<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>exim | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>26 Nov  2009 05:45:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[Bug 922] 4.70 doc changes - several but relatively minor.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86081</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 923] 4.70 introcuces f-protd av-scanner but no docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=923   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:54:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86080</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 924] No documentation about &amp;#039;dkim_disable_verify&amp;#039;.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86079</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 924] New: No documentation about &amp;#039;dkim_disable_verify&amp;#039;.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86077</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 923] New: 4.70 introcuces f-protd av-scanner but no docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=923      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:33:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86076</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 922] New: 4.70 doc changes - several but relatively minor.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86075</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 919] [testsuite] exim 4.70 re-sorts headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:05:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86061</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 921] Changelog refers to main option &amp;#039;spamd_servers&amp;#039; - but there is no option</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:27:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86059</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 920] Changelog refers to experimental DCC support in docs, but it is not present</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:27:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Docs - gnutls_compat_mode in two places?</title>
<description>Hello, Looking through the 4.70 docs, some of the &amp;#039;gnutls&amp;#039; options appear in two different sections. I&amp;#039;m not sure if this was intentional, but it loo</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:31:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86040</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 921] New: Changelog refers to main option &amp;#039;spamd_servers&amp;#039; - but there is no option</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:47:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86039</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 920] New: Changelog refers to experimental DCC support in docs, but it is not present</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:35:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86038</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 919] New: [testsuite] exim 4.70 re-sorts headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86037</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 918] fix for running testsuite with non-ancient gnutls</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:15:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86036</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 918] New: fix for running testsuite with non-ancient gnutls</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 04:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86035</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 847] Enabled DNSDB by default</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86013</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 917] New: New condition expansion variables - $condvalue_left, $condvalue_right</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86026</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 916] New: fail_nodata keyword for DNSDB</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=916      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86027</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 12:09:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85998</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] New: scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 12:07:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85997</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 914] Makefile-FreeBSD falsely assumes X11BASE is set</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 10:58:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85996</link>
</item><item>
<title>Towards 4.71</title>
<description>So is anything outstanding for 4.71?  Only thing I can see is http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 and the NetBSD 5 issues - which I don&amp;#039;t have a</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 11:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85962</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 914] New: Makefile-FreeBSD falsely assumes X11BASE is set</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 09:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85923</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70: Copyright notice</title>
<description>Hi, Exim 4.70 shows:   exim -bV  Exim version 4.70 #1 built 16-Nov-2009 13:53:55  Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2006 The copyright not</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85903</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim&amp;#039;s own Bugzilla vs DKIM</title>
<description>So, before I can declare that my domain signs *all* mail with DKIM, how do I deal with things like, oh, the Exim Bugzilla which sends mail from the si</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:14:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85902</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 913] Spec 30.4: wrong &amp;quot;Use:&amp;quot; for gnutls_*</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85899</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 722] Need a random number generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722   --- Comment #12</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:34:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85898</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 913] New: Spec 30.4: wrong &amp;quot;Use:&amp;quot; for gnutls_*</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:25:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85897</link>
</item><item>
<title>NewStuff 4.70 fixes</title>
<description>NewStuff is somewhat bare in the 4.70 release. I see from CVS that the solution chosen is to expand the 4.70 section when 4.71 comes out. I worked t</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85896</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 643] Enhance exim -bP to read the value of macros, or similar</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643 Phil Pennock &amp;lt;exim</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 04:36:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85895</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 721] [PATCH] open libspf dynamicaly</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721   --- Comment #16</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 03:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85881</link>
</item><item>
<title>testsuite</title>
<description>Hello, I have given the test-suite a testrun. Stuff it breaks on: * umask. I am running with umask 0002 and therefore aux-fixed/* is g+w in my CVS c</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 07:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85870</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 04:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85866</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] New: exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 04:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85865</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 911] MakeLinks makes dead links</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85856</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 911] New: MakeLinks makes dead links</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:48:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85855</link>
</item><item>
<title>Time to release?</title>
<description>Is there any reason to not release the current state as 4.70 now? Bug reports have all been minor stuff (mostly build), and have been fixed in CVS as</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85854</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 10:14:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85838</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 910] &amp;quot;dkim_canon = simple&amp;quot; uses relaxed canonicalisation</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 05:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85835</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 910] New: &amp;quot;dkim_canon = simple&amp;quot; uses relaxed canonicalisation</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 04:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85834</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 909] connect() uses &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; addrlen in dcc.c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 00:34:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85826</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 909] New: connect() uses &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; addrlen in dcc.c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 14:55:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85824</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] New: NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 09:01:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85827</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 907] New: Build errors on Mac OS X 10.6.2</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 09:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85800</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 636] retry timeout exceeded 450 bug?</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636 Thorsten Meinl &amp;lt;Th</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 08:33:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85810</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70: Release Candidate 4</title>
<description>This RC is mainly to test that my release scripts and documentation building stuff are working correctly, so the comments in the RC3 announcement at</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 08:30:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85799</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 906] exim 4.70rc4 dkim_cur_signer empty if no sig</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906 Wolfgang Breyha &amp;lt;w</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 08:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85796</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 906] New: exim 4.70rc4 dkim_cur_signer empty if no sig</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=906      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 07:56:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85795</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 Wolfgang Breyha &amp;lt;w</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 05:08:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85792</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] New: Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 04:31:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85791</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 904] Absolute path in XSL files</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:31:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85773</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 904] New: Absolute path in XSL files</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:24:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85771</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-src/src dkim.c mime.c</title>
