<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>ClamAV | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 17:14:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[Fwd from Luca Gibelli] [Clamav-announce] ClamAV is migrating from	subversion to git</title>
<description>FYI ----- Forwarded message from Luca Gibelli ----- Dear ClamAV users, we would like to announce that git will be the new Version Control System (VC</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 08:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello Edwin, Thank you for useful information. I have a question as well: 1) Is PE section MD5 signature created from a particular section like code</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44526</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>On 2009-07-02 23:10, Sang Kil Cha wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello, When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older version of ClamAV like 0.90, to compare the s</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 13:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-18 14:12, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; 2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 10:16:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email &amp;gt; from a user, talking abo</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 23:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>Hi, After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email from a user, talking about this problem building on 6.3. warranty; not ev</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 15:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44362</link>
</item><item>
<title>DATADIR clash on cygwin/mingw</title>
<description>w32api defines now in /usr/include/w32api/objidl.h: typedef enum tagDATADIR {     DATADIR_GET=1,     DATADIR_SET } DATADIR; This is used in c</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 08:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:08:54 +0200 Janos SUTO &amp;lt;sj@datanet.hu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Most of them are self-explanatory, also the source c</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 03:35:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44201</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; Most of them are self-explanatory, also the source code of clamd and &amp;gt; clamscan should clear up any doubts. Which particular fie</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 03:08:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44200</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>On Wed, 27 May 2009 10:54:46 +0200 (CEST) sj@datanet.hu wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Dear list, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have updated my application (using libclamav), but I ran into a</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 02:12:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44198</link>
</item><item>
<title>I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>Dear list, I have updated my application (using libclamav), but I ran into a problem when I tried to set some limits (used to use &amp;#039;struct cl_limit&amp;#039;)</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 01:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44197</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On 21 May 2009, at 3:19 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 &amp;gt; Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It would also elim</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:25:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; It would also eliminate another issue I&amp;#039;ve had to work  &amp;gt; around which</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On the one hand, you&amp;#039;re right that were clamscan to have a command-</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:08:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44151</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The regular expressions being excluded or included are compiled  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; just once and stored in memory  Brilliant! &amp;gt; On the one hand, you&amp;#039;re right t</description>
<pubDate>19 May  2009 07:49:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>Kamens, Jonathan wrote: &amp;gt; On the other hand, I don&amp;#039;t quite view clamscan as being a pipeline &amp;gt; tool of the same genre as sed, tr, etc. I think of it</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 07:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>Thanks for the feedback. Please forgive the formatting of this response; I am unfortunately stuck using Outlook :-/, and I&amp;#039;m sure it&amp;#039;s going to stick</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 09:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>Hi there, On Wed, 13 May 2009 Kamens, Jonathan &amp;gt; ... wanted to make clamscan a bit smarter ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; * don&amp;#039;t scan files more than 30 days old ... &amp;gt; *</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 03:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue May 12 2009 20:37:19 GMT+0200 (CEST) Kamens, Jonathan &amp;lt;jkamens@Advent.COM&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I would be delighted to hear any feedback that anyone has</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 00:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44080</link>
</item><item>
<title>PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>My employer uses ClamAV to do a daily scan of the client data stored on our appliances. Our appliances are pretty beefy, but some of our clients have</description>
<pubDate>12 May  2009 11:37:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44077</link>
</item><item>
<title>objective-C version of freshclam</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working on an antivirus for Mac, under GPL. Clamd protocol and its unix socket transport is just fine for interacting from Objective-C. But fres</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2009 11:22:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Compiling error with &amp;quot;dazukoio_compat12.c&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On 2009-04-17 16:38, Caloro Maurizio wrote: &amp;gt; Please, if i compile ClamAV [Clamav-devel-latest - 17.04.2009] &amp;gt; on Solaris 10 with following options it</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2009 06:49:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43843</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
