Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 16 May 2008 14:48:51 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Thanks Jon and all others for your great suggestions. As Jon said, I'm drawing towards the conclusion that the issue was with some bug or incompatibi 16 May 2008 09:06:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25451 > I'm not 100% sure, but I think these are MyISAM only. I think the > roughly equivalent InnoDB setting is: > > innodb_buffer_pool = 1024M It is myis 16 May 2008 03:16:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25450 Hi, I've written a patch for pop3 and imap to rewrite usernames similar to this request, it reduced support emails/calls/tickets by 25% :P. Perhaps 15 May 2008 15:46:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25449 Hi all. Thanks for all your suggestions on my last question. Now I have another question. Is there a way to specify dbmail pop/imap to ignore domain 15 May 2008 15:23:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25448 You could prolly use centos 5 version of postfix what comes with mysql and pgsql support. RHEL5 is based to FC6 and centos5 = rhel5 Same time you cou 15 May 2008 14:30:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25447 James, my earlier post illustrates how the dbmailDomain objectClass might by of use. There is no 'supposed-to' in the ldap world. It is strictly a co 15 May 2008 09:36:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25443 Hi Everyone, Could someone please explain to me how to the LDAP dbmailDomain object class is supposed to work? >From what I can see, it is des 15 May 2008 05:19:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25441 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:14 +0200, Daniel Urstöger wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > > > > > But who could h 14 May 2008 22:48:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25439 Do Not use Mysql 5.1.23-rc on FreeBSD from ports/packages!!! Use 5.1.22. I ran into an issue where order by's were causing data from the result sets 14 May 2008 22:39:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25438 Michael Mayer wrote: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j > > Do I have to add those 100 testusers and ma 14 May 2008 14:06:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25436 Paul J Stevens wrote: > formail -ds dbmail-smtp -u testuser$i -m mailbox$j Do I have to add those 100 testusers and mailboxes first or will that 14 May 2008 12:20:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25435 Michael Mayer wrote: > dbmail@bobich.net wrote: >> But if you can empirically demonstrate that over-indexing >> signifficantly slows down the typical 14 May 2008 11:32:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25434 I wish this came up 3 weeks ago. Just before I migrated to dbmail, I purged all of my spam - all 2GB of it (100K-150K messages, IIRC). I figured the 14 May 2008 09:42:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25433 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > But if you can empirically demonstrate that over-indexing signifficantly > slows down the typical (mostly read) workload o 14 May 2008 09:36:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25432 On Wed, 14 May 2008, Michael Mayer wrote: > In contrast, storing the messages in a very ineffectively clustered way, like > it currently seems to be 14 May 2008 05:28:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25429 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > I'm still not convinced that over-indexing is harmful in this case. In > general, too many indices is better than too few, 14 May 2008 05:17:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25428 > > On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > >> But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list? >> Then, >> you 14 May 2008 05:14:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25427 On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 13:32 +0200, Michael Mayer wrote: > But who could have such a large mailbox? Anyone here on this list? Then, > you should thin 14 May 2008 05:06:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25426 I'm still not convinced that over-indexing is harmful in this case. In general, too many indices is better than too few, and even if the data fits i 14 May 2008 04:57:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25425 Michael Mayer wrote: > An interesting idea for performance improvement of the messages table > would be a PRIMARY KEY consisting of mailbox_idnr and 14 May 2008 04:50:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25424 Hi there, one more word on database performance: If you got an index on the mailbox id and the data is even clustered, then most of the other index 14 May 2008 04:32:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25423 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Michael Mayer wrote: >> But especially the messages >> table seems to be over-indexed. > > Please propose a better index setu 14 May 2008 04:06:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25422 Aaron Stone wrote: >> the imap parser is already hooked up into dbmail-export. Shouldn't be >> too hard to do the same for dbmail-smtp/dbmail-deliver 14 May 2008 01:07:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25421 Hi Khanh I don't know the exact scenario how your MySQL halts though, it may be caused by the bug in the MySQL's query optimizer. If you see a query 13 May 2008 17:38:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25419 > I've attached the my.cnf we're using in a hope that my config tweaks can > help others. For comparison my hardware is 3Gb RAM, Celeron 3GHz on > lin 13 May 2008 15:47:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25418 I don't