<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>ClamAV | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>08 Nov  2009 21:16:15 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>Re: [Clamav-binary] ClamAV 0.95.3</title>
<description>On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; the new stable release can be downloaded here (please &amp;gt; keep these li</description>
<pubDate>28 Oct  2009 11:52:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45407</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: why does libclamav need libltdl ?</title>
<description>Per Jessen wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m building clamav on one system, then copying the libraries to my &amp;gt; production system. This has worked fine right up until lib</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2009 02:08:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45218</link>
</item><item>
<title>why does libclamav need libltdl ?</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m building clamav on one system, then copying the libraries to my production system. This has worked fine right up until libclamav.6, which require</description>
<pubDate>04 Oct  2009 01:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45217</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A portable way to determine the version of	libclamav</title>
<description>&amp;gt; You could use one of the macros that are defined in 0.95 and not in &amp;gt; 0.94, such as CL_INIT_DEFAULT. That should do it, thanks alot. Tillmann ____</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2009 03:45:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45077</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: A portable way to determine the version of libclamav</title>
<description>On 2009-09-20 13:15, Tillmann Werner wrote: &amp;gt; Hi list, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; does anybody know of a portable way to determine the version of &amp;gt; libclamav? I&amp;#039;d like to li</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2009 03:38:18 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45076</link>
</item><item>
<title>A portable way to determine the version of libclamav</title>
<description>Hi list, does anybody know of a portable way to determine the version of libclamav? I&amp;#039;d like to link against it on different platforms that use diffe</description>
<pubDate>20 Sep  2009 03:15:43 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45075</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Clamuko: DazukoFS support + fix reload race</title>
<description>On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:46:25 +0200 John Ogness &amp;lt;dazukocode@ogness.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On 2009-09-09, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; if possible,</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2009 14:21:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45012</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Clamuko: DazukoFS support + fix reload race</title>
<description>On 2009-09-09, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; if possible, please open two bug reports at bugs.clamav.net (for &amp;gt; race condition and dazukofs</description>
<pubDate>10 Sep  2009 13:46:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45011</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [PATCH] Clamuko: DazukoFS support + fix reload race</title>
<description>On Wed Sep 09 2009 00:37:14 GMT+0200 (CEST) John Ogness &amp;lt;dazukocode@ogness.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; This is a patch against ClamAV 0.95.2 that introduces DazukoF</description>
<pubDate>09 Sep  2009 14:25:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/45005</link>
</item><item>
<title>[PATCH] Clamuko: DazukoFS support + fix reload race</title>
<description>This is a patch against ClamAV 0.95.2 that introduces DazukoFS support for Clamuko. If /dev/dazukofs.ctrl is not found, it falls back to the original</description>
<pubDate>08 Sep  2009 15:37:14 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44993</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Making the shared directory a convenience library</title>
<description>On 2009-08-25 00:13, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:06:10PM +0300, Török Edwin said: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2009-08-23 03:24, Stephen Gran wrote</description>
<pubDate>25 Aug  2009 00:26:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44895</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Making the shared directory a convenience library</title>
<description>On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 01:06:10PM +0300, Török Edwin said: &amp;gt; On 2009-08-23 03:24, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hi all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This patch makes the shared</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2009 14:13:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44888</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ClamAV-clamd av-scanner FAILED and ClamAV-clamscan av-scanner FAILED</title>
<description>Federico Giovannini wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m new in this mailing-list and also as clamav-user so sorry for my elementary questions. &amp;gt; With my config</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2009 07:25:20 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44872</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Making the shared directory a convenience library</title>
<description>On 2009-08-23 03:24, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; Hi all, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; This patch makes the shared/ subdirectory build a convenience library. &amp;gt;   Hi Stephen, Did y</description>
<pubDate>24 Aug  2009 03:06:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44869</link>
</item><item>
<title>Making the shared directory a convenience library</title>
<description>Hi all, This patch makes the shared/ subdirectory build a convenience library. This means that on builds, each object file is only built once, then c</description>
<pubDate>22 Aug  2009 17:24:50 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44865</link>
</item><item>
<title>ClamAV-clamd av-scanner FAILED and ClamAV-clamscan av-scanner FAILED</title>
<description>Hi all, I&amp;#039;m new in this mailing-list and also as clamav-user so sorry for my elementary questions. With my configuration gentoo, postfix ( 2.2.11-r1</description>
<pubDate>17 Aug  2009 08:15:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44834</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: ClamAV is migrating from subversion to git</title>
<description>Hello, &amp;gt; we would like to announce that git will be the new Version &amp;gt; Control System (VCS) for ClamAV.  we recently added support for git native pr</description>
