Mailing List Archive: exim: users

Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease

1 2 3

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

tom at duncanthrax

Oct 15, 2009, 8:35 AM

Post #26 of 53 (1844 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

John Horne wrote:

> util-spool_in.o: In function `spool_read_header':
> spool_in.c:(.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `dkim_signers'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [eximon.bin] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/john/exim-src/build-Linux-x86_64'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ===================================================================

You pulled this from git today, right? I shuffled something and forgot
to update the exim_monitor (again).

Either wait a few hours or don't build eximmon. :)

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

john.horne at plymouth

Oct 15, 2009, 8:59 AM

Post #27 of 53 (1846 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Thu, 2009-10-15 at 17:35 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
>
> > util-spool_in.o: In function `spool_read_header':
> > spool_in.c:(.text+0x33f): undefined reference to `dkim_signers'
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[1]: *** [eximon.bin] Error 1
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/john/exim-src/build-Linux-x86_64'
> > make: *** [all] Error 2
> > ===================================================================
>
> You pulled this from git today, right? I shuffled something and forgot
> to update the exim_monitor (again).
>
> Either wait a few hours or don't build eximmon. :)
>
Yup, downloaded the git source a short while ago. I'll try again later.

Thanks,

John.

--
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

marc at perkel

Oct 15, 2009, 9:09 AM

Post #28 of 53 (1839 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease - compile errors [In reply to]

Tom Kistner wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> I'm missing something. Running Fedora 10. Thanks in advance
>
> I guess you're re-using an old Local/Makefile. In that case, add
> "-lpcre" to LDFLAGS. Otherwise the linker does not know where to get
> the pcre refs.
>
> /tom
>
>

Yes - that was it - thanks

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

marc at perkel

Oct 15, 2009, 9:10 AM

Post #29 of 53 (1838 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease - compile errors [In reply to]

Tom Kistner wrote:
> Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>> I'm missing something. Running Fedora 10. Thanks in advance
>
> I guess you're re-using an old Local/Makefile. In that case, add
> "-lpcre" to LDFLAGS. Otherwise the linker does not know where to get
> the pcre refs.
>
> /tom
>
>
Yes that was it - thanks.

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

marc at perkel

Oct 15, 2009, 9:12 AM

Post #30 of 53 (1842 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease - 4096 connection limit [In reply to]

Has the 4096 connection limit been fixed? If not can we make it a
settable option?

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

serge at srv0

Oct 15, 2009, 4:18 PM

Post #31 of 53 (1830 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Le Tuesday 13 October 2009 17:38:49 Tom Kistner, vous avez �crit�:
> The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has
> accumulated in CVS since January 2008. Since we want to give the current
> code some wider exposure, please accept this invitation to test a 4.70
> pre-release. You can get the current code by pulling a snapshot from
> David's GIT shadow:
>
> git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git
>
> Or wget a tarball here:
>
> http://duncanthrax.net/temp/exim-4.70-RC-20091013.tar.gz
>
> Feel free to post testing results to this list - no matter if positive
> or negative.

Building eximon:

Source0: exim-4.70-CVS-20091016
BuildRequires: libXaw-devel

XLFLAGS=-L/usr/lib -lX11
X11_LD_LIB=/usr/lib

[...]
/bin/sh ../scripts/Configure-eximon
>>> eximon script built

gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY spool_in.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY store.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY string.c
gcc tod.c
gcc tree.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_StripChart.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_globals.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_init.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_log.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_main.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_menu.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_queue.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_strip.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_text.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_xs.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_version.c
gcc -o eximon.bin
util-spool_in.o: In function `spool_read_header':
spool_in.c:(.text+0x36d): undefined reference to `dkim_signers'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [eximon.bin] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/exim-4.70-CVS-20091016/build-Linux-i386'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90276 (%build)

--
(o_
(/)_
S e r g e

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

list at srv0

Oct 15, 2009, 8:04 PM

Post #32 of 53 (1839 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Le Tuesday 13 October 2009 17:38:49 Tom Kistner, vous avez �crit�:
> The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has
> accumulated in CVS since January 2008. Since we want to give the current
> code some wider exposure, please accept this invitation to test a 4.70
> pre-release. You can get the current code by pulling a snapshot from
> David's GIT shadow:
>
> git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git
>
> Or wget a tarball here:
>
> http://duncanthrax.net/temp/exim-4.70-RC-20091013.tar.gz
>
> Feel free to post testing results to this list - no matter if positive
> or negative.

