<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>conserver | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>26 Nov  2009 00:50:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: conserver spy mode</title>
<description>If you use &amp;#039;console -s &amp;lt;console&amp;gt;&amp;#039; then you&amp;#039;ll be requested a read-only connection, and you won&amp;#039;t become read-write when the other user disconnects. T</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 17:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1532</link>
</item><item>
<title>conserver spy mode</title>
<description>Hi, I have seen the following behavior during my checks to see if we can use conserver. I perform the following commands: 1] Open a read/write cons</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 02:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1531</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>Guang Cheng Li wrote: &amp;gt; We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using &amp;gt; the IBM hardware management console to open the</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 08:54:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1530</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>HI,  We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using the IBM hardware management console to open the consoles. The IBM</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 03:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1529</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>2009/11/18 Guang Cheng Li &amp;lt;liguangc@cn.ibm.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything &amp;gt; worked perfect until sev</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:30:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1528</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:58:47AM +0100, Fabien Wernli wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Whatever optimization you&amp;#039;ll end up using, you will have to use more than &amp;gt; one co</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 00:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1527</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:29:44PM +0800, Guang Cheng Li wrote: &amp;gt; We did try some scaling tuning for conserver, but does not seem quite &amp;gt; helpful. Cou</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 23:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1526</link>
</item><item>
<title>question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>HI,  We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything worked perfect until several months ago when our cluster is growing l</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 23:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bug in line handling?</title>
<description>In fact, I mis-read this and there are two missing new lines in this.  There should also be a newline before &amp;quot;nasaaa2*:&amp;quot; Which is the same  host as</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1524</link>
</item><item>
<title>bug in line handling?</title>
<description>Hi, We&amp;#039;ve now using conserver with over 200 consoles all logging to one  conserver server. It all works really well except that sometimes  combined</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver and LXNI Icebox</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Brian Luckau &amp;lt;bluckau@sgi.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  Hi, &amp;gt; Does Conserver support LNXI Iceboxes? &amp;gt; All you need is telnet suppo</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 17:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Conserver and LXNI Icebox</title>
<description>Hi, Does Conserver support LNXI Iceboxes?</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 08:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: passing ctrl+z key combination</title>
<description>At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:43:48 -0400 (EDT), Jeremy Eder &amp;lt;jeder@redhat.com&amp;gt; wrote: Subject: passing ctrl+z key combination &amp;gt; &amp;gt; im looking to pass ctrl+z</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 18:05:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1520</link>
</item><item>
<title>passing ctrl+z key combination</title>
<description>hi, im looking to pass ctrl+z to a server - console man page says  1) escape sequence (mine is default &amp;#039;control-E c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) 2) then type \ooo where ooo i</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 10:43:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; As a workaround, I&amp;#039;d script around &amp;#039;console&amp;#039; with &amp;#039;expect&amp;#039; :) to provide &amp;gt; different functionality as user-accessible</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 08:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1518</link>
</item><item>
<title>GSSAPI patch for Ubuntu/Debian</title>
<description>Hi, Attached is a one-liner that fixes a segfault in 8.1.17 when compiled against libgssapi2-heimdal on Ubuntu Jaunty. Looks like a typo? Andras</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 04:30:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Pearce Andy wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As I understand it the conserver is started with a configuration file &amp;gt; conserver.cf</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 01:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1516</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Hi Andras, As I understand it the conserver is started with a configuration file conserver.cf that defines a set of consoles for various machines, ou</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 01:03:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1515</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:19:11AM +0200, Pearce Andy wrote: &amp;gt; Is it possible to override the initcmd specified for a console &amp;gt; in the conserver.cf fi</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 00:42:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1514</link>
</item><item>
<title>Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Hi, Is it possible to override the initcmd specified for a console in the conserver.cf file, so that varying scripts can be run as required when the</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 00:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1513</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Hi Fabien,  Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:39:42 +0200 Fabien Wernli &amp;lt;wernli@in2p3.fr&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; could you be a little more verbose in the %changelog? Hups, su</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 08:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1512</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Jodok Ole Muellers wrote: &amp;gt; I modified the spec file to generate two sub packages could you be a little mor</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 07:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1511</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Hello, I modified the spec file to generate two sub packages  conserver-client and  conserver-server Because we run a lot of clients that need to</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 05:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1510</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] telnet negotiation</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m forwarding this patch on behalf of Nicolas De Metz-Noblat who has been using conserver-8.1.15 to handle the consoles of ~1000 VME Single Boar</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 01:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1509</link>
</item><item>
<title>Xiao Peng Wang is on vacation.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 2009-09-28 and will not return until 2009-10-12. If you have urgent thing, Guang Cheng Li is my backup.</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 13:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1508</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