<pubDate>31 Jul  2009 04:04:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44709</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Ibraheem Khan wrote: &amp;gt; Hello Edwin, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Thank you for useful information. I have a question as well: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; 1) Is PE section MD5 signature created from</description>
<pubDate>06 Jul  2009 11:05:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44537</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Fwd from Luca Gibelli] [Clamav-announce] ClamAV is migrating from	subversion to git</title>
<description>FYI ----- Forwarded message from Luca Gibelli ----- Dear ClamAV users, we would like to announce that git will be the new Version Control System (VC</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 08:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello Edwin, Thank you for useful information. I have a question as well: 1) Is PE section MD5 signature created from a particular section like code</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44526</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>On 2009-07-02 23:10, Sang Kil Cha wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello, When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older version of ClamAV like 0.90, to compare the s</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 13:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-18 14:12, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; 2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 10:16:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email &amp;gt; from a user, talking abo</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 23:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>Hi, After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email from a user, talking about this problem building on 6.3. warranty; not ev</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 15:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44362</link>
</item><item>
<title>DATADIR clash on cygwin/mingw</title>
<description>w32api defines now in /usr/include/w32api/objidl.h: typedef enum tagDATADIR {     DATADIR_GET=1,     DATADIR_SET } DATADIR; This is used in c</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 08:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44299</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:08:54 +0200 Janos SUTO &amp;lt;sj@datanet.hu&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Most of them are self-explanatory, also the source c</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 03:35:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44201</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; Most of them are self-explanatory, also the source code of clamd and &amp;gt; clamscan should clear up any doubts. Which particular fie</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 03:08:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44200</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>On Wed, 27 May 2009 10:54:46 +0200 (CEST) sj@datanet.hu wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Dear list, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have updated my application (using libclamav), but I ran into a</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 02:12:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44198</link>
</item><item>
<title>I am uncertain of the meaning of cl_engine_field members</title>
<description>Dear list, I have updated my application (using libclamav), but I ran into a problem when I tried to set some limits (used to use &amp;#039;struct cl_limit&amp;#039;)</description>
<pubDate>27 May  2009 01:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44197</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On 21 May 2009, at 3:19 pm, Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 &amp;gt; Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; It would also elim</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:25:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44153</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; It would also eliminate another issue I&amp;#039;ve had to work  &amp;gt; around which</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:19:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44152</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:23 +0100 Mark Allan &amp;lt;markjallan@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; On the one hand, you&amp;#039;re right that were clamscan to have a command-</description>
<pubDate>21 May  2009 07:08:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44151</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>&amp;gt;&amp;gt; The regular expressions being excluded or included are compiled  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; just once and stored in memory  Brilliant! &amp;gt; On the one hand, you&amp;#039;re right t</description>
<pubDate>19 May  2009 07:49:23 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44134</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>Kamens, Jonathan wrote: &amp;gt; On the other hand, I don&amp;#039;t quite view clamscan as being a pipeline &amp;gt; tool of the same genre as sed, tr, etc. I think of it</description>
<pubDate>17 May  2009 07:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44110</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for	clamscan</title>
<description>Thanks for the feedback. Please forgive the formatting of this response; I am unfortunately stuck using Outlook :-/, and I&amp;#039;m sure it&amp;#039;s going to stick</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 09:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44085</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>Hi there, On Wed, 13 May 2009 Kamens, Jonathan &amp;gt; ... wanted to make clamscan a bit smarter ... &amp;gt; &amp;gt; * don&amp;#039;t scan files more than 30 days old ... &amp;gt; *</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 03:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44083</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>On Tue May 12 2009 20:37:19 GMT+0200 (CEST) Kamens, Jonathan &amp;lt;jkamens@Advent.COM&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; I would be delighted to hear any feedback that anyone has</description>
<pubDate>13 May  2009 00:59:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44080</link>
</item><item>
<title>PATCH: Enhanced exclude / include support for clamscan</title>
<description>My employer uses ClamAV to do a daily scan of the client data stored on our appliances. Our appliances are pretty beefy, but some of our clients have</description>
<pubDate>12 May  2009 11:37:19 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44077</link>
</item><item>
