oz at nixil
Feb 13, 2004, 12:54 PM
Post #4 of 9
Julien Benoist wrote:
>On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:22:11 -0700
>Phil Oleson <oz [at] nixil> wrote:
>> So I've been playing with clamd & clamav-milter on 2 extremely
>>loaded sendmail servers,
>>and I think we are pushing clamd over it's limits..
>Just wondering ... do you have any stats to share ? Scanned mails per sec, avgload, percentage of infected mails, etc ...
My Sendmail guy says that the together these 2 boxes process 600,000 to
800,000 e-mails each day.
btw, my libevent patched clamd seems happier than I remembered.. at a
max child of 50. Guess
checking out how the thread version responded in this environment
clouded my memory a bit.
I'm going to check out James's? nclamd again now that I'm more familiar
and can make a better analysis of it. Though I'd like to see where the
project leads want things
btw, I've found that clamav-milter chokes after a time when --quiet arg
is not provided.. didn't investigate too much.. (mainly because I dont
want that email anyways).