<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>exim | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>16 May  2008 19:02:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[Bug 29] LTMP error messages not passed back in returned message</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 05:24:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79175</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 490] $message_linecount should be correct in maildir_tag</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 05:22:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79174</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 598] dovecot authenticator incorrect protocol handling</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 05:22:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79173</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 411] cyrus_sasl authenticator sets wrong appname</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 05:10:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79172</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 437] maildirfolder_create_regex create files with mode 0000</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 05:02:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79171</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 693] OptionLists.txt states last update was 4.67</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 May  2008 04:33:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79170</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #20</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 06:57:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79130</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, adopted/fixed by me and recently forward-ported/updated by David Woodhouse, makes exim able to (optiona</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 06:15:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79140</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 708] prvs scheme doesn&amp;#039;t use slashes anymore (fix included)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 02:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79098</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 708] New: prvs scheme doesn&amp;#039;t use slashes anymore (fix included)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 May  2008 02:07:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79097</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 621] hostnames with trailing blanks should be handled differently</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 Andrew Buckeridge</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2008 17:47:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79090</link>
</item><item>
<title>Development blockage...</title>
<description>I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on  exim - the bugzilla queue is increasing, but very few of them are  being tou</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2008 09:05:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79078</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 706] Dropping privileges because of deliver_drop_privilege isn&amp;#039; t debug logged</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2008 05:58:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79038</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 706] New: Dropping privileges because of deliver_drop_privilege isn&amp;#039; t debug logged</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2008 13:25:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79022</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 703] New: other ways to exit</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>02 May  2008 09:57:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78909</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 702] New: gnutls-params file hardcoded mode 400</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>28 Apr  2008 00:15:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78762</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] XCLIENT supported by exim?</title>
<description>On 24/04/2008, Sergey Skvortsov &amp;lt;skv@protey.ru&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 23.04.2008 1:34, Marten Lehmann wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; in front of our exim setup we have a anti</description>
<pubDate>24 Apr  2008 05:21:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78700</link>
</item><item>
<title>expand_string and ldap_default_servers</title>
<description>Hi! I tried to get the used/configured ldap server(s) with perl and exim::expand_string function and failed badly. After reading the source i stumbl</description>
<pubDate>22 Apr  2008 10:02:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78633</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 701] exiwhat should automatically fall back to ps/ kill if multikill not available</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2008 06:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78625</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 700] Chokes on empty command line options</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>21 Apr  2008 06:01:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78626</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 701] New: exiwhat should automatically fall back to ps/ kill if multikill not available</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2008 11:16:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78603</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 700] New: Chokes on empty command line options</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Apr  2008 10:42:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78604</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 697] eximstats write to stderr if there have been no deliveries</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697 Andreas Metzler &amp;lt;e</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2008 11:00:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78543</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 697] New: eximstats write to stderr if there have been no deliveries</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2008 11:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78542</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 695] smtp_active_hostname example in documentation has unknown variable</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>15 Apr  2008 05:15:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78503</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 696] transport-filter.pl gone, stop claiming otherwise</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>15 Apr  2008 02:15:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78504</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 696] New: transport-filter.pl gone, stop claiming otherwise</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>15 Apr  2008 02:02:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78505</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 694] SMTP banner does not honor smtp_active_hostname setting</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694 Mrten &amp;lt;bugzilla@ii</description>
<pubDate>14 Apr  2008 04:20:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78477</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 695] New: smtp_active_hostname example in documentation has unknown variable</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 Apr  2008 04:16:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78478</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 694] New: SMTP banner does not honor smtp_active_hostname setting</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 Apr  2008 04:12:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78479</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 693] New: OptionLists.txt states last update was 4.67</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>12 Apr  2008 13:52:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78445</link>
</item><item>
<title>DKIM, GPLv3</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;d like to start shipping Fedora&amp;#039;s Exim package with DKIM support, so I&amp;#039;m looking at the licensing issues. Once upon a time, the only available Doma</description>
<pubDate>12 Apr  2008 05:10:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78438</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 692] New: Restructure the default configuration</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>11 Apr  2008 03:42:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Bug#475194: D-H parameter generation is All Wrong</title>
<description>I recently administered a stiff flaming to the Debian package maintainers for exim4, and was rebuffed with the observation that the behaviour I was co</description>
