Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: exim: users

[OT] Webmail...

 

 

exim users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


dave at restall

Sep 4, 2009, 7:42 AM

Post #1 of 7 (861 views)
Permalink
[OT] Webmail...

Hi,

following on from my previous missive, I have picked up a few mailbox
accounts from the client but am now getting asked if I can supply a
webmail interface. In the past I've used courier and squirrelmail as
the front end, I've done a fair bit of googling over the last few days
and there are several options out there, is anybody on the list using
anything that they think is particularly brilliant ?

It will have exim as the MTA :-)

TTFN




D
exim/2009-09-04.2.tx exim-users
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Dave Restall, Computer Nerd, Cyclist, Radio Amateur G4FCU, Bodger |
| Mob +44 (0) 7973 831245 Skype: dave.restall Radio: G4FCU |
| email : dave [at] restall Web : Not Ready Yet :-( |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| So so is good, very good, very excellent good: and yet it is not; |
| it is but so so. |
| -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------------+


--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


morten at nidelven-it

Sep 4, 2009, 8:48 AM

Post #2 of 7 (809 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

Hi David,

we're planning on "upgrading" from Squirrelmail to Roundcube these days,
as it looks a lot sleeker. Roundcube is more "desktop application like"
than
Squirrelmail.

-Morten

David Restall - System Administrator skrev:
> Hi,
>
> following on from my previous missive, I have picked up a few mailbox
> accounts from the client but am now getting asked if I can supply a
> webmail interface. In the past I've used courier and squirrelmail as
> the front end, I've done a fair bit of googling over the last few days
> and there are several options out there, is anybody on the list using
> anything that they think is particularly brilliant ?
>
> It will have exim as the MTA :-)
>
> TTFN
>
>
>
>
> D
> exim/2009-09-04.2.tx exim-users
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Dave Restall, Computer Nerd, Cyclist, Radio Amateur G4FCU, Bodger |
> | Mob +44 (0) 7973 831245 Skype: dave.restall Radio: G4FCU |
> | email : dave [at] restall Web : Not Ready Yet :-( |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | So so is good, very good, very excellent good: and yet it is not; |
> | it is but so so. |
> | -- William Shakespeare, "As You Like It" |
> +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
>


--
Morten W. Petersen
Manager
Nidelven IT Ltd

Phone: +47 45 44 00 69
Email: morten [at] nidelven-it


--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


eduardo at kalinowski

Sep 4, 2009, 9:47 AM

Post #3 of 7 (811 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

On Sex, 04 Set 2009, David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
> following on from my previous missive, I have picked up a few mailbox
> accounts from the client but am now getting asked if I can supply a
> webmail interface. In the past I've used courier and squirrelmail as
> the front end, I've done a fair bit of googling over the last few days
> and there are several options out there, is anybody on the list using
> anything that they think is particularly brilliant ?

I like IMP, which is part of the Horde Suite, which provides also
address book, calendar, etc. It's not pretty[0], but it's quite
powerful and functional.

[0] Actually there is a new project, DIMP, to create a better-looking
AJAX-enhanced version of the webmail, but it lacks functionality yet.


--
Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
eduardo [at] kalinowski


--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


exim-users at lists

Sep 4, 2009, 10:56 AM

Post #4 of 7 (804 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

Morten W. Petersen wrote:

> we're planning on "upgrading" from Squirrelmail to Roundcube these days,
> as it looks a lot sleeker. Roundcube is more "desktop application like"
> than Squirrelmail.

Thanks for mentioning RoundCube. I've just been having a play with it,
and it seems to work extremely well.

--
Mike Cardwell - IT Consultant and LAMP developer
Cardwell IT Ltd. (UK Reg'd Company #06920226) http://cardwellit.com/

--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


bill-exim at carpenter

Sep 4, 2009, 10:58 AM

Post #5 of 7 (812 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

> we're planning on "upgrading" from Squirrelmail to Roundcube these days,
> as it looks a lot sleeker. Roundcube is more "desktop application like"
> than Squirrelmail.
>

I've tried both of those. I agree that RC is "prettier". No question
that SM has a vastly richer feature set, especially with its wealth of
plugins. If you are just looking to provide a pleasant but basic
interface, I would go for RC. If there are sophisticated users who
might want to give things a real workout, I would go with SM.

Over the years, I've looked at a lot of webmail interfaces (though very
few of the not-free-as-in-beer packages) for my humble and eclectic user
population. In a word, they are all a disappointment along at least one
of the dimensions of (1) easy on the eyes, (2) rich feature set, (3)
admin hassle. Most of them tend to be written in PHP and don't really
integrate well with anything else you might happen to be running.
(i.e., if you have some kind of web site logon, the best you can
probably do is stash the raw credentials somewhere and hide the logon to
the webmail interface.) There are a variety of webmail packages that
will do whatever some random geek (i.e., the kind of person who reads
this list :-)) would want, but these turn out to be surprisingly
confusing to the non-geek population.

If someone finds this holy grail of webmail interfaces, please do let us
all know.


--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


jgh at wizmail

Sep 5, 2009, 4:10 AM

Post #6 of 7 (775 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

On 09/04/2009 03:42 PM, David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
> Hi,
>
> following on from my previous missive, I have picked up a few mailbox
> accounts from the client but am now getting asked if I can supply a
> webmail interface.

We offer "prayer" as an alternate to sqwebmail to our clients. Like exim,
it comes from Cambridge.....

- Jeremy


--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/


wbh at conducive

Sep 5, 2009, 4:30 PM

Post #7 of 7 (772 views)
Permalink
Re: [OT] Webmail... [In reply to]

WJCarpenter wrote:
>> we're planning on "upgrading" from Squirrelmail to Roundcube these days,
>> as it looks a lot sleeker. Roundcube is more "desktop application like"
>> than Squirrelmail.
>>
>
> I've tried both of those. I agree that RC is "prettier". No question
> that SM has a vastly richer feature set, especially with its wealth of
> plugins. If you are just looking to provide a pleasant but basic
> interface, I would go for RC. If there are sophisticated users who
> might want to give things a real workout, I would go with SM.
>
> Over the years, I've looked at a lot of webmail interfaces (though very
> few of the not-free-as-in-beer packages) for my humble and eclectic user
> population. In a word, they are all a disappointment along at least one
> of the dimensions of (1) easy on the eyes, (2) rich feature set, (3)
> admin hassle. Most of them tend to be written in PHP and don't really
> integrate well with anything else you might happen to be running.
> (i.e., if you have some kind of web site logon, the best you can
> probably do is stash the raw credentials somewhere and hide the logon to
> the webmail interface.) There are a variety of webmail packages that
> will do whatever some random geek (i.e., the kind of person who reads
> this list :-)) would want, but these turn out to be surprisingly
> confusing to the non-geek population.
>
> If someone finds this holy grail of webmail interfaces, please do let us
> all know.
>
>

JM2CW, 'coz there ain't no 'one size fits all'.

But 'Prayer' gives us a higher performance to lower hassle ratio than anything
else we have used to date.

- As with Exim, compiled C, not [favorite flavor] interpreted.

- Http(s) daemon built-in,

- comfortable with external cache/fail-over front AND back ends, including
Perdition and such like.

Developed by David Carter at Cambridge, and definitely works well with Exim.

;-)

Also used by several other US, UK, Canadian Universities.



--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://wiki.exim.org/

exim users RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.