Building eximon:

Source0: exim-4.70-CVS-20091016
BuildRequires: libX11-devel libXaw-devel

XLFLAGS=-L/usr/lib -lX11
X11_LD_LIB=/usr/lib

[...]
/bin/sh ../scripts/Configure-eximon
>>> eximon script built

gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY spool_in.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY store.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY string.c
gcc tod.c
gcc tree.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_StripChart.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_globals.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_init.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_log.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_main.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_menu.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_queue.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_strip.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_text.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_xs.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_version.c
gcc -o eximon.bin
util-spool_in.o: In function `spool_read_header':
spool_in.c:(.text+0x36d): undefined reference to `dkim_signers'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [eximon.bin] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory
`/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/exim-4.70-CVS-20091016/build-Linux-i386'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90276 (%build)

--
(o_
(/)_
S e r g e
--

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

list at srv0

Oct 16, 2009, 12:46 AM

Post #33 of 53 (1836 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Le Friday 16 October 2009 05:04:49 List, vous avez �crit�:
> Le Tuesday 13 October 2009 17:38:49 Tom Kistner, vous avez �crit�:
> > The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has
> > accumulated in CVS since January 2008. Since we want to give the current
> > code some wider exposure, please accept this invitation to test a 4.70
> > pre-release. You can get the current code by pulling a snapshot from
> > David's GIT shadow:
> >
> > git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git
> >
> > Or wget a tarball here:
> >
> > http://duncanthrax.net/temp/exim-4.70-RC-20091013.tar.gz
> >
> > Feel free to post testing results to this list - no matter if positive
> > or negative.
>
> Building eximon:
>
> Source0: exim-4.70-CVS-20091016
> BuildRequires: libX11-devel libXaw-devel
>
> XLFLAGS=-L/usr/lib -lX11
> X11_LD_LIB=/usr/lib
>
> [...]
> /bin/sh ../scripts/Configure-eximon
>
> >>> eximon script built
>
> gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY spool_in.c
> gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY store.c
> gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY string.c
> gcc tod.c
> gcc tree.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_StripChart.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_globals.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_init.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_log.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_main.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_menu.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_queue.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_strip.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_text.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_xs.c
> gcc exim_monitor/em_version.c
> gcc -o eximon.bin
> util-spool_in.o: In function `spool_read_header':
> spool_in.c:(.text+0x36d): undefined reference to `dkim_signers'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [eximon.bin] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/exim-4.70-CVS-20091016/build-Linux-i386'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.90276 (%build)

/bin/sh ../scripts/Configure-eximon
>>> eximon script built

gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY spool_in.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY store.c
gcc -DCOMPILE_UTILITY string.c
gcc tod.c
gcc tree.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_StripChart.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_TextPop.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_globals.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_init.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_log.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_main.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_menu.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_queue.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_strip.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_text.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_xs.c
gcc exim_monitor/em_version.c
gcc -o eximon.bin
>>> exim monitor binary built

I have compiled and installed eximon.bin. Now it runs fine.

Thanks!
--
(o_
(/)_
S e r g e

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

john.horne at plymouth

Oct 16, 2009, 1:59 AM

Post #34 of 53 (1830 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 17:38 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has
> accumulated in CVS since January 2008. Since we want to give the current
> code some wider exposure, please accept this invitation to test a 4.70
> pre-release. You can get the current code by pulling a snapshot from
> David's GIT shadow:
>
> git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git
>
> Or wget a tarball here:
>
> http://duncanthrax.net/temp/exim-4.70-RC-20091013.tar.gz
>
> Feel free to post testing results to this list - no matter if positive
> or negative.
>
Compiles fine on Fedora 11 (x86_64), but untested.

John.

