<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>exim | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 20:17:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: 4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>On 8 Nov 2009, at 15:17, john ffitch wrote: &amp;gt; Should have said this was from the tarball. Found the missing files &amp;gt; in the CVS and then all is OK to</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 08:58:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85752</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>PS: Should have said this was from the tarball. Found the missing files in the CVS and then all is OK to build. Does not run though. 2009-11-08 15</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 07:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85744</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>PS: Should have said this was from the tarball. Found the missing files in the CVS and then all is OK. ==John ffitch -- ## List details at http:/</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 07:04:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85746</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>PS: There is a directory pdkim in the build directory, but is consists of slinks to non-existent files lrwxrwxrwx 1 jpff users 24 2009-11-08 14:42 b</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:53:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85747</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70 rc3 does not build here</title>
<description>I did manage to build an earlier release candidate, but...  make[2]: Entering directory `/home/jpff/System/exim-4.70_RC3/build-Linux-x86_64/pdkim&amp;#039; ma</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 06:47:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85745</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70: Release Candidate 3</title>
<description>Announcing the 3rd Release Candidate for the exim 4.70 release - we intend this to be the final release candidate unless any release blocking bugs are</description>
<pubDate>08 Nov  2009 05:54:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85742</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 39] decoding of base64 MIME parts does not work for unusual line lengths</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 09:17:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85739</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 39] decoding of base64 MIME parts does not work for unusual line lengths</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Jakob Hirsch &amp;lt;jh.ex</description>
<pubDate>07 Nov  2009 05:28:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85748</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 486] Monthly datestamped log files</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486   --- Comment #11</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 09:30:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85734</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 486] Monthly datestamped log files</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486   --- Comment #10</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 08:00:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85731</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 460] fail to corectly guess dk_domain</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:40:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85727</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 460] fail to corectly guess dk_domain</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=460 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:37:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85726</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 76] calls local_scan() with O_WRONLY|O_APPEND fd causing EBADF in read()</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:37:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85725</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 70] files in /var/spool/exim4/scan are mode 666</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:35:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85724</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 39] decoding of base64 MIME parts does not work for unusual line lengths</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 05:29:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85723</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 Serge Demonchaux &amp;lt;</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 04:34:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85722</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>On 5 Nov 2009, at 22:13, Jakob Hirsch wrote: &amp;gt; Not that it matters _that_ much, but any reason why bug#39 is not  &amp;gt; going in? Ah - thats assigned t</description>
<pubDate>06 Nov  2009 00:24:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85717</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: null char in string expansions</title>
<description>On 2009-11-05 at 18:57 +0000, Mike Cardwell wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I was trying to generate unique IDs by taking a bunch of variables, &amp;gt; joining them toget</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 18:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85715</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 848] Allow more variable in local_scan API before calling dlfunc</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=848   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:46:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85714</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; I have integrated the patches that have come in since that RC2 release. &amp;gt; If there are any other issues, especially relea</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:13:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85713</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>Le Thursday 05 November 2009 22:51:00 Johannes Berg, vous avez Ã©critÂ : &amp;gt; ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- &amp;gt; You are the QA conta</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 14:13:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85712</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #25</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:51:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85711</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>On 5 Nov 2009, at 20:51, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: &amp;gt; Is my understanding correct that no one ran these RCs through exim  &amp;gt; test suite? Its quite</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:24:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85710</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>Arkadiusz Miskiewicz schrieb: &amp;gt; Is my understanding correct that no one ran these RCs through exim test suite? You&amp;#039;re welcome to try :) -- ## List</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 13:10:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85709</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #24</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 12:51:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85707</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>On Thursday 05 of November 2009, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; This RC2 has been out for a week now. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have integrated the patches that have come i</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 12:51:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85708</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 12:25:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85706</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>On Thu, 2009-11-05 at 20:51 +0100, Tom Kistner wrote: &amp;gt; Nigel Metheringham schrieb: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Otherwise I&amp;#039;d like to see an RC3 go out tomorrow, and aim t</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:54:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85704</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham schrieb: &amp;gt; Otherwise I&amp;#039;d like to see an RC3 go out tomorrow, and aim to call that  &amp;gt; the release version a week or so later. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:51:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85703</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70 RC2 - Current Status</title>
<description>This RC2 has been out for a week now. I have integrated the patches that have come in since that RC2 release. If there are any other issues, especial</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:48:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85702</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:40:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85701</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:37:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85700</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:31:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85699</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 11:28:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85698</link>
</item><item>
<title>null char in string expansions</title>
