aman.chugh at gmail
Oct 8, 2008, 7:45 AM
Post #3 of 3
(95 views)
Permalink
|
Yes, So far we have evaluated CUOM and ITPM and it certainly looks good
over CUOM . I am disappointed that we need anther server ITPMX for CME
boxes. We are also having some issues adding Nortel CS1000M system and are
currently working on that.
Thanks for your inputs.
Aman
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Matthew Saskin <matt[at]saskin.net> wrote:
> I've got a big IPTM install base (many clusters, many many thousands of
> phones) and absolutely love the product. Did a bake off a while ago between
> IPTM, NetCool, CUOM and a few others and ended up with IPTM.
>
> For what it's worth the newly added in Avaya monitoring component is pretty
> cool - not as full-featured as the Cisco monitoring but that's more a
> limitation of what Avaya makes available. To me on the Avaya side of things
> the graphical representation of enclosure hardware (compared to a 'list
> config all' via SAT) is worth a good deal.
>
> Let me know if you have any specific questions.
>
> -matt
>
> Aman Chugh wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to get an opinion from people using Prognosis for Cisco IPT
>> , I am evaluating it for CCM 4 and the new CUCM. Any gotchas, any cool
>> features. We are looking at it to monitor Cisco , Nortel and Avaya with it.
>> Thanks,
>> Aman
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
|