<title>objective-C version of freshclam</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m working on an antivirus for Mac, under GPL. Clamd protocol and its unix socket transport is just fine for interacting from Objective-C. But fres</description>
<pubDate>11 May  2009 11:22:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44062</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Compiling error with &amp;quot;dazukoio_compat12.c&amp;quot;</title>
<description>On 2009-04-17 16:38, Caloro Maurizio wrote: &amp;gt; Please, if i compile ClamAV [Clamav-devel-latest - 17.04.2009] &amp;gt; on Solaris 10 with following options it</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2009 06:49:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43843</link>
</item><item>
<title>Compiling error with &amp;quot;dazukoio_compat12.c&amp;quot;</title>
<description>Please, if i compile ClamAV [Clamav-devel-latest - 17.04.2009] on Solaris 10 with following options it&amp;#039;s appair the error dazukoio_compat12.c:122: err</description>
<pubDate>17 Apr  2009 06:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43842</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>On Tue, 7 Apr 2009 18:19:42 +0200 Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; What is the status of this release? Will it happen today? &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Yes, it wi</description>
<pubDate>07 Apr  2009 13:12:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43734</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>On Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:59:08 -0600 Phil Oleson &amp;lt;oz@nixil.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; aCaB wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My question is, are you planning to</description>
<pubDate>07 Apr  2009 09:19:42 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43730</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>aCaB wrote: &amp;gt; Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My question is, are you planning to release a bugfix version &amp;gt;&amp;gt; in short period? If not, does anybody can help</description>
<pubDate>07 Apr  2009 08:59:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43729</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; Will be enough to update before 7.2. Very nice to hear that!  _______________________________________________ http://lurker.</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 07:04:03 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43665</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 10:44 AM, aCaB &amp;lt;acabng@digitalfuture.it&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; My question is, are you planning to release a bugfix</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 06:53:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43664</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; My question is, are you planning to release a bugfix version &amp;gt; in short period? If not, does anybody can help me providing &amp;gt; a</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 06:44:16 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43663</link>
</item><item>
<title>Fix clamav-milter bug on FreeBSD ports tree</title>
<description>Hello, A FreeBSD clamav user notified me about a bug on clamav-0.95, and after research he pointed me to this bug: https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/</description>
<pubDate>03 Apr  2009 06:16:08 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43662</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Suggestion - decouple functionality upgrade from API	changes</title>
<description>Per Jessen wrote: &amp;gt; The latest 0.95 release brings a new flevel 41 with the previous one &amp;gt; from 0.94.2 being 38. Unfortunately it looks like libclama</description>
<pubDate>30 Mar  2009 05:30:56 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43550</link>
</item><item>
<title>Suggestion - decouple functionality upgrade from API changes</title>
<description>The latest 0.95 release brings a new flevel 41 with the previous one from 0.94.2 being 38. Unfortunately it looks like libclamav 0.95 isn&amp;#039;t a drop-in</description>
<pubDate>27 Mar  2009 12:53:04 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>Ladar Levison wrote: &amp;gt; Eugene Crosser wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; I suspect that this may break on AMD64. It&amp;#039;s more picky about PIC/non-PIC code &amp;gt;&amp;gt; (no pun intended), a</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 23:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43501</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>Eugene Crosser wrote: &amp;gt; I suspect that this may break on AMD64. It&amp;#039;s more picky about PIC/non-PIC code &amp;gt; (no pun intended), attempt to link objects fr</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 15:06:52 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43492</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>Ladar Levison wrote: &amp;gt; I then merge together the different ClamAV libs using this command: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; ld -shared -o clamav.lib clamav-0.94.2/libclamav/.lib</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 13:46:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43489</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>nicolas dumont wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I am using clamav-0.95 with my own daemon that use libclamav &amp;gt; &amp;gt; During the initialization I have the message : &amp;gt; L</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 12:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43484</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>2009/3/25 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-03-25 19:54, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:51:02 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43483</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:24 PM, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed Mar 25 2009 19:11:36 GMT+0100 (CET) &amp;gt; Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.co</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:50:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43482</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed Mar 25 2009 19:11:36 GMT+0100 (CET) Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; And about the way I did the changes, is it ok? Yes, generally</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:24:05 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43480</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed Mar 25 2009 19:05:13 GMT+0100 (CET) &amp;gt; Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.co</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:11:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43479</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed Mar 25 2009 19:05:13 GMT+0100 (CET) Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; And for the other one: &amp;gt;   cfg-&amp;gt;maxfiles = 100; Setting max</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:07:38 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43478</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Gianluigi Tiesi &amp;lt;sherpya@netfarm.it&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Renato Botelho wrot</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:05:13 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43477</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On 2009-03-25 19:54, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 a</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:04:22 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43481</link>
