<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>conserver | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>12 Feb  2012 16:19:09 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: logfilemax</title>
<description>On Jan 7, 2012, at 9:50 AM, Chris Fowler wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is there an option to tell conserver to not accumulate files and simply &amp;gt; truncate vs c</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 14:57:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1697</link>
</item><item>
<title>logfilemax</title>
<description>Hello, Is there an option to tell conserver to not accumulate files and simply truncate vs copy? I&amp;#039;m trying to keep from accumulating a directory of</description>
<pubDate>07 Jan  2012 09:50:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1696</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>I need to add that for the stuff we consider critical I use the PCI board. For the stuff that is not I use the tty pipe method in VM and run conserve</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 07:28:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1695</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 08:58 -0600, Joe Greco wrote: &amp;gt; [from a message exchange in private e-mail] &amp;gt; Right. I had a complex question. You suggested</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 07:25:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1694</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 07:59 -0700, Ryan Kirkpatrick wrote: &amp;gt; Without that -q option, netcat hangs even after the &amp;quot;client&amp;quot; has gone &amp;gt; away. Guess netca</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 07:13:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1693</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>There may be a way you could use dnsmasq on the conserver host. dnsmasq will first consult /etc/hosts before it uses /etc/resolv.conf. Consider it a</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 07:12:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1692</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Joe Greco wrote: &amp;gt; Like to the conserver box. So my obvious first attempt was to use netcat, &amp;gt; using &amp;quot;nc -l &amp;lt;port&amp;gt;&amp;quot; like so: ...</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 06:59:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1691</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 07:15 -0600, Joe Greco wrote: &amp;gt; Anyways, the point here is that we&amp;#039;re trying to get rid of unnecessary &amp;gt; hardware. We&amp;#039;re alread</description>
<pubDate>07 Dec  2011 06:02:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1690</link>
</item><item>
<title>Using conserver with vmware</title>
<description>Hi, LOOOOONG time serial console user, been running conserver for many years. Great package. For most sites, conserver primarily represents OOB acce</description>
<pubDate>06 Dec  2011 18:12:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1689</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Moxa NPort 6150/6250</title>
<description>Thank you to everyone who responded (I received a few off-list responses as well). I&amp;#039;m going to give OpenGear a shot. -Joe  On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at</description>
<pubDate>28 Nov  2011 11:12:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1688</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Moxa NPort 6150/6250</title>
<description>I have a patch for conserver that introduces support for Moxa RealCOM TTY including SSL support.Due to original code license (kernel module and user-s</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2011 23:30:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1687</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Moxa NPort 6150/6250</title>
<description>On 11/17/11 21:22, Joe Digilio wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all- &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m a long time conserver user, and need to replace a failed Cyclades TS400. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The Moxa terminal s</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2011 02:03:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1685</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Moxa NPort 6150/6250</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;ve used the ACM5002, and I LOVE IT ! It&amp;#039;s sturdy, versatile, and some models can support local monitoring of contact closures and etc. (I&amp;#039;ve got 50</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 13:42:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1686</link>
</item><item>
<title>Moxa NPort 6150/6250</title>
<description>Hi all- I&amp;#039;m a long time conserver user, and need to replace a failed Cyclades TS400. The Moxa terminal servers were recommended to me by a colleague</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2011 13:22:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1684</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to let conserver work with BMC</title>
<description>Hi there is a patch to work with SOL via freeipmi:http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/162202.11.2011, 06:50, &amp;quot;jiabo&amp;quot; &amp;lt;jiabwang@redh</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2011 02:43:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1683</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to let conserver work with BMC</title>
<description>Hi, There are some (old) versions of wrappers available at http://conserver.com/contrib/ for use w/ ipmitool. Cheers ______________________________</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2011 02:36:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1682</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: how to let conserver work with BMC</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 10:50:52AM +0800, jiabo wrote: &amp;gt; Dear, all, &amp;gt;  we had some servers did not have console hardware devices like Avocent &amp;gt; ACS</description>
<pubDate>02 Nov  2011 01:19:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1681</link>
</item><item>
<title>how to let conserver work with BMC</title>
<description>Dear, all,   we had some servers did not have console hardware devices like Avocent ACS, only with BMC. I can use ipmitool(Dell) or SMBridge(IBM) t</description>
<pubDate>01 Nov  2011 19:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1680</link>
</item><item>
<title>Conserver using SSH</title>
<description>Folks,   I&amp;#039;ve seen a few email threads over the years around using Conserver with ssh but does anyone have a good example setup using Cisco terminal</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2011 02:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1679</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Cyclades ACS6000 Config Assistance</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m happy to help (I&amp;#039;ve got SLC 16, 32, 48&amp;#039;s, and ACS2000s&amp;#039;).  If you want to share a bit of your conserver.cf file (the &amp;quot;defailts&amp;quot; at the top, and</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2011 16:29:07 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1678</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cyclades ACS6000 Config Assistance</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;ve got conserver running with Lantronix SLC NTS. We&amp;#039;re now getting some Avocent Cyclades ACS6000s. I don&amp;#039;t get any response when connecting to t</description>
<pubDate>27 Oct  2011 16:15:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1677</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slow connection time - turning off reverse DNS lookup</title>
<description>I give up on the point of not using the workaround at the /etc/hosts file... I was reluctant at first, but your 4-line shell script has convinced me t</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 14:04:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1676</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slow connection time - turning off reverse DNS lookup</title>
<description>On Fri, 2011-10-21 at 18:35 -0200, Felipe Rechia wrote: &amp;gt; It is certainly broken, I don&amp;#039;t have name resolution for this ip &amp;gt; address range! But I don&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 13:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1675</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slow connection time - turning off reverse DNS lookup</title>
<description>&amp;gt; What do you get if you do nslookup on the different host names? Do you see delays there too? &amp;gt; since the lookup time that I am wasting is in my con</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 13:35:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1674</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Slow connection time - turning off reverse DNS lookup</title>
<description>What do you get if you do nslookup on the different host names? Do you see delays there too? The reason I ask is that if you indeed have a DNS server</description>
<pubDate>21 Oct  2011 12:44:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1673</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>

