<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>conserver | users</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>24 Nov  2009 19:27:57 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: conserver spy mode</title>
<description>If you use &amp;#039;console -s &amp;lt;console&amp;gt;&amp;#039; then you&amp;#039;ll be requested a read-only connection, and you won&amp;#039;t become read-write when the other user disconnects. T</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 17:13:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1532</link>
</item><item>
<title>conserver spy mode</title>
<description>Hi, I have seen the following behavior during my checks to see if we can use conserver. I perform the following commands: 1] Open a read/write cons</description>
<pubDate>20 Nov  2009 02:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1531</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>Guang Cheng Li wrote: &amp;gt; We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using &amp;gt; the IBM hardware management console to open the</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 08:54:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1530</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>HI,  We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using the IBM hardware management console to open the consoles. The IBM</description>
<pubDate>19 Nov  2009 03:10:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1529</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>2009/11/18 Guang Cheng Li &amp;lt;liguangc@cn.ibm.com&amp;gt; &amp;gt; We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything &amp;gt; worked perfect until sev</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 05:30:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1528</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:58:47AM +0100, Fabien Wernli wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Whatever optimization you&amp;#039;ll end up using, you will have to use more than &amp;gt; one co</description>
<pubDate>18 Nov  2009 00:23:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1527</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:29:44PM +0800, Guang Cheng Li wrote: &amp;gt; We did try some scaling tuning for conserver, but does not seem quite &amp;gt; helpful. Cou</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 23:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1526</link>
</item><item>
<title>question about conserver scaling out ability</title>
<description>HI,  We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything worked perfect until several months ago when our cluster is growing l</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2009 23:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: bug in line handling?</title>
<description>In fact, I mis-read this and there are two missing new lines in this.  There should also be a newline before &amp;quot;nasaaa2*:&amp;quot; Which is the same  host as</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1524</link>
</item><item>
<title>bug in line handling?</title>
<description>Hi, We&amp;#039;ve now using conserver with over 200 consoles all logging to one  conserver server. It all works really well except that sometimes  combined</description>
<pubDate>09 Nov  2009 07:14:58 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1523</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver and LXNI Icebox</title>
<description>On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Brian Luckau &amp;lt;bluckau@sgi.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  Hi, &amp;gt; Does Conserver support LNXI Iceboxes? &amp;gt; All you need is telnet suppo</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 17:50:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1522</link>
</item><item>
<title>Conserver and LXNI Icebox</title>
<description>Hi, Does Conserver support LNXI Iceboxes?</description>
<pubDate>05 Nov  2009 08:51:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1521</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: passing ctrl+z key combination</title>
<description>At Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:43:48 -0400 (EDT), Jeremy Eder &amp;lt;jeder@redhat.com&amp;gt; wrote: Subject: passing ctrl+z key combination &amp;gt; &amp;gt; im looking to pass ctrl+z</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 18:05:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1520</link>
</item><item>
<title>passing ctrl+z key combination</title>
<description>hi, im looking to pass ctrl+z to a server - console man page says  1) escape sequence (mine is default &amp;#039;control-E c&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) 2) then type \ooo where ooo i</description>
<pubDate>22 Oct  2009 10:43:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1519</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; As a workaround, I&amp;#039;d script around &amp;#039;console&amp;#039; with &amp;#039;expect&amp;#039; :) to provide &amp;gt; different functionality as user-accessible</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 08:53:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1518</link>
</item><item>
<title>GSSAPI patch for Ubuntu/Debian</title>
<description>Hi, Attached is a one-liner that fixes a segfault in 8.1.17 when compiled against libgssapi2-heimdal on Ubuntu Jaunty. Looks like a typo? Andras</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 04:30:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1517</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:03:10AM +0200, Pearce Andy wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; As I understand it the conserver is started with a configuration file &amp;gt; conserver.cf</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 01:17:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1516</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Hi Andras, As I understand it the conserver is started with a configuration file conserver.cf that defines a set of consoles for various machines, ou</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 01:03:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1515</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 09:19:11AM +0200, Pearce Andy wrote: &amp;gt; Is it possible to override the initcmd specified for a console &amp;gt; in the conserver.cf fi</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 00:42:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1514</link>