</item><item>
<title>Some Projects Missing from ClamAV Windows Source tree</title>
<description>All, I know support for Windows ClamAV has been stopped. But still I was able to find a download link for Windows ClamAV Sources. I want to add some</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 11:00:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43476</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:46 PM, Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Gianluigi Tiesi &amp;lt;sherpya@netfarm.it&amp;gt; wro</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 10:54:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43475</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Gianluigi Tiesi &amp;lt;sherpya@netfarm.it&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Renato Botelho wrot</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 10:46:26 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43474</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I want to update clamav to 0.95 on FreeBSD ports collection, but, &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 10:14:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43470</link>
</item><item>
<title>Help to fix some code with new API</title>
<description>Hello, I want to update clamav to 0.95 on FreeBSD ports collection, but, before it I need to have all dependant ports working fine. I&amp;#039;ve contacted s</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 09:32:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43469</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>I&amp;#039;m sorry if I&amp;#039;m not enough clear of what I want to do. I just want to have the unpacked RAR files feature available in my binary without loading sep</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 08:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43467</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>nicolas dumont wrote: &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;ve developped a small daemon in order to do the initialization of &amp;gt; libclamav and load the database. Then I am able to answe</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 08:18:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43465</link>
</item><item>
<title>[clamav-devel] Misunderstand Clamav recursive scan</title>
<description>Hello. I&amp;#039;m using Clamav and improving Clamav for my final exams. Actually i very need you all help for my misunderstanding of clamscan scandir() algor</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 08:13:53 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43468</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>2009/3/25 aCaB &amp;lt;acabng@digitalfuture.it&amp;gt; &amp;gt; nicolas dumont wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is there a way in my Makefile or elsewhere to have the libclamunrar &amp;gt; &amp;gt; directly</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 07:08:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43464</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>nicolas dumont wrote: &amp;gt; Is there a way in my Makefile or elsewhere to have the libclamunrar &amp;gt; directly called &amp;gt; inside my binary without modifying the</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 06:58:21 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43463</link>
</item><item>
<title>[Clamav] Cannot dlopen: file not found - unrar support unavailable</title>
<description>Hello, I am using clamav-0.95 with my own daemon that use libclamav During the initialization I have the message : LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen:</description>
<pubDate>25 Mar  2009 06:35:39 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43462</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: clamdscan problems (misunderstanding?)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rick Macdougall wrote: &amp;gt; Andy Ruddock wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2009 12:18:00 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43421</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: clamdscan problems (misunderstanding?)</title>
<description>Andy Ruddock wrote: &amp;gt; -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- &amp;gt; Hash: SHA1 &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I&amp;#039;m running Ubuntu 8.10 AMD64 and have clamav installed from the &amp;gt; reposito</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2009 11:48:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43420</link>
</item><item>
<title>clamdscan problems (misunderstanding?)</title>
<description>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I&amp;#039;m running Ubuntu 8.10 AMD64 and have clamav installed from the repositories. I&amp;#039;ve compiled a &amp;quot;hello w</description>
<pubDate>23 Mar  2009 11:28:46 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43419</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Safebrowsing and web</title>
<description>On 2009-03-17 04:13, Henrik K wrote: &amp;gt; Quote from http://www.clamav.net/support/faq-safebrowsing: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;quot;It is mainly targeted at people who are using C</description>
<pubDate>19 Mar  2009 10:59:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43355</link>
</item><item>
<title>Safebrowsing and web</title>
<description>Quote from http://www.clamav.net/support/faq-safebrowsing: &amp;quot;It is mainly targeted at people who are using ClamAV to filter web traffic.&amp;quot; Seems unlik</description>
<pubDate>16 Mar  2009 19:13:24 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43289</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: API concerns</title>
<description>Would you accept a patch file if I ever have the time? Tomasz Kojm wrote: &amp;gt; On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:12:06 -0500 &amp;gt; Ladar Levison &amp;lt;ladar@lavabit.com&amp;gt; wr</description>
<pubDate>13 Mar  2009 16:44:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43268</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: API concerns</title>
