Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: VOIP

OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?

 

 

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


svoll.voip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 12:33 PM

Post #1 of 17 (625 views)
Permalink
OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?

Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was wondering
if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
network. All responses welcome.

Scott


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 12:47 PM

Post #2 of 17 (609 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Well, you said all responses...

We just did a Cisco IPT implementation with 3Com switches (customer
controlled switches completely), and the implementation failed because
the switches couldn't handle multicast streams... 12 streams killed
the LAN.

So, I am now a convert... switches made by someone not Cisco? Just
move along pal...



Jonathan

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was wondering
> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
> network. All responses welcome.
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


lelio at uoguelph

Jul 17, 2008, 12:58 PM

Post #3 of 17 (609 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

but the nortel green calculator says Cisco is bad for the environment.

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27549

Lelio
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7'
crossover cable
is not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?


> Well, you said all responses...
>
> We just did a Cisco IPT implementation with 3Com switches (customer
> controlled switches completely), and the implementation failed because
> the switches couldn't handle multicast streams... 12 streams killed
> the LAN.
>
> So, I am now a convert... switches made by someone not Cisco? Just
> move along pal...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
>> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>> wondering
>> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>> network. All responses welcome.
>>
>> Scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


smetsysocsic at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 12:59 PM

Post #4 of 17 (606 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
/ core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
into the back of the phone.

They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
if it were up to me.

-Joe C.


On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was wondering
> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
> network. All responses welcome.
>
> Scott
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 1:01 PM

Post #5 of 17 (608 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

I am of the belief that global climate change is real and that the
tipping point was in 1994. Since that point is past, and it is too
late to save the planet, we might as well party.



Jonathan

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio[at]uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> but the nortel green calculator says Cisco is bad for the environment.
>
> http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27549
>
> Lelio
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> ...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7'
> crossover cable
> is not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?
>
>
>> Well, you said all responses...
>>
>> We just did a Cisco IPT implementation with 3Com switches (customer
>> controlled switches completely), and the implementation failed because
>> the switches couldn't handle multicast streams... 12 streams killed
>> the LAN.
>>
>> So, I am now a convert... switches made by someone not Cisco? Just
>> move along pal...
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
>>> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>>> wondering
>>> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>>> network. All responses welcome.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 1:02 PM

Post #6 of 17 (606 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.

Support.

More Support.

Lots more Support.

Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.



Jonathan

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
> Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
> exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
> / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
> negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
> voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
> into the back of the phone.
>
> They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
> that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
> if it were up to me.
>
> -Joe C.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
>> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was wondering
>> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>> network. All responses welcome.
>>
>> Scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


svoll.voip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 1:07 PM

Post #7 of 17 (606 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know if
I would go quite that far.

Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.

Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).

My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on $$$
but still wanting to do VoIP.

Scott

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>
> Support.
>
> More Support.
>
> Lots more Support.
>
> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
> > into the back of the phone.
> >
> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
> > if it were up to me.
> >
> > -Joe C.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
> wondering
> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
> >> network. All responses welcome.
> >>
> >> Scott
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
>


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 2:14 PM

Post #8 of 17 (609 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
tendency to get fixed...

I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...




Jonathan

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know if
> I would go quite that far.
>
> Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
> updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
> engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>
> Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>
> My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on $$$
> but still wanting to do VoIP.
>
> Scott
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>>
>> Support.
>>
>> More Support.
>>
>> Lots more Support.
>>
>> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
>> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
>> > into the back of the phone.
>> >
>> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
>> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
>> > if it were up to me.
>> >
>> > -Joe C.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
>> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>> >> wondering
>> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>> >> network. All responses welcome.
>> >>
>> >> Scott
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >>
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


svoll.voip at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 2:32 PM

Post #9 of 17 (596 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

The TAs are the routers / VGW. I was only looking at the switches. Mohamad
said he is having good luck with them. That was what I was looking for.

once things calm down this fall I'll get a demo and see how they work.

Scott
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
> tendency to get fixed...
>
> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
> if
> > I would go quite that far.
> >
> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
> >
> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
> >
> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
> $$$
> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
> >>
> >> Support.
> >>
> >> More Support.
> >>
> >> Lots more Support.
> >>
> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
> >> > into the back of the phone.
> >> >
> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
> >> > if it were up to me.
> >> >
> >> > -Joe C.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
> /
> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
> >> >> wondering
> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
> >> >>
> >> >> Scott
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >
> >
> >
>


lelio at uoguelph

Jul 17, 2008, 5:17 PM

Post #10 of 17 (586 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

You'll find they are moving away from this with the "E" series of
switches....
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?


> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
> tendency to get fixed...
>
> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
>> if
>> I would go quite that far.
>>
>> Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
>> updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>> engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>>
>> Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>>
>> My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
>> $$$
>> but still wanting to do VoIP.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>>>
>>> Support.
>>>
>>> More Support.
>>>
>>> Lots more Support.
>>>
>>> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Jonathan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>>> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>>> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
>>> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>>> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>>> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
>>> > into the back of the phone.
>>> >
>>> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
>>> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
>>> > if it were up to me.
>>> >
>>> > -Joe C.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
>>> >> /
>>> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>>> >> wondering
>>> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>>> >> network. All responses welcome.
>>> >>
>>> >> Scott
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>> >
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


aman.chugh at gmail

Jul 17, 2008, 7:38 PM

Post #11 of 17 (583 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

I would be interested to know if somebody is using HP procurve switches with
Cisco IPT and thier experience Good, Bad, UGLY.....

Aman


On 7/18/08, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio[at]uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> You'll find they are moving away from this with the "E" series of
> switches....
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?
>
>
> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
>> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
>> tendency to get fixed...
>>
>> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
>> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
>> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
>>> if
>>> I would go quite that far.
>>>
>>> Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
>>> updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>>> engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>>>
>>> Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>>>
>>> My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
>>> $$$
>>> but still wanting to do VoIP.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>>>>
>>>> Support.
>>>>
>>>> More Support.
>>>>
>>>> Lots more Support.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>>>> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>>>> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
>>>> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>>>> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>>>> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
>>>> > into the back of the phone.
>>>> >
>>>> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
>>>> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
>>>> > if it were up to me.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Joe C.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
>>>> >> /
>>>> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>>>> >> wondering
>>>> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>>>> >> network. All responses welcome.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Scott
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


thsglobal at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 2:09 AM

Post #12 of 17 (552 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Has the warranty changed recently? It used to be Limited Lifetime warranty -
usually 10 days before they ship a replacement (For the access switches)
And I think they were giving you 90 days on a anything above a 4500?

Sure you can buy smartnet... but its not cheap.

Dont get me wrong.. I love Cisco stuff, and if it was up to me, I wouldnt
have worked on anything else... but some places just dont have the cash. For
a cheap alternative someone like HP Procurve is a good option. Sure they
dont have as many features as Cisco... but they usually have the most
important ones that you actually turn on and need :)

They had true lifetime warranty on the access switches.. lifetime of the
product (until it physically disappears or disintegrates) and they normally
ship parts next business day. I had a really old ethertwist hub at home.. it
failed.. i logged it.. they replaced it with a new model switch. (I will say
I did want the ethertwist switch fixed.. it was a classic.. but cant fault
their service there)

And the price was very reasonable from the start. They also have reasonably
priced management software that wasnt too shabby either.

And I believe they are also running on the international space station now..
so that should be a fairly good reference site :)

Next interesting thing would be the LLDP-MED and Cisco Phones... if they
could autoconfigure.. it would be fairly sweet.

Like I said.. love the Cisco... but there is always room for some healthy
competition I guess.

Cheers,

Tim.

On 7/17/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
> tendency to get fixed...
>
> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
> if
> > I would go quite that far.
> >
> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
> >
> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
> >
> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
> $$$
> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
> >>
> >> Support.
> >>
> >> More Support.
> >>
> >> Lots more Support.
> >>
> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
> >> > into the back of the phone.
> >> >
> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
> >> > if it were up to me.
> >> >
> >> > -Joe C.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
> /
> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
> >> >> wondering
> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
> >> >>
> >> >> Scott
> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 4:53 AM

Post #13 of 17 (532 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

I bought a 3550 for the house in 2003, it blew up six months ago...
Cisco replaced it, no smartnet, just warranty... dunno if they have
lifetime on the 4/6xxx's