--
John Horne Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287
University of Plymouth, UK Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

graeme at graemef

Oct 16, 2009, 2:42 AM

Post #35 of 53 (1827 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 09:59 +0100, John Horne wrote:
> Compiles fine on Fedora 11 (x86_64), but untested.

Likewise on:

Fedora 10 (i686)
CentOS 5.3

Both as yet untested in operation, but it builds perfectly.

Graeme

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

list at srv0

Oct 16, 2009, 3:11 AM

Post #36 of 53 (1846 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease \|\| undefined reference to `EVP_sha256' [In reply to]

Hi,

with last commit:

=====================================
Modified files:
exim-src/src expand.c functions.h host.c tls-openssl.c
Log:
Bugzilla #722

Revision Changes Path
1.104 +86 -0 exim/exim-src/src/expand.c
1.46 +1 -0 exim/exim-src/src/functions.h
1.30 +5 -0 exim/exim-src/src/host.c
1.17 +71 -3 exim/exim-src/src/tls-openssl.c

Index: expand.c
=====================================

awk '{ print ($1+1) }' cnumber.h > cnumber.temp
rm -f cnumber.h; mv cnumber.temp cnumber.h
gcc version.c
rm -f exim
gcc -o exim
tls.o: In function `tls_init':
tls.c:(.text+0x4bc): undefined reference to `EVP_sha256'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[1]: *** [exim] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/exim-4.70/build-Linux-i386'
make: *** [all] Error 2
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8761 (%build)

-- Serge

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

exim-users at spodhuis

Oct 16, 2009, 4:14 AM

Post #37 of 53 (1834 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease \|\| undefined reference to `EVP_sha256' [In reply to]

On 2009-10-16 at 12:11 +0200, List wrote:
> Hi,
>
> with last commit:
>
> =====================================
> Modified files:
> exim-src/src expand.c functions.h host.c tls-openssl.c
> Log:
> Bugzilla #722
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.104 +86 -0 exim/exim-src/src/expand.c
> 1.46 +1 -0 exim/exim-src/src/functions.h
> 1.30 +5 -0 exim/exim-src/src/host.c
> 1.17 +71 -3 exim/exim-src/src/tls-openssl.c
>
> Index: expand.c
> =====================================
>
> awk '{ print ($1+1) }' cnumber.h > cnumber.temp
> rm -f cnumber.h; mv cnumber.temp cnumber.h
> gcc version.c
> rm -f exim
> gcc -o exim
> tls.o: In function `tls_init':
> tls.c:(.text+0x4bc): undefined reference to `EVP_sha256'
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> make[1]: *** [exim] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/rpm/BUILD/exim-4.70/build-Linux-i386'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8761 (%build)

Crap. This is my code. Although the actual commit is revision 1.16 or
tls-openssl.c, which adds the reference to EVP_sha256(). That's for
Bugzilla #674.

You're linking against OpenSSL, right?

What does running:
openssl version
say?

EVP_sha256() was added in 2004; surely any version of OpenSSL old enough
to lack this support has major security issues and is a danger to the
system it's running on?

It looks like it might be 0.9.8-onwards. But I can't find any
authoritative statement to that effect, only third-party comments.

-Phil

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

jpm at retail-sc

Oct 16, 2009, 4:24 AM

Post #38 of 53 (1842 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

> git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git

Compiles (with a few warnings) fine on Mac OS/X 10.6.1, including
eximon.

-JP

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

exim-users at spodhuis

Oct 16, 2009, 4:28 AM

Post #39 of 53 (1832 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease \|\| undefined reference to `EVP_sha256' [In reply to]

On 2009-10-16 at 04:14 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
> Crap. This is my code. Although the actual commit is revision 1.16 or
> tls-openssl.c, which adds the reference to EVP_sha256(). That's for
> Bugzilla #674.
>
> You're linking against OpenSSL, right?
>
> What does running:
> openssl version
> say?
>
> EVP_sha256() was added in 2004; surely any version of OpenSSL old enough
> to lack this support has major security issues and is a danger to the
> system it's running on?
>
> It looks like it might be 0.9.8-onwards. But I can't find any
> authoritative statement to that effect, only third-party comments.

