Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/ en-us (c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved. 26 Nov 2009 04:05:23 -0800 120 75 23 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/ http://www.gossamer-threads.com/images/lists/rss_logo.jpg console -u Arthur On 26 Nov 2009, at 08:52, Pearce Andy wrote: > We have the requirement to graphically present the status of all > console links. 26 Nov 2009 01:00:54 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1534 Hi, We have the requirement to graphically present the status of all console links. Does the conserver daemon maintain this information in any form t 26 Nov 2009 00:52:18 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1533 If you use 'console -s <console>' then you'll be requested a read-only connection, and you won't become read-write when the other user disconnects. T 20 Nov 2009 17:13:58 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1532 Hi, I have seen the following behavior during my checks to see if we can use conserver. I perform the following commands: 1] Open a read/write cons 20 Nov 2009 02:16:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1531 Guang Cheng Li wrote: > We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using > the IBM hardware management console to open the 19 Nov 2009 08:54:10 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1530 HI, We are not using the terminal servers to connect to the nodes, we are using the IBM hardware management console to open the consoles. The IBM 19 Nov 2009 03:10:38 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1529 2009/11/18 Guang Cheng Li <liguangc@cn.ibm.com> > We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything > worked perfect until sev 18 Nov 2009 05:30:51 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1528 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 08:58:47AM +0100, Fabien Wernli wrote: > > Whatever optimization you'll end up using, you will have to use more than > one co 18 Nov 2009 00:23:41 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1527 On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 03:29:44PM +0800, Guang Cheng Li wrote: > We did try some scaling tuning for conserver, but does not seem quite > helpful. Cou 17 Nov 2009 23:58:47 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1526 HI, We are using conserver to handle the consoles in our cluster, everything worked perfect until several months ago when our cluster is growing l 17 Nov 2009 23:29:44 -0800 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/conserver/users/1525