<description>Hi, I was trying to generate unique IDs by taking a bunch of variables, joining them together and creating an MD5 of the result. I used the null char</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 10:57:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85697</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:21:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85696</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 901] New: Patch to remove differ in signedness (exim-4.70 RC2)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 05:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85695</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 139] Dynamically loadable lookup modules</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139   --- Comment #23</description>
<pubDate>03 Nov  2009 08:54:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85683</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 900] How to customize SMTP authentications for clients?</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 11:30:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85678</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 900] New: How to customize SMTP authentications for clients?</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2009 11:14:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85680</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] Exim 4.70: Release Candidate</title>
<description>Hello, Tom Kistner wrote: &amp;gt; Before releasing 4.70, we&amp;#039;d like interested parties to test another &amp;gt; Release Candidate (RC2). &amp;gt;  I just tested it on O</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 23:48:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85671</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim 4.70: Release Candidate</title>
<description>On 30 Oct 2009, at 14:38, Tom Kistner wrote: &amp;gt; Before releasing 4.70, we&amp;#039;d like interested parties to test another &amp;gt; Release Candidate (RC2). Tom,</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 08:20:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85662</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 08:14:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85658</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 727] maildirsize not being created with correct permissions</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 08:08:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85657</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim 4.70: Release Candidate</title>
<description>Before releasing 4.70, we&amp;#039;d like interested parties to test another Release Candidate (RC2). In case you missed the prerelease announcement two week</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 07:38:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85656</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease</title>
<description>Le Friday 30 October 2009 10:52:14 Tom Kistner, vous avez écrit : &amp;gt; Todd Rinaldo wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Exim 4.70 is now compiling for us on: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thanks for the h</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 03:09:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85645</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease</title>
<description>Todd Rinaldo wrote: &amp;gt; Exim 4.70 is now compiling for us on: Thanks for the heads-up. The list is quite impressive :) /tom  &amp;gt; 32bit: &amp;gt; caos/2 &amp;gt; ce</description>
<pubDate>30 Oct  2009 02:52:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85644</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [exim] Testing Exim 4.70 prerelease</title>
<description>Tom Kistner, 2009-10-13 17:38:  &amp;gt; The release of Exim 4.70 is on the horizon. A lot of stuff has Concerning PCRE, We generate exim RPMs for many pla</description>
<pubDate>29 Oct  2009 12:09:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85633</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 727] maildirsize not being created with correct permissions</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=727 Andrey Chesnakov &amp;lt;</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 15:42:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85624</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Multiple DKIM signature log messages</title>
<description>Simon Arlott wrote: &amp;gt; This is a bit weird, the same message reported 4 DKIM verifications &amp;gt; with identical details: &amp;gt; 2009-10-27 21:30:58 ******-****</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 07:33:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85614</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 2009-10-27 at 14:50 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:34, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;  - add changebars into the do</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 20:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85601</link>
</item><item>
<title>Multiple DKIM signature log messages</title>
<description>This is a bit weird, the same message reported 4 DKIM verifications with identical details: 2009-10-27 21:30:58 ******-******-** DKIM: d=facebookmail.</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:25:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85600</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85599</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:03:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85598</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 899] New: Minor grammatical corrections to the docs.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 15:02:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85597</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:11:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85596</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 898] New: pipe transport_filter error overwritten by child exit error</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=898      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 13:10:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85595</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:34, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt;  - add changebars into the documentation - which is pretty much &amp;gt;   a case of looking at a d</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2009 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85592</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 26 Oct 2009, at 13:58, Johannes Berg wrote: &amp;gt; I think Nigel just fixed it but closed the wrong bug (again)? Sorry - this is a nasty side effect o</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 08:28:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85584</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 2009-10-26 Graeme Fowler &amp;lt;graeme@graemef.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:08 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; http://git.infradead.org/exim-</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:29:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85580</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:08 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; http://git.infradead.org/exim-src.git/history/a60eeb5b0822109b3ff08fab528d2712ba9095e1:/sr</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:12:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85579</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889   --- Comment #6</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85578</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 2009-10-26 Johannes Berg &amp;lt;johannes@sipsolutions.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:41 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I would really like to</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:08:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85577</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889 Graeme Fowler &amp;lt;gra</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 07:01:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85576</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 14:41 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; I would really like to see http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=896 &amp;gt; fixed in the releas</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:58:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85575</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>On 2009-10-26 Nigel Metheringham &amp;lt;nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve gone through all the non-wishlist bugs that are currently a</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:41:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85574</link>
</item><item>