Found statement in the changelog file inside an OpenSSL distribution.
(Where I should perhaps have looked before using a search-engine.)

Changes between 0.9.7h and 0.9.8 [05 Jul 2005]
[...]
*) New FIPS 180-2 algorithms, SHA-224/-256/-384/-512 are implemented.
[Andy Polyakov and a number of other people]

So, tiny patch attached to:
http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674
If you grab the one called:
Make SHA256 loading conditional upon OpenSSL >= 0.9.8
and apply it, do your build problems go away?

-Phil

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

list at srv0

Oct 16, 2009, 5:35 AM

Post #40 of 53 (1851 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease \|\| undefined reference to `EVP_sha256' [In reply to]

Le Friday 16 October 2009 13:28:00 Phil Pennock, vous avez �crit :
> On 2009-10-16 at 04:14 -0700, Phil Pennock wrote:
> > Crap. This is my code. Although the actual commit is revision 1.16 or
> > tls-openssl.c, which adds the reference to EVP_sha256(). That's for
> > Bugzilla #674.
> >
> > You're linking against OpenSSL, right?
> >
> > What does running:
> > openssl version
> > say?
> >
> > EVP_sha256() was added in 2004; surely any version of OpenSSL old enough
> > to lack this support has major security issues and is a danger to the
> > system it's running on?
> >
> > It looks like it might be 0.9.8-onwards. But I can't find any
> > authoritative statement to that effect, only third-party comments.
>
> Found statement in the changelog file inside an OpenSSL distribution.
> (Where I should perhaps have looked before using a search-engine.)
>
> Changes between 0.9.7h and 0.9.8 [05 Jul 2005]
> [...]
> *) New FIPS 180-2 algorithms, SHA-224/-256/-384/-512 are implemented.
> [Andy Polyakov and a number of other people]
>
> So, tiny patch attached to:
> http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674
> If you grab the one called:
> Make SHA256 loading conditional upon OpenSSL >= 0.9.8
> and apply it, do your build problems go away?
>
> -Phil

My openssl:
openssl-0.9.7m-1.caos (latest on Caos)

/usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h:#define OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER 0x009070dfL

Now with last commit in git/cvs ( 2009/10/16 12:38:01 BST )
1.18 +2 -0 exim/exim-src/src/tls-openssl.c

Now (without patch) i can compile the code

Thanks!

--Serge
--

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

exim4 at heesakkers

Oct 16, 2009, 5:37 AM

Post #41 of 53 (1828 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Op dinsdag 13 oktober 2009 17:38:49 schreef Tom Kistner:
> The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has
> accumulated in CVS since January 2008. Since we want to give the current
> code some wider exposure, please accept this invitation to test a 4.70
> pre-release. You can get the current code by pulling a snapshot from
> David's GIT shadow:
>
> git clone git://git.exim.org/exim-src.git
>
> Or wget a tarball here:
>
> http://duncanthrax.net/temp/exim-4.70-RC-20091013.tar.gz
>
> (...)
>
> Other changes:
>
> * PCRE removed from Exim distribution. You will need
> a separate PCRE library (and matching headers) to
> compile Exim.
>

Noticed this is on 64-bit FreeBSD 7.2 (RELENG and STABLE), using the tarball.

When the local Makefile does not specify LOOKUP_LIBS the build would fail at
the end (ld: cannot find -lpcre)

Other than specifying LOOKUP_LIBS, the solution would be to specify PCRE_LIBS
as follows:

PCRE_LIBS=-L/usr/local/lib -lpcre

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

v.tolstov at selfip

Oct 16, 2009, 2:23 PM

Post #42 of 53 (1833 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:17 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:
>
> > Yes.
> > dns_check_names_pattern = (?i)^(?>(?(1)\.|())[a-z0-9
> > \xc0-\xff](?>[-a-z0-9\x80-\xff]*[a-z0-9\x80-\xbf])?)+$
>
> Try this:
>
> dns_check_names_pattern =
> (?i)^(?>(?(1)\.|())[a-z_0-9\xc0-\xff](?>[-a-z_0-9\x80-\xff]*[a-z_0-9\x80-\xbf])?)+$
>
> /tom

