marc at electronics-design
Apr 16, 2008, 7:22 AM
Post #3 of 3
(227 views)
Permalink
|
No!
Apart from my dislike of perl syntax (pike resembles C),
I have the same issue about no use to have another interpreter,
as Roxen Webserver already is running on pike.
You are however free to use the source and rewrite it in perl ;)
Marc
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 02:29:04PM +0200, Simon Lange wrote:
> Good Idea, but i would prefer perl. No need for installing another
> interpreter if perl is already aboard.
> You may have a perl version?
>
> Simon
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: dbmail-bounces[at]dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bounces[at]dbmail.org] Im Auftrag
> von Marc Dirix
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. April 2008 13:41
> An: DBMail mailinglist
> Betreff: [Dbmail] Dummy pop3-server
>
> As someone already requested, I also needed a dummy pop3 server
> for maintainance (database upgrade).
>
> I've created a small pike script, that does just that.
> For those interested it can be found here:
>
> http://www.dirix.nu/dummypop.pike.gz
>
> You need to have a running pike interpreter installed
>
> It takes optionally 2 parameters:
>
> -p <port> bind port default 110
> -i <ip> bind ip, default all IP's.
>
> The script does not check authentication, and is not able to do apop.
> I had however no complaints during my maintainance round.
>
>
> Marc
> _______________________________________________
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmail[at]dbmail.org
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
>
_______________________________________________
DBmail mailing list
DBmail[at]dbmail.org
https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mailman/listinfo/dbmail
|
