
jarausch at igpm
May 2, 2012, 1:59 AM
Post #35 of 39
(134 views)
Permalink
|
On 05/02/2012 02:51:07 AM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol [at] gmail> wrote: > > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Mark Knecht <markknecht [at] gmail> > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:36 PM, Paul Hartman > >> <paul.hartman+gentoo [at] gmail> wrote: > >>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:14 PM, Mark Knecht > <markknecht [at] gmail> wrote: > >>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Paul Hartman > >>>> <paul.hartman+gentoo [at] gmail> wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Michael Mol <mikemol [at] gmail> > wrote: > >>>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Paul Hartman > >>>>>> <paul.hartman+gentoo [at] gmail> wrote: > >>>>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Neil Bothwick > <neil [at] digimed> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On Tue, 1 May 2012 12:30:11 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Notice the (-win32codecs) flag. Seems to me (on this system > anyway) > >>>>>>>>> they are hard masked off? I tried adding the flag to > package.use but > >>>>>>>>> emerge won't enable the darn thing... > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> You need to unmask the USE flag first, by adding -win32codecs > >>>>>>>> to /etc/portage/profile/use.mask > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If he is using amd64 he can't use win32codecs unless he uses > a 32-bit > >>>>>>> mplayer/ffmpeg. AFAIK. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Wouldn't using multilib work around this? > >>>>> > >>>>> I think he would still need to compile a 32-bit mplayer/ffmpeg > (in a > >>>>> 32-bit chroot) to be able to make use of them. Multilib would > let him > >>>>> run 32-bit mplayer or ffmpeg binaries (which themselves would > be able > >>>>> to use the 32-bit DLLs). But I don't think 64-bit > mplayer/ffmpeg can > >>>>> call 32-bit DLLs. > >>>>> > >>>>> There is an amd64codecs package containing the 64-bit codecs, > but it > >>>>> has been masked and made obsolete by the fact that > mplayer/ffmpeg can > >>>>> natively do most (or all?) of those codecs these days. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> And presumably for all the same reasons, if I cannot play them I > >>>> cannot convert them. > >>>> > >>>> Ah, a world full of unspecified, proprietary vendor specific file > >>>> formats hidden in old dlls... Ain't it a fine world we live in? > >>>> > >>>> Sort of painful to start maintaining a 32-bit chroot just to > handle > >>>> this sort of thing. I suspect there's some freeware for the > Windows > >>>> world that might allow me to do the conversion in a VM. I'll > start > >>>> looking for that. The web site that advertised conversion didn't > work > >>>> as it bombed out after an hour. > >>> > >>> There used to be a 32-bit mplayer-bin package in portage that > would > >>> have made it simple, but that disappeared some time ago. > >>> > >>>> Maybe there's some simple binary install I could do - Fedora or > >>>> Ubuntu, etc. - but my concern there is that those binaries might > not > >>>> play well inside my 64-bit Gentoo environ... > >>> > >>> If you can find a statically-linked 32-bit mplayer somewhere, and > >>> emerge the win32codecs package on your machine, I think it has a > >>> chance of working. > >>> > >> > >> Actually, going back to the title of the thread, I don't need to > watch > >> wmv files in 64-bit. I really only need to _convert_ them to mp4 so > >> that I could watch them using xine, etc. or externa > lly on the Kindle. > >> > >> Maybe a 32-bit Gentoo chroot that doesn't maintain any desktop or > X11, > >> etc. could work? If I could convert the files at the command line > >> using ffmpeg in 32-bit then that would be pretty manageable in > terms > >> of Gentoo work, assuming the ffmpeg package can be built as without > >> any GUI stuff? > > > > I was just thinking that. I played with a chroot briefly just before > > inara and kaylee bit it, and it seemed pretty trivial. Were it me, > > that'd be the next thing I'd try. (But then, compiling is cheap for > > me) > > > > I think I'll try it in a Virtualbox VM first I instead of a chroot. > That's pretty easy to deal with. Easy to back up. Easy to move to a > different system down the road. No disk partitions, etc. > > Biggest issue for me is likely to be that I haven't done a 32-bit > install in at least 6 years. No idea what to watch out for but I doubt > it's any big deal. No idea how the 32-bit VM really does 32-bit when > it's running on a 64-bit processor that's doing 64-bit all the time > but I guess that's why we pay these Intel & Oracle people the big > bucks, right? ;-) > > And if I end up needing X in the 32-bit environment for some reason it > will be easy to add that down the road. > > It's a real drag about the hassles your machines have been going > through. I hope you get by that soon. > I'd use a SystemRescueCD image (it's an up-to-date Gentoo 32 bit system) Helmut.
|