Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 20:40:51 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:24:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79175 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:22:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79174 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:22:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79173 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:10:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79172 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:02:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79171 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 04:33:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79170 On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 13:24 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Just make it clear, please. My 2p, fwiw: Commits, comments and such into Bugzilla are gate 16 May 2008 02:07:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79167 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 --- Comment #4 15 May 2008 06:04:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79146 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 Tony Finch <fanf@e 15 May 2008 04:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79166 On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 12:21 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, 15 May 2008 04:24:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79164 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, adopted/fixed by me > and recently forward-ported/updated 15 May 2008 04:21:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79165 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #22 14 May 2008 09:09:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79136 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #21 14 May 2008 08:18:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79133 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:57 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > --- Comment #20 from Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> 2008-05-14 14:57:21 --- > Some comments based o 14 May 2008 07:40:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79132 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:45 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I don't think that a second issue tracking system is going to help. I wasn't positing a second 14 May 2008 06:57:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79131 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #20 14 May 2008 06:57:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79130 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:30 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote: > > Indeed, we do need a wor 14 May 2008 06:45:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79129 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:30 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote: > Indeed, we do need a work flow. "Things don't get lost" is the point > of view taken by th 14 May 2008 06:43:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79128 > That's a work-flow problem. Either we can do a patch-based email > workflow like Linux does, or we can attach patches to bugzilla bugs. The > latter 14 May 2008 06:30:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79127 On Wed, 14 May 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > > As for development... I've never really got it into my head that it > would be _acceptable_ for me to 14 May 2008 06:21:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79124 This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, adopted/fixed by me and recently forward-ported/updated by David Woodhouse, makes exim able to (optiona 14 May 2008 06:15:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79140 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > There is a test suite. Its very comprehensive, however I have not got my > head around it nor manag 14 May 2008 06:10:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79123 2008/5/14 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>: > If you want to propose changing the workflow, that's fine, but I think > it requires even mor 14 May 2008 06:04:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79122 > I read something about a patch for dynamic lookup methods. We might > start with that. How about sending a description of the change (text, > not 14 May 2008 05:59:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79121 On 14 May 2008, at 12:39, Michael Haardt wrote: > A few people have CVS access, but most are afraid of changing Exim > on their own. In the past, Phi 14 May 2008 05:05:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79118