Richard.Hall at publishingtechnology
Nov 23, 2009, 4:01 AM
Post #11 of 16
(2471 views)
Permalink
|
Apologies for the somewhat haphazard nature of this message, and even more
apologies if I'm mis-remembering something. I just wanted to "head 'em off
at the pass" before Nigel builds 4.71 ...
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Tom Kistner wrote:
> Nigel Metheringham wrote:
>
> > So is anything outstanding for 4.71?
>
> As of this morning, from my side: We're good to go.
>
> /tom
and slightly earlier on Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Tom Kistner wrote:
>
> Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:34:06 +0000
> From: Tom Kistner <tom [at] tahini>
> Reply-To: exim-dev [at] exim
> To: exim-cvs [at] exim
> Subject: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-src/src/pdkim pdkim.c
>
> tom 2009/11/23 08:34:05 GMT
>
> Modified files:
> exim-src/src/pdkim pdkim.c
> Log:
> DKIM: fix wrong "pass" result on bodyhash mismatch
>
> Revision Changes Path
> 1.10 +37 -12 exim/exim-src/src/pdkim/pdkim.c
[...]
> /* Print debugging functions */
> #ifdef PDKIM_DEBUG
> @@ -1283,7 +1304,7 @@
> #ifdef PDKIM_DEBUG
> if (ctx->debug_stream)
> fprintf(ctx->debug_stream,
> - "PDKIM
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<\n");
> + "\nPDKIM
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<\n");
> #endif
> }
[...]
I may be completely wrong, but ISTR there was a recent fix which _removed_
that additional newline, so this looks to me like a regression. Right now
I don't have the time or the wherewithal to go hunting for it, I'm afraid.
I did find a message from Andreas Metzler reporting it, at
http://lists.exim.org/lurker/message/20091114.160115.b4d8e58b.en.html
Sorry I can't be more specific, but better safe than sorry. (I hope;
otherwise it is egg-on-face time)
HTH,
Richard
--
## List details at http://lists.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-dev Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ##
|
smime.p7s
