<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>exim | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>25 Nov  2009 22:04:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[Bug 922] 4.70 doc changes - several but relatively minor.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:55:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86081</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 923] 4.70 introcuces f-protd av-scanner but no docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=923   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:54:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86080</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 924] No documentation about &amp;#039;dkim_disable_verify&amp;#039;.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 23:54:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86079</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 924] New: No documentation about &amp;#039;dkim_disable_verify&amp;#039;.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=924      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:38:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86077</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 923] New: 4.70 introcuces f-protd av-scanner but no docs</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=923      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:33:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86076</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 922] New: 4.70 doc changes - several but relatively minor.</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=922      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 14:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86075</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; On 23 Nov 2009, at 15:03, Graeme Fowler wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Builds on CentOS 5.4 using my much-edited spec file derived from &amp;gt;&amp;gt; RedH</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 07:14:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86069</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 23 Nov 2009, at 15:03, Graeme Fowler wrote: &amp;gt; Builds on CentOS 5.4 using my much-edited spec file derived from &amp;gt; RedHat&amp;#039;s distro spec file. Thanks</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 07:10:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 13:48 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; OK, I have tagged 4.71, and built all the release files, but put them in &amp;gt;  http://ftp</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 07:03:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>OK, I have tagged 4.71, and built all the release files, but put them in  http://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/Testing/  ftp://ftp.exim.org/pub/exim/Testing</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:48:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86063</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>Richard.Hall wrote: &amp;gt; Sorry I can&amp;#039;t be more specific, but better safe than sorry. (I hope; &amp;gt; otherwise it is egg-on-face time) No egg on face, and t</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:38:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86062</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 919] [testsuite] exim 4.70 re-sorts headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 05:05:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86061</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 918] fix for running testsuite with non-ancient gnutls</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:47:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86060</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 921] Changelog refers to main option &amp;#039;spamd_servers&amp;#039; - but there is no option</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:27:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86059</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 920] Changelog refers to experimental DCC support in docs, but it is not present</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:27:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>Apologies for the somewhat haphazard nature of this message, and even more apologies if I&amp;#039;m mis-remembering something. I just wanted to &amp;quot;head &amp;#039;em off</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 04:01:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86055</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; So is anything outstanding for 4.71?  As of this morning, from my side: We&amp;#039;re good to go. /tom  -- ## List details a</description>
<pubDate>23 Nov  2009 00:45:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86049</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Docs - gnutls_compat_mode in two places?</title>
<description>On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 14:31 +0000, John Horne wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Looking through the 4.70 docs, some of the &amp;#039;gnutls&amp;#039; options appear in &amp;gt; two different section</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:41:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86041</link>
</item><item>
<title>Docs - gnutls_compat_mode in two places?</title>
<description>Hello, Looking through the 4.70 docs, some of the &amp;#039;gnutls&amp;#039; options appear in two different sections. I&amp;#039;m not sure if this was intentional, but it loo</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 06:31:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86040</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 921] New: Changelog refers to main option &amp;#039;spamd_servers&amp;#039; - but there is no option</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=921      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:47:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86039</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 920] New: Changelog refers to experimental DCC support in docs, but it is not present</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=920      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:35:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86038</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 919] New: [testsuite] exim 4.70 re-sorts headers</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=919      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:19:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86037</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 918] fix for running testsuite with non-ancient gnutls</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 05:15:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86036</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 918] New: fix for running testsuite with non-ancient gnutls</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=918      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>21 Nov  2009 04:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86035</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 2009-11-20 at 10:59 +0000, Graeme Fowler wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:54 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Anyone else want to speak up for</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 15:58:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86020</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 13:22:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86019</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 847] Enabled DNSDB by default</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 04:18:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86014</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 847] Enabled DNSDB by default</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:21:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86013</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 847] Enabled DNSDB by default</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:12:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86028</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 917] New: New condition expansion variables - $condvalue_left, $condvalue_right</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=917      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86026</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 916] New: fail_nodata keyword for DNSDB</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=916      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 03:07:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86027</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 10:54 +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; Anyone else want to speak up for it... it is pretty small in both effect and implementa</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 