Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 11:35:50 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg On 12/02/12 09:33, jb wrote: > Thanks for answering me a while, back, i took a break into trying to > resolve it, I'm still stuck as to where I can fi 11 Feb 2012 16:03:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93189 Thanks for answering me a while, back, i took a break into trying to resolve it, I'm still stuck as to where I can find clear documentation on this, 11 Feb 2012 15:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93188 On 2012-02-10 13:38, Muhammad Irfan wrote: > We are using Exim MTA on dedicated server hosted on US data center with > CENTOS 5. > Our users are in tw 11 Feb 2012 07:57:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93187 On 2012-02-10 at 15:43 -0500, Matt X wrote: > I'm using exim4 with a catchall router to forward mail to a java process. > The java process users are t 11 Feb 2012 03:13:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93186 I'm using exim4 with a catchall router to forward mail to a java process. The java process users are the valid recipients. I'm trying to reduce the am 10 Feb 2012 12:43:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93185 Hi, We are using Exim MTA on dedicated server hosted on US data center with CENTOS 5. Our users are in two regions in US and China. Problem is that we 10 Feb 2012 05:38:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93184 Antonio Leding <dev@leding.net> (Di 07 Feb 2012 19:36:34 CET): > Exim users - couple more questions here… > 1) Does any cfg file change require a da 07 Feb 2012 13:00:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93183 Heiko Schlittermann <hs@schlittermann.de> (Di 07 Feb 2012 18:10:24 CET): (…) > When called as transport filter, the complete message has to *pass* > 07 Feb 2012 11:19:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93182 On 2012-02-07 18:36, Antonio Leding wrote: > 1) Does any cfg file change require a daemon restart? Effectively, yes. Note however that files and da 07 Feb 2012 11:13:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93181 Antonio Leding wrote: > Exim users - couple more questions here… > > 1) Does any cfg file change require a daemon restart? Yes. One way to minimize 07 Feb 2012 11:04:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93180 Exim users - couple more questions here… 1) Does any cfg file change require a daemon restart? 2) Can Exim be restarted in a graceful fashion such t 07 Feb 2012 10:36:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93179 Ian Eiloart wrote: > On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:48, Antonio Leding wrote: >> Hi Heiko, >> >> Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions f 07 Feb 2012 09:39:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93178 Ian Eiloart wrote: > On 7 Feb 2012, at 09:02, W B Hacker wrote: >> >> Don't GENERATE bounces to off-box 'strangers'. At all. Allow ONLY >> 'DSN' to y 07 Feb 2012 09:32:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93177 On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:48, Antonio Leding wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions for you and the communit 07 Feb 2012 09:24:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93176 Antonio Leding wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions for you and the community: > > 1) It seems that AC 07 Feb 2012 09:12:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93175 On 7 Feb 2012, at 09:02, W B Hacker wrote: > > Don't GENERATE bounces to off-box 'strangers'. At all. > Allow ONLY 'DSN' to your own 'local' user po 07 Feb 2012 09:11:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93173 Hello Antonio, Antonio Leding <dev@leding.net> (Di 07 Feb 2012 17:48:29 CET): > Hi Heiko, > Thanks very much for this information - so two more quest 07 Feb 2012 09:10:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93174 Hi Heiko, Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions for you and the community: 1) It seems that ACL is faster when compared to T 07 Feb 2012 08:48:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93172 On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Leonardo <leonardodiserpierodavinci@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > I'd like Exim to send mail bounces not to the or 07 Feb 2012 06:51:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93171 > From: "Hub Dohmen" <hub@dohmen.nl> > Spammers are abusing our system by sending fake bounces to our server, > that Exim 'returns' to the &# 07 Feb 2012 04:52:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93170 Dear all, I'd like Exim to send mail bounces not to the original sender, but to another address. As the wiki says, "When a message fails to be deliv 07 Feb 2012 02:35:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93169 Hub Dohmen wrote: > > Spammers are abusing our system by sending fake bounces to our server, > that Exim'returns' to the'sender' 07 Feb 2012 01:02:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93168 Am 06.02.2012 10:37, schrieb Hub Dohmen: > I enabled blacklisting. But that fdoes not seem to have any effect. > Try the Spamhaus DNSBL list, i 07 Feb 2012 00:48:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93167 On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 14:25 -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > And there's no way to advertise a DMARC record that says "ignore any > > SPF records 06 Feb 2012 14:41:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93165 > -----Original Message----- > From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org] On Behalf Of 06 Feb 2012 14:27:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93164 > -----Original Message----- > From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org] On Behalf Of 06 Feb 2012 14:27:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93163 > -----Original Message----- > From: exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org [mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark.com@exim.org] On Behalf Of 06 Feb 2012 14:25:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93162 On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 11:11 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: > Just a quick question. SPF breaks email forwarding. Does DMARC get > around this limitation? 06 Feb 2012 07:58:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93161 Hi! I have a serious problem. Spammers are abusing our system by sending fake bounces to our server, that Exim & 06 Feb 2012 01:37:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93166 Folks using GSSAPI auth, Heimdal 1.4 put in some restrictions on honouring a value of $KRB5_KTNAME inherited from the environment, which means that a 04 Feb 2012 16:59:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93160 On 2012-02-03 at 12:48 -0800, Kyle King wrote: > I have set up so that the domain is found in ldap but still unsure, how > to search that an ldap obje 04 Feb 2012 16:45:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93159 Hello Antonio, Antonio Leding <dev@leding.net> (Sa 04 Feb 2012 04:19:20 CET): > In reading the Exim documentation, it is clear that SpamAsassin can b 04 Feb 2012 11:14:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93158 On 2012-02-03 at 11:11 -0800, Marc Perkel wrote: > Just a quick question. SPF breaks email forwarding. Does DMARC get > around this limitation? DMAR 03 Feb 2012 19:30:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93153 Hello Exim Users, I have a few question re: Exim operation specifically ACL and transport functionality and how these interoperate with SpamAssassin. 03 Feb 2012 19:19:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93157 I have set up so that the domain is found in ldap but still unsure, how to search that an ldap object has a set value. I know in postfix this is done 03 Feb 2012 12:48:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93156 I am trying to set up my MTA server so that it will deliver all mail in which there is a ldap group with atributs to the following, "(cn=domain) and ( 03 Feb 2012 12:11:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93155 Just a quick question. SPF breaks email forwarding. Does DMARC get around this limitation? On 1/31/2012 1:32 AM, Oliver Howe wrote: > Hi, > > Does a 03 Feb 2012 11:11:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93152 On 2012-02-01 at 16:05 +0000, Oliver Howe wrote: > is it possible to have a manualroute router that gets executed only if > the load average is above 01 Feb 2012 23:09:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93150 Yet another update: - Multiline headers also needed newlines expanding - Added check for too many Received: headers -- Jeremy -- ## List details a 01 Feb 2012 13:33:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93149 How, for the daemon, -odf is exactly the same as -odb? With -odb, the accepting process doesn't wait for the delivery processes to finish. With -odf, 01 Feb 2012 08:11:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93147 hi, is it possible to have a manualroute router that gets executed only if the load average is above a certain value? i want to send some messages on 01 Feb 2012 08:05:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93146 > From: ??????? ?????? <_lek@inbox.ru> > i want to check IP and LOGIN in acl_smtp_auth (check it > before authentication, if too many errors (passwor 01 Feb 2012 04:21:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93145 Hi Phil, >> So why is it tempfailing the message? And is there any other way to avoid >> a tempfail on a condition that results in a defer? > > Note 01 Feb 2012 01:54:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93151 On Tue, 31 Jan 2012, áÌÅËÓÅÊ ëÉÒÅÅ× wrote: > From: áÌÅËÓÅÊ ëÉÒÅÅ× <_lek@inbox.ru> > To: exim-users@exim.org > Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:47:43 > Subje 31 Jan 2012 09:14:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93144 Hello, i want to check IP and LOGIN in acl_smtp_auth (check it before authentication, if too many errors (password guessing) - reject now). As for IP 31 Jan 2012 05:47:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93143 Hello, I have a standard transport and router configured that will look for a message file and a list of recipients that can get the automatic 31 Jan 2012 02:53:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93142 On 31/01/12 09:32, Oliver Howe wrote: > Does anyone have any experience of using DMARC? Nope. > See http://dmarc.org/overview.html Looks interesti 31 Jan 2012 02:32:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93141 Hi, Does anyone have any experience of using DMARC? See http://dmarc.org/overview.html and http://www.returnpath.net/blog/intheknow/2012/01/return 31 Jan 2012 01:32:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93140 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 14:49:36 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > Without wanting to get into any form of shouting/slagging match, the > bit that wo 30 Jan 2012 03:31:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93139 A further update. This fixes a problem triggered by a 4xx response to a STARTTLS on the callout, which put us into a loop. -- Jeremy -- ## List d 29 Jan 2012 06:35:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93137 On 2012-01-28 21:24, SW & Work SaS wrote: > I would like to check user activity (all using SMTP AUTH) and be warned > every X messages sent or Y kb se 29 Jan 2012 06:05:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93134 Hello I would like to check user activity (all using SMTP AUTH) and be warned every X messages sent or Y kb sent or Z errors the idea is to put a ca 28 Jan 2012 13:24:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93133 On 2012-01-26 at 12:18 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > # check WHOIS for domains registered by Communicado Ltd > warn set acl_m_whois = ${run {/usr/b 27 Jan 2012 18:17:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93132 On 2012-01-25 at 17:00 +0200, support@oaks.co.za wrote: > 2012-01-24 15:05:32 1Rpg44-0005KV-Ma ** name@domain.co.za: Unrouteable > address (I edited 27 Jan 2012 18:03:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93131 On 2012-01-21 16:34, Jeremy Harris wrote: > As the bug (http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201) I've logged says: > >> The modern world of spammers 26 Jan 2012 13:00:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93128 Hi all, The Exim documentation says: "If any condition on a warn statement cannot be completed (that is, there is some sort of defer), the log lin 26 Jan 2012 04:19:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93127 Hi all, The Exim documentation says: "If any condition on a warn statement cannot be completed (that is, there is some sort of defer), the log lin 26 Jan 2012 04:18:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93130 I've got an interesting one. I just need to send email from our helpdesk server using php mailer. I did a basic internet site exim config using dp 25 Jan 2012 07:00:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93126 On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Marius Stan wrote: > And i had to define that macro THROTTLED_SERVERS, because the hostlist below > doesn't get expanded ?!: > h 25 Jan 2012 01:25:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93125 On 24.01.2012 10:37, Marius Stan wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm currently throttling mail using the following setup: > > domainlist throttled_domains = y 24 Jan 2012 22:43:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93124 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 08:04:49PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > > Iirc Ubuntu's default MTA has always been postfix, not exim. This is > one point 24 Jan 2012 11:55:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93123 Graeme Fowler <graeme@graemef.net> wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 14:28 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> I like the statistic from security space[0] for 24 Jan 2012 11:04:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93122 Am 24.01.2012 17:17, schrieb Todd Lyons: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Graeme Fowler<graeme@graemef.net> wrote: >> There are at least two people 24 Jan 2012 10:06:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93121 On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Graeme Fowler <graeme@graemef.net> wrote: > There are at least two people from cPanel on this list that I am aware > 24 Jan 2012 08:17:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93120 On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 15:01 +0000, Oliver Howe wrote: > Yes, the reason why my company uses it is because it enables us to > make it do what we and ou 24 Jan 2012 07:16:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93119 On Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 14:49:36 UTC, nigel@dotdot.it confabulated: > On 24 Jan 2012, at 14:25, Klaus Ethgen wrote: >> Postfix is much less 24 Jan 2012 07:10:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93118 Yes, the reason why my company uses it is because it enables us to make it do what we and our customers want it to. This is all the better if I can ba 24 Jan 2012 07:01:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93117 On 24 Jan 2012, at 14:25, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > Postfix is much less flexible than exim. However, I like to suggest > postfix for not expert users if 24 Jan 2012 06:49:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93116 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Am Di den 24. Jan 2012 um 15:02 schrieb Graeme 24 Jan 2012 06:25:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93115 On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 14:28 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote: > I like the statistic from security space[0] for obvious reason ;-) ...which shows the rise o 24 Jan 2012 06:02:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93114 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Hi, Am Di den 24. Jan 2012 um 13:19 schrieb Ol 24 Jan 2012 05:28:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93113 On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Cyborg wrote: > I think, fedora, redhat, debian and ubuntu aka the vendors, should have > the best stats about which MTA was in 24 Jan 2012 05:26:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93112 Am 24.01.2012 13:35, schrieb Graeme Fowler: > On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:19 +0000, Oliver Howe wrote: >> Is there any way to see or estimate the usage a 24 Jan 2012 05:01:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93109 On 24 Jan 2012, at 2:35 PM, Graeme Fowler wrote: > I think you'd be better off asking what your client requires, then > demonstrating how it can be d 24 Jan 2012 04:47:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93111 On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 12:19 +0000, Oliver Howe wrote: > Is there any way to see or estimate the usage and popularity of Exim? > I am going to do a pre 24 Jan 2012 04:35:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93108 On 24/01/2012 14:19, Oliver Howe wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any way to see or estimate the usage and popularity of Exim? > I am going to do a presentat 24 Jan 2012 04:27:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93107 Hi, Is there any way to see or estimate the usage and popularity of Exim? I am going to do a presentation to a prospective client and would like to i 24 Jan 2012 04:19:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93106 Hello all, I'm currently throttling mail using the following setup: domainlist throttled_domains = yahoo.com : yahoo.co.uk : yahoo.ca : yahoo.es ya 24 Jan 2012 00:37:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93110 On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 16:00, Ronaldo Luiz de Carvalho < ronaldol@cybernet.com.br> wrote: > Hi all, > > I need to log all delivery e-mails from a sp 23 Jan 2012 05:40:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93105 Ronaldo Luiz de Carvalho wrote: > Hi all, > > I need to log all delivery e-mails from a specific user. > > I have one user who says that one of you 23 Jan 2012 05:21:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93104 Hi all, I need to log all delivery e-mails from a specific user. I have one user who says that one of your contacts are not receiving some your ema 23 Jan 2012 05:00:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93103 The Doctor <doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca> wrote: > Any issues with Berkeley DB 4.8 to 5.3 and Exim 4.7X ? I doubt it, exim's usage of BerkeleyDB does not 21 Jan 2012 23:51:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93101 Any issues with Berkeley DB 4.8 to 5.3 and Exim 4.7X ? -- Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@nl2k.ab.ca God, Queen 21 Jan 2012 17:37:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93100 On Sat, 21 Jan 2012, Jeremy Harris wrote: > > One thing I forgot to make clear in the announcement mail: only a single > destination recipient is han 21 Jan 2012 13:32:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93099 On 2012-01-21 20:02, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > Do you think, that your cuthrough extension can be even more extened to > provide "normal transports 21 Jan 2012 12:57:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93098 Hello Jeremy, Jeremy Harris <jgh@wizmail.org> (Sa 21 Jan 2012 17:34:29 CET): > I've been meaning to do this for some time now, but didn't get around 21 Jan 2012 12:02:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93097 I've been meaning to do this for some time now, but didn't get around to it until this winter's break. As the bug (http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi? 21 Jan 2012 08:34:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93096 On 2012-01-20 at 14:20 -0500, bedroomeyes78@gmail.com wrote: > Folks, > > I compiled exim with libspf ( libspf2-1.2.9 ) That adds a new "spf" condi 21 Jan 2012 01:45:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93089 Folks, I compiled exim with libspf ( libspf2-1.2.9 ) I published TXT record for the domain that would deny everything except for my mailers : IN T 20 Jan 2012 11:20:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93088 Hai Nguyen wrote: > Hi, > > exim4.conf.template: > plain_server: > driver = plaintext > public_name = PLAIN > server_condition = ${lookup pgs 20 Jan 2012 00:38:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93087 W dniu 2012-01-19 21:49, Phil Pennock napisaÅ‚(a): > If you have a copy of such an email which you're willing to share, > then > could you please for 19 Jan 2012 13:34:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93084 On 2012-01-19 at 16:42 +0100, Marcin MirosÅ‚aw wrote: > W dniu 11.01.2012 20:12, David Saez Padros pisze: > > I'm having problems with domains for whi 19 Jan 2012 12:49:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93083 Hi, exim4.conf.template: plain_server: driver = plaintext public_name = PLAIN server_condition = ${lookup pgsql {select some_condition from som 19 Jan 2012 08:08:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93085 W dniu 11.01.2012 20:12, David Saez Padros pisze: > Hi > > I'm having problems with domains for which i get the error > "verification failed - signat 19 Jan 2012 07:42:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93082 On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 07:52 -0500, Alan McConnell wrote: > If you run a mail-server in Kenya, which relays for client users, > perhaps you can give me 19 Jan 2012 04:59:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93081 On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:42:11AM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > This means that the exim at gltap.com must be configured to accept E-mail > 19 Jan 2012 04:52:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93080 Graeme Fowler <graeme <at> graemef.net> writes: > > On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 09:41 +0000, Paul Diedericks wrote: > > Thomas Pircher <tehpeh <at> gmx.ne 19 Jan 2012 03:46:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93086 On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 09:41 +0000, Paul Diedericks wrote: > Thomas Pircher <tehpeh <at> gmx.net> writes: [something that's over 9 years old] Paul, p 19 Jan 2012 02:49:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93079 Thomas Pircher <tehpeh <at> gmx.net> writes: > > Hi, > > We want to allow our virtual users to have a .forward file. But the > variable $home is ex 19 Jan 2012 01:41:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93078 On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 17:41, Alan McConnell <alan@patriot.net> wrote: > Assembled Wisdom! > > This request for information is on behalf of a system 19 Jan 2012 00:42:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/users/93077