Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 24 Nov 2009 11:49:47 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Am 17.11.2009 17:25, schrieb Paul J Stevens: > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> I have no idea how i should do this with sieve in future because we >> switc 18 Nov 2009 04:14:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28963 >Piotr, >the code involved is in src/dbmail-mailbox.c around line 353 >try attached patch. Bingo :) I first thoght it doesn't, because I just replace 17 Nov 2009 10:18:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28962 Reindl Harald wrote: > I have no idea how i should do this with sieve in future because we > switch here from mysql-database to a protocl and afaik t 17 Nov 2009 08:25:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28961 Hallo Paul Thank you very much for your answer This is new and very bad for me because we have a really fine webinterface with login against dbmail- 17 Nov 2009 08:09:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28960 Harald, For the record: the autoreply table is documented (only on the wiki) as being dangerous, unsupported, deprecated, etc.... It's been removed c 17 Nov 2009 07:52:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28959 The way autoreplies are processed is wrong and dangerous * In the MUA i see not from which address the reply comes * Many servers will block as long 17 Nov 2009 03:44:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28958 Piotr Wadas wrote: > > The question is where to find a query to modify, to avoid filtering dump > through a regex :) > Regards, > DT Piotr, the co 17 Nov 2009 02:38:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28957 The question is where to find a query to modify, to avoid filtering dump through a regex :) Regards, DT -- View this message in context: http://old.n 17 Nov 2009 00:36:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28956 When exporting user email folder, with dbmail-export 2.3.6, the date field is in invalid format. At least from postgres 8.4. Exported mbox file has 17 Nov 2009 00:28:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28955 Paul J Stevens wrote: > the proposed solution is to follow the git-head code: > > declare a dependency on gmime >= 2.2.10. > trust gmime. > drop supp 16 Nov 2009 01:10:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28954 the proposed solution is to follow the git-head code: declare a dependency on gmime >= 2.2.10. trust gmime. drop support for broken encoded headers. 16 Nov 2009 00:53:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28952 Been doing some tests with this on both the 2.2 and 2.3 codebases. looks like this is indeed a bug on the 2.2 branch where dbmail tries very hard to 16 Nov 2009 00:27:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28951 John Fawcett-4 wrote: > > On 27/10/09 09:30, Peter Welzien wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:24:13 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: >> >> 15 Nov 2009 19:39:49 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28950 Peter Welzien wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:05:51 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: >> I think that problems on dbmail are almost certain 15 Nov 2009 13:33:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28949 Hi Peter, I hope someone of the dev team can clear this up, I just remember this vaguely from developing my webmail client: quoting the wikipedia ar 15 Nov 2009 09:50:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28948 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:05:51 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > I think that problems on dbmail are almost certainly ruled out > (roundcub 15 Nov 2009 09:31:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28947 Reindl Harald wrote: > http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=46508 Thank you for reporting this upstream (and actually getting it fixed). I have added the 13 Nov 2009 06:48:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28946 Update your mysql! http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=46508 The problem is that debian/ubuntu have an idiotic update-policy resulting in having the sam 13 Nov 2009 06:11:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28945 Hi, we've encountered a serious issue while testing DBMail 2.2.13 with MySQL server version 5.1. Since this is a MySQL bug I didn't file one against 13 Nov 2009 05:49:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28944 Piotr Wadas wrote: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/dbmail@dbmail.org/msg12339.html > > Is it '~/.dbmail.db' ( or '/var/mail/$USER' or similar trick 13 Nov 2009 00:53:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28943 http://www.mail-archive.com/dbmail@dbmail.org/msg12339.html Is it '~/.dbmail.db' ( or '/var/mail/$USER' or similar trick) available with 2.3.6 ? And 12 Nov 2009 10:17:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28941 On Mittwoch 11 November 2009 Paul Stevens wrote: > I'm not aware of any showstoppers. You may need to tweak the pg > config to silence spurious warnin 11 Nov 2009 12:59:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28940 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Dienstag 10 November 2009 Piotr Wadas wrote: >> - there are still some problems on vacuuming/cleaning up the >> database, 11 Nov 2009 11:45:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28939 On Dienstag 10 November 2009 Piotr Wadas wrote: > - there are still some problems on vacuuming/cleaning up the > database, at least with postgresql 8. 