Nothing new:

PDKIM >> Found sig, trying to parse >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
v=1
a=rsa-sha256
c=relaxed/relaxed
d=gmail.com
s=gamma
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding
bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=
b=TgO3eH/BB/accDNIPzF9IVTOhPnuXmuRt6UIzqdOKuLqPE98ycc0U4x5taeoAVT8PWR371hmItogIU8t66WSndS5Ni7fKDHqT37+f+mFDNuVzQQIQt3CFBO8mpwZbkWCU0Xc7ZMzb3yoe7FqgH1baRc51s7IOckY/39idB8m10I=
PDKIM >> Raw signature w/o b= tag value >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
DKIM-Signature:{SP}v=1;{SP}a=rsa-sha256;{SP}c=relaxed/relaxed;{CR}{LF}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}d=gmail.com;{SP}s=gamma;{CR}{LF}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject{CR}{LF}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;{CR}{LF}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;{CR}{LF}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}{SP}b=
PDKIM <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
PDKIM >> Hashed body data, canonicalized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
VGVzdAoKLS0gCvMg1dfB1sXOycXNLArt1dLB28/XIO/MxccK{CR}{LF}11300 host in
ignore_fromline_hosts? no (option unset)
11300 >>Headers received:
11300 Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 13so535529eye.42
11300 for <vase [at] selfip>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:21:18 -0700
(PDT)
11300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
11300 d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
11300
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
11300 :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
11300 bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;
11300
b=TgO3eH/BB/accDNIPzF9IVTOhPnuXmuRt6UIzqdOKuLqPE98ycc0U4x5taeoAVT8PW
11300 R371hmItogIU8t66WSndS5Ni7fKDHqT37+f
+mFDNuVzQQIQt3CFBO8mpwZbkWCU0Xc7Z
11300 Mzb3yoe7FqgH1baRc51s7IOckY/39idB8m10I=
11300 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
11300 d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
11300
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
11300 :content-transfer-encoding;
11300 b=L1VSiWoIOmeU/ubbcyiM76ZzpzQ/C5BrG9BkzBf
+FmHHvjCkvHRALDA5QgWExtD43J
11300 J9qDIzelC+vP/cjp920i6NrVdzz+pSD01VFetOLUD+rJdZ07VGjZ7a
+UL/aaIlcL+DHI
11300 D9ZWcY77nT8HPv4XtwPe7Js/FD5dfd3KPFOyo=
11300 MIME-Version: 1.0
11300 Received: by 10.216.89.5 with SMTP id
b5mr762485wef.143.1255728078097; Fri, 16
11300 Oct 2009 14:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
11300 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:18 +0400
11300 Message-ID:
<7f254f630910161421v3a8eb3e9x4413bc558a72c635 [at] mail>
11300 Subject: Test
11300 From: =?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?= <o.murashov [at] gmail>
11300 To: vase [at] selfip
11300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
11300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
11300
11300 rewrite_one_header: type=F:
11300 From: =?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?= <o.murashov [at] gmail>
11300 rewrite_one_header: type=T:
11300 To: vase [at] selfip
11300 search_tidyup called
11300 >>Headers after rewriting and local additions:
11300 P Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id
13so535529eye.42
11300 for <vase [at] selfip>; Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:21:18 -0700
(PDT)
11300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
11300 d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
11300
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
11300 :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
11300 bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;
11300
b=TgO3eH/BB/accDNIPzF9IVTOhPnuXmuRt6UIzqdOKuLqPE98ycc0U4x5taeoAVT8PW
11300 R371hmItogIU8t66WSndS5Ni7fKDHqT37+f
+mFDNuVzQQIQt3CFBO8mpwZbkWCU0Xc7Z
11300 Mzb3yoe7FqgH1baRc51s7IOckY/39idB8m10I=
11300 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
11300 d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
11300
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
11300 :content-transfer-encoding;
11300 b=L1VSiWoIOmeU/ubbcyiM76ZzpzQ/C5BrG9BkzBf
+FmHHvjCkvHRALDA5QgWExtD43J
11300 J9qDIzelC+vP/cjp920i6NrVdzz+pSD01VFetOLUD+rJdZ07VGjZ7a
+UL/aaIlcL+DHI
11300 D9ZWcY77nT8HPv4XtwPe7Js/FD5dfd3KPFOyo=
11300 MIME-Version: 1.0
11300 P Received: by 10.216.89.5 with SMTP id
b5mr762485wef.143.1255728078097; Fri, 16
11300 Oct 2009 14:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
11300 Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:18 +0400
11300 I Message-ID:
<7f254f630910161421v3a8eb3e9x4413bc558a72c635 [at] mail>
11300 Subject: Test
11300 F From: =?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?= <o.murashov [at] gmail>
11300 T To: vase [at] selfip
11300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
11300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
11300
11300 Data file written for message 1MyuEh-0002wG-Fu
11300 >>Generated Received: header line
11300 P Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([74.125.78.150]:40562
helo=ey-out-1920.google.com)
11300 by mxs.selfmail.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.70)
11300 (envelope-from <o.murashov [at] gmail>)
11300 id 1MyuEh-0002wG-Fu
11300 for vase [at] selfip; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:19 +0400