<title>Working to a 4.70 release</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve gone through all the non-wishlist bugs that are currently active. Some require significant work - which I am not in a position to  perform, so</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:34:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85573</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85572</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:20:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85571</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:18:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85569</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 889] expr usage in exinext invalid on FreeBSD</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=889   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:15:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85568</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 888] clarification for tls client settings.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=888 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:14:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85567</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 875] Bad description of $message_size availability in the docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=875 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85564</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 866] spec 22.6 redirection list items (:blackhole:) buggy/misleading</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=866 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85565</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 862] Spec.txt doc file quoted examples displayed incorrectly</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=862 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 06:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85566</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Renaud Allard &amp;lt;renaud@allard.it&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt; Showing a message&amp;#039;s spam s</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 02:53:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85563</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Showing a message&amp;#039;s spam status to the sender can be bad, if he is &amp;gt; really a spammer. So the page can also return: &amp;gt;   * SP</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 02:07:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85561</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Yao Ziyuan &amp;lt;yaoziyuan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Passive Spam Revocation (PSR) &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Currently almost all mail systems (e.g. H</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 02:02:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85560</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 07:42 +0000, Simon Arlott wrote: &amp;gt; On 26/10/09 01:32, Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Currently almost all mail systems (e.g. Hotmail and</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 01:09:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85559</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>On 26/10/09 01:32, Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt; Currently almost all mail systems (e.g. Hotmail and Gmail) use a spam &amp;gt; filter, which can drop good and importa</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 00:42:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85558</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 09:32 +0800, Yao Ziyuan wrote: &amp;gt; I propose an optional feature for current mail systems. The main idea &amp;gt; is if a message is con</description>
<pubDate>26 Oct  2009 00:40:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85557</link>
</item><item>
<title>Passive Spam Revocation</title>
<description>Passive Spam Revocation (PSR) Currently almost all mail systems (e.g. Hotmail and Gmail) use a spam filter, which can drop good and important message</description>
<pubDate>25 Oct  2009 18:32:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85556</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: exim-doc/doc-docbook doesn&amp;#039;t build</title>
<description>On 21/10/09 12:58, Simon Arlott wrote: &amp;gt; There&amp;#039;s a reference to /home/tom/ in one of the source documents: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; $ make everything &amp;gt; ... &amp;gt; xmlto -x MyS</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 16:32:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85541</link>
</item><item>
<title>gentoo ebuild for current git version of exim</title>
<description>In case anyone is interested... http://simon.arlott.org/pub/gentoo/exim-git-portage.tar.lzma It&amp;#039;s based on the 4.69 ebuild, and I added in xfpt/sdop</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 16:31:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85540</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Mail Server Tutorial</title>
<description>Within the Exim Configuration Editor, the newer version of of Exim does not list &amp;quot;AUTHENTICATION CONFIGURATION,&amp;quot; as in the older version on step three</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 09:08:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Mail Server Tutorial</title>
<description>Right. The newer version of of Exim does not list &amp;quot;AUTHENTICATION CONFIGURATION,&amp;quot; as in the older version on step three of the DynDNS instructions.</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:59:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Mail Server Tutorial</title>
<description>Hello, uisiscom wrote: &amp;gt; We are searching for an update to DynDNS&amp;#039;s Mail Server Tutorial from Exim &amp;gt; version 4.20 to Exim 4.63 and Fedora 7. The prev</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:48:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85520</link>
</item><item>
<title>Mail Server Tutorial</title>
<description>We are searching for an update to DynDNS&amp;#039;s Mail Server Tutorial from Exim version 4.20 to Exim 4.63 and Fedora 7. The previous instructions yield the</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 08:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85519</link>
</item><item>
<title>exim-doc/doc-docbook doesn&amp;#039;t build</title>
<description>There&amp;#039;s a reference to /home/tom/ in one of the source documents: $ make everything ... xmlto -x MyStyle-chunk-html.xsl -o spec_html html spec-html.x</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2009 04:58:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Updates via git?</title>
<description>Hello, I have finally managed to get round to reading up a little about using &amp;#039;git&amp;#039;. I have a copy (clone) of the exim-doc repository, and &amp;#039;git pull&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 14:26:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85511</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 831] hosts_find_bydns does not support trailing &amp;#039;.&amp;#039; on DNS names</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=831 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:15:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85506</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 811] With SRS Exim crashes with SIGSEGV</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=811 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85505</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 807] LMTP transport doesn&amp;#039;t log deliveries</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=807 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:10:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85504</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 807] LMTP transport doesn&amp;#039;t log deliveries</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=807   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 06:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85503</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 805] Glitches about documentation ch. 3 and ch. 9</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=805   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:46:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85502</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 802] os_common_find_running_interfaces() fails on NetBSD-5</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802   --- Comment #4</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:45:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85501</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 802] os_common_find_running_interfaces() fails on NetBSD-5</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:39:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85500</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 795] No user message after accept with endpass on ACL</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=795 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:31:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85499</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 786] tls_verify_hosts not verifying X509 signed from Outlook 2007</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786   --- Comment #6</description>
<pubDate>20 Oct  2009 05:26:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85498</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 799] ratelimit doc example borked</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=799 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Oct  2009 05:57:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85483</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
