Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 20:27:34 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:24:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79175 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:22:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79174 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:22:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79173 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=411 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:10:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79172 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=437 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 05:02:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79171 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Nigel Metheringham 16 May 2008 04:33:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79170 On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 13:24 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > Just make it clear, please. My 2p, fwiw: Commits, comments and such into Bugzilla are gate 16 May 2008 02:07:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79167 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 --- Comment #4 15 May 2008 06:04:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79146 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 Tony Finch <fanf@e 15 May 2008 04:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79166 On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 12:21 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, 15 May 2008 04:24:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79164 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Johannes Berg wrote: > This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, adopted/fixed by me > and recently forward-ported/updated 15 May 2008 04:21:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79165 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #22 14 May 2008 09:09:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79136 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #21 14 May 2008 08:18:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79133 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:57 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > --- Comment #20 from Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at> 2008-05-14 14:57:21 --- > Some comments based o 14 May 2008 07:40:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79132 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:45 +0200, Marc Haber wrote: > I don't think that a second issue tracking system is going to help. I wasn't positing a second 14 May 2008 06:57:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79131 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #20 14 May 2008 06:57:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79130 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 02:43:29PM +0100, Graeme Fowler wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:30 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote: > > Indeed, we do need a wor 14 May 2008 06:45:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79129 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 15:30 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote: > Indeed, we do need a work flow. "Things don't get lost" is the point > of view taken by th 14 May 2008 06:43:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79128 > That's a work-flow problem. Either we can do a patch-based email > workflow like Linux does, or we can attach patches to bugzilla bugs. The > latter 14 May 2008 06:30:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79127 On Wed, 14 May 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > > As for development... I've never really got it into my head that it > would be _acceptable_ for me to 14 May 2008 06:21:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79124 This patch, originally written by Tim Jackson, adopted/fixed by me and recently forward-ported/updated by David Woodhouse, makes exim able to (optiona 14 May 2008 06:15:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79140 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > There is a test suite. Its very comprehensive, however I have not got my > head around it nor manag 14 May 2008 06:10:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79123 2008/5/14 Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>: > If you want to propose changing the workflow, that's fine, but I think > it requires even mor 14 May 2008 06:04:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79122 > I read something about a patch for dynamic lookup methods. We might > start with that. How about sending a description of the change (text, > not 14 May 2008 05:59:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79121 On 14 May 2008, at 12:39, Michael Haardt wrote: > A few people have CVS access, but most are afraid of changing Exim > on their own. In the past, Phi 14 May 2008 05:05:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79118 2008/5/14 Michael Haardt <michael.haardt@freenet.ag>: > > Look at domainkeys, for example. As far as I can tell, it's still not > > easy to do with 14 May 2008 05:00:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79117 > You're kidding, right? A project that no longer develops can, for all > intents and purposes, be dropped because it will not be able to adapt to > a 14 May 2008 04:39:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79116 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 12:22 +0200, Michael Haardt wrote: > > The migration is easy enough -- we have a git tree which is following > > the CVS tree au 14 May 2008 04:18:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79112 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:36 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:27 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > > On Wed, 14 May 2008, David Woodho 14 May 2008 04:07:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79111  > To me, Exim is now at the point of many successful open source projects: > It is mature and widespread, there are very few bugs, and it attracts 14 May 2008 03:37:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79110 > The migration is easy enough -- we have a git tree which is following > the CVS tree automatically; all we have to do is stop committing to CVS > an 14 May 2008 03:22:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79109 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 11:00:29AM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > I'm sure that those who maintain the Exim package in Linux (and other > OS) distrib 14 May 2008 03:16:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79119 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:34 AM, Jaco van der Schyff <jvds@netgroup.co.za> wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote: > 14 May 2008 03:10:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79108 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 11:34 +0200, Jaco van der Schyff wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote: > > Putting my THUS/Demo 14 May 2008 03:00:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79107 Jaco van der Schyff wrote: On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote: Putting my THUS/Demon hat on, we clearly have lots of ex 14 May 2008 02:47:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79106 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > What really concerns me at present is if we get hit by a security > issue in the code, how long wou 14 May 2008 02:38:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79105 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 10:27 +0100, Tony Finch wrote: > On Wed, 14 May 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > > > > We already have http://git.infradead.org/ex 14 May 2008 02:36:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79104 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:11:56AM +0100, Alex Kiernan wrote: > Putting my THUS/Demon hat on, we clearly have lots of exim in service > and a vested i 14 May 2008 02:34:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79103 On Wed, 14 May 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > > We already have http://git.infradead.org/exim-src.git > It would be nice to host that on exim.org, and 14 May 2008 02:27:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79102 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708 Tony Finch <fanf@e 14 May 2008 02:16:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79120 On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 19:15 +0200, B. Johannessen wrote: > Suggestion 1: Set up public (read only) CVS/SVN to make it easier to > track ongoing devel 14 May 2008 02:12:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79101 On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Nigel Metheringham <nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk> wrote: > > On 13 May 2008, at 18:15, B. Johannessen 14 May 2008 02:11:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79100 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708 Heiko Schlitterman 14 May 2008 02:08:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79099 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708 --- Comment #1 14 May 2008 02:08:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79098 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708 Summary: 14 May 2008 02:07:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79097 On 13 May 2008, at 18:15, B. Johannessen