Jonathan

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Has the warranty changed recently? It used to be Limited Lifetime warranty -
> usually 10 days before they ship a replacement (For the access switches)
> And I think they were giving you 90 days on a anything above a 4500?
>
> Sure you can buy smartnet... but its not cheap.
>
> Dont get me wrong.. I love Cisco stuff, and if it was up to me, I wouldnt
> have worked on anything else... but some places just dont have the cash. For
> a cheap alternative someone like HP Procurve is a good option. Sure they
> dont have as many features as Cisco... but they usually have the most
> important ones that you actually turn on and need :)
>
> They had true lifetime warranty on the access switches.. lifetime of the
> product (until it physically disappears or disintegrates) and they normally
> ship parts next business day. I had a really old ethertwist hub at home.. it
> failed.. i logged it.. they replaced it with a new model switch. (I will say
> I did want the ethertwist switch fixed.. it was a classic.. but cant fault
> their service there)
>
> And the price was very reasonable from the start. They also have reasonably
> priced management software that wasnt too shabby either.
>
> And I believe they are also running on the international space station now..
> so that should be a fairly good reference site :)
>
> Next interesting thing would be the LLDP-MED and Cisco Phones... if they
> could autoconfigure.. it would be fairly sweet.
>
> Like I said.. love the Cisco... but there is always room for some healthy
> competition I guess.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
> On 7/17/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
>> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
>> tendency to get fixed...
>>
>> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
>> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
>> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
>> > if
>> > I would go quite that far.
>> >
>> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
>> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>> >
>> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>> >
>> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
>> > $$$
>> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
>> >
>> > Scott
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>> >>
>> >> Support.
>> >>
>> >> More Support.
>> >>
>> >> Lots more Support.
>> >>
>> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise -
>> >> > access
>> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
>> >> > into the back of the phone.
>> >> >
>> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
>> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
>> >> > if it were up to me.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Joe C.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
>> >> >> /
>> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>> >> >> wondering
>> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Scott
>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


thsglobal at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 5:06 AM

Post #14 of 17 (532 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

Yep.. but they will announce an effective end of support where they wont
replace it any more...

And did you get a replacement next business day? :)

Cheers,

Tim


On 7/18/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I bought a 3550 for the house in 2003, it blew up six months ago...
> Cisco replaced it, no smartnet, just warranty... dunno if they have
> lifetime on the 4/6xxx's
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> > Has the warranty changed recently? It used to be Limited Lifetime
> warranty -
> > usually 10 days before they ship a replacement (For the access switches)
> > And I think they were giving you 90 days on a anything above a 4500?
> >
> > Sure you can buy smartnet... but its not cheap.
> >
> > Dont get me wrong.. I love Cisco stuff, and if it was up to me, I wouldnt
> > have worked on anything else... but some places just dont have the cash.
> For
> > a cheap alternative someone like HP Procurve is a good option. Sure they
> > dont have as many features as Cisco... but they usually have the most
> > important ones that you actually turn on and need :)
> >
> > They had true lifetime warranty on the access switches.. lifetime of the
> > product (until it physically disappears or disintegrates) and they
> normally
> > ship parts next business day. I had a really old ethertwist hub at home..
> it
> > failed.. i logged it.. they replaced it with a new model switch. (I will
> say
> > I did want the ethertwist switch fixed.. it was a classic.. but cant
> fault
> > their service there)
> >
> > And the price was very reasonable from the start. They also have
> reasonably
> > priced management software that wasnt too shabby either.
> >
> > And I believe they are also running on the international space station
> now..
> > so that should be a fairly good reference site :)
> >
> > Next interesting thing would be the LLDP-MED and Cisco Phones... if they
> > could autoconfigure.. it would be fairly sweet.
> >
> > Like I said.. love the Cisco... but there is always room for some healthy
> > competition I guess.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Tim.
> >
> > On 7/17/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
> >> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
> >> tendency to get fixed...
> >>
> >> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
> >> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
> >> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Jonathan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't
> know
> >> > if
> >> > I would go quite that far.
> >> >
> >> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free
> Firmware
> >> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
> >> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
> >> >
> >> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
> >> >
> >> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short
> on
> >> > $$$
> >> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
> >> >
> >> > Scott
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
> >> >>
> >> >> Support.
> >> >>
> >> >> More Support.
> >> >>
> >> >> Lots more Support.
> >> >>
> >> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Jonathan
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
> >> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
> >> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise -
> >> >> > access
> >> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
> >> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
> >> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is
> plugged
> >> >> > into the back of the phone.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
> >> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco
> gear
> >> >> > if it were up to me.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > -Joe C.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran
> switches
> >> >> >> /
> >> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
> >> >> >> wondering
> >> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM
> /
> >> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Scott
> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
> >> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > _______________________________________________
> >> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
> >> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>


voicenoob at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 5:56 AM

Post #15 of 17 (533 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

I wonder why they are changing the lifetime Warranty with the E series?