<description>Le Monday 09 November 2009 15:31:25 Tom Kistner, vous avez écrit : &amp;gt; tom     2009/11/09 14:31:24 GMT &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  Modified files: &amp;gt;   exim-src/src</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:21:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85770</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 902] Compilation errors with 4.70 RC3 using Sun compiler</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 06:31:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85769</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] Exim 4.70: Release Candidate 3</title>
<description>On 9 Nov 2009, at 10:06, Ian Eiloart wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; --On 8 November 2009 13:54:27 +0000 Nigel Metheringham &amp;gt; &amp;lt;nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 02:21:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85764</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 903] exim 4.70_RC3: documentation missing</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 02:19:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85760</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 903] New: exim 4.70_RC3: documentation missing</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 01:23:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85788</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 902] New: Compilation errors with 4.70 RC3 using Sun compiler</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 00:33:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85758</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>PS: Should have said this was from the tarball. Found the missing files in the CVS and then all is OK to build. Does not run though. 2009-11-08 15</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 07:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85744</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70: Release Candidate 3</title>
<description>Announcing the 3rd Release Candidate for the exim 4.70 release - we intend this to be the final release candidate unless any release blocking bugs are</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 05:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85742</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 486] Monthly datestamped log files</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486   --- Comment #10</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85731</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 460] fail to corectly guess dk_domain</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85726</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 76] calls local_scan() with O_WRONLY|O_APPEND fd causing EBADF in read()</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85725</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 70] files in /var/spool/exim4/scan are mode 666</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:35:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85724</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 39] decoding of base64 MIME parts does not work for unusual line lengths</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:29:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85723</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 848] Allow more variable in local_scan API before calling dlfunc</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=848   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:46:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85714</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>This RC2 has been out for a week now. I have integrated the patches that have come in since that RC2 release. If there are any other issues, especial</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85702</link>
</item><item>
<title>null char in string expansions</title>
<description>Hi, I was trying to generate unique IDs by taking a bunch of variables, joining them together and creating an MD5 of the result. I used the null char</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 10:57:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85697</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85696</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] New: Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85695</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #23</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:54:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85683</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 900] How to customize SMTP authentications for clients?</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 11:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85678</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 900] New: How to customize SMTP authentications for clients?</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 11:14:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85680</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70: Release Candidate</title>
<description>Before releasing 4.70, we&amp;#039;d like interested parties to test another Release Candidate (RC2). In case you missed the prerelease announcement two week</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 07:38:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Multiple DKIM signature log messages</title>
<description>This is a bit weird, the same message reported 4 DKIM verifications with identical details: 2009-10-27 21:30:58 ******-******-** DKIM: d=facebookmail.</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85600</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85598</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] New: Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85597</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:11:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85596</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] New: pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:10:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85595</link>
</item><item>
<title>Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve gone through all the non-wishlist bugs that are currently active. Some require significant work - which I am not in a position to  perform, so</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:34:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85573</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85568</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 875] Bad description of $message_size availability in the docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85564</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 866] spec 22.6 redirection list items (:blackhole:) buggy/misleading</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85565</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 862] Spec.txt doc file quoted examples displayed incorrectly</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=862 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85566</link>
</item><item>
<title>Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>Passive Spam Revocation (PSR) Currently almost all mail systems (e.g. Hotmail and Gmail) use a spam filter, which can drop good and important message</description>
<pubDate>25 Oct  2009 18:32:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85556</link>
</item><item>
<title>gentoo ebuild for current git version of exim</title>
<description>In case anyone is interested... http://simon.arlott.org/pub/gentoo/exim-git-portage.tar.lzma It&amp;#039;s based on the 4.69 ebuild, and I added in xfpt/sdop</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 16:31:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail Server Tutorial</title>
<description>We are searching for an update to DynDNS&amp;#039;s Mail Server Tutorial from Exim version 4.20 to Exim 4.63 and Fedora 7. The previous instructions yield the</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85519</link>
</item><item>
<title>exim-doc/doc-docbook doesn&amp;#039;t build</title>
<description>There&amp;#039;s a reference to /home/tom/ in one of the source documents: $ make everything ... xmlto -x MyStyle-chunk-html.xsl -o spec_html html spec-html.x</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 04:58:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Updates via git?</title>
<description>Hello, I have finally managed to get round to reading up a little about using &amp;#039;git&amp;#039;. I have a copy (clone) of the exim-doc repository, and &amp;#039;git pull&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 14:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85511</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 831] hosts_find_bydns does not support trailing &amp;#039;.&amp;#039; on DNS names</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85506</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 811] With SRS Exim crashes with SIGSEGV</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85505</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 807] LMTP transport doesn&amp;#039;t log deliveries</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=807   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85503</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 805] Glitches about documentation ch. 3 and ch. 9</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85502</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 802] os_common_find_running_interfaces() fails on NetBSD-5</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:39:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85500</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 795] No user message after accept with endpass on ACL</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:31:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85499</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 786] tls_verify_hosts not verifying X509 signed from Outlook 2007</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786   --- Comment #6</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85498</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 799] ratelimit doc example borked</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 05:57:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85483</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 736] exim 4.69 fails to use all MX records before failing</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 05:49:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85482</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 727] maildirsize not being created with correct permissions</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 05:42:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85481</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim/exim-src/src eximstats.src</title>
<description>Nigel, It looks like you have a minor typo in this fix ... On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; nm4     2009/10/19 12:41:27 BST &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 05:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85478</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
