Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 04 Jul 2009 16:42:17 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg Hi all, I've uploaded libzdb-2.6 packages to debian.nfgd.net/stable and dbmail-2.3.6 packages to experimental. btw, Doing the package I discovered 04 Jul 2009 14:28:27 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28236 Piotr Wadas wrote: > > I guess I shoud make some x.y.z_to_a.b.c.sql script, but from which version > I should start? which version do you have insta 02 Jul 2009 12:48:08 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28233 I guess I shoud make some x.y.z_to_a.b.c.sql script, but from which version I should start? I deleted all tables in pgsql, and now I'm trying to recre 02 Jul 2009 04:38:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28232 I guess I shoud make some x.y.z_to_a.b.c.sql script, but from which version I should start? I deleted all tables in pgsql, and now I'm trying to recre 02 Jul 2009 04:38:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28231 FYI, I've just pushed a fix for this problem to the dbmail_2_2 tree. patch attached. Gordan Bobic wrote: > Marc Dirix wrote: >> I think 2.2.10 do 01 Jul 2009 09:51:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28230 Marc Dirix wrote: > I think 2.2.10 does not seem to suffer from it. > > As I tried to downgrade earlier I got into problems with strtoul. I just rol 30 Jun 2009 15:34:26 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28226 I started seeing this regression after upgrading to 2.2.11 from 2.2.10 yes. 2.2.10 has other bugs which are solved in 2.2.11. Marc -- Dipl.-Ing. 30 Jun 2009 01:45:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28225 Marc Dirix wrote: > I think 2.2.10 does not seem to suffer from it. > > As I tried to downgrade earlier I got into problems with strtoul. So 2.2.10 30 Jun 2009 01:03:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28224 I think 2.2.10 does not seem to suffer from it. As I tried to downgrade earlier I got into problems with strtoul. Regards, Marc _________________ 30 Jun 2009 00:56:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28223 There is a sql migration from 2.2 to 2.3 that needs to be done in addition to dbmail-util runs. This could take longer than you expect to do. I'm no 29 Jun 2009 13:02:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28222 On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:58 +0200, Paul J Stevens <paul@nfg.nl> wrote: > Gordan Bobic wrote: > >> Is this a DBmail misconfiguration? Or corruption i 29 Jun 2009 08:19:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28221 Ah, OK. Thanks. What is the database format compatibility situation between 2.2 and 2.3? If I upgrade the package, will it all still "just work"? Or i 29 Jun 2009 07:11:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28220 Gordan Bobic wrote: > Is this a DBmail misconfiguration? Or corruption in my mail database? Is > there anything that can be done about this? this is 29 Jun 2009 06:15:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28219 Hi, I'm seeing an odd issue with the IMAP folders. If I have multiple sub-folders, When I check folders on a higher level, I see the higher level fol 29 Jun 2009 04:04:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28217 Jake Anderson wrote: > Any chance of debs of this? > It makes upgrading much easier ;-> > > Oh and is there anything to migrate headers over to the ne 28 Jun 2009 21:15:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28216 Any chance of debs of this? It makes upgrading much easier ;-> Oh and is there anything to migrate headers over to the new storage as well? Paul J St 28 Jun 2009 18:02:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28214 Paul J Stevens wrote: > New features in this release: > There is also a new option -M on dbmail-util to migrate 2.2 messageblks stored messages to 28 Jun 2009 11:42:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28212 Good work Paul! Feedback from people who will use this 2.3.6 version are welcome. Jorge, > -----Original Message----- > From: dbmail-bounces@dbmai 28 Jun 2009 10:11:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28210 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Greetings, I've just released dbmail 2.3.6, the latest development release. There are still some ro 28 Jun 2009 08:19:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28209 DBMail folks, I'm signing off this list because I ended up using AOX rather than DBMail. However, I'm available to answer specific PostgreSQL trou 27 Jun 2009 11:42:21 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28205 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Freitag 26 Juni 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: >> I don't follow. It's been in dbmail forever. Take a look at >> dbmail.schem 27 Jun 2009 07:38:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28204 Jean Naimard wrote: > $ dbmail-users -l * > Jun 26 17:34:45 domus dbmail-users[11177]: Error:[sql] > dbmysql.c,db_connect(+172): mysql_real_connect f 26 Jun 2009 18:58:01 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28203 Greetings. I am unable to have dbmail work; I have tried to look in the archives, but they don't seem to be searchable, all there is is a directory 26 Jun 2009 14:51:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28202 On Freitag 26 Juni 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: > I don't follow. It's been in dbmail forever. Take a look at > dbmail.schema. OK, I never looked so fa 26 Jun 2009 09:23:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28201 henry wrote: > Hi, > > > One of my customers want to change the way the shared folders are shown. In what client? Please realize