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:17 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio[at]uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> You'll find they are moving away from this with the "E" series of
> switches....
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
> Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 5:14 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?
>
>
> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
>> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
>> tendency to get fixed...
>>
>> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
>> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
>> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't know
>>> if
>>> I would go quite that far.
>>>
>>> Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free Firmware
>>> updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>>> engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>>>
>>> Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>>>
>>> My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short on
>>> $$$
>>> but still wanting to do VoIP.
>>>
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>>>>
>>>> Support.
>>>>
>>>> More Support.
>>>>
>>>> Lots more Support.
>>>>
>>>> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Jonathan
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>>>> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>>>> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise - access
>>>> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>>>> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>>>> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is plugged
>>>> > into the back of the phone.
>>>> >
>>>> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having said
>>>> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco gear
>>>> > if it were up to me.
>>>> >
>>>> > -Joe C.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches
>>>> >> /
>>>> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>>>> >> wondering
>>>> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>>>> >> network. All responses welcome.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Scott
>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > cisco-voip mailing list
>>>> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>>>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>


voicenoob at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 5:56 AM

Post #16 of 17 (531 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

No with Warranty you do not get it next business day. But you can if you
purchase smartnet :)

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:

> Yep.. but they will announce an effective end of support where they wont
> replace it any more...
>
> And did you get a replacement next business day? :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 7/18/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I bought a 3550 for the house in 2003, it blew up six months ago...
>> Cisco replaced it, no smartnet, just warranty... dunno if they have
>> lifetime on the 4/6xxx's
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Has the warranty changed recently? It used to be Limited Lifetime
>> warranty -
>> > usually 10 days before they ship a replacement (For the access switches)
>> > And I think they were giving you 90 days on a anything above a 4500?
>> >
>> > Sure you can buy smartnet... but its not cheap.
>> >
>> > Dont get me wrong.. I love Cisco stuff, and if it was up to me, I
>> wouldnt
>> > have worked on anything else... but some places just dont have the cash.
>> For
>> > a cheap alternative someone like HP Procurve is a good option. Sure they
>> > dont have as many features as Cisco... but they usually have the most
>> > important ones that you actually turn on and need :)
>> >
>> > They had true lifetime warranty on the access switches.. lifetime of the
>> > product (until it physically disappears or disintegrates) and they
>> normally
>> > ship parts next business day. I had a really old ethertwist hub at
>> home.. it
>> > failed.. i logged it.. they replaced it with a new model switch. (I will
>> say
>> > I did want the ethertwist switch fixed.. it was a classic.. but cant
>> fault
>> > their service there)
>> >
>> > And the price was very reasonable from the start. They also have
>> reasonably
>> > priced management software that wasnt too shabby either.
>> >
>> > And I believe they are also running on the international space station
>> now..
>> > so that should be a fairly good reference site :)
>> >
>> > Next interesting thing would be the LLDP-MED and Cisco Phones... if they
>> > could autoconfigure.. it would be fairly sweet.
>> >
>> > Like I said.. love the Cisco... but there is always room for some
>> healthy
>> > competition I guess.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Tim.
>> >
>> > On 7/17/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
>> >> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
>> >> tendency to get fixed...
>> >>
>> >> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
>> >> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
>> >> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't
>> know
>> >> > if
>> >> > I would go quite that far.
>> >> >
>> >> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free
>> Firmware
>> >> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>> >> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>> >> >
>> >> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short
>> on
>> >> > $$$
>> >> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
>> >> >
>> >> > Scott
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com
>> >
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> More Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lots more Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jonathan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>> >> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>> >> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise -
>> >> >> > access
>> >> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>> >> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>> >> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is
>> plugged
>> >> >> > into the back of the phone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having
>> said
>> >> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco
>> gear
>> >> >> > if it were up to me.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -Joe C.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com
>> >
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran
>> switches
>> >> >> >> /
>> >> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>> >> >> >> wondering
>> >> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco
>> CM /
>> >> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Scott
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


jonvoip at gmail

Jul 18, 2008, 6:14 AM

Post #17 of 17 (531 views)
Permalink
Re: OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer? [In reply to]

No, two weeks... better than tossing it in a dumpster...