wrote: > Suggestion 1: Set up public (read only) CVS/SVN to make it easier to > track ongoing development (no 14 May 2008 02:05:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79096 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Heiko Schlittermann wrote: > > I have a feeling Philip left behind a sort of leadership vacuum. I expected that to happen. I a 14 May 2008 01:49:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79095 Nigel Metheringham <nigel.metheringham@dev.intechnology.co.uk> (Di 13 Mai 2008 18:05:20 CEST): > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work 14 May 2008 01:26:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79094 Hello, B. Johannessen <bob@db.org> (Di 13 Mai 2008 19:15:06 CEST): > Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no w 14 May 2008 01:18:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79093 On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 07:15:06PM +0200, B. Johannessen wrote: > Suggestion 3: Organise triage team tasked with maintaining a prioritised > list of 13 May 2008 23:29:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79089 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621 Andrew Buckeridge 13 May 2008 17:47:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79090 On Tue, 13 May 2008, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on > exim - the bugzilla queue i 13 May 2008 11:55:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79082 Nigel Metheringham wrote: > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on > exim - the bugzilla queue is increasing, but ve 13 May 2008 10:15:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79080 On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 17:05 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on > exim - the b 13 May 2008 09:29:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79079 I think we have hit a stage where effectively no work is being done on exim - the bugzilla queue is increasing, but very few of them are being tou 13 May 2008 09:05:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79078 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Tony Finch <fanf@e 09 May 2008 05:58:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79038 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706 Summary: 08 May 2008 13:25:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/79022 Dear anonymous crypto-expert, On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 01:58:46PM +0200, Tom Kistner wrote: > > It's also not very important that the D-H parameters b 04 May 2008 00:31:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78924 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703 Summary: 02 May 2008 09:57:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78909 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702 Summary: 28 Apr 2008 00:15:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78762 On 24/04/2008, Sergey Skvortsov <skv@protey.ru> wrote: > On 23.04.2008 1:34, Marten Lehmann wrote: > > > > in front of our exim setup we have a anti 24 Apr 2008 05:21:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78700 Hi! I tried to get the used/configured ldap server(s) with perl and exim::expand_string function and failed badly. After reading the source i stumbl 22 Apr 2008 10:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78633 On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 20:41 +0200, B. Johannessen wrote: > Is there any interest in this patch at all or should I just resign > myself for maintainin 21 Apr 2008 09:36:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78610 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 Tony Finch <fanf@e 21 Apr 2008 06:13:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78625 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700 Tony Finch <fanf@e 21 Apr 2008 06:01:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78626 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=701 Summary: 20 Apr 2008 11:16:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78603 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700 Summary: 20 Apr 2008 10:42:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78604 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 David Woodhouse <d 19 Apr 2008 16:38:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78588 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697 Andreas Metzler <e 17 Apr 2008 11:00:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78543 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697 Summary: 17 Apr 2008 11:00:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78542 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 Tony Finch <fanf@e 16 Apr 2008 03:16:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78522 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695 Tony Finch <fanf@e 15 Apr 2008 05:15:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78503 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 --- Comment #1 15 Apr 2008 02:15:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78504 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696 Summary: 15 Apr 2008 02:02:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78505 On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > So I could possibly link with libdkim and ship Fedora's Exim under > GPLv3. Does anyone have a problem 14 Apr 2008 06:39:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78466 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694 Mrten <bugzilla@ii 14 Apr 2008 04:20:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78477 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695 Summary: 14 Apr 2008 04:16:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78478 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694 Summary: 14 Apr 2008 04:12:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78479 "B. Johannessen" <bob@db.org> wrote: > sacrificial-spam-address@horizon.com wrote: >> I recently administered a stiff flaming to the Debian package m 13 Apr 2008 14:58:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78456 Dear anonymous Crypto-Expert, > There appears to be a fundamental misapprehension about the role of > Diffie-Hellman parameters. Section 39.3 confla 13 Apr 2008 04:58:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78449 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693 Summary: 12 Apr 2008 13:52:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78445 David Woodhouse wrote: > > So I could possibly link with libdkim and ship Fedora's Exim under > GPLv3. Does anyone have a problem with that, and/pr 12 Apr 2008 12:11:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78444 I'd like to start shipping Fedora's Exim package with DKIM support, so I'm looking at the licensing issues. Once upon a time, the only available Doma 12 Apr 2008 05:10:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78438 sacrificial-spam-address@horizon.com wrote: > I recently administered a stiff flaming to the Debian package maintainers > for exim4, and was rebuffed 11 Apr 2008 13:31:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78429 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692 Summary: 11 Apr 2008 03:42:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78435 I recently administered a stiff flaming to the Debian package maintainers for exim4, and was rebuffed with the observation that the behaviour I was co 10 Apr 2008 12:04:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78420 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 David Woodhouse <d 09 Apr 2008 12:58:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78379 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139 --- Comment #17 07 Apr 2008 07:34:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78344 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691 Summary: 04 Apr 2008 00:50:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78286 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381 Claas Hilbrecht <C 02 Apr 2008 02:27:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78251 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688 Summary: 31 Mar 2008 12:33:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78175 Is there any interest in this patch at all or should I just resign myself for maintaining it privately? For the record, it's been working flawlessly 31 Mar 2008 11:41:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78174 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 Tony Finch <fanf@e 31 Mar 2008 09:47:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78185 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687 Summary: 31 Mar 2008 08:52:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78165 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 --- Comment #5 31 Mar 2008 04:00:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78166 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 --- Comment #4 31 Mar 2008 03:44:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78168 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 --- Comment #3 31 Mar 2008 03:41:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78167 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680 Tony Finch <fanf@e 31 Mar 2008 03:34:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78169 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 --- Comment #2 31 Mar 2008 03:30:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78150 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684 --- Comment #1 30 Mar 2008 02:21:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/exim/dev/78148