know if the original problem here was actually tracked to the database or just guessing there, but another thing to check is logging. Eg. if y 13 May 2008 15:44:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25417 Hi, I found with our installation that 100 concurrent connections isn't unusual, especially during peak usage times. We've set our max connections 13 May 2008 15:33:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25416 On May 13, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote: > Aaron Stone wrote: >> >> On May 13, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote: >>> Bert Slagter wrot 13 May 2008 14:20:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25414 Aaron Stone wrote: > > On May 13, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Bert Slagter wrote: >> >>> As far as I understand from the man pages dbm 13 May 2008 13:46:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25413 On May 13, 2008, at 6:01 AM, Paul J Stevens wrote: > Bert Slagter wrote: > >> As far as I understand from the man pages dbmail-smtp allows me to >> 13 May 2008 11:59:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25412 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > On Tue, 13 May 2008, Michael Mayer wrote: >> A cluster always is the last thing that helps. I did not recommend >> that. B 13 May 2008 11:38:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25411 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Michael Mayer wrote: >> But especially the messages >> table seems to be over-indexed. > > Please propose a better index setu 13 May 2008 10:29:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25410 Michael Mayer wrote: > But especially the messages > table seems to be over-indexed. Please propose a better index setup. -- ____________________ 13 May 2008 10:14:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25409 On Tue, 13 May 2008, Michael Mayer wrote: > dbmail@bobich.net wrote: >> Unlikely, unless you have more writes than reads, which would be rather >> u 13 May 2008 10:04:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25408 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > Unlikely, unless you have more writes than reads, which would be rather > unusual for most applications. :) An index on a 13 May 2008 09:54:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25407 On Tue, 13 May 2008, Michael Mayer wrote: > khanh.truong@1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote: >> My question is: does the schema that comes with DBMail already hav 13 May 2008 09:16:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25406 khanh.truong@1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote: > My question is: does the schema that comes with DBMail already have indexing defined in it or do I have to do my 13 May 2008 09:10:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25405 khanh.truong@1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote: > Hi, > > We've been testing DBMail for a few months now and did a test launch > yesterday. We have about 850 pop 13 May 2008 09:07:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25404 On Tue, 13 May 2008, khanh.truong@1800GOTJUNK.COM wrote: > We've been testing DBMail for a few months now and did a test launch > yesterday. We have 13 May 2008 09:07:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25403 Hi, We've been testing DBMail for a few months now and did a test launch yesterday. We have about 850 pop3/imap users accessing through the webmail, 13 May 2008 08:46:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25402 Bert Slagter wrote: > As far as I understand from the man pages dbmail-smtp allows me to let > dbmail deliver a message to a user. So I'm afraid this 13 May 2008 06:01:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25401 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Bert Slagter wrote: > >> My conclusion is that we'll have to switch to IMAP APPEND as soon as >> possible. One big issue fo 13 May 2008 04:49:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25400 On Montag, 12. Mai 2008 Michael Mayer wrote: > I think using lookup tables is still the better option for high > traffic servers, because most of the 12 May 2008 15:21:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25398 Paul J Stevens <paul <at> nfg.nl> writes: > > > Peter, > > I see you filed the bug reports. But why are you filing them both twice? > > Peter Mil 12 May 2008 07:03:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25397 Peter Rabbitson wrote: > Just FYI - make sure to add proxy: to all your mysql lookups just like > Josh Marshall did here > http://www.mail-archive. 12 May 2008 04:13:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25386 Aleksander Kamenik wrote: > <snip> > > As for the postfix configuration, it looks like this for me, I'm pretty > sure I found it in the dbmail READ 12 May 2008 02:32:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25385 Peter, I see you filed the bug reports. But why are you filing them both twice? Peter Milesson wrote: > Paul J Stevens <paul <at> nfg.nl> writes: > 12 May 2008 02:11:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25383 My solution: Aleksander Kamenik schrieb: > Michael Mayer wrote: > > > mail:/etc/postfix # grep local_recipient_maps main.cf > local_recipient_maps 11 May 2008 23:52:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25377 Aleksander Kamenik wrote: > It's fast enough. If you need postfx-mysql, download and install the > Fedora postfix srpm and look into the spec file. Y 11 May 2008 16:53:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25376 Michael Mayer wrote: > I think I can remember a way for > Postfix to access MySQL directly, but this might be slow plus you need > compiled-in MySQ 11 May 2008 16:36:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25375 