Mailing List Archive: Full Disclosure: Full-Disclosure

more on that

Full Disclosure full-disclosure RSS feed

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

ty13rdurt3n at gmail

Nov 24, 2009, 1:41 PM

Post #1 of 4 (451 views)
Permalink

more on that

And this is what I'm talking about:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412

akl at experian

Nov 25, 2009, 3:15 AM

Post #2 of 4 (422 views)
Permalink

Re: more on that [In reply to]

So youre whining about a 4 year old post? lol
and who uses an exploit without changing the shellcode anyway

________________________________

From: full-disclosure-bounces [at] lists
[mailto:full-disclosure-bounces [at] lists] On Behalf Of Tyler
Durten
Sent: 24. november 2009 22:42
To: full-disclosure [at] lists
Subject: [Full-disclosure] more on that

And this is what I'm talking about:
http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412

andfarm at gmail

Nov 25, 2009, 10:04 PM

Post #3 of 4 (406 views)
Permalink

Re: more on that [In reply to]

On 24 Nov 2009, at 13:41, Tyler Durten wrote:
> And this is what I'm talking about:
> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412

... which reads, in part:
> main()
> {
>
> //Section Initialises designs implemented by mexicans
> //Imigrate
> system(launcher);
> system(netcat_shell);
> system(shellcode);

I can understand possibly overlooking something clever (like a fake exploit that buffer-overflows itself), but this isn't even marginally subtle.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

yirimyah at gmail

Nov 25, 2009, 10:37 PM

Post #4 of 4 (400 views)
Permalink

Re: more on that [In reply to]

well, all that really depends on the theory that the OP actually read it
prior to executing it.

2009/11/26 Andrew Farmer <andfarm [at] gmail>

> On 24 Nov 2009, at 13:41, Tyler Durten wrote:
> > And this is what I'm talking about:
> > http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2005/Apr/412
>
>
> ... which reads, in part:
> > main()
> > {
> >
> > //Section Initialises designs implemented by mexicans
> > //Imigrate
> > system(launcher);
> > system(netcat_shell);
> > system(shellcode);
>
> I can understand possibly overlooking something clever (like a fake exploit
> that buffer-overflows itself), but this isn't even marginally subtle.
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
> Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
>

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads