
A.C.Aitchison at dpmms
Apr 24, 2012, 11:01 AM
Post #5 of 5
(192 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: [Bug 1232] The default makefile is unhelpful for IPv6
[In reply to]
|
|
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012, Phil Pennock wrote: > On 2012-04-23 at 22:56 +0100, Jeremy Harris wrote: >> On 2012-04-23 22:25, Jeremy Harris wrote: >>> Resolution| |FIXED >> >> For the future: when do we enable IPV6 by default? > > There was a recent RFC on what Internet connectivity means, which > includes IPv6, so we have an argument in our favour any time we do make > the change. > > We have a README.UPDATING which should get a warning of this sort of > change. > > I think that the best way forward will be to pick a release, then in the > previous release's announcement mail include a note warning that the > subsequent release will enable IPv6 by default. We can do that in the > 4.78 announcement and then enable in 4.79, if there's a general > consensus to go for it. I'd be tempted to say that enabling IPv6 by default qualified a release for a "0" - perhaps 4.80 ? Phil Hazel didn't usually use all the numbers. -- Dr. Andrew C. Aitchison Computer Officer, DPMMS, Cambridge A.C.Aitchison [at] dpmms http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~werdna -- ## List details at https://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
|