<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>exim | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 04:33:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>SASL changes: branch sasl_fixes</title>
<description>Folks, In debugging why my GSSAPI authenticator (cyrus_sasl driver) had stopped working, I made a number of fixes, which are on the sasl_fixes branch</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 23:39:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93154</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1201] forwarding to a content-scanning site is a bounce-generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 Jeremy Harris &amp;lt;jg</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 13:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93148</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: invalid byte sequence for encoding &amp;quot;UTF8&amp;quot; from header</title>
<description>On 2012-01-29 at 16:58 +0100, Axel Rau wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m getting &amp;gt;  PGSQL: query failed: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding &amp;quot;UTF8&amp;quot;: 0xfc &amp;gt; while t</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 15:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93138</link>
</item><item>
<title>invalid byte sequence for encoding &amp;quot;UTF8&amp;quot; from header</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m getting  PGSQL: query failed: ERROR: invalid byte sequence for encoding &amp;quot;UTF8&amp;quot;: 0xfc while trying to insert a $h_subject. Main config c</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 07:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93136</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1201] forwarding to a content-scanning site is a bounce-generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 Jeremy Harris &amp;lt;jg</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2012 06:31:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93135</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1201] forwarding to a content-scanning site is a bounce-generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201 Jeremy Harris &amp;lt;jg</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2012 12:34:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93129</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1178] queue runner is using huge amounts of memory</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Jan  2012 03:48:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93102</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1065] add support for the attached files RFC2231-encoded filenames</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065 Andrey N. Oktyabr</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 09:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93095</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1063] add &amp;quot;remove_header&amp;quot; modifier for headers removal in the ACLs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063 Andrey N. Oktyabr</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 09:29:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93094</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1065] add support for the attached files RFC2231-encoded filenames</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1065 Phil Pennock &amp;lt;pdp</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 08:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93093</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1063] add &amp;quot;remove_header&amp;quot; modifier for headers removal in the ACLs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1063 Phil Pennock &amp;lt;pdp</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 08:51:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93092</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1201] forwarding to a content-scanning site is a bounce-generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 07:34:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93091</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1201] New: forwarding to a content-scanning site is a bounce-generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1201      Summary</description>
<pubDate>21 Jan  2012 07:33:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93090</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1007] tod_stamp uses non-reentrant localtime()</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1007 Nigel Metheringha</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2012 01:08:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in example Shell code in the documentation</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Phil Pennock &amp;lt;pdp@exim.org&amp;gt; writes: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2012-01-15 at 20:23 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: [â€¦]  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; # rm -f new-params &amp;gt;&amp;gt; # touch new-param</description>
<pubDate>17 Jan  2012 01:16:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: the use of &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in example Shell code in the documentation</title>
<description>On 2012-01-15 at 20:23 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: &amp;gt;    The documentation reads: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; --cut: http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch</description>
<pubDate>16 Jan  2012 04:42:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93055</link>
</item><item>
<title>the use of &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in example Shell code in the documentation</title>
<description>The documentation reads: --cut: http://exim.org/exim-html-current/doc/html/spec_html/ch39.html --   To replace the parameters with new ones, instea</description>
<pubDate>15 Jan  2012 05:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93054</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1197] New: typo in spec chapter 14.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197      Summary</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 16:21:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93024</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1178] queue runner is using huge amounts of memory</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 04:28:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93023</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1178] queue runner is using huge amounts of memory</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 02:04:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93027</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1178] queue runner is using huge amounts of memory</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178   --- Comment #9</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 01:53:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93026</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 1178] queue runner is using huge amounts of memory</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1178   --- Comment #8</description>
<pubDate>09 Jan  2012 01:52:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93025</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [admin] Why didn&amp;#039;t bugzilla#1192 end up on exim-dev?</title>
<description>The -dev list isn&amp;#039;t explicitly cc&amp;#039;d in that bug. No idea why, but without that there won&amp;#039;t be any emails to this list! Graeme. -- ## List details a</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2012 04:40:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93022</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mention outgoing ssmtp support in chapter &amp;quot;Support for the legacy &amp;quot;ssmtp&amp;quot; (aka &amp;quot;smtps&amp;quot;) protocol&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Hello, the chapter »Support for the legacy &amp;quot;ssmtp&amp;quot; (aka &amp;quot;smtps&amp;quot;) protocol« currently only talks about incoming (-tls-on-connect) suuport but not the</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2012 03:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93021</link>
</item><item>
<title>[admin] Why didn&amp;#039;t bugzilla#1192 end up on exim-dev?</title>
<description>Hello, just wondering: Was bugzilla#1192 not cced to exim-dev intentionally (perhaps because I selected component DKIM) or was there a (temporary) er</description>
<pubDate>08 Jan  2012 03:12:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/93020</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

