Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 19:21:23 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Also make sure that your MySQL is not 5.1.23 from packages or ports. I had an issue with the sorting of large result sets losing rows. I had the iss 16 May 2008 17:58:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25453 Hi Everyone, Does anyone know what has happened to the dbmail admin website - http://dbma.mobrien.com ? It seems to have been down for at least a co 16 May 2008 17:14:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25452 Thanks Jon and all others for your great suggestions. As Jon said, I'm drawing towards the conclusion that the issue was with some bug or incompatibi 16 May 2008 09:06:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25451 > I'm not 100% sure, but I think these are MyISAM only. I think the > roughly equivalent InnoDB setting is: > > innodb_buffer_pool = 1024M It is myis 16 May 2008 03:16:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25450 Hi, I've written a patch for pop3 and imap to rewrite usernames similar to this request, it reduced support emails/calls/tickets by 25% :P. Perhaps 15 May 2008 15:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25449 Hi all. Thanks for all your suggestions on my last question. Now I have another question. Is there a way to specify dbmail pop/imap to ignore domain 15 May 2008 15:23:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25448 You could prolly use centos 5 version of postfix what comes with mysql and pgsql support. RHEL5 is based to FC6 and centos5 = rhel5 Same time you cou 15 May 2008 14:30:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25447 James, my earlier post illustrates how the dbmailDomain objectClass might by of use. There is no 'supposed-to' in the ldap world. It is strictly a co 15 May 2008 09:36:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25443 Hi Everyone, Could someone please explain to me how to the LDAP dbmailDomain object class is supposed to work? >From what I can see, it is des 15 May 2008 05:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25441 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:14 +0200, Daniel Urstöger wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > > > > > But who could h 14 May 2008 22:48:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25439 Do Not use Mysql 5.1.23-rc on FreeBSD from ports/packages!!! Use 5.1.22. I ran into an issue where order by's were causing data from the result sets 14 May 2008 22:39:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25438 Michael Mayer wrote: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j > > Do I have to add those 100 testusers and ma 14 May 2008 14:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25436 Paul J Stevens wrote: > formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j Do I have to add those 100 testusers and mailboxes first or will that 14 May 2008 12:20:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25435 Michael Mayer wrote: > dbmail@bobich.net wrote: >> But if you can empirically demonstrate that over-indexing >> signifficantly slows down the typical 14 May 2008 11:32:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25434 I wish this came up 3 weeks ago. Just before I migrated to dbmail, I purged all of my spam - all 2GB of it (100K-150K messages, IIRC). I figured the 14 May 2008 09:42:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25433 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > But if you can empirically demonstrate that over-indexing signifficantly > slows down the typical (mostly read) workload o 14 May 2008 09:36:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25432 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Michael Mayer wrote: > In contrast, storing the messages in a very ineffectively clustered way, like > it currently seems to be 14 May 2008 05:28:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25429 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > I'm still not convinced that over-indexing is harmful in this case. In > general, too many indices is better than too few, 14 May 2008 05:17:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25428 > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > >> But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list? >> Then, >> you 14 May 2008 05:14:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25427 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list? Then, > you should thin 14 May 2008 05:06:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25426 I'm still not convinced that over-indexing is harmful in this case. In general, too many indices is better than too few, and even if the data fits i 14 May 2008 04:57:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25425 Michael Mayer wrote: > An interesting idea for performance improvement of the messages table > would be a PRIMARY KEY consisting of mailbox_idnr and 14 May 2008 04:50:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25424 Hi there, one more word on database performance: If you got an index on the mailbox id and the data is even clustered, then most of the other index 14 May 2008 04:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25423 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Michael Mayer wrote: >> But especially the messages >> table seems to be over-indexed. > > Please propose a better index setu 14 May 2008 04:06:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25422 Aaron Stone wrote: >> the imap parser is already hooked up into dbmail-export. Shouldn't be >> too hard to do the same for dbmail-smtp/dbmail-deliver 14 May 2008 01:07:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25421