. Anyone seen this? What am I doing wr</description>
<pubDate>09 Aug  2006 10:47:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/310</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: The end of compaq java. Current Gentoo/Alpha java situation.</title>
<description>On 7/13/06, Jose Luis Rivero (YosWinK) &amp;lt;yoswink@gentoo.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This means we currently haven&amp;#039;t got a full working java (== &amp;gt; virtual/{jre,jd</description>
<pubDate>14 Jul  2006 01:17:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/309</link>
</item><item>
<title>The end of compaq java. Current Gentoo/Alpha java situation.</title>
<description>Dear alpha crew: After the last modification to our Gentoo/Java virtual system (bug #138747) , the completely disappeared upstream support (from year</description>
<pubDate>13 Jul  2006 12:05:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/308</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:58:50 -0700 (PDT) Jeff Donsbach &amp;lt;jeff_donsbach@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; What kind of graphics cards did you have in those? The firs</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 17:01:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/307</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>What kind of graphics cards did you have in those? Jeff ----- Original Message ---- From: Thomas Cort &amp;lt;tcort@gentoo.org&amp;gt; To: gentoo-alpha@lists.gent</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 09:58:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/306</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 09:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Jeff Donsbach &amp;lt;jeff_donsbach@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; No, no. I meant that if anyone tries upgrading to 7.1, pleas</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 09:40:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/305</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>No, no. I meant that if anyone tries upgrading to 7.1, please tell us all of your experiences ... not if 7.1 is marked stable. ;-) Jeff ----- Origin</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 09:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/304</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 08:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Jeff Donsbach &amp;lt;jeff_donsbach@yahoo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; If you do this, please keep everyone posted. X.org 7.1 was</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 09:04:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/303</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>If you do this, please keep everyone posted. I lurk on the Debian Alpha list and folks over there have been having a devil of a time with Xorg 7. Me,</description>
<pubDate>07 Jul  2006 08:36:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/302</link>
</item><item>
<title>Modular X going Stable</title>
<description>Greetings, Donnie Berkholz (spyderous) is marking Modular X.Org 7.1 stable on alpha this evening. If you run a monolithic version of X.Org (ie any ve</description>
<pubDate>30 Jun  2006 17:07:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/301</link>
</item><item>
<title>Gentoo/Alpha Status Report</title>
<description>Note: this doc can be found on the web at the following URLs... http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/alpha/status/status-20060621.xml (HTML) http://www.</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2006 07:33:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/alpha/300</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

