<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet title="XSL_formatting" type="text/xsl" href="/images/lists/rssstyle2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>ClamAV | devel</title>
<description>Mailing List Archive by Gossamer Threads</description>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/</link>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>(c) Gossamer Threads Inc. All rights reserved.</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>04 Jul  2009 08:26:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>120</ttl>

<item>
<title>[Fwd from Luca Gibelli] [Clamav-announce] ClamAV is migrating from	subversion to git</title>
<description>FYI ----- Forwarded message from Luca Gibelli ----- Dear ClamAV users, we would like to announce that git will be the new Version Control System (VC</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 08:44:31 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44534</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello Edwin, Thank you for useful information. I have a question as well: 1) Is PE section MD5 signature created from a particular section like code</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44526</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>On 2009-07-02 23:10, Sang Kil Cha wrote: &amp;gt; Hello, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older</description>
<pubDate>03 Jul  2009 01:34:51 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44525</link>
</item><item>
<title>Why MD5 signatures prevail?</title>
<description>Hello, When I look at ClamAV&amp;#039;s signatures, most of them are md5 signatures. Also, when I download older version of ClamAV like 0.90, to compare the s</description>
<pubDate>02 Jul  2009 13:10:54 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44524</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-18 14:12, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; 2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt;  &amp;gt;&amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt;</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:22:01 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44388</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>18 Jun  2009 04:12:45 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44383</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>2009/6/17 Török Edwin &amp;lt;edwintorok@gmail.com&amp;gt;: &amp;gt; On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt;&amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;gt;&amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collecti</description>
<pubDate>17 Jun  2009 10:16:57 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44370</link>
</item><item>
<title>Re: Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>On 2009-06-17 01:58, Renato Botelho wrote: &amp;gt; Hi, &amp;gt; &amp;gt; After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email &amp;gt; from a user, talking abo</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 23:41:37 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44364</link>
</item><item>
<title>Problems building 0.95.2 under FreeBSD 6.3</title>
<description>Hi, After upgrade clamav on FreeBSD ports collection i recieved this email from a user, talking about this problem building on 6.3. warranty; not ev</description>
<pubDate>16 Jun  2009 15:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44362</link>
</item><item>
<title>DATADIR clash on cygwin/mingw</title>
<description>w32api defines now in /usr/include/w32api/objidl.h: typedef enum tagDATADIR {     DATADIR_GET=1,     DATADIR_SET } DATADIR; This is used in c</description>
<pubDate>09 Jun  2009 08:58:11 -0800</pubDate>
<link>http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/clamav/devel/44299</link>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