PDKIM <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
PDKIM [gmail.com] Body bytes hashed: 50
PDKIM [gmail.com] bh computed:
6bc033ece0c70ef6ffd39c40f574a97580ec0368960bd0713584c25afaee216d
PDKIM [gmail.com] Body hash verified OK
PDKIM >> Hashed header data, canonicalized, in sequence >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
domainkey-signature:a=rsa-sha1;{SP}c=nofws;{SP}d=gmail.com;{SP}s=gamma;{SP}h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type{SP}:content-transfer-encoding;{SP}b=L1VSiWoIOmeU/ubbcyiM76ZzpzQ/C5BrG9BkzBf+FmHHvjCkvHRALDA5QgWExtD43J{SP}J9qDIzelC+vP/cjp920i6NrVdzz+pSD01VFetOLUD+rJdZ07VGjZ7a+UL/aaIlcL+DHI{SP}D9ZWcY77nT8HPv4XtwPe7Js/FD5dfd3KPFOyo={CR}{LF}
mime-version:1.0{CR}{LF}
received:by{SP}10.216.89.5{SP}with{SP}SMTP{SP}id{SP}b5mr762485wef.143.1255728078097;{SP}Fri,{SP}16{SP}Oct{SP}2009{SP}14:21:18{SP}-0700{SP}(PDT){CR}{LF}
date:Sat,{SP}17{SP}Oct{SP}2009{SP}01:21:18{SP}+0400{CR}{LF}
message-id:<7f254f630910161421v3a8eb3e9x4413bc558a72c635 [at] mail>{CR}{LF}
subject:Test{CR}{LF}
from:=?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?={SP}<o.murashov [at] gmail>{CR}{LF}
to:vase [at] selfip{CR}{LF}
content-type:text/plain;{SP}charset=KOI8-R{CR}{LF}
content-transfer-encoding:base64{CR}{LF}
PDKIM <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
PDKIM >> Signed DKIM-Signature header, canonicalized >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
dkim-signature:v=1;{SP}a=rsa-sha256;{SP}c=relaxed/relaxed;{SP}d=gmail.com;{SP}s=gamma;{SP}h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject{SP}:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;{SP}bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;{SP}b=
PDKIM <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
PDKIM [gmail.com] hh computed:
89fd02957144d8f599f10730c7941db67701bf2b07025f9e4a3511e3c70a0a6c
11300 DNS name syntax check failed: gamma._domainkey.gmail.com. (TXT)
11300 LOG: MAIN
11300 DKIM: d=gmail.com s=gamma c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha256
[invalid - public key record (currently?) unavailable]

--
Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov [at] selfip>
Selfip.Ru

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

tom at duncanthrax

Oct 16, 2009, 2:36 PM

Post #43 of 53 (1828 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:

>> dns_check_names_pattern =
>> (?i)^(?>(?(1)\.|())[a-z_0-9\xc0-\xff](?>[-a-z_0-9\x80-\xff]*[a-z_0-9\x80-\xbf])?)+$
>>
>> /tom
>
> Nothing new:

Please comment it out completely. Just to check if it is really the culprit.

