<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>DBMail | dev</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2008 14:27:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>ANNOUNCE: dbmail-2.2.11 release candidate 1</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  Hi all, I&amp;#039;ve just tagged and uploaded 2.2.11-rc1 to dbmail.org. This is a bugfix maintenance release</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2008 04:08:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25737</link>
</item><item>
<title>[DBMail 0000712]: traces to stderr may cause core dumps if hostname &amp;gt;=16</title>
<description>The following issue has been RESOLVED. ====================================================================== http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2008 01:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25734</link>
</item><item>
<title>[DBMail 0000713]: Wrong activation/deactivation report in sievecmd</title>
<description>The following issue has been SUBMITTED. ====================================================================== http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2008 01:43:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25733</link>
</item><item>
<title>[DBMail 0000710]: eliminate annoying &amp;quot;[Illegal seek] on read-stream&amp;quot; message from imap4d</title>
<description>The following issue has been RESOLVED. ====================================================================== http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2008 00:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25732</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: DBMail Performance &amp;amp; Schema</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1  | John, | Here are the explain plans from my production system. | dbmail=&amp;gt; SELECT message_idnr FROM</description>
<pubDate>27 Jun  2008 12:47:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25725</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: -u and -d options for dbmail-smtp</title>
<description>hinote wrote: &amp;gt; Hi there, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I cannot figure out the difference between those 2 options for dbmail-smtp - &amp;gt; -u and -d. &amp;gt; What&amp;#039;s the reason for havin</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2008 08:01:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25702</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: -u and -d options for dbmail-smtp</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Looks like they are completely equivalent after all. That&amp;#039;s the issue... -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-u-and--d-options</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2008 07:02:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25701</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: -u and -d options for dbmail-smtp</title>
<description>hinote wrote: &amp;gt; yeah, that&amp;#039;s right - the manuals say that the behaviour is different... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; however, I made a look at the sources of dbmail-smtp (2.2</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2008 06:53:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25700</link>
</item><item>
<title>[DBMail 0000711]: undefined symbol for gmime</title>
<description>A NOTE has been added to this issue. ====================================================================== http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2008 06:48:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25699</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: -u and -d options for dbmail-smtp</title>
<description>yeah, that&amp;#039;s right - the manuals say that the behaviour is different... however, I made a look at the sources of dbmail-smtp (2.2.current) and dbmail</description>
<pubDate>20 Jun  2008 06:29:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/dbmail/dev/25698</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