02:59:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86012</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 20 Nov 2009, at 10:16, Mike Cardwell wrote: &amp;gt; Any chance http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=847 could be done in &amp;gt; 4.71? It has six votes for wh</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 02:54:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86011</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I would appreciate if the &amp;quot;stop dkim fom adding empty lines to &amp;gt;&amp;gt; debugging output patch in &amp;gt;&amp;gt; http://lists.exim.org/lur</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 02:16:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86009</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 14:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86003</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 13:24:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/86001</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 12:09:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85998</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 915] New: scripts/Configure-Makefile does not fail if ExtUtils::Embed is not installed</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=915      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 12:07:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85997</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 914] Makefile-FreeBSD falsely assumes X11BASE is set</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 10:58:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85996</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 2009-11-19 Nigel Metheringham &amp;lt;nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 19 Nov 2009, at 18:08, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I would a</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 10:49:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85995</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 19 Nov 2009, at 18:08, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; I would appreciate if the &amp;quot;stop dkim fom adding empty lines to &amp;gt; debugging output patch in &amp;gt; http:</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 10:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85994</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On 2009-11-18 Nigel Metheringham &amp;lt;nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; So is anything outstanding for 4.71?  &amp;gt; Only thing I can see is</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 10:08:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85990</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Towards 4.71</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 07:45:21PM +0000, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; So is anything outstanding for 4.71?  &amp;gt; Only thing I can see is http://bugs.exi</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 16:41:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85968</link>
</item><item>
<title>Towards 4.71</title>
<description>So is anything outstanding for 4.71?  Only thing I can see is http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914 and the NetBSD 5 issues - which I don&amp;#039;t have a</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 11:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85962</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 722] Need a random number generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 11:15:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85918</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 913] Spec 30.4: wrong &amp;quot;Use:&amp;quot; for gnutls_*</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 11:10:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85917</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 4.70: Copyright notice</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; On 16 Nov 2009, at 14:15, John Horne wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; The copyright notice should be updated to 2009. I seem to remember that &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 10:55:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85916</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 914] New: Makefile-FreeBSD falsely assumes X11BASE is set</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=914      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 09:51:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85923</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim&amp;#039;s own Bugzilla vs DKIM</title>
<description>On 16/11/2009, Nigel Metheringham &amp;lt;nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 16 Nov 2009, at 14:14, Phil Pennock wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; So, befor</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:27:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85910</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 4.70: Copyright notice</title>
<description>On 16 Nov 2009, at 14:15, John Horne wrote: &amp;gt; The copyright notice should be updated to 2009. I seem to remember that &amp;gt; Philip Hazel said he had a scr</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:17:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85905</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Exim&amp;#039;s own Bugzilla vs DKIM</title>
<description>On 16 Nov 2009, at 14:14, Phil Pennock wrote: &amp;gt; So, before I can declare that my domain signs *all* mail with DKIM, how &amp;gt; do I deal with things like,</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:16:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85904</link>
</item><item>
<title>4.70: Copyright notice</title>
<description>Hi, Exim 4.70 shows:   exim -bV  Exim version 4.70 #1 built 16-Nov-2009 13:53:55  Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2006 The copyright not</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:15:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85903</link>
</item><item>
<title>Exim&amp;#039;s own Bugzilla vs DKIM</title>
<description>So, before I can declare that my domain signs *all* mail with DKIM, how do I deal with things like, oh, the Exim Bugzilla which sends mail from the si</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:14:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85902</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 722] Need a random number generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722   --- Comment #14</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 06:06:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85901</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 722] Need a random number generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722 Phil Pennock &amp;lt;exim</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85900</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 913] Spec 30.4: wrong &amp;quot;Use:&amp;quot; for gnutls_*</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85899</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 722] Need a random number generator</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722   --- Comment #12</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:34:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85898</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 913] New: Spec 30.4: wrong &amp;quot;Use:&amp;quot; for gnutls_*</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=913      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:25:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85897</link>
</item><item>
<title>NewStuff 4.70 fixes</title>
<description>NewStuff is somewhat bare in the 4.70 release. I see from CVS that the solution chosen is to expand the 4.70 section when 4.71 comes out. I worked t</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 05:11:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85896</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 643] Enhance exim -bP to read the value of macros, or similar</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643 Phil Pennock &amp;lt;exim</description>
<pubDate>16 Nov  2009 04:36:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85895</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 721] [PATCH] open libspf dynamicaly</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721   --- Comment #16</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 03:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85881</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: testsuite</title>
<description>On 2009-11-14 Johannes Berg &amp;lt;johannes@sipsolutions.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 16:45 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have given</description>