Hi Michael, Accessing MySQL directly isn't slow, possibly slower than a lookup table, however the email will eventually need to be inserted into the 11 May 2008 15:17:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25374 Paul J Stevens <paul <at> nfg.nl> writes: > > Peter, > > Please file seperate bugreports for both issues in the tracker - with > level=5 logs if po 11 May 2008 13:58:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25373 Peter, Please file seperate bugreports for both issues in the tracker - with level=5 logs if possible. They help a lot in tracking down problems, and 11 May 2008 12:36:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25372 Hi there, I'm pretty sure there are other solutions to create lookup tables for Postfix as well, but want to share my script with the community anyw 11 May 2008 07:42:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25371 Hi folks, When I copy messages from Thunderbird mbox-folders to the IMAP folders in DBMail, the first messages are copied OK, but after a few message 11 May 2008 04:52:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25370 Bert Slagter wrote: > > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Inserting messages into the database directly (without respecting the >> cache tables) is a /bad/ id 09 May 2008 07:46:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25369 Great, I'll be watching it's release. > -----Original Message----- > From: dbmail-bounces@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bounces@dbmail.org] On > Behalf O 09 May 2008 06:23:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25368 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Inserting messages into the database directly (without respecting the > cache tables) is a /bad/ idea. I've said so before man 09 May 2008 06:12:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25367 Jorge Bastos wrote: > To when 2.3.3? I’d love to try the new threading code on my testing > server (no more tests on production server J ) I don' 09 May 2008 02:23:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25366 Hi Paul, To when 2.3.3? I'd love to try the new threading code on my testing server (no more tests on production server J ) Jorge 09 May 2008 02:04:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25365 Bert Slagter wrote: > Hello all, > > Using a webmail client I insert messages in the database directly > (dbmail_messages, dbmail_physmessage, dbmail 09 May 2008 00:40:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25364 Hello all, Using a webmail client I insert messages in the database directly (dbmail_messages, dbmail_physmessage, dbmail_messageblks). DBMail 2.2 ha 08 May 2008 23:56:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25363 Josh Marshall wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Attached is the schema dump. I do see constraints on the tables, maybe > they're incorrect? Looking good. -- 08 May 2008 23:46:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25362 I think I found the problem with having 100,000 emails not deleted (but don't know why) If I run dbmail-util -ay it deletes about 10,000-15,000, no 08 May 2008 20:41:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25361 Hi Paul, Attached is the schema dump. I do see constraints on the tables, maybe they're incorrect? Thanks, Josh. Paul J Stevens wrote: > Please se 08 May 2008 15:04:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25360 Josh, Please send a schema dump (mysqldump -d dbmail) Sounds like your foreign key constraints aren't in place. Josh Marshall wrote: > Hi all, > 08 May 2008 00:18:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25359 Hi all, When running /usr/sbin/dbmail-util -ay each night, I get a lot of messages deleted: Deleting messages with DELETE status... Ok. [18657] me 07 May 2008 17:05:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25358 On Tue, 6 May 2008, Gordon Hay wrote: > On Tue, 6 May 2008, Gordon Hay wrote: > >>> I upgraded my server from Fedora FC6 to FC8, and all seemed OK at 06 May 2008 03:35:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25357 On Tue, 6 May 2008, Gordon Hay wrote: > > I upgraded my server from Fedora FC6 to FC8, and all seemed OK at the > > end of the process. DBMAIL (2.2. 06 May 2008 03:28:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25356 Gordon Hay wrote: > I upgraded my server from Fedora FC6 to FC8, and all seemed OK at the > end of the process. DBMAIL (2.2.10) continues to work as 06 May 2008 02:43:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25355 On Tue, 6 May 2008, Gordon Hay wrote: > I upgraded my server from Fedora FC6 to FC8, and all seemed OK at the > end of the process. DBMAIL (2.2.10) 06 May 2008 02:42:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25354 I upgraded my server from Fedora FC6 to FC8, and all seemed OK at the end of the process. DBMAIL (2.2.10) continues to work as expected. But a subse 06 May 2008 02:30:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25353 Thomas Raschbacher wrote: > any reason why this is not announced on the main dbmail page yet? Yes there was... fixed now. -- ___________________ 05 May 2008 05:15:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25352 any reason why this is not announced on the main dbmail page yet? On Mon, 2008-03-24 at 16:28 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MES 05 May 2008 04:15:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25351 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: | On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Alan Hodgson wrote: | |>> Tis a good question ... I don 02 May 2008 10:57:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25349 That is a system user for DBMail wich has to exist. Insert this SQL's: # create the user for the delivery chain INSERT INTO dbmail_users (userid, pa 01 May 2008 05:50:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25339 Hi Paul, Thanks for your help - very much appreciated! BUT!!! I get the following error in mailog when I try to send a message to myself: May 1 20 01 May 2008 04:42:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25338 I believe you mean dis-adventages :P > Your best way, is to get over the sendmail advantages, and > start using postfix. > > Marc > _____________ 30 Apr 2008 12:27:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25335 On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Alan Hodgson wrote: >> Tis a good question ... I don't know what causes it offhand, if the >> resolver otherwise seems to work. 30 Apr 2008 12:01:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25334 On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Jesse Norell <jesse@kci.net> wrote: > Tis a good question ... I don't know what causes it offhand, if the > resolver other 30 Apr 2008 11:07:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25333 Tis a good question ... I don't know what causes it offhand, if the resolver otherwise seems to work. It sounds familiar, though .. it seems like you 30 Apr 2008 10:49:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25332 On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Jesse Norell wrote: >>> local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps \ >>> mysql:/etc/postfix/sql-r 30 Apr 2008 10:39:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25331 On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 16:55 +0100, dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > > local_recipient_maps = proxy:unix:passwd.byname $alias_maps \ > > mysql: 30 Apr 2008 09:08:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25330 On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Jesse Norell wrote: >>> Also here, you can add a second hash containing local users. >> >> Except that's not what I want - I wan 30 Apr 2008 08:55:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25329 On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 14:21 +0100, dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > > Also here, you can add a second hash containing local users. > > Except that's not wh 30 Apr 2008 07:28:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25328 On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Marc Dirix wrote: >> If I set mytestdomain in mydestination, I can deliver to it. Otherwise I >> just get relaying denied. Is th 30 Apr 2008 06:21:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25327 > If I set mytestdomain in mydestination, I can deliver to it. Otherwise I > just get relaying denied. Is there a reasonably sane way to have > myde 30 Apr 2008 06:13:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25326 James Reid wrote: > I *believe* I need to put something in local_recipient_maps in main.cf to > point it at the ldap aliases (I think this is to stop 30 Apr 2008 05:41:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25325 I decided to have a go at getting postfix to work with this instead of sendmail as per the suggestion that was made here, and I still have a few prob 30 Apr 2008 03:33:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25324 > Seems people use dbmail differently than we do. We have a "dbmail mail > server", which *only* does > - run dbmail-* daemons to connect to the db > 29 Apr 2008 14:45:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25322 On Dienstag, 29. April 2008 Marc Dirix wrote: > is the support for milters Seems people use dbmail differently than we do. We have a "dbmail mail se 29 Apr 2008 14:36:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25321 I wasn't able to find much in the way of useful information while searching for dbmail and per-user procmail configurations. So, I rolled my own, b 29 Apr 2008 07:51:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25319 On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:51:57PM -0400, Colin Wetherbee wrote: > Marc Dirix wrote: >> Your best way, is to get over the sendmail advantages, and sta 29 Apr 2008 07:16:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25318 Colin Wetherbee writes: > Hmm, Postfix has had support for 3461 since about 2005, in roughly > version 2.3. Oh, fine. Is it complete? Does it pass o 29 Apr 2008 07:08:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25317 Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > I'll continue to use postfix for incoming mail, but plan to switch to > sendmail for outgoing mail when workload permits. T 29 Apr 2008 07:01:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25316 Colin Wetherbee writes: > Marc Dirix wrote: >> Your best way, is to get over the sendmail advantages, and start >> using postfix. > > It's been about 29 Apr 2008 06:03:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25315 Hi Daniel, Thanks for your suggestions! I *believe* I need to put something in local_recipient_maps in main.cf to point it at the ldap aliases (I th 29 Apr 2008 05:26:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25314 On Mon, Apr 28, 2008, Marc Dirix <marc@electronics-design.nl> said: >> Since I'm doing this on my own, don't expect a final 2.4 release before >> oct 29 Apr 2008 03:29:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25313 I havent checked Daniels HOWTO, but the simplest way is to use the rimap mechanism for saslauthd. If dbmail-imapd is running, saslauthd will also work 29 Apr 2008 02:36:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25312 On Dienstag, 29. April 2008 dbmail@bobich.net wrote: > Yes, that occured to me, too. I was just hoping to avoid it as my > current sendmail config is 28 Apr 2008 22:56:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/25310