<pubDate>10 Apr  2008 12:04:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78420</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #17</description>
<pubDate>07 Apr  2008 07:34:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78344</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 691] New: Incorrect maildirsize file mode</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>04 Apr  2008 00:50:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78286</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 381] Allow &amp;quot;warn&amp;quot; and/or &amp;quot;no_warn&amp;quot; modifier in retry rules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381 Claas Hilbrecht &amp;lt;C</description>
<pubDate>02 Apr  2008 02:27:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78251</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 688] New: exiwhat fails on log_selector = +pid (fix included)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>31 Mar  2008 12:33:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78175</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 687] New: eximstats mis-interprets some log lines (fix included)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>31 Mar  2008 08:52:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78165</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 680] No target port number in debugging output</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>31 Mar  2008 03:34:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78169</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 684] $sender_host_name via CNAME resolving error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2008 02:21:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78148</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 685] New: Wrong resolving of SPF with big size A/MX RRs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2008 01:56:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78149</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 684] New: $sender_host_name via CNAME resolving error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2008 01:33:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78145</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 673] Patch to exiscan to support f-protd-scanner</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2008 06:08:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78043</link>
</item><item>
<title>Patch to allow calling MySQL stored procedures from Exim</title>
<description>The below patch allows you to call MySQL stored procedures that return results by adding the CLIENT_MULTI_RESULTS flag to the call to mysql_real_con</description>
<pubDate>20 Mar  2008 09:47:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77884</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 681] exim hangs when processing message from server with lot of MX records</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>18 Mar  2008 02:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77828</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 681] New: exim hangs when processing message from server with lot of MX records</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>17 Mar  2008 19:42:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77827</link>
</item><item>
<title>Automatically removing old mail</title>
<description>Hello, I brought up this topic two times now and by now accept the fact that nobody likes it being integrated in Sieve. ;) So here is a new approach:</description>
<pubDate>14 Mar  2008 05:07:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77670</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 680] New: No target port number in debugging output</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2008 12:22:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77625</link>
</item><item>
<title>*blink* *blink* There be spams!</title>
<description>I take it this list doesn&amp;#039;t have a built in moderation if someone tries to post to it who is not subscribed. I&amp;#039;m surprised this didn&amp;#039;t start a fun l</description>
<pubDate>07 Mar  2008 01:40:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77445</link>
</item><item>
<title>POWER PROMO DRAWS RESULT</title>
<description>Power Promo Ireland 20b Barrow Street, Ringsend, Dublin 4, Ireland Date: March 6th, 2008 Power Promo Ireland is at it again. 5 (Five) Lucky Winners</description>
<pubDate>06 Mar  2008 02:20:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77443</link>
</item><item>
<title>From: Barrister Gary Kim (ESQ)</title>
<description>From: Barrister Gary Kim (ESQ) Gary Kim &amp;amp; Associates, 21 Campshill Road Se13 6qu Lewisham London England. (+44 704 577 3459) I am really very sorry t</description>
<pubDate>06 Mar  2008 01:15:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77442</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 679] Problems with vacation_reply</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>05 Mar  2008 05:39:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77360</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 679] New: Problems with vacation_reply</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>05 Mar  2008 05:29:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77390</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 677] New: callout sender verify defer remembered incorrectly as a defer on sender verify</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=677      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>29 Feb  2008 12:57:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77285</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 675] exim-html does not include pcrepattern.html</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>26 Feb  2008 03:37:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77121</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 675] New: exim-html does not include pcrepattern.html</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>25 Feb  2008 01:35:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77109</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 674] exim can&amp;#039;t verify sha256WithRSAEncryption signature in X. 509 certificates when linked against OpenSSL</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>22 Feb  2008 04:04:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77068</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 674] New: exim can&amp;#039;t verify sha256WithRSAEncryption signature in X. 509 certificates when linked against OpenSSL</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2008 13:52:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77041</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 673] New: Patch to exiscan to support f-protd-scanner</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2008 12:27:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77013</link>
</item><item>
<title>Where to send patches?</title>
<description>Hello list :o) I&amp;#039;m sorry if this is the wrong place to ask, but I have added f-protd-support to exiscan and was wondering where to send those patches</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2008 12:21:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77010</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 672] strict_acl_vars failures in the unused half of a conditional</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>21 Feb  2008 09:53:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/77003</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 672] New: strict_acl_vars failures in the unused half of a conditional</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Feb  2008 11:36:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76963</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 384] 0x000b: terminated by signal 11</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=384 Paul &amp;quot;Che&amp;quot; Letskiy</description>
<pubDate>19 Feb  2008 08:19:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76951</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 670] imroved &amp;quot;spamd_address&amp;quot; syntax</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670 Johannes Berg &amp;lt;joh</description>
<pubDate>17 Feb  2008 02:02:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76892</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 670] New: imroved &amp;quot;spamd_address&amp;quot; syntax</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>16 Feb  2008 08:19:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76891</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] loading libspf dynamically</title>
<description>This is a preliminar patch for loading libspf dynamically. It still needs testing, cleanup and better integration with Exim coding style, etc; Befor</description>