<pubDate>15 Nov  2009 01:34:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85879</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912   --- Comment #4</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 12:22:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85875</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 12:15:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85874</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 12:11:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85873</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: testsuite</title>
<description>On 2009-11-14 Andreas Metzler &amp;lt;eximusers@downhill.at.eu.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; I have given the test-suite a testrun. [...] Hello, updating the tes</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 08:01:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85872</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: testsuite</title>
<description>On Sat, 2009-11-14 at 16:45 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; I have given the test-suite a testrun. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Stuff it breaks on: ...  And, apart</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 07:52:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85871</link>
</item><item>
<title>testsuite</title>
<description>Hello, I have given the test-suite a testrun. Stuff it breaks on: * umask. I am running with umask 0002 and therefore aux-fixed/* is g+w in my CVS c</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 07:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85870</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 06:02:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85869</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 05:26:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85868</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 04:59:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85867</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912 Tom Kistner &amp;lt;tom@d</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 04:59:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85866</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 912] New: exim 4.70 rc4 segfault on testsuite case 0002</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 04:51:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85865</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Time to release?</title>
<description>On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Nigel Metheringham wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve got a release announcement written at &amp;gt;    http://wiki.exim.org/Exim470ReleaseNotes Congrat</description>
<pubDate>14 Nov  2009 02:54:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85864</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Time to release?</title>
<description>OK, its out and tahini is running it... I&amp;#039;ve got a release announcement written at     http://wiki.exim.org/Exim470ReleaseNotes Any problems wit</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 12:45:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85861</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Time to release?</title>
<description>Tom Kistner wrote: &amp;gt; Nigel Metheringham schrieb: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Personally I am back at work after this weekend and so my free time will suddenly dramatically</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 11:32:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85860</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Time to release?</title>
<description>Nigel Metheringham schrieb: &amp;gt; Personally I am back at work after this weekend and so my free time will suddenly dramatically decrease, so pushing it</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 10:04:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85859</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 911] MakeLinks makes dead links</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:58:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85857</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 911] MakeLinks makes dead links</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:49:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85856</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 911] New: MakeLinks makes dead links</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=911      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:48:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85855</link>
</item><item>
<title>Time to release?</title>
<description>Is there any reason to not release the current state as 4.70 now? Bug reports have all been minor stuff (mostly build), and have been fixed in CVS as</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 07:07:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85854</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 04:18:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85851</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908   --- Comment #4</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 04:12:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85850</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>13 Nov  2009 04:09:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85862</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908   --- Comment #2</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 10:14:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85838</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908   --- Comment #1</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 09:37:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85849</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 910] &amp;quot;dkim_canon = simple&amp;quot; uses relaxed canonicalisation</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 05:02:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85835</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 910] New: &amp;quot;dkim_canon = simple&amp;quot; uses relaxed canonicalisation</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=910      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 04:51:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85834</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 909] connect() uses &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; addrlen in dcc.c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909 Nigel Metheringham</description>
<pubDate>12 Nov  2009 00:34:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85826</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 909] New: connect() uses &amp;quot;wrong&amp;quot; addrlen in dcc.c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=909      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 14:55:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85824</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 908] New: NetBSD3 can be g/c</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 09:01:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85827</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 Serge Demonchaux &amp;lt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 09:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85821</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #9</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 08:52:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85820</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #8</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 07:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85818</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #7</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 07:14:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85817</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #6</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 06:45:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85816</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #5</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 06:43:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85815</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905 Serge Demonchaux &amp;lt;</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 05:29:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85813</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 905] Typo, signed/unsigned char Exim-4.70 CVS (2009-11-09 18:29:22 +0100)</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905   --- Comment #3</description>
<pubDate>11 Nov  2009 02:08:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85811</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Bug 907] New: Build errors on Mac OS X 10.6.2</title>
<description>------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907      Summary:</description>
<pubDate>10 Nov  2009 09:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/85800</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