10 Nov 2009 13:07:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28938 Daniel Urstöger wrote: > just installed it ... everything fine so far! Haven't heard any complaints either. Regards, -- Aleksander Kamenik System 10 Nov 2009 05:23:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28935 just installed it ... everything fine so far! Thanks Paul :) Am 10.11.2009 um 11:42 schrieb Aleksander Kamenik: > Paul J Stevens wrote: >> I just 10 Nov 2009 05:11:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28934 Piotr Wadas wrote: > > Well, after some tests for a few months on selected accounts with dbmail > 2.3.6 The 2.3 series is an experimental branch, ak 10 Nov 2009 04:37:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28933 Well, after some tests for a few months on selected accounts with dbmail 2.3.6, I'm afraid I must go back to previous solution for now. To summarize 10 Nov 2009 04:01:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28932 Paul J Stevens wrote: > I just uploaded 2.2.13. > > I won't have time today for formal announcements. debian/stable debs are > forthcoming though. > 10 Nov 2009 02:42:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28930 Michael Monnerie wrote: > I've had this yesterday: > > /var/log/messages: > Nov 9 13:53:26 mailsrv1.zmi.at kernel: dbmail-pop3d[12215]: segfault at 10 Nov 2009 02:14:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28925 Michael Monnerie wrote: > Yesterday I saw this error again: > > Error:[sql] dbpgsql.c,db_query(+287): query failed [.INSERT INTO > dbmail_tofiel 10 Nov 2009 02:11:07 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28924 Aleksander Kamenik wrote: > Jonathan Feally wrote: >> We have fixed this in the git tree. >> >> Paul, >> Can we get a 2.2.12.1 release because of the 10 Nov 2009 02:00:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28923 I've had this yesterday: /var/log/messages: Nov 9 13:53:26 mailsrv1.zmi.at kernel: dbmail-pop3d[12215]: segfault at c ip 00000000f7cec943 sp 000000 10 Nov 2009 01:09:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28922 Jonathan Feally wrote: > We have fixed this in the git tree. > > Paul, > Can we get a 2.2.12.1 release because of the bugs and missing configure > r 10 Nov 2009 00:29:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28921 Yesterday I saw this error again: Error:[sql] dbpgsql.c,db_query(+287): query failed [.INSERT INTO dbmail_tofield (physmessage_id, toname, toaddr 10 Nov 2009 00:10:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28920 On Montag 09 November 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Reindl, Hihi, that's what comes when writing the surename first. :-) mfg zmi -- // Michael Monne 10 Nov 2009 00:04:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28919 Reindl, I've seen this happen when there are write locks on the dbmail database. The dbmail logs should provide more information about what's going 09 Nov 2009 06:48:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28917 Nov 7 05:36:29 mail postfix/error[3119]: A1F34535: to=<xxxxx>, relay=none, delay=26433, delays=26433/0/0/0, dsn=4.4.2, status=deferred (delivery temp 06 Nov 2009 20:43:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28915 On 28/10/09 14:54, Reindl Harald wrote: > Sometimes we see this too, but i can not reproduce this > > SquirrelMail seems not to be the reason because 29 Oct 2009 15:06:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28907 Sometimes we see this too, but i can not reproduce this SquirrelMail seems not to be the reason because thunderbird and horde have also the nearly sa 28 Oct 2009 06:54:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28905 On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:05:51 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > I think that problems on dbmail are almost certainly ruled out > At this 27 Oct 2009 23:53:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28904 On 27/10/09 09:30, Peter Welzien wrote: > On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:24:13 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > > > The from line in the dbma 27 Oct 2009 14:05:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28903 On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:24:13 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: >> I don't know if I should look in any other tables. > the raw message wi 27 Oct 2009 01:30:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28902 On 26/10/09 08:37, Peter Welzien wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:29:01 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > > >>> The " is not presen 26 Oct 2009 13:24:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28901 On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 22:29:01 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: >> The " is not present in the raw mail header. I'm not really sure where 26 Oct 2009 00:37:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28900 On 25/10/09 21:36, Peter Welzien wrote: > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:09:00 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > > >> The position of the quot 25 Oct 2009 14:29:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28899 On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:09:00 +0100, John Fawcett <john.ml@erba.tv> wrote: > Peter > squirrelmail should display quoted printable "from" headers corre 25 Oct 2009 13:36:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28898 On 23/10/09 20:03, Peter Welzien wrote: > Hi. I'm not sure if the problem I'm having is because of DBMail or > SquirrelMail. I've tried the SquirrelMa 25 Oct 2009 13:09:00 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28897 Hi. I'm not sure if the problem I'm having is because of DBMail or SquirrelMail. I've tried the SquirrelMail mailinglist without getting a reply. I'm 23 Oct 2009 11:03:19 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28895 I'm using gmime-2.2.24. I was able to confirm through testing that gmime is changing the header Mime-Version to MIME-Version, its in "gmime/gmime-mes 17 Oct 2009 20:46:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28885 No apologies, that's a good find. How did you test the library? What version of gmime are you working with? Aaron On Oct 17, 2009, at 2:03 PM, N 17 Oct 2009 14:10:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28884 I was able to further narrow down the problem to gmime (not dbmail), which changes "Mime-Version" to uppercase "MIME-Version" and its causing problems 17 Oct 2009 14:03:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28883 diff of emails forwarded by dbmail and postfix shows that dbmail changes the "Mime-Version" to "MIME-Version" (upper-case MIME) and splits Content-Typ 15 Oct 2009 14:50:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28881 Denis Frère wrote: > 2009/10/12 Paul J Stevens <paul@nfg.nl <mailto:paul@nfg.nl>> > > Michael Monnerie wrote: > >> My question is : can I add 13 Oct 2009 01:34:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28873 2009/10/12 Paul J Stevens <paul@nfg.nl> > Michael Monnerie wrote: > >> My question is : can I add columns to DBmail tables without breaking > somethi 12 Oct 2009 14:55:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28872 Michael Monnerie wrote: >> My question is : can I add columns to DBmail tables without breaking something in DBmail ? > > Yes, I did so for my ext 12 Oct 2009 12:30:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28871 > My question is : can I add columns to DBmail tables without breaking something in DBmail ? Yes, I did so for my extensions to have domains and cu 12 Oct 2009 11:51:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28868 I'm having problems when forwarding domaikeys (not DKIM) signed emails from dbmail to a mailserver (such as gmail) that checks for DomainKeys. ebay u 12 Oct 2009 08:38:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28867 Hi, I'm using DBmail in a Django project (http://www.djangoproject.com). I would like to map DBmail tables to Django models, so that I could use Dja 12 Oct 2009 07:58:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28866 Aleksander Kamenik wrote: > Bret Baptist wrote: > >> Also looks like the "internaldate as UTC" is causing issues with Mac Mail and >> older Outloo 12 Oct 2009 06:28:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28865 Bret Baptist wrote: > Also looks like the "internaldate as UTC" is causing issues with Mac Mail and > older Outlook clients. They are subtracting th 12 Oct 2009 04:33:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28864 >> Welcome! Please update anything in the wiki that appeared to be >> inaccurate, and add any helpful information you learned along the way. It >> is 09 Oct 2009 14:29:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28858 > Welcome! Please update anything in the wiki that appeared to be > inaccurate, and add any helpful information you learned along the way. It > is gre 09 Oct 2009 13:35:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28857 Welcome! Please update anything in the wiki that appeared to be inaccurate, and add any helpful information you learned along the way. It is greatly a 09 Oct 2009 12:57:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28856 On Thursday 08 October 2009 12:28:41 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: > Bret Baptist wrote: > > It looks like this version broke POP before SMTP. I am not ge 09 Oct 2009 12:51:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28855 On Friday 09 October 2009 02:19:47 am Paul J Stevens wrote: > Jonathan Feally wrote: > > Jonathan Feally wrote: > >> The correct operation would be to 09 Oct 2009 12:50:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28854 Hi, having a lot of trouble with getting Postfix, MySQL and DBMail running I had a little chit-chat with Brian Evans and Wietse Venema on the Postfix 09 Oct 2009 12:15:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28853 Jonathan Feally wrote: > Jonathan Feally wrote: >> The correct operation would be to have the UTC timestamp stored in the >> database. When read from 09 Oct 2009 00:19:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28850 Jonathan Feally wrote: > The correct operation would be to have the UTC timestamp stored in the > database. When read from the database, it is not ad 08 Oct 2009 19:50:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28848 On 10/07/2009 11:14 PM, Paul J Stevens wrote: > I've just uploaded dbmail 2.2.12, the latest production release. Attached is cplogs patch for 2.2.12. 08 Oct 2009 16:17:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28847 Paul J Stevens wrote: > >> It looks like it is happening for post 2.2.12 inserted email. Perhaps only >> with IMAP clients, but I was not able to co 08 Oct 2009 13:24:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28846 Bret Baptist wrote: > On Thursday 08 October 2009 12:29:24 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Bret Baptist wrote: >>> Also looks like the "internaldate as UT 08 Oct 2009 10:53:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28845 On Thursday 08 October 2009 12:28:41 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: > Bret Baptist wrote: > > It looks like this version broke POP before SMTP. I am not ge 08 Oct 2009 10:42:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28844 On Thursday 08 October 2009 12:29:24 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: > Bret Baptist wrote: > > Also looks like the "internaldate as UTC" is causing issues wi 08 Oct 2009 10:41:39 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28843 Bret Baptist wrote: > Also looks like the "internaldate as UTC" is causing issues with Mac Mail and > older Outlook clients. They are subtracting t 08 Oct 2009 10:29:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28842 Bret Baptist wrote: > It looks like this version broke POP before SMTP. I am not getting an update > on the time stamp in the database when people 08 Oct 2009 10:28:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28841 On Thursday 08 October 2009 10:05:10 am Bret Baptist wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2009 03:14:32 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I' 08 Oct 2009 08:25:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28840 On Wednesday 07 October 2009 03:14:32 pm Paul J Stevens wrote: > Greetings, > > I've just uploaded dbmail 2.2.12, the latest production release. > > 08 Oct 2009 08:05:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28838 That goes without saying. Hopefully later today. "Jake Anderson" <jake@vapourforge.com> wrote: >Will this be coming out in deb format? > >Paul J S 07 Oct 2009 23:09:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28830 Will this be coming out in deb format? Paul J Stevens wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Greetings, > > I've just uploa 07 Oct 2009 17:27:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28827 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I've just uploaded dbmail 2.2.12, the latest production release. Changes: * Backpor 07 Oct 2009 13:14:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28822 I love the fedora-maintainers :-) Here are pacthed packages for F11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=135515 I would recommend a 07 Oct 2009 10:58:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28816 I need some help - output from "rpmbuild -bb dbmail.spec": https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527690 + umask 022 + cd /home/builduser/rpmbui 07 Oct 2009 08:39:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28815 Thank you! Can i use this patch for rpm-SPEC? So i would try to rebuild our package asap and give feedback ____ BTW: Why are sender/recipient so 07 Oct 2009 08:03:03 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28814 Reindl Harald wrote: > I can not believe that i'am the only person with this problem and i speak about e real big > problem - In near future we have t 07 Oct 2009 06:27:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28813 I can not believe that i'am the only person with this problem and i speak about e real big problem - In near future we have to migrate 10.000 addresse 07 Oct 2009 04:43:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28808 > There's never a question that nobody else will ask (or search for in > the > archives); when you figure out an answer yourself, please let the list 03 Oct 2009 02:56:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28793 There's never a question that nobody else will ask (or search for in the archives); when you figure out an answer yourself, please let the list know w 02 Oct 2009 16:22:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28792 Already found out! Thanks :P From: dbmail-bounces@dbmail.org [mailto:dbmail-bounces@dbmail.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Bastos Sent: sexta-feira, 2 02 Oct 2009 12:35:57 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28791 People, I need an help :P I have a raw message on a file, and I want to inject it in another account? I'm very dumb today and can't understan 02 Oct 2009 12:09:25 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28790 Your explanation is perfect Paul! This was for something else, to explain somebody with physical evidences (the links), that the person was wrong! M 30 Sep 2009 03:21:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28789 Shane Kerr wrote: > Jorge, > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:22 +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: > >> Can you point me to the IETF link where it says that the 30 Sep 2009 00:27:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28788 > A bit off-topic, but: > Nice, but there are programs with bugs that generate 8bit headers, > namely that Outlook extension that gives the users fanc 29 Sep 2009 14:44:22 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28787 > Jorge, > > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:22 +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: > > > Can you point me to the IETF link where it says that the emails > > header 29 Sep 2009 14:43:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28786 On Dienstag 29 September 2009 Shane Kerr wrote: > I have been getting familiar with the IMAP RFC lately, and it says > this: > >          Note that he 29 Sep 2009 14:28:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28784 Jorge, On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:22 +0100, Jorge Bastos wrote: > Can you point me to the IETF link where it says that the emails > headers MUST be en 29 Sep 2009 14:10:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28783 According to my family I was born on Earth, which might actually explain a lot :) Anyways thanks everything is rolling!!!! On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5: 29 Sep 2009 14:04:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28785 Hi there, Paul/others, Can you point me to the IETF link where it says that the emails headers MUST be encoded and never in PLAIN ASCII? Than 29 Sep 2009 08:20:06 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28780 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Schütze wrote: > Hi All > > > > I have a working installation of DBMAIL running 2.2 29 Sep 2009 03:04:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28779 Daniel Schütze wrote: > Hi All > > > > I have a working installation of DBMAIL running 2.2.8rc1 on FreeBSD and > I would like to enable the 29 Sep 2009 02:48:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28778