mrraptor98 at hotmail
Jul 12, 2011, 10:43 AM
Post #4 of 5
(415 views)
Permalink
|
|
Re: Average Inbox Load Times (Eric Hiller)
[In reply to]
|
|
I don't have the size column, but imapproxy and roundcube seem like they are worth a try. I really like roundcube, I just know it will be a nightmere to switch to for our customers.
> From: jesse [at] kci
> To: dbmail [at] dbmail
> Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:16:58 -0600
> Subject: Re: [Dbmail] Average Inbox Load Times (Eric Hiller)
>
> Also iirc the "Size" column in the display requires it to actually
> download every message to calculate the size, so should run faster
> without that (though maybe that's only older dbmail versions ?)
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 22:04 +1000, Jake Anderson wrote:
> > are you using imapproxy? it'll speed up squirrelmail a fair bit.
> >
> > On 07/12/2011 09:44 PM, Daniel Schütze wrote:
> > > Eric
> > >
> > > For reference we are running dbmail 2.2.x and one account I just tested with
> > > 5,000 messages in the inbox loaded the Squirrel Mail interface (i.e.. showing
> > > the inbox listing) in about 4 seconds.
> > >
> > > This was of course over the LAN and so there is no chance of any networking
> > > issues cropping up.
> > >
> > > I should say though that we find Squirrel mail with dbmail 2.2.x incredibly
> > > slow if there are a lot of mail folders and it can take a minute or more for
> > > some users to access their accounts. To access the same account with, say,
> > > roundcubemail takes a fraction of the time.
> > >
> > > Daniel
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Message: 1
> > > Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 16:38:44 -0500
> > > From: Eric Hiller<mrraptor98 [at] hotmail>
> > > Subject: [Dbmail] Average Inbox Load Times
> > > To:<dbmail [at] dbmail>
> > > Message-ID:<BLU166-w4586C1250481DF58AD538DB450 [at] phx>
> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> > >
> > >
> > > We are using squirrelmail currently for the front end with dbmail 2.2 and
> > > currently the mail interface seems slow. I was wondering what you all
> > > typically saw for load times with ~900 messages in the Inbox? I am just
> > > trying to figure if our page load times can be increased at this point
> > > before I start doing serious investigation.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > -Eric
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > DBmail mailing list
> > > DBmail [at] dbmail
> > > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DBmail mailing list
> > DBmail [at] dbmail
> > http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>
>
> --
> Jesse Norell
> Kentec Communications, Inc.
> jesse [at] kci
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmail [at] dbmail
> http://mailman.fastxs.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
|