</item><item>
<title>Varying the initcmd for a console</title>
<description>Hi, Is it possible to override the initcmd specified for a console in the conserver.cf file, so that varying scripts can be run as required when the</description>
<pubDate>16 Oct  2009 00:19:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1513</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Hi Fabien,  Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:39:42 +0200 Fabien Wernli &amp;lt;wernli@in2p3.fr&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; could you be a little more verbose in the %changelog? Hups, su</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 08:59:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1512</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 01:48:17PM +0200, Jodok Ole Muellers wrote: &amp;gt; I modified the spec file to generate two sub packages could you be a little mor</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 07:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1511</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Hello, I modified the spec file to generate two sub packages  conserver-client and  conserver-server Because we run a lot of clients that need to</description>
<pubDate>14 Oct  2009 05:03:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1510</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] telnet negotiation</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m forwarding this patch on behalf of Nicolas De Metz-Noblat who has been using conserver-8.1.15 to handle the consoles of ~1000 VME Single Boar</description>
<pubDate>12 Oct  2009 01:43:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1509</link>
</item><item>
<title>Xiao Peng Wang is on vacation.</title>
<description>I will be out of the office starting 2009-09-28 and will not return until 2009-10-12. If you have urgent thing, Guang Cheng Li is my backup.</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 13:07:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1508</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver-8.1.17 is available</title>
<description>At Mon, 5 Oct 2009 03:24:46 -0700, Eric Biederman &amp;lt;ebiederm@aristanetworks.com&amp;gt; wrote: Subject: Re: conserver-8.1.17 is available &amp;gt; &amp;gt; The one feature</description>
<pubDate>09 Oct  2009 11:12:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1507</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver-8.1.17 is available</title>
<description>On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Bryan Stansell &amp;lt;bryan@conserver.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; There are one or two features I haven&amp;#039;t implemented that I&amp;#039;ve been &amp;gt; th</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2009 03:24:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1506</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Spruce up the conserver init.d script</title>
<description>Another patch we have been carrying that hasn&amp;#039;t made it up to conserver. - Add basic error handling - Rename the current restart reload - Implement a</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2009 03:16:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1505</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Install man pages read-only</title>
<description>With the release of conserver-8.1.17 I went back through our patch queue and I found this minor patch that has not made it&amp;#039;s way into conserver. Eric</description>
<pubDate>05 Oct  2009 03:10:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1504</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Script Exit/Reinitialization</title>
<description>On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 04:24:17PM +0200, Ben Batten wrote: &amp;gt; ... I tried &amp;quot;!autoreinit&amp;quot; and that didn&amp;#039;t work. I see the spin I use default * {</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 07:32:41 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1503</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Script Exit/Reinitialization</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; - pass or embed a console-exit -- &amp;quot;^Ec.&amp;quot; -- through a forced ssh &amp;gt;&amp;gt; command. Ie., running a forced script (menu) and an option is to exi</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 07:24:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1502</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Script Exit/Reinitialization</title>
<description>Hi, On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:10:39AM -0400, Ben Batten wrote: &amp;gt; - pass or embed a console-exit -- &amp;quot;^Ec.&amp;quot; -- through a forced ssh &amp;gt; command. Ie., r</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 06:40:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1501</link>
</item><item>
<title>Script Exit/Reinitialization</title>
<description>All-- Apologies in advance if these have been asked-and-answered but with Googling and experimenting I haven&amp;#039;t been able to find a configuration yet</description>