that the output fr 26 Jun 2009 07:03:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28200 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Freitag 26 Juni 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: >> Even we do very much the same in our main installation, we use LDAP >> to e 26 Jun 2009 06:54:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28199 Hi, One of my customers want to change the way the shared folders are shown. I want to know if there is a way to change dbmail so that a shared fol 26 Jun 2009 06:37:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28198 On Freitag 26 Juni 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: > Even we do very much the same in our main installation, we use LDAP > to extend the user model, so the 26 Jun 2009 06:30:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28197 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote: >> I've extended dbmail since before we started, in order to have an >> ext 26 Jun 2009 04:59:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28196 On Mittwoch 24 Juni 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote: > I've extended dbmail since before we started, in order to have an > extra "domains" and "customers" 26 Jun 2009 04:25:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28195 Aaron Stone wrote: > What version of libSieve do you have? There have been some additional > checks for autoresponder headers that might be relevant 26 Jun 2009 00:38:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28193 Jon Duggan wrote: > As i understood the usage, it will remove replycache info older than > 72hours. This to me seems a sane figure for old entries t 26 Jun 2009 00:36:33 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28192 On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:21:30 +0100, Jon Duggan <Jon@host-it.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks paul, > > >> I would need to see the full query, and the one 25 Jun 2009 18:20:02 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28191 Thanks paul, > I would need to see the full query, and the one just before this one. > You'll need to run at trace_errlog=5 to get at them, or u 25 Jun 2009 14:21:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28190 Jon Duggan wrote: > Jun 25 20:07:41 mail4-db-2 dbmail/lmtpd[427]: Error:[sql] > dbmysql.c,db_query(+290): [.Duplicate entry > 'Customer.Care@vodafo 25 Jun 2009 14:08:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28189 Hi Guys, We have what looks like looping mail between two auto responders (by way of vacation in sieve). I can see in our lmtpd logs lots of failed 25 Jun 2009 12:20:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28188 I think I've said this around 2006 already, but maybe time has come to suggest it again. As far as I read this mailing list, most people use dbmai 24 Jun 2009 12:47:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28187 On Dienstag 23 Juni 2009 Aaron Stone wrote: > There is a search for "is this message actually addressed to me?" -- > an important error case being mai 23 Jun 2009 13:31:31 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28180 On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:54:09 +0200, Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@is.it-management.at> wrote: > Dear list, > > I have vacation via sieve scr 23 Jun 2009 12:03:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28178 Dear list, I have vacation via sieve scripts in the form of: require "vacation"; vacation :days 5 :subject "Abwesenheitsnotiz" "Danke für Ih 23 Jun 2009 11:54:09 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28177 > > Piotr, I'll release 2.3.6 real soon now, which should fix all your issues. Allright, I'll look forward to checkout :) regards, P. ______________ 18 Jun 2009 22:18:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28167 Attached the trace.txt I also tried some output tests: If in config.c I put printf("%s\n",port_string); in line 263, it writes "5434 18 Jun 2009 13:54:48 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28165 Marc Dirix wrote: >> strace -o /tmp/trace.txt -ff /usr/sbin/dbmail-timsieved Please do try to provide the lines from a trace leading up to the exit. 18 Jun 2009 12:42:42 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28164 Jonathan Feally wrote: > A couple extra maybe?? Not too far off. >> dbmail_tofield | 5011 >> > This is about 5x the correct size - th 18 Jun 2009 12:39:56 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28163 Piotr Wadas wrote: > The count(*) result is zero, anyway rows are still available in mentioned > tables, as listed :/ > Well then it sounds like t 18 Jun 2009 12:33:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28162 > Try: > select count(*) from dbmail_partlists left join dbmail_physmessage on > (dbmail_physmessage.id=dbmail_partlists.physmessage_id) where > dbm 18 Jun 2009 12:25:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28161 Piotr Wadas wrote: > dbmail_physmessage | 994 > dbmail_fromfield | 994 > These match - that is good - should be one from head 18 Jun 2009 12:18:20 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28160 > Are you perhaps then starting the wrong daemon, or one looking at the > wrong dbmail.conf? > > Try: > > strace -o /tmp/trace.txt -ff /usr/sbin/dbma 18 Jun 2009 11:43:59 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28159 Marc Dirix wrote: > >> >> This means the value specified for sqlport cannot be parsed into a 'long >> long unsigned int'. >> >> Something *must* have 18 Jun 2009 10:18:45 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28158 > > This means the value specified for sqlport cannot be parsed into a 'long > long unsigned int'. > > Something *must* have changed on your system. > 18 Jun 2009 09:41:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28157 Paul J Stevens schreef: > Marc Dirix wrote: > > >> Jun 18 12:39:37 gamma dbmail-timsieved[5934]: FATAL:[config] >> config.c,GetDBParams(+263): wron 18 Jun 2009 09:41:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28156 Marc Dirix wrote: > Jun 18 12:39:37 gamma dbmail-timsieved[5934]: FATAL:[config] > config.c,GetDBParams(+263): wrong value for sqlport in config file 18 Jun 2009 08:10:43 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28155 Hi Paul, I am a bit out of it, this is a level TRACE_STDERR of 5, is that not the highest value? root@gamma:/var/src/dbmail# dbmail-timsieved Jun 18 18 Jun 2009 06:21:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28154 Marc Dirix wrote: > Hi, > > Although I did not change my config file, now dbmail-timsieved does not > start anymore. > Version: 2.2.11 > It says: > J 18 Jun 2009 03:15:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28153 Jonathan Feally wrote: > Jorge Bastos wrote: >> I think there's something incomplete on that function 'cause when I used the >> git version when that 18 Jun 2009 03:13:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28152 Hi, Although I did not change my config file, now dbmail-timsieved does not start anymore. Version: 2.2.11 It says: Jun 18 11:40:57 gamma dbmail-tims 18 Jun 2009 02:43:30 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28151 additional empty folders like trash and sent are created by imap on log-on, that's why dbmail_mailboxes is higher a little bit. -- View this message 17 Jun 2009 23:18:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28148 here you are - one user, 1GB mail moved to DB, one folder (inbox), all (actually there's 2-3 users, anyway they're all are just tests, and remaining 17 Jun 2009 22:22:04 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28147 What tables still have a lot of rows? select count(*) from dbmail_xxx; For a single user, you should probably have <10 rows in all of the tables. Le 17 Jun 2009 21:37:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28146 > Jorge Bastos wrote: > > I think there's something incomplete on that function 'cause when I > used the > > git version when that was added, messages 17 Jun 2009 10:41:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28145 Jorge Bastos wrote: > I think there's something incomplete on that function 'cause when I used the > git version when that was added, messages were no 17 Jun 2009 09:58:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28144 > > Paul J Stevens wrote: > > delete from dmail_mimeparts > > where id not in (select part_id from dbmail_partlists) > > > > though this is of course 17 Jun 2009 09:35:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28143 Paul J Stevens wrote: > delete from dmail_mimeparts > where id not in (select part_id from dbmail_partlists) > > though this is of course a very slow 17 Jun 2009 09:22:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28142 Piotr Wadas wrote: > >>> Garbage collection on dbmail_mimeparts is still missing. > > Shall I expect the same behaviour, no matter what kind of back 17 Jun 2009 08:05:23 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28141 >>Garbage collection on dbmail_mimeparts is still missing. Shall I expect the same behaviour, no matter what kind of backend (mysql/pgsql/sqlite) I'l 17 Jun 2009 06:39:05 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28140 Piotr Wadas wrote: > The same behaviour with 1GB mailbox (about 750 messages) - after > deleting, emptying trash, cleaning, purging, vacuuming, reinde 17 Jun 2009 06:33:35 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28139 The same behaviour with 1GB mailbox (about 750 messages) - after deleting, emptying trash, cleaning, purging, vacuuming, reindexing etc. etc. the disk 17 Jun 2009 06:30:32 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28138 Hello, I have one user on new installation of dbmail 2.3.5 on postgres 8.3.x. I started with empty database (1-5MB total database size). Then, I put 17 Jun 2009 06:30:12 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28137 Hi, Is there any chance the LIST command in 2.2.11 is going te be fixed? Or do you recommend downgrade to 2.2.10 / upgrade to 2.3? Best regards, Ma 17 Jun 2009 03:34:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28136 Jon Duggan wrote: > Our pop3 box is a quad xeon with 4gb of ram, the DB backend is a dual > quad xeon with 16gb of ram using mysql. what type of dis 17 Jun 2009 00:08:14 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28135 On Dienstag 16 Juni 2009 Jon Duggan wrote: > The pop3 box is a dedicated quad core with 4gb of ram. And how much memory is used during peak hours? Ju 16 Jun 2009 17:40:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28134 Thanks Paul, I'll up to 450 and see how we go. Our pop3 box is a quad xeon with 4gb of ram, the DB backend is a dual quad xeon with 16gb of ram using 16 Jun 2009 14:43:28 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28133 The pop3 box is a dedicated quad core with 4gb of ram. I've watched the box looking for bottlenecks during the busy periods, there are no bandwidth/c 16 Jun 2009 14:37:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28132 The hardcoded ceiling was aimed at avoiding overloading the database server. You can change the value and recompile if you like. It does make me curi 16 Jun 2009 13:47:15 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28131 On Dienstag 16 Juni 2009 Jon Duggan wrote: > MAX_CHILDREN limit of 300 in pop3 Are you sure your box has enough RAM to keep 300 pop3 daemons around, 16 Jun 2009 13:29:55 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28130 Guys, We're now quite consistently hitting MAX_CHILDREN limit of 300 in pop3 during business hours. I understand it's hard set in code to 300 (after 16 Jun 2009 13:08:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28129 libzdb-2.4 will work fine with the latest git. It may have issues with 2.3.5 release. Download link: http://www.tildeslash.com/libzdb/dist/libzdb-2. 