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

v.tolstov at selfip

Oct 16, 2009, 2:43 PM

Post #44 of 53 (1827 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:36 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:
>
> >> dns_check_names_pattern =
> >> (?i)^(?>(?(1)\.|())[a-z_0-9\xc0-\xff](?>[-a-z_0-9\x80-\xff]*[a-z_0-9\x80-\xbf])?)+$
> >>
> >> /tom
> >
> > Nothing new:
>
> Please comment it out completely. Just to check if it is really the culprit.
>

Hm solved , now with commented out this string:
5424 DKIM: d=gmail.com s=gamma c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha256
[verification succeeded]

but, warn add_header = :at_start:X-DKIM:
$dkim_verify_status

not working (no X-DKIM in headers)

> /tom
--
Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov [at] selfip>
Selfip.Ru

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

tom at duncanthrax

Oct 16, 2009, 2:44 PM

Post #45 of 53 (1825 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:

> but, warn add_header = :at_start:X-DKIM:
> $dkim_verify_status
>
> not working (no X-DKIM in headers)

I made some changes in the last 48 hours, can you please fetch a new git
snapshot? Thanks.

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

v.tolstov at selfip

Oct 16, 2009, 2:50 PM

Post #46 of 53 (1819 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:44 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:
>
> > but, warn add_header = :at_start:X-DKIM:
> > $dkim_verify_status
> >
> > not working (no X-DKIM in headers)
>
> I made some changes in the last 48 hours, can you please fetch a new git
> snapshot? Thanks.
>
> /tom
>
Nothing.

Return-path: <o.murashov [at] gmail>
Envelope-to: vase [at] selfip
Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:38 +0400
X-SPF: pass (gmail.com)
Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([209.85.219.223]:50510
helo=mail-ew0-f223.google.com) by mxs.selfmail.ru with esmtp (Exim
4.70)
(envelope-from <o.murashov [at] gmail>) id 1Myug6-0003hd-EV for
vase [at] selfip; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:38 +0400
Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so2469319ewy.2 for <vase [at] selfip>;
Fri,
16 Oct 2009 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;
b=aazflhd1lnzRFmfKWDOxPjkxv7+id5heE+N589nL91S5G91CLv+xxlHlyEqWjvjZe3
w/ZghgjdClJgN11RJe3Ez5xLFH5xUBuXeU8lSWbCtQz5GrjKPyN0DsrsVP1vfLEsaBk4
wlXbhz2pxa1PAkKg4oigfqxf73lG+2Zc0cAow=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
b=f+z5QoC0yjIjdwMQRJgTul+lRKdUKUVuqXKpdtDS1fC357IXuLwJUfVXLNI3aeJEX4
wlN/15D+lL8o61frNuAKi4dLgrfec+vXTaEbnUYM4rQmksPzgQAuIEnFP6zQIdwmfgaM
+o6dHmMfyrf15a+IO/NRoT8Khhmup6px0BSsU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.88.67 with SMTP id z45mr797464wee.112.1255729777587;
Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:37 +0400
Message-ID:
<7f254f630910161449q58e3663au371eeeca4ecf5e7e [at] mail>
Subject: Test
From: =?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?= <o.murashov [at] gmail>
To: vase [at] selfip
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
X-Evolution-Source: imap://vase%40selfip.ru [at] imap/

VGVzdAoKLS0gCvMg1dfB1sXOycXNLArt1dLB28/XIO/MxccK

Acl in first letter

--
Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov [at] selfip>
Selfip.Ru