Jonathan

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep.. but they will announce an effective end of support where they wont
> replace it any more...
>
> And did you get a replacement next business day? :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
>
> On 7/18/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I bought a 3550 for the house in 2003, it blew up six months ago...
>> Cisco replaced it, no smartnet, just warranty... dunno if they have
>> lifetime on the 4/6xxx's
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 4:09 AM, Tim Smith <thsglobal[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Has the warranty changed recently? It used to be Limited Lifetime
>> > warranty -
>> > usually 10 days before they ship a replacement (For the access switches)
>> > And I think they were giving you 90 days on a anything above a 4500?
>> >
>> > Sure you can buy smartnet... but its not cheap.
>> >
>> > Dont get me wrong.. I love Cisco stuff, and if it was up to me, I
>> > wouldnt
>> > have worked on anything else... but some places just dont have the cash.
>> > For
>> > a cheap alternative someone like HP Procurve is a good option. Sure they
>> > dont have as many features as Cisco... but they usually have the most
>> > important ones that you actually turn on and need :)
>> >
>> > They had true lifetime warranty on the access switches.. lifetime of the
>> > product (until it physically disappears or disintegrates) and they
>> > normally
>> > ship parts next business day. I had a really old ethertwist hub at
>> > home.. it
>> > failed.. i logged it.. they replaced it with a new model switch. (I will
>> > say
>> > I did want the ethertwist switch fixed.. it was a classic.. but cant
>> > fault
>> > their service there)
>> >
>> > And the price was very reasonable from the start. They also have
>> > reasonably
>> > priced management software that wasnt too shabby either.
>> >
>> > And I believe they are also running on the international space station
>> > now..
>> > so that should be a fairly good reference site :)
>> >
>> > Next interesting thing would be the LLDP-MED and Cisco Phones... if they
>> > could autoconfigure.. it would be fairly sweet.
>> >
>> > Like I said.. love the Cisco... but there is always room for some
>> > healthy
>> > competition I guess.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Tim.
>> >
>> > On 7/17/08, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Well, first off, all Cisco switches have a lifetime warranty... yes,
>> >> they are expensive... yes, there are bugs, but the bugs have a
>> >> tendency to get fixed...
>> >>
>> >> I have experience with Adtran, and after supporting the TA612 and 624
>> >> et al for a year or so, I can tell you, they should stick to CSUs and
>> >> buggy whips... maybe PSTN and WAN simulators...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Jonathan
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Going to work?..... How many bugs have I personally found? I don't
>> >> > know
>> >> > if
>> >> > I would go quite that far.
>> >> >
>> >> > Adtran is about 1/3 of the cost / no Smartnet contracts / Free
>> >> > Firmware
>> >> > updates / 5 year warrenty, soon to be lifetime and all there support
>> >> > engineers are both certified on Cisco and Adtran.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thay do a lot of (so I'm told) interop with other venders (cisco).
>> >> >
>> >> > My main double take of it was for my school districts that are short
>> >> > on
>> >> > $$$
>> >> > but still wanting to do VoIP.
>> >> >
>> >> > Scott
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip[at]gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Also, let's add up what you get with Cisco.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> More Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lots more Support.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh, yeah, and no questions about whether it is going to work or not.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jonathan
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Joe Cisco <smetsysocsic[at]gmail.com>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > The only non-cisco switches i've ever seen successfully work with
>> >> >> > Cisco phones were made by Enterasys. We have a client using
>> >> >> > exclusively Enterasys switches across their entire enterprise -
>> >> >> > access
>> >> >> > / core - everything. When properly configured they successfully
>> >> >> > negotiate CDP with the phones and split the voice traffic into the
>> >> >> > voice vlan and PC/data traffic into the data vlan if a PC is
>> >> >> > plugged
>> >> >> > into the back of the phone.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > They were about 1/2 the price of equivalent cisco gear. Having
>> >> >> > said
>> >> >> > that, i'd still personally pony up the extra cash for the cisco
>> >> >> > gear
>> >> >> > if it were up to me.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -Joe C.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip[at]gmail.com>
>> >> >> > wrote:
>> >> >> >> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran
>> >> >> >> switches
>> >> >> >> /
>> >> >> >> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was
>> >> >> >> wondering
>> >> >> >> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco
>> >> >> >> CM /
>> >> >> >> network. All responses welcome.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Scott
>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> >> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> >> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> > _______________________________________________
>> >> >> > cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> >> > cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> >> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> cisco-voip mailing list
>> >> cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
>> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>> >
>> >
>
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip[at]puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact lists@gossamer-threads.com
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.