<pubDate>30 Sep  2009 05:10:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1500</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Since I&amp;#039;ve only seen a handful of hits grabbing version 8.1.17, I&amp;#039;ve gone ahead and just added the missing file to the tarball. For anyone that snagg</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 16:01:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1499</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Ahh! Sorry about that. It was me...I forgot to update my packaging script. I&amp;#039;ll get this fixed and out soon. Bryan On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:17:</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 13:26:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1497</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: 8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>Hi, On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:10:42AM -0700, Eric Heydrick wrote: &amp;gt; The spec file included with conserver 8.1.17 references a defaults file &amp;gt; that&amp;#039;</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 13:17:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1496</link>
</item><item>
<title>8.1.17 spec file issue</title>
<description>The spec file included with conserver 8.1.17 references a defaults file that&amp;#039;s supposed to be in contrib/redhat-rpm/conserver.defaults but that file</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 11:10:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1495</link>
</item><item>
<title>conserver-8.1.17 is available</title>
<description>After an incredibly long delay, version 8.1.17 is finally out. Sorry for both the length of time and any missing features I may have promised an indi</description>
<pubDate>29 Sep  2009 08:37:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1494</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] open conserver client connections in nonblocking mode</title>
<description>I recently tracked down a nasty conserver stall to the fact that conserver opens connections to the console program and leaves the socket in blocking</description>
<pubDate>24 Sep  2009 22:48:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: &amp;#039;console&amp;#039; exit status</title>
<description>It should, and it looks like it isn&amp;#039;t. It exits non-zero if there&amp;#039;s a &amp;quot;hard&amp;quot; error (for lack of a better term - out of memory, ssl protocol failure,</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2009 23:31:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1491</link>
</item><item>
<title>&amp;#039;console&amp;#039; exit status</title>
<description>Hi, Shouldn&amp;#039;t &amp;#039;console&amp;#039; return with an exit status other than 0 if the connection failed? Andras _______________________________________________ use</description>
<pubDate>21 Sep  2009 08:37:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1490</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kerberos authentication?</title>
<description>On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:03:04PM +0200, Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Note: authentication info has to be in username@REALM.DOMAIN format &amp;gt; ins</description>
<pubDate>18 Sep  2009 05:47:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1489</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kerberos authentication?</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Here is my most recent patch with works with libgssapi and libgssglue. Works for me, thank you! Note: authentication info has to be in username@RE</description>
<pubDate>17 Sep  2009 06:03:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1488</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Kerberos authentication?</title>
<description>On Sep 16 17:33, Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m wondering if anyone has a patch to use Kerberos5 tokens for &amp;gt; authentication between the client a</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 10:21:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1487</link>
</item><item>
<title>Kerberos authentication?</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m wondering if anyone has a patch to use Kerberos5 tokens for authentication between the client and the server? I can use the appropriate pass</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 08:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1486</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Console Variables</title>
<description>On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 08:18:54AM -0400, Ben Batten wrote: &amp;gt; Is it possible to use variable substitutions/interpolations in &amp;gt; conserver.cf? I&amp;#039;m look</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 05:50:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1485</link>
</item><item>
<title>Console Variables</title>
<description>Is it possible to use variable substitutions/interpolations in conserver.cf? I&amp;#039;m looking to shorten the numerous console definitions I have by utiliz</description>
<pubDate>16 Sep  2009 05:18:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1484</link>
</item><item>
<title>Reconnect after network outage??</title>
<description>I had an event where the network conserver and my terminal servers are on was down for a period of time. During the outage conserver could not connect</description>
<pubDate>02 Sep  2009 10:30:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1483</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: packet filtering vs. conserver</title>
<description>Got it. I had tunnle vision, and was only thinking of Conserver starting up and connecting to console servers on other networks...    -Z- On Thu</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2009 08:34:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1482</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: packet filtering vs. conserver</title>
<description>On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:22:00AM +0200, Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; It would make the main port 782, and then start allocating from 783 for &amp;gt; the rest.</description>
<pubDate>20 Aug  2009 04:05:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1481</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: packet filtering vs. conserver</title>
