Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: VOIP

PoE alternatives

 

 

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


mikenorton at pwsd76

Apr 18, 2008, 11:02 AM

Post #1 of 5 (813 views)
Permalink
PoE alternatives

Anyone use third-party PoE midspans for powering phones? Particularly
with a 2950/2960 switch?

I typically have been installing the PoE version of 3550 or 3560
switches for phones. However, I am entertaining the idea of using a 2960
switch with a third-party PoE midspan, because it is much cheaper and we
do not really use any of the layer-3 switch features anyway. I also have
some future phone installs coming up where there are several existing
2950 switches already in place. In particular, I am looking at
Microsemi/PowerDsine for midspans.

If anyone can provide their thoughts/experiences with such a setup, or
other alternatives, I would appreciate it.

P.S. I am aware of the new 2960 model that has PoE, but it is not
available in 48-port nor with 1000BaseT uplinks, so by the time I buy
two and put SFP modules in, a regular 48-port with midspans is still
appealing.

--
Mike Norton
I.T. Support
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
Helpdesk: (780) 831-3080
Direct: (780) 831-3076
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


mhyde at monitor

Apr 20, 2008, 8:53 PM

Post #2 of 5 (760 views)
Permalink
Re: PoE alternatives [In reply to]

We have been using Linksys SRW224P switches. 24 Port PoE with QOS for
under $500. The downside is that they do not understand CDP.

On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Norton, Mike wrote:

> Anyone use third-party PoE midspans for powering phones? Particularly
> with a 2950/2960 switch?
>
> I typically have been installing the PoE version of 3550 or 3560
> switches for phones. However, I am entertaining the idea of using a
> 2960
> switch with a third-party PoE midspan, because it is much cheaper
> and we
> do not really use any of the layer-3 switch features anyway. I also
> have
> some future phone installs coming up where there are several existing
> 2950 switches already in place. In particular, I am looking at
> Microsemi/PowerDsine for midspans.
>
> If anyone can provide their thoughts/experiences with such a setup, or
> other alternatives, I would appreciate it.
>
> P.S. I am aware of the new 2960 model that has PoE, but it is not
> available in 48-port nor with 1000BaseT uplinks, so by the time I buy
> two and put SFP modules in, a regular 48-port with midspans is still
> appealing.
>
> --
> Mike Norton
> I.T. Support
> Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
> Helpdesk: (780) 831-3080
> Direct: (780) 831-3076
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


A.L.M.Buxey at lboro

Apr 20, 2008, 11:03 PM

Post #3 of 5 (769 views)
Permalink
Re: PoE alternatives [In reply to]

Hi,
> We have been using Linksys SRW224P switches. 24 Port PoE with QOS for
> under $500. The downside is that they do not understand CDP.

a couple of PowerDsine midspan bridges here