<pubDate>14 Feb  2008 08:23:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76843</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 668] [PATCH] fix a pair of issues with parallel build (make -j2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>14 Feb  2008 05:42:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76852</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 668] New: [PATCH] fix a pair of issues with parallel build (make -j2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 Feb  2008 04:20:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76835</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 521] SPF &amp;quot;best-guess&amp;quot;</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521   --- Comment #8</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2008 08:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76748</link>
</item><item>
<title>Sieve regression?</title>
<description>The test suite says:  Basic/0427 Sieve tests using -bf --- test-stdout-munged 2008-02-07 19:25:46.000000000 +0000 +++ stdout/0427 2006-03-01 10:40:0</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2008 11:26:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76659</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 629] Please consider allowing linking against artistic license code</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=629 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2008 04:49:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76621</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 665] GnuTLS: Please allow disabling of MAC Padding</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2008 04:48:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76620</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 667] Dovecot authentication bug - missing close</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2008 04:44:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76619</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 667] New: Dovecot authentication bug - missing close</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2008 13:34:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76609</link>
</item><item>
<title>NewStuff</title>
<description>Our documentation model is now to keep the main spec in sync with the code, which means that the NewStuff file is much less important than it was. How</description>
<pubDate>05 Feb  2008 06:20:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76598</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 665] New: GnuTLS: Please allow disabling of MAC Padding</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2008 04:56:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76591</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] spam.c small performace and debugging improvement</title>
<description>Hello, attached please find a patch that does the following: - it eliminates a memset() and replaces it by manually terminating  the string receiv</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2008 11:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76539</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim/exim-src/src exicyclog.src</title>
<description>Apologies if I&amp;#039;m being foolish (no caffeine yet), but this patch looks wrong to my untrained eye ... On Wed, 30 Jan 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote:</description>
<pubDate>31 Jan  2008 01:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76529</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-docbook spec.xfpt</title>
<description>On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Tony Finch wrote: &amp;gt;  Modified files: &amp;gt;   exim-doc/doc-docbook spec.xfpt &amp;gt;  Log: &amp;gt;  Strip change-bars before adding any new</description>
<pubDate>29 Jan  2008 09:31:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76504</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 659] Reject the entire message if one syntactically faulty recipient was found in the headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2008 10:36:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76489</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 663] $spam_score[_int] mismatch (rounding?)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2008 10:30:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76488</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 662] stack corruption in daemon exec code</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662 Tony Finch &amp;lt;fanf@e</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan  2008 10:24:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76490</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 663] New: $spam_score[_int] mismatch (rounding?)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>26 Jan  2008 02:51:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76460</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 662] New: stack corruption in daemon exec code</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2008 14:20:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76449</link>
</item><item>
<title>Bug 661</title>
<description>Sorry - I&amp;#039;m probably breaking threading... but a dime just dropped.. maybe.. Danny said in the OP: &amp;quot;Based on my experience in the past if I modify</description>
<pubDate>25 Jan  2008 07:12:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76394</link>
</item><item>
<title>patch for review: TLS logging</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve been putting together a patch that fixes the TLS error reporting so that it respects the incoming_interface log selector. This is so that the pos</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2008 10:01:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76338</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 661] Exim fails to deliver message to remote smtp host.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>24 Jan  2008 01:49:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76328</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 661] New: Exim fails to deliver message to remote smtp host.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=661      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2008 16:19:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76277</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 660] multi-valued attributes returned from an ldap lookup parsing is hard</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2008 10:51:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76276</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 660] New: multi-valued attributes returned from an ldap lookup parsing is hard</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Jan  2008 08:15:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76278</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 659] New: Reject the entire message if one syntactically faulty recipient was found in the headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 17:41:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76271</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mass bug posting...</title>
<description>I changed 300 bugs to be allocated to me (were to Philip where they  tend not to be noticed). I realised just after doing it that it was  sending o</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 09:25:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76250</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 430] Advanced 550 error processing</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=430 Dave &amp;lt;exim-bugzill</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 08:04:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76249</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 133] MIME-format bounce messages</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:10:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76244</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 132] expanded basic variables</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:10:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76247</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 131] admin_users option, like trusted_users</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76246</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 130] header to list failures for syntax_errors_to</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:10:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76243</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 129] message to go with -Mg</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:09:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76245</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 128] fallback_transport</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>18 Jan  2008 07:09:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/76242</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
