Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 12 Feb 2012 15:27:16 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg >On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Pascal BERTON <pascal.berton3@free.fr> wrote: >> Florian, >> >> I've watched your video, very interesting indeed... 12 Feb 2012 09:44:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23146 On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Pascal BERTON <pascal.berton3@free.fr> wrote: > Florian, > > I've watched your video, very interesting indeed... Unfo 12 Feb 2012 08:23:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23145 Florian, I've watched your video, very interesting indeed... Unfortunately for you it raised some more questions to me :-) First, just to be sure I c 11 Feb 2012 10:30:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23144 Well, we are using active/active because we have configured Automatic High Availability as well as live migration... But could force it to be managed 11 Feb 2012 08:43:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23143 On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Maurits van de Lande <M.vandeLande@vdl-fittings.com> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm exploring the features of flashcache see 10 Feb 2012 11:50:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23142 Hello, I'm exploring the features of flashcache see: http://www.github.com/facebook/flashcache and I like it's possibilities. Fortunately toracat fr 10 Feb 2012 06:38:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23141 Hi, On Thursday 09 February 2012 19:39:02 José Román Bilbao wrote: > We have this scenario: > - A datacenter > - 1 Server running kvm VMs: > * 1 09 Feb 2012 13:20:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23140 Hi all, We have this scenario: - A datacenter - 1 Server running kvm VMs: * 1 Openfiler to distribute hard disk to other VMs (stores VMs and VM 09 Feb 2012 10:39:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23139 Thanks Florian. While that does illustrate how convoluted the process becomes when you have so many layers (as in this case), it seems to me that it 09 Feb 2012 05:51:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23138 On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Justin Cattle <j@ocado.com> wrote: > Is this still the case - DRBD 8.3 (or even 8.4) using Linux 3.1 ? http://lists. 09 Feb 2012 05:29:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23137 Hi Just trying to follow up on my post. Is there an obvious explanation as to why 8.3.12 seems to perform better than 8.4.1? Thx Fred On Fri, Feb 3 09 Feb 2012 04:25:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23136 Hi All, I've read a few post regarding the possibilities of I/O deadlock if using a loopback mounted file as the storage layer for DRBD. I have a 09 Feb 2012 03:08:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23135 On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Felix Frank <ff@mpexnet.de> wrote: > Hi, > > what Linux distribution is this? I think many distributors build > separa 09 Feb 2012 02:57:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23134 Hi, what Linux distribution is this? I think many distributors build separate kernel module packages for DRBD, so you may install this as well. For 09 Feb 2012 00:31:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23133 Hi, I am trying to install DRBD-8.3 on my linux box running 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-smp kernel. I install this drbd package drbd-8.3.9-20.1.x86_64.rpm on my 08 Feb 2012 23:25:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23132 On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:39:40AM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo 08 Feb 2012 07:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23131 On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:39:40AM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: > Greetings, > > I just tried to update to DRBD 8.4.1 (after having is 08 Feb 2012 06:53:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23130 On 02/07/2012 03:16 AM, Felix Frank wrote: > Hi, > > On 02/07/2012 08:36 AM, Jaap78 wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Normally DRBD writes changes from devic 07 Feb 2012 04:51:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23129 Hi, On 02/07/2012 08:36 AM, Jaap78 wrote: > > Hello, > > Normally DRBD writes changes from device /dev/drbd[x] to a lower level block > device (for 07 Feb 2012 00:16:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23128 Hello, Normally DRBD writes changes from device /dev/drbd[x] to a lower level block device (for example /dev/sda) and then submit it to the secondary 06 Feb 2012 23:36:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23127 We've seen similar issues on Debian Squeeze (2.6.32-5-xen-amd64) with DRBD 8.4.x which has led to us rolling back to the in kernel version (8.3.7), al 06 Feb 2012 09:00:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23126 Hi Lars and Everyone else, I put the no-disk-drain in the hope that it might help me find the problem. I leave it out on production. The run with 04 Feb 2012 01:14:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23125 On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa <ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com> wrote: > Update: the problem seems to go away with kernel 03 Feb 2012 19:53:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23124 Greetings, It looks like an update to DRBD 8.4.1 (with update to kernel 3.x) solved at least the issue with slow reads while writing. Just wanted to 03 Feb 2012 19:47:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23123 DRBD Users, Looking for some advise on performance implications as the number of drbd devices on a host increases. What is the trade off between:- 1. 03 Feb 2012 08:20:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23122