<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DRBD | Users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 11:30:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: drbd + flashcache</title>
<description>&amp;gt;On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Pascal BERTON &amp;lt;pascal.berton3@free.fr&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Florian, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve watched your video, very interesting indeed...</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 09:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23146</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: drbd + flashcache</title>
<description>On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:30 PM, Pascal BERTON &amp;lt;pascal.berton3@free.fr&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Florian, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve watched your video, very interesting indeed... Unfo</description>
<pubDate>12 Feb  2012 08:23:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23145</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: drbd + flashcache</title>
<description>Florian, I&amp;#039;ve watched your video, very interesting indeed... Unfortunately for you it raised some more questions to me :-) First, just to be sure I c</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 10:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23144</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: active-active over long distance (split-brains)</title>
<description>Well, we are using active/active because we have configured Automatic High Availability as well as live migration... But could force it to be managed</description>
<pubDate>11 Feb  2012 08:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23143</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: drbd + flashcache</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Maurits van de Lande &amp;lt;M.vandeLande@vdl-fittings.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m exploring the features of flashcache see</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 11:50:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23142</link>
</item><item>
<title>drbd + flashcache</title>
<description>Hello, I&amp;#039;m exploring the features of flashcache see: http://www.github.com/facebook/flashcache and I like it&amp;#039;s possibilities. Fortunately toracat fr</description>
<pubDate>10 Feb  2012 06:38:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23141</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: active-active over long distance (split-brains)</title>
<description>Hi, On Thursday 09 February 2012 19:39:02 José Román Bilbao wrote: &amp;gt; We have this scenario: &amp;gt; - A datacenter &amp;gt; - 1 Server running kvm VMs: &amp;gt;   * 1</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 13:20:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23140</link>
</item><item>
<title>active-active over long distance (split-brains)</title>
<description>Hi all, We have this scenario: - A datacenter - 1 Server running kvm VMs:   * 1 Openfiler to distribute hard disk to other VMs (stores VMs and VM</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 10:39:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23139</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Seeking extra info on loopback mounted devices</title>
<description>Thanks Florian.  While that does illustrate how convoluted the process becomes when you have so many layers (as in this case), it seems to me that it</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 05:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23138</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Seeking extra info on loopback mounted devices</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Justin Cattle &amp;lt;j@ocado.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Is this still the case - DRBD 8.3 (or even 8.4) using Linux 3.1 ? http://lists.</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 05:29:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23137</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Just trying to follow up on my post. Is there an obvious explanation as to why 8.3.12 seems to perform better than 8.4.1? Thx Fred On Fri, Feb 3</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 04:25:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23136</link>
</item><item>
<title>Seeking extra info on loopback mounted devices</title>
<description>Hi All,  I&amp;#039;ve read a few post regarding the possibilities of I/O deadlock if using a loopback mounted file as the storage layer for DRBD. I have a</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 03:08:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23135</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Any DRBD 8.3 package that work with kernel version 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-smp</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Felix Frank &amp;lt;ff@mpexnet.de&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; what Linux distribution is this? I think many distributors build &amp;gt; separa</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 02:57:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Any DRBD 8.3 package that work with kernel version 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-smp</title>
<description>Hi, what Linux distribution is this? I think many distributors build separate kernel module packages for DRBD, so you may install this as well. For</description>
<pubDate>09 Feb  2012 00:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23133</link>
</item><item>
<title>Any DRBD 8.3 package that work with kernel version 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-smp</title>
<description>Hi, I am trying to install DRBD-8.3 on my linux box running 2.6.16.60-0.54.5-smp kernel. I install this drbd package drbd-8.3.9-20.1.x86_64.rpm on my</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 23:25:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23132</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 10:23 AM, Lars Ellenberg &amp;lt;lars.ellenberg@linbit.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:39:40AM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 07:46:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23131</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:39:40AM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: &amp;gt; Greetings, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I just tried to update to DRBD 8.4.1 (after having is</description>
<pubDate>08 Feb  2012 06:53:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23130</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Changes from lower level block device</title>
<description>On 02/07/2012 03:16 AM, Felix Frank wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 02/07/2012 08:36 AM, Jaap78 wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Normally DRBD writes changes from devic</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 04:51:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23129</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Changes from lower level block device</title>
<description>Hi, On 02/07/2012 08:36 AM, Jaap78 wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Normally DRBD writes changes from device /dev/drbd[x] to a lower level block &amp;gt; device (for</description>
<pubDate>07 Feb  2012 00:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23128</link>