<description>secondaryport is what you want. Something like: config * {   secondaryport 9900; } tells conserver to start allocating from port 9900 for it&amp;#039;s se</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2009 21:22:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: packet filtering vs. conserver</title>
<description>Normally, a &amp;quot;stateful&amp;quot; packet filter will allow the &amp;quot;return ports&amp;quot; for all sessions opened from &amp;quot;inside&amp;quot; the firewall... In that case, Conserver initi</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2009 08:53:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1479</link>
</item><item>
<title>packet filtering vs. conserver</title>
<description>Hi, Is there a way to make conserver listen on a limited number of ports only (instead of opening random ports)?  The manual page talks about the &amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>19 Aug  2009 07:23:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Cannot exit ssh conserver connection to cisco terminal server.</title>
<description>Hello, I am testing a ssh conserver connection to a cisco terminal server attached to the serial ILOM of a Sun M4000 sparc server running solaris 10.</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug  2009 04:58:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver exit on failed NSS lookup</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:11:18AM +0200, Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; Anyway, maybe that helps clear things up...but if conserver is really &amp;gt; exiting, I</description>
<pubDate>01 Jul  2009 06:15:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1476</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver exit on failed NSS lookup</title>
<description>On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:11:18AM +0200, Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; Those two lines should be independent of themselves. In other words, &amp;gt; the first (p</description>
<pubDate>23 Jun  2009 01:54:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver exit on failed NSS lookup</title>
<description>Those two lines should be independent of themselves. In other words, the first (pcitfiot05) logs an exitsbecause the command to bring up that console</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 15:11:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1474</link>
</item><item>
<title>conserver exit on failed NSS lookup</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m running conserver on a host that uses LDAP for the user database, and sometimes we have problems with that. However, shouldn&amp;#039;t conserver simp</description>
<pubDate>22 Jun  2009 07:39:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1473</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: memleak?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 04:28:48PM -0700, Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; What version are you using? I don&amp;#039;t want to assume. conserver: conserver.com versi</description>
<pubDate>12 Jun  2009 00:20:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1472</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: memleak?</title>
<description>On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 05:13:34PM +0200, Fabien Wernli wrote: &amp;gt; I know there&amp;#039;s some ipmitool processes which seem to memleak, and which I &amp;gt; kill on a</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 16:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1471</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: memleak?</title>
<description>On Jun 11 17:13, Fabien Wernli wrote: &amp;gt; Also, there&amp;#039;s 100 conserver processes which use around 8M of RAM each upon &amp;gt; startup. Now these grow over time</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 08:29:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1470</link>
</item><item>
<title>memleak?</title>
<description>Hi, I&amp;#039;m having some memory related problems on linux 2.6 x64. One of our conserver handles 1700 consoles, most of which are &amp;#039;exec&amp;#039; types. 1300 use &amp;#039;i</description>
<pubDate>11 Jun  2009 08:13:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:58:03AM -0400, Chris Ross wrote: &amp;gt;  Looking at this a little more, that difference there was the important one.  &amp;gt; The pa</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 10:45:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1468</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>On Monday 08 June 2009 09:30:26 Chris Ross wrote: &amp;gt; On Monday 08 June 2009 02:05:47 Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; A quick search found this thread: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 06:58:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1467</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>On Monday 08 June 2009 02:05:47 Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; Yep, something is broken dealing with enumerating all the interfaces. &amp;gt; Looks like it thinks t</description>
<pubDate>08 Jun  2009 06:30:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1466</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>Yep, something is broken dealing with enumerating all the interfaces. Looks like it thinks there are 31 of them (is that even close?)...but it&amp;#039;s not s</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 23:05:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1465</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>On Jun 6, 2009, at 18:06, Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; Does &amp;#039;conserver -DS&amp;#039; show 127.0.0.1 in the ProbeInterfaces()  &amp;gt; output? If &amp;gt; it&amp;#039;s not there (or Pr</description>
<pubDate>07 Jun  2009 18:31:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1464</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>&amp;gt;  Okay. Default * has &amp;quot;master localhost&amp;quot;. That&amp;#039;s the only master I have. &amp;gt; localhost does, using IPv4 resolution, resolve to 127.0.0.1. I don&amp;#039;t &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>06 Jun  2009 15:06:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1463</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>On Friday 05 June 2009 13:30:03 Bryan Stansell wrote: &amp;gt; Well, this could be an interesting failure mode with the SSL code, or &amp;gt; something changed such</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 12:14:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1462</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>Hm!  OS Upgrade?  Check your HOSTS file.  Various unix&amp;#039;s implement the local host name differently.  If your node is phred, and its IP is say, 141</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 10:33:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1461</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>Well, this could be an interesting failure mode with the SSL code, or something changed such that conserver no longer believes it&amp;#039;s running on the hos</description>
<pubDate>05 Jun  2009 10:30:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1460</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems with conserver after OS upgrade</title>
<description>Apologies for those who feel this is an OS problem, and you&amp;#039;re  likely right. That, and/or a &amp;quot;stupid user trick&amp;quot;.   I was running NetBSD 4.0_STABL</description>
<pubDate>04 Jun  2009 19:48:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1459</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver ?</title>
<description>Thanks Brian &amp;amp; Greg. I went with the cygwin approach. I grabbed the redhat version, it seemed to come with openssl and the make commands as the base.</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 17:24:49 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1458</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver ?</title>
<description>At Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:34:20 -0700, Bryan Stansell &amp;lt;bryan@conserver.com&amp;gt; wrote: Subject: Re: conserver ? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; There isn&amp;#039;t direct support for that, but</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 17:15:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1457</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver ?</title>
<description>There isn&amp;#039;t direct support for that, but I have seen folks use a script (or actual compiled program) as a shell for a user, that then fires the consol</description>
<pubDate>02 Jun  2009 13:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1456</link>
</item><item>
<title>conserver ?</title>
<description>First let me start by I am new to conserver and I have it setup and working with the console client. But is there a way to setup conserver so I can ss</description>
<pubDate>30 May  2009 20:50:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1455</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>Using tcp raw sockets works well for me on our private &amp;quot;back door&amp;quot; network. When going through the production network or production WANs, it is best</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 13:48:12 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1454</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>Mark Wedel &amp;lt;Mark.Wedel@Sun.Com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On a T1000 I have 700 consoles - most are actually getting the console &amp;gt; connection over ssh scripts to SP&amp;#039;s</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 13:24:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1453</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>Steve Lammert wrote: &amp;gt; I have two Conserver installations, one managing nearly 1800 lines and &amp;gt; the other nearly 1200. All lines are telnet-based (t</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 13:15:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1452</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>I have two Conserver installations, one managing nearly 1800 lines and the other nearly 1200. All lines are telnet-based (to Cyclades/Avocent termi</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 12:43:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1451</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 15:13 -0400, Rob wrote: &amp;gt; That&amp;#039;s the order of magnitude I was looking for ...... forgot to &amp;gt; mention I&amp;#039;m running Linux ..... any</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 12:24:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1450</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Rob wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Does anyone have any real life experience monitoring 100&amp;#039;s of consoles??? &amp;gt; Maybe 6-7 years ago, we had a 400+ port setup on a singl</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 12:14:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1449</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>That&amp;#039;s the order of magnitude I was looking for ...... forgot to mention I&amp;#039;m running Linux ..... anyone with experience on that OS?? --&amp;gt; Rob  On Thu</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 12:13:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1448</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>Rob wrote: &amp;gt; Does anyone have any real life experience monitoring 100&amp;#039;s of consoles??? Maybe 6-7 years ago, we had a 400+ port setup on a single free</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 11:45:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1447</link>
</item><item>
<title>How many consoles can conserver support??</title>
<description>I know it&amp;#039;s a loaded question .... but given I&amp;#039;m running conserver on a DUAL 3.2GHZ Xeon server with 4GB of memory ... how many consoles could I expec</description>
<pubDate>28 May  2009 11:36:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1446</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver logfile mod ....</title>
<description>SWEET !! ... didn&amp;#039;t see that in the MAN PAGE On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Bryan Stansell &amp;lt;bryan@conserver.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; That functionality is alre</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2009 18:46:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1445</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver logfile mod ....</title>
<description>That functionality is already there. If a console has the &amp;quot;timestamp 1l;&amp;quot; option, you&amp;#039;ll get a timestamp before each line. Bryan On Fri, May 08, 20</description>
<pubDate>09 May  2009 14:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1444</link>
</item><item>
<title>RE: Conserver logfile mod ....</title>
<description>I like this idea...if you do make a patch, would you mind sharing it? --Brian -----Original Message----- From: users-bounces@conserver.com [mailto:u</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2009 12:39:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1443</link>
</item><item>
<title>Conserver logfile mod ....</title>
<description>I was looking to make a modification to the code and wondering if you can tell me where to start looking ..... I want to add an option so that EVERY L</description>
<pubDate>08 May  2009 12:32:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1442</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver through a proxy server?</title>
<description>On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 1:34 PM, John Stoffel &amp;lt;john.stoffel@taec.toshiba.com&amp;gt;wrote: &amp;gt; Zonker&amp;gt;  For simplicity, let&amp;#039;s call my conserver the &amp;quot;Lab&amp;quot;, and</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2009 14:11:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1441</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver through a proxy server?</title>
<description>Zonker&amp;gt;  Here&amp;#039;s some more info...given that I can&amp;#039;t talk about some Zonker&amp;gt;  specifics. :-) Heh, security through obscurity. :] Zonker&amp;gt;  For si</description>
<pubDate>07 May  2009 13:34:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1440</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver through a proxy server?</title>
<description>Hi John, Chris (and the group at large)  Here&amp;#039;s some more info...given that I can&amp;#039;t talk about some specifics. :-)  For simplicity, let&amp;#039;s call my</description>
<pubDate>06 May  2009 19:16:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1439</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Conserver through a proxy server?</title>
<description>Zonker&amp;gt;  I find myself in a situation where I must access a Zonker&amp;gt; restricted network via a proxy server. Do you have a terminal server on the rest</description>
<pubDate>06 May  2009 18:34:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1438</link>
</item><item>
<title>Conserver through a proxy server?</title>
<description>I find myself in a situation where I must access a restricted network via a proxy server.  Conserver here is a &amp;quot;normal&amp;quot; setup... many local (in-buil</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2009 10:47:29 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1437</link>
</item><item>
<title>configuration in a hierarchical system</title>
<description>Hello-- I want to set up conserver to manage consoles in a hierarchical fashion within a cluster environment....... I&amp;#039;m not sure if conserver support</description>
<pubDate>19 Feb  2009 10:02:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1436</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: Re: conserver extras</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:23:36PM +0100, Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; This works just as well and it minimizes the times stuff needs to be &amp;gt; regen</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 07:48:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1435</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: conserver extras</title>
<description>&amp;gt; Our conservers share the same conserver.cf using crond and cvs. &amp;gt; The nice part is being able to &amp;#039;console myserver&amp;#039; on any of the conservers &amp;gt; witho</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 07:23:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1434</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Re: conserver extras</title>
<description>Hi, On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:40:10PM +0100, Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; I don&amp;#039;t. Each headnode only knows only its own clients. From the same &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 06:59:55 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1433</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver extras</title>
<description>On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 03:14:16PM +0100, Fabien Wernli wrote: &amp;gt; How do you sync conserver.cf among conservers? I don&amp;#039;t. Each headnode only knows on</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 06:40:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1432</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: conserver extras</title>
<description>Hi, On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 01:47:33PM +0100, Andras.Horvath@cern.ch wrote: &amp;gt; optional multiport serial cards) every 40..200 clients where server cod</description>
<pubDate>17 Nov  2008 06:14:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1431</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
