bimargulies at gmail
Feb 2, 2011, 6:48 PM
Post #13 of 22
Lots of people still embed antique copies of Jetty. They have this
Re: [VOTE] please review release candidate then vote
[In reply to]
annoying tendency to just work.
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Brian M Dube <bdube [at] apache> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 12:41:53PM +1100, David Crossley wrote:
>> Tim Williams wrote:
>> > It seems that we forgot to update our Jetty version and it's *really*
>> > old. ¬†It's not technically a blocker and we wouldn't recommend a
>> > production deployment using our embedded Jetty anyway, but it's
>> > embarrassingly old. ¬†I don't know what's involved in updating it but
>> > it shouldn't be that difficult. ¬†Anyway, I could go either way on this
>> > one.
>> There are various things that we should have upgraded, e.g. Ant.
>> Yeah it would be great to have upgraded Jetty. I did try at various
>> stages, but cannot remember why i was not successful.
> Launching Jetty is done differently in current versions. Our
> configuration file would also need to be redone. I'm working on this
>> The old one works at the moment, good on it. If someone manages
>> to get it upgraded, and if we need a new RC for other reasons
>> then i reckon that we should include it. Otherwise IMO do a new
>> release for 0.10 soon after, to update various supporting products.