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

v.tolstov at selfip

Oct 18, 2009, 12:23 PM

Post #47 of 53 (1766 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Sat, 2009-10-17 at 01:50 +0400, Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 23:44 +0200, Tom Kistner wrote:
> > Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:
> >
> > > but, warn add_header = :at_start:X-DKIM:
> > > $dkim_verify_status
> > >
> > > not working (no X-DKIM in headers)
> >
> > I made some changes in the last 48 hours, can you please fetch a new git
> > snapshot? Thanks.
> >
> > /tom
> >
> Nothing.
>
> Return-path: <o.murashov [at] gmail>
> Envelope-to: vase [at] selfip
> Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:38 +0400
> X-SPF: pass (gmail.com)
> Received: from [UNAVAILABLE] ([209.85.219.223]:50510
> helo=mail-ew0-f223.google.com) by mxs.selfmail.ru with esmtp (Exim
> 4.70)
> (envelope-from <o.murashov [at] gmail>) id 1Myug6-0003hd-EV for
> vase [at] selfip; Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:38 +0400
> Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so2469319ewy.2 for <vase [at] selfip>;
> Fri,
> 16 Oct 2009 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
> s=gamma;
> h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject
> :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
> bh=a8Az7ODHDvb/05xA9XSpdYDsA2iWC9BxNYTCWvruIW0=;
> b=aazflhd1lnzRFmfKWDOxPjkxv7+id5heE+N589nL91S5G91CLv+xxlHlyEqWjvjZe3
> w/ZghgjdClJgN11RJe3Ez5xLFH5xUBuXeU8lSWbCtQz5GrjKPyN0DsrsVP1vfLEsaBk4
> wlXbhz2pxa1PAkKg4oigfqxf73lG+2Zc0cAow=
> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
> h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
> :content-transfer-encoding;
> b=f+z5QoC0yjIjdwMQRJgTul+lRKdUKUVuqXKpdtDS1fC357IXuLwJUfVXLNI3aeJEX4
> wlN/15D+lL8o61frNuAKi4dLgrfec+vXTaEbnUYM4rQmksPzgQAuIEnFP6zQIdwmfgaM
> +o6dHmMfyrf15a+IO/NRoT8Khhmup6px0BSsU=
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Received: by 10.216.88.67 with SMTP id z45mr797464wee.112.1255729777587;
> Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:49:37 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:49:37 +0400
> Message-ID:
> <7f254f630910161449q58e3663au371eeeca4ecf5e7e [at] mail>
> Subject: Test
> From: =?KOI8-R?B?78zFxyDt1dLB28/X?= <o.murashov [at] gmail>
> To: vase [at] selfip
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> X-Evolution-Source: imap://vase%40selfip.ru [at] imap/
>
> VGVzdAoKLS0gCvMg1dfB1sXOycXNLArt1dLB28/XIO/MxccK
>
> Acl in first letter

Do You have some ideas of this behaviour?

--
Vasiliy G Tolstov <v.tolstov [at] selfip>
Selfip.Ru

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

odhiambo at gmail

Oct 19, 2009, 6:54 AM

Post #48 of 53 (1726 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Tom Kistner <tom [at] duncanthrax> wrote:

> Vasiliy G Tolstov schrieb:
>
> >> dns_check_names_pattern =
> >>
> (?i)^(?>(?(1)\.|())[a-z_0-9\xc0-\xff](?>[-a-z_0-9\x80-\xff]*[a-z_0-9\x80-\xbf])?)+$
> >>
> >> /tom
> >
> > Nothing new:
>
> Please comment it out completely. Just to check if it is really the
> culprit.
>
>
I commented out the dns_check_names_pattern and now I get:

2009-10-19 16:48:15 1Mzsas-000NaV-FW DKIM: d=gmail.com s=gamma
c=relaxed/relaxed a=rsa-sha256 [verification succeeded]

So it means the regex is the culprit??

--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
"If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!."
-- Lucky Dube
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

tom at duncanthrax

Oct 19, 2009, 7:16 AM

Post #49 of 53 (1723 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Odhiambo Washington wrote:

> So it means the regex is the culprit??

Yes. It needs to allow underscores. But I'll "fix" this in the DNS code.

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

tom at duncanthrax

Oct 19, 2009, 7:18 AM

Post #50 of 53 (1723 views)
Permalink

Re: Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease [In reply to]

Vasiliy G Tolstov wrote:

> Do You have some ideas of this behaviour?

I have now added the bits that allow add_header in the DKIM ACL.

/tom

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

1 2 3

View All

Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded

Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads