hawkgotyou at gmail
Jul 28, 2012, 6:02 AM
Post #3 of 3
(119 views)
Permalink
|
they should not have been fixed, as when exploit has been released they
where not and looking at SVN no change has been made (
http://pligg.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/pligg/ )
no CVE has been asked for this vuln (at least from me), so none should has
been assigned.
And regarding your post been deleted: it's a common practice for the head
of Pligg to try hiding bugs of his CMS instead of encouraging responsible
disclosing them ( that's why exploit has been released in the wild ).
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Henri Salo <henri [at] nerv> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 06:34:46PM +0200, BlackHawk wrote:
> > Exploit attached, info inside. 2.0 versions could still be affected
> >
> > http://pastebin.com/MSXFSvzA
>
> Do you know if these issues have been fixed in some version of Pligg and
> if these have CVE-identifiers? I tried to ask this from forum.pligg.com,
> but my post was removed.
>
> - Henri Salo
>
--
BlackHawk - hawkgotyou [at] gmail
Remembered not as a messenger,
remembered not as a reformer,
not as a prophet, not as a hero,
not even as Sebastian.
Remembered only…as Jack.
|