<description>On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:12:06 -0500 Ladar Levison &amp;lt;ladar@lavabit.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; There currently is no function call available via the public libclamav</description>
<pubDate>13 Mar  2009 15:44:36 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43267</link>
</item><item>
<title>API concerns</title>
<description>There currently is no function call available via the public libclamav API to return the total number of signatures in the database directory. To fi</description>
<pubDate>13 Mar  2009 15:12:06 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43266</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:47:28 -0300 Renato Botelho &amp;lt;rbgarga@gmail.com&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Since API was chenged one more time, a new RC will be released to &amp;gt; 0.</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 11:27:10 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43248</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:01:59 +0300 Eugene Crosser &amp;lt;crosser@average.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; Tomasz, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; thank you for your attention to my concerns. Now I can</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 11:22:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43247</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>Tomasz, thank you for your attention to my concerns. Now I can go ahead and adjust zmscanner&amp;#039;s clamav plugin to use the new API ... with confidence!</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 10:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43244</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Tomasz Kojm &amp;lt;tkojm@clamav.net&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:39:47 +0300 &amp;gt; Eugene Crosser &amp;lt;crosser@average.org&amp;gt; wr</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 08:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43243</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:39:47 +0300 Eugene Crosser &amp;lt;crosser@average.org&amp;gt; wrote: &amp;gt; To mitigate this problem (if you *really* want to get rid of cl_limi</description>
<pubDate>12 Mar  2009 08:34:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43242</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>G.W. Haywood wrote: &amp;gt; What you say is true. However it would be much clearer that you &amp;gt; understand that your new milter breaks a lot of existing and</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2009 07:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43073</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>Chris Moules wrote: &amp;gt; Thanks for the feedback. I am using Postfix as MTA. Postfix does not have a &amp;gt; &amp;#039;quarantine queue&amp;#039; as such, it places messages on</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2009 07:28:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43072</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>Hi there, On Tue, 3 Mar 2009 aCaB wrote: &amp;gt; Chris Moules wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have been looking at the RC1 for ClamAV. With the rewrite of the &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Milter i</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2009 03:32:17 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43067</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>aCaB wrote: &amp;gt; Chris Moules wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; As an ISP here in Luxembourg we stand liable if we intercept and remove &amp;gt;&amp;gt; mail without informing the client. Our</description>
<pubDate>03 Mar  2009 00:44:28 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43064</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>Chris Moules wrote: &amp;gt; As an ISP here in Luxembourg we stand liable if we intercept and remove &amp;gt; mail without informing the client. Our current system</description>
<pubDate>02 Mar  2009 20:29:35 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43061</link>
</item><item>
<title>Binhex and PDF decoders</title>
<description>Hi. I am compiling clamav on a platform that does not provide mmap (required by pdf and binhex decoders), so I wrote a small patch that adds support</description>
<pubDate>02 Mar  2009 10:03:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43051</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>Patch now on Bugzilla (sorry for the mess, not use to the submission process). Bug: 1448 Chris Chris Moules wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; I have been looking a</description>
<pubDate>02 Mar  2009 09:59:32 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43050</link>
</item><item>
<title>New ClamAV Milter + Patch</title>
<description>Hi, I have been looking at the RC1 for ClamAV. With the rewrite of the Milter it has removed one important (for us) feature. That is the ability to</description>
<pubDate>02 Mar  2009 08:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43048</link>
</item><item>
<title>New 0.95 API concerns</title>
<description>Gentlemen, I have a couple of concerns about the new libclamav API introduced in 0.95 (rc1). I understand the reason to remove cl_limits structure, b</description>
<pubDate>02 Mar  2009 01:39:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/43042</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: use system libtommath when present</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:56:30AM +0200, Török Edwin said: &amp;gt; On 2009-02-20 02:12, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Hopefully this will be a useful patch. &amp;gt; &amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>20 Feb  2009 03:03:59 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/42816</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: [fabio.ped@libero.it: [Pkg-clamav-devel] Bug#512776: License incompatibility with libgmp (&amp;quot;GPLv2 only&amp;quot; linking to &amp;quot;LGPLv3 or later&amp;quot;)]</title>
<description>On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52:17AM +0200, Török Edwin said: &amp;gt; On 2009-02-20 03:13, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Now that I&amp;#039;ve been doing some looking, I se</description>
<pubDate>20 Feb  2009 03:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/42815</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: use system libtommath when present</title>
<description>On 2009-02-20 02:12, Stephen Gran wrote: &amp;gt; Hopefully this will be a useful patch. &amp;gt; &amp;gt; Cheers, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; [PATCH] Modify build system to conditionally use sy</description>
<pubDate>20 Feb  2009 01:56:30 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/42814</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