</item><item>
<title>Changes from lower level block device</title>
<description>Hello, Normally DRBD writes changes from device /dev/drbd[x] to a lower level block device (for example /dev/sda) and then submit it to the secondary</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 23:36:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23127</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>We&amp;#039;ve seen similar issues on Debian Squeeze (2.6.32-5-xen-amd64) with DRBD 8.4.x which has led to us rolling back to the in kernel version (8.3.7), al</description>
<pubDate>06 Feb  2012 09:00:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23126</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Weird DRBD performance problem</title>
<description>Hi Lars and Everyone else,  I put the no-disk-drain in the hope that it might help me find the problem. I leave it out on production.  The run with</description>
<pubDate>04 Feb  2012 01:14:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23125</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa &amp;lt;ildefonso.camargo@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Update: the problem seems to go away with kernel</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 19:53:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23124</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Read performance goes really low while writing.</title>
<description>Greetings, It looks like an update to DRBD 8.4.1 (with update to kernel 3.x) solved at least the issue with slow reads while writing. Just wanted to</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 19:47:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23123</link>
</item><item>
<title>Practical limit on number of paired devices on 2 hosts</title>
<description>DRBD Users, Looking for some advise on performance implications as the number of drbd devices on a host increases. What is the trade off between:- 1.</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 08:20:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23122</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hello, On 02/03/2012 04:35 PM, Felix Frank wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 02/03/2012 04:05 PM, Owen Le Blanc wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; This still &amp;gt;&amp;gt; leaves open the question o</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 07:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23121</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hi, On 02/03/2012 04:05 PM, Owen Le Blanc wrote: &amp;gt; This still &amp;gt; leaves open the question of why split brain keeps occuring? The &amp;gt; cluster is managed</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 07:35:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23120</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Lars Thanks for your answer. I restarted a bunch of tests using DRBD 8.3.12 and DRBD 8.4.1 - Scientific Linux 64 bits with Kernel 2.6.32-220.4.1</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 07:08:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23119</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Felix Frank wrote: &amp;gt; please watch the kernel log output during the time of connecting. It &amp;gt; would indicate a split-brain if there is one. If there is</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 07:05:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23118</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hello, On 02/03/2012 03:05 PM, Owen Le Blanc wrote: &amp;gt; Kaloyan Kovachev wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; what does &amp;#039;cat /proc/drbd&amp;#039; say at this moment on both nodes? &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 06:29:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23117</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Kaloyan Kovachev wrote: &amp;gt; what does &amp;#039;cat /proc/drbd&amp;#039; say at this moment on both nodes? on the primary: &amp;gt; cat /proc/drbd version: 8.4.1 (api:1/proto</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 06:05:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23116</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Hi, please watch the kernel log output during the time of connecting. It would indicate a split-brain if there is one. If there is, follow the steps</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 05:22:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23115</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 13:11:14 +0000, Owen Le Blanc &amp;lt;LeBlanc@man.ac.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Kaloyan Kovachev wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; You have got a split brain. Outdate then s</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 05:15:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23114</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>Kaloyan Kovachev wrote: &amp;gt; You have got a split brain. Outdate then stop drbd on the secondary -&amp;gt; do &amp;gt; (re)connect on the primary -&amp;gt; start secondary a</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 05:11:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23113</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: URGENT: DRBD bring up for first time failed with sync error.</title>
<description>Hi, I got the drbd version 8.4.1 and OS- centos 6.2. -Vengatesh Prabhu On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Peter Niessen &amp;lt;niessen@par-tec.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 04:52:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23112</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>On Fri, 3 Feb 2012 10:57:56 +0000, Owen Le Blanc &amp;lt;LeBlanc@man.ac.uk&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I have a test system using a linux kernel 3.0.0 with drbd 8.4.1 to try &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 03:44:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23111</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problem with drbd 8.4.1 on linux kernel 3.0.0</title>
<description>I have a test system using a linux kernel 3.0.0 with drbd 8.4.1 to try using the new feature with two volumes in one resource. The difficulty I have</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 02:57:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: URGENT: DRBD bring up for first time failed with sync error.</title>
<description>Where did you get the drbd packages? Which OS is used? Cheers, Peter. On 02/03/12 11:15, venkatesh prabhu wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; I am trying to bring up DRB</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 02:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23109</link>
</item><item>
<title>URGENT: DRBD bring up for first time failed with sync error.</title>
<description>Hi, I am trying to bring up DRBD for first time and i am getting sync error. Please help me to get rid of this issue. I followed following steps. 1.</description>
<pubDate>03 Feb  2012 02:15:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23108</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>On 02/02/12 21:29, Richard Baverstock wrote: &amp;gt; I found the checksum based sync last night after sending the email - &amp;gt; thanks for pointing it out thoug</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 14:08:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23107</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>I found the checksum based sync last night after sending the email - thanks for pointing it out though. I&amp;#039;m doing the sync now. Is there any way to s</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 12:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23106</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Read performance goes really low while writing.</title>
<description>On 02/01/2012 05:16 PM, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: &amp;gt; Greetings, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m doing some experimentation with DRBD and relatively low speed &amp;gt; link</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 08:14:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23105</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>Update: the problem seems to go away with kernel 3.0. I still need to do more testing, but apparently the kernel update did the trick. After finishin</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 08:07:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23104</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Read performance goes really low while writing.</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:23 AM, Lars Ellenberg &amp;lt;lars.ellenberg@linbit.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:46:54PM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo T</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 08:05:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23103</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Confused about no-disk-drain</title>
<description>----- Original Message ----- &amp;gt; From: &amp;quot;Lars Ellenberg&amp;quot; &amp;lt;lars.ellenberg@linbit.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; To: drbd-user@lists.linbit.com &amp;gt; Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2012</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 07:55:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23102</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Confused about no-disk-drain</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:27:05AM -0500, Jake Smith wrote: &amp;gt; Lars, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I didn&amp;#039;t want to hijack a different thread so I started a new one. I &amp;gt; want</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 07:37:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23101</link>
</item><item>
<title>Confused about no-disk-drain</title>
<description>Lars, I didn&amp;#039;t want to hijack a different thread so I started a new one. I want to understand better why you said in another thread today not to use</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 07:27:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23100</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 02:24:08PM +0000, Frederic DeMarcy wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Lars &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m usinng 8.4.1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [root@server1 ~]# service drbd status &amp;gt; drbd dr</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:31:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23099</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Lars I&amp;#039;m usinng 8.4.1 [root@server1 ~]# service drbd status drbd driver loaded OK; device status: version: 8.4.1 (api:1/proto:86-100) Fred  On</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:24:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23098</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 03:11:44PM +0100, Felix Frank wrote: &amp;gt; On 02/02/2012 02:58 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Technically, if you&amp;#039;d manipulate the</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:19:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23097</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:18:25PM +0100, Andreas Kurz wrote: &amp;gt; On 02/01/2012 05:15 PM, Frederic DeMarcy wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi Andrea &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Commenting out</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:15:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23096</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>On 02/02/2012 02:58 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Technically, if you&amp;#039;d manipulate the local metadata to make your UUID &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt; 36357CED276F2436, DRBD wou</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:11:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23095</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Weird DRBD performance problem</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 06:04:18PM -0700, Roof, Morey R. wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Everyone, &amp;gt;  &amp;gt; I have a DRBD performance problem that has got me completely conf</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 06:11:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23094</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 10:06:51AM +0100, Felix Frank wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 02/02/2012 08:45 AM, Richard Baverstock wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering if there&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 05:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23093</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Read performance goes really low while writing.</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 08:46:54PM -0430, Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote: &amp;gt; Greetings, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m doing some experimentation with DRBD and relative</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 05:53:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23092</link>
</item><item>
<title>Kernel error message with drbd 8.4.1</title>
<description>Greetings, I just tried to update to DRBD 8.4.1 (after having issues with 8.3.7 : it would freeze reads while it was writing, see may other thread fo</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 05:09:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23091</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Choreography for db storage consistency check use case</title>
<description>Hi, (going back on-list) On 02/02/2012 12:31 PM, John Anthony wrote: &amp;gt; The application is just a consistency check - so do not mind discarding &amp;gt; the</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 04:46:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23090</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (off topic) alternative to drbd</title>
<description>&amp;gt; not quite true: &amp;gt; stor1 fails -&amp;gt; VM keeps using stor2 -&amp;gt; power outage (all machines are &amp;gt; down) -&amp;gt; stor1 boots faster and VM starts using it ... oo</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 04:35:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23089</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Urgent: Stuch with DRBD bring up.</title>
<description>FYI. On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Andreas Kurz &amp;lt;andreas@hastexo.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ... don&amp;#039;t forget to post to the group. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On 01/30/2012</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 04:20:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23088</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Urgent: Stuch with DRBD bring up.</title>
<description>Hello, ... don&amp;#039;t forget to post to the group. On 01/30/2012 01:06 PM, venkatesh prabhu wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Andreas, &amp;gt; Thanks for your quick reply. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 04:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23087</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Andreas Thank you. Couldn&amp;#039;t try &amp;quot;drbdadm invalidate-remote mysql&amp;quot; because when both nodes are connected it forces a sync (SyncSource &amp;gt; SyncTarget</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 03:37:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23086</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Pascal Thank you. I think the speed difference comes from how the ext4 filesystems were created... On /dev/sda, /home, /opt, /var, /tmp, /usr are</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 03:30:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: (off topic) alternative to drbd</title>
<description>On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:24:15 -0500 (EST), &amp;quot;John Lauro&amp;quot; &amp;lt;john.lauro@covenanteyes.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I apologize for the off topic discussion. If there is a</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 02:40:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23084</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Archlinux packaging</title>
<description>On 01/02/2012 19:30, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 05:58:48PM +0100, Seblu wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Why there is a global version and not only api</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 01:43:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Choreography for db storage consistency check use case</title>
<description>Hi, On 02/02/2012 12:03 AM, John Anthony wrote: &amp;gt; 1) If the use case feasible ? Assuming YES! No. Sorry. The moment you promote the disconnected Sec</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 01:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23082</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>Hi, On 02/02/2012 08:45 AM, Richard Baverstock wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering if there&amp;#039;s anything we can do to get drbd to recognize the &amp;gt; data that is curre</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb  2012 01:06:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23081</link>
</item><item>
<title>Full resync after reboot</title>
<description>I have drbd set up to replicate data between two servers. One of these servers unfortunately kernel panic&amp;#039;d and rebooted. After coming back online, th</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 23:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23080</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Thanks for the informative read Florian. Martin, I agree with you that a hardware based shared storage solution is ideal but our budget doesn&amp;#039;t allo</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 22:38:09 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23078</link>
</item><item>
<title>(off topic) alternative to drbd</title>
<description>I apologize for the off topic discussion. If there is a more general list about the dozens of network storage options please point me in the right di</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 19:24:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23077</link>
</item><item>
<title>Read performance goes really low while writing.</title>
<description>Greetings, I&amp;#039;m doing some experimentation with DRBD and relatively low speed links (~30Mbps), with latency around 34ms. I have this: 1. DRBD versio</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 17:16:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23076</link>
</item><item>
<title>Weird DRBD performance problem</title>
<description>Hi Everyone,  I have a DRBD performance problem that has got me completely confused. I hoping that someone can help with this one as my other server</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 17:04:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23075</link>
</item><item>
<title>Choreography for db storage consistency check use case</title>
<description>All: Fairly new to DRBD, so request patience with framing the question itself. Net Net - want to &amp;quot;use&amp;quot; secondary DRBD storage to start up the databa</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 15:03:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23079</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>On 02/01/2012 05:15 PM, Frederic DeMarcy wrote: &amp;gt; Hi Andrea &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Commenting out &amp;quot;csum-alg&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t seem to make any noticeable difference... &amp;gt; However</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 13:18:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23074</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: drbd 8.3.12 cannot get syncer speed beyond 110MB/s</title>
<description>Hello, On 02/01/2012 01:36 PM, Maurits van de Lande wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have asked this question before for drbd 8.4.1 but I couldn&amp;#039;t get proper w</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 12:50:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Antwort: Re: question about start drbd on single node after a power outage</title>
<description>Thanks Robert and Kaloyan. I use same command as Robert mentioned when solve the problem manually.  I tried split brain auto resolve settings. See</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 10:58:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23070</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Archlinux packaging</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 05:58:48PM +0100, Seblu wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I doesn&amp;#039;t try to build module! Unfortunatly, building userland check &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; kernel version.</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 10:30:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23069</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Frederic,   Paravirtual SCSI is supposed to be fully efficient passed a given level of IOPS, under that level of activity an LSI SAS adapter used to</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 10:00:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Archlinux packaging</title>
<description>On 01/02/2012 14:42, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:48:18PM +0100, Seblu wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 30/01/2012 17:14, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:58:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23068</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>d, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Lawrence Strydom &amp;lt;qholloi@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi List. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am having trouble mounting my drbd device on the seccondary n</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:32:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23066</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>On 1-2-2012 16:56, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Martin, &amp;gt;&amp;gt;    &amp;gt;   &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m actually running a dual-active Samba server with a shared GFS2 &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:30:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23065</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Pascal 1) Both vdisks for /dev/sda and /dev/sdb are on the same datastore which is made of the entire RAID5 array capacity (7xHDs + 1 spare). Minu</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:19:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Andrea Commenting out &amp;quot;csum-alg&amp;quot; doesn&amp;#039;t seem to make any noticeable difference... However commenting out &amp;quot;data-integrity-alg&amp;quot; and running Test #2</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 08:15:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Martin, &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m actually running a dual-active Samba server with a shared GFS2 &amp;gt; file-system (block-replicated by DR:BD). I&amp;#039;m also (ab)using it for</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:56:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23063</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Martin, I&amp;#039;m actually running a dual-active Samba server with a shared GFS2 file-system (block-replicated by DR:BD). I&amp;#039;m also (ab)using it for an Ap</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 07:30:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Am 01.02.12 14:59, schrieb Felix Frank: &amp;gt; On 02/01/2012 02:44 PM, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Every time somebody recommends to use Pacemaker w</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:38:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23061</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: drbd 8.3.12 cannot get syncer speed beyond 110MB/s</title>
<description>Maurits, I faced this issue some times ago. After a few hours scratching my head, my eyes stopped by luck on one small line in /var/log/messages amon</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 06:06:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23071</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>On 02/01/2012 02:44 PM, Martin Gerhard Loschwitz wrote: &amp;gt; Every time somebody recommends to use Pacemaker with &amp;gt; OCFS2, god kills a kitten. News to m</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23060</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hello, On 02/01/2012 01:04 PM, Frederic DeMarcy wrote: &amp;gt; Hi &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Note 1: &amp;gt; Scientific Linux 6.1 with kernel 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 &amp;gt; DRBD 8.4.1 co</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:48:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23057</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On 02/01/2012 12:38 PM, Lawrence Strydom wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi Felix. &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My setup is, supposed to be, fairly straightforward. Two web servers, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; one in</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23059</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Archlinux packaging</title>
<description>On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:48:18PM +0100, Seblu wrote: &amp;gt; On 30/01/2012 17:14, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Sebl</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:42:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23056</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>&amp;gt; On 02/01/2012 12:38 PM, Lawrence Strydom wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi Felix. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; My setup is, supposed to be, fairly straightforward. Two web servers, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; on</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 05:34:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23058</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Ah sorry for the cc oversite. Network policies pretty much block me from any funky moves so it seems I will be going with the dual primary, OCFS2, Fe</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:42:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23055</link>
</item><item>
<title>drbd 8.3.12 cannot get syncer speed beyond 110MB/s</title>
<description>Hello, I have asked this question before for drbd 8.4.1 but I couldn&amp;#039;t get proper write performance. Currently I downgraded drbd to 8.3.12 but I cann</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:36:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23054</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Hi Lawrence, please be careful to CC the list (everyone&amp;#039;s hearing half a conversation otherwise ;-) On 02/01/2012 12:38 PM, Lawrence Strydom wrote:</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:19:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23053</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>Hi Note 1: Scientific Linux 6.1 with kernel 2.6.32-220.4.1.el6.x86_64 DRBD 8.4.1 compiled from source Note 2: server1 and server2 are 2 VMware VMs o</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 04:04:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23052</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Archlinux packaging</title>
<description>On 30/01/2012 17:14, Lars Ellenberg wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:52:57AM +0100, Seblu wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; i&amp;#039;m working on adding drbd userspa</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 03:48:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23051</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Hi again, On 02/01/2012 10:49 AM, Lawrence Strydom wrote: &amp;gt; woow ohkay. Thanks Felix. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; So that means I will have to use pacemaker or something si</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 02:55:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23050</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Hi! On 02/01/2012 10:02 AM, Lawrence Strydom wrote: &amp;gt; Hi List. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am having trouble mounting my drbd device on the seccondary node. It &amp;gt; mounts</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 01:43:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23049</link>
</item><item>
<title>can&amp;#039;t mount on secondary node</title>
<description>Hi List. I am having trouble mounting my drbd device on the seccondary node. It mounts fine on the primary but when i try and mount it on the seccon</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 01:02:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23048</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slower disk throughput on DRBD partition</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve configured DRBD with a view to use it with MySQL (and later on &amp;gt; Pacemaker + Corosync) in a 2 nodes primary/secondary &amp;gt; (master/slave)</description>
<pubDate>01 Feb  2012 00:35:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/drbd/users/23047</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