03 Jun 2009 21:27:13 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28043 Hi guys, I am trying to install dbmail-2.3.5 but without success by now. What I tried is to install is dbmail-2.3.5 + libzdb-2.5. As there is no lib 03 Jun 2009 14:31:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28042 Michael Monnerie wrote: >>> Can dbmail- smtp loose messages? >> Only if the disks are full. Remember, dbmail-smtp (pipe) doesn't have >> a mechanism 30 May 2009 02:16:53 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28015 On Freitag 29 Mai 2009 Paul J Stevens wrote: > > And I have in dbmail.conf: > > [LMTP] > > PORT     = 24 > > NCHILDREN         = 1 > > MINSPARECHILDRE 30 May 2009 01:25:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28014 Michael Monnerie wrote: > On Donnerstag 28 Mai 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote: >> http://zmi.at/x/ripdefang-dbmail >> >> I just released this very first 29 May 2009 00:35:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28013 On Donnerstag 28 Mai 2009 Michael Monnerie wrote: > http://zmi.at/x/ripdefang-dbmail > > I just released this very first version of a "un-defang" tool 28 May 2009 23:48:24 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28012 http://zmi.at/x/ripdefang-dbmail I just released this very first version of a "un-defang" tool. It's for everybody who has defanged spams and wants 28 May 2009 03:41:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28005 On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Andreja Babic <a.babic@ecircle.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using dbmail for several years. Recently I have made perf 28 May 2009 03:17:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28004 On Donnerstag 28 Mai 2009 Andreja Babic wrote: > Database dbmail took 48G while cyrus mail storage had 30G for the > same amount of mails. Boah, a ve 28 May 2009 01:42:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28003 Hi Jon, Interesting idea. I will do so and let you know the results. Andreja -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: dbmail-bounces@dbmail.org [mail 28 May 2009 00:36:40 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28002 It would be very nice if you were to compare the new 2.3.x from git vs. 2.2.x. I suspect that the size of the database will be much less than your 2 27 May 2009 18:46:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28001 > I am using roundcube webmail as front end for dbmail imap server and > after login it takes ages to open huge mailbox. I would appreciate if > you k 27 May 2009 16:06:52 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27999 On 27/05/2009 23:01, Andreja Babic wrote: > I am using roundcube webmail as front end for dbmail imap server and > after login it takes ages to open 27 May 2009 15:50:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/28000 Hi, I am using dbmail for several years. Recently I have made performance test of dbmail and cyrus. I have 350 users in dbmail with total 4 million m 27 May 2009 15:01:11 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27998 Thanks for that. Is there any reason not to use something like this instead? main.cf: local_recipient_maps = ldap:/etc/postfix/ldap-recipients.cf myd 22 May 2009 08:54:37 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27996 Gordan, We use the dbmailDomain objectClass for that purpose. We stuff domains in their own subtree, and add users to the correct subtree below tha 22 May 2009 08:27:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27995 Hi, I think i've done a similar queston In the past. I want to backup my DB, but I don't want emails, just users plus mailbox's+alias etc. So, I'll 22 May 2009 07:28:16 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27994 I'm currently using DBMail in standalone mode, and my Postfix domain and recipient maps are as follows: main.cf: mydestination = $myhostname, localho 22 May 2009 05:56:34 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27993 Thanks, that did the trick. I think I had misunderstood the way the mail entry works. I thought I needed an entry there like "username", and then atta 22 May 2009 02:35:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27991 Gordan Bobic wrote: > USER_OBJECTCLASS = top,account,dbmailUser > > Other than the fact that I can't seem to add the object class to an > existing 22 May 2009 00:31:36 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27990 Aaron Stone wrote: > Please read the DBMail config file's [LDAP] section. It is designed to > interact with essentially arbitrary schemas, you simply 21 May 2009 16:06:50 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27989 Please read the DBMail config file's [LDAP] section. It is designed to interact with essentially arbitrary schemas, you simply tell it what the field 21 May 2009 16:02:29 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27987 Jonathan Feally wrote: [...] > You should have also read README.ldap from the tarball. Indeed I did, but the documentation isn't exactly extensive. : 21 May 2009 16:01:17 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27988 I'm not a dbmail LDAP user so I can't help you much on getting your directory setup. As far as I know, you do not need to add users to the database 21 May 2009 15:53:46 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/users/27986