
chris+exim at qwirx
Mar 11, 2010, 12:11 AM
Post #2 of 2
(372 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: exim's OpenSSL "compile-time" & "runtime" versions differ. How do I make them consistent?
[In reply to]
|
|
Hi Ben, On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Ben DJ wrote: > -> OpenSSL compile-time version: OpenSSL 0.9.8k 25 Mar 2009 > -> OpenSSL runtime version: OpenSSL 0.9.8m 25 Feb 2010 > > I notice that the OpenSSL compile-time & runtime versions differ. > > Is that a problem? Probably not, they should be ABI compatible. > How do I make it consistent? Remove these parts of these variables: > INCLUDE=-I/usr/local/ssl/openssl > LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/ssl/lib > TLS_INCLUDE=-I/usr/local/ssl/openssl > TLS_LIBS=-L/usr/local/ssl/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/ssl/lib and recompile. But that's probably not the answer you want, as you probably put those there. I'm guessing you "upgraded" OpenSSL because of a security vulnerability, and you want everything on your distro to use it. If so, then you may not need to do so, as the vulnerability should have been patched by your distro anyway, without necessarily increasing the apparent version number. But if you insist, then installing another copy of OpenSSL is not the best way to ensure that. Better to build a new RPM with OpenSSL 0.9.8m and use it to replace the current 0.9.8k RPM on your system. Cheers, Chris. -- _ ___ __ _ / __/ / ,__(_)_ | Chris Wilson <0000 at qwirx.com> - Cambs UK | / (_/ ,\/ _/ /_ \ | Security/C/C++/Java/Perl/SQL/HTML Developer | \ _/_/_/_//_/___/ | We are GNU-free your mind-and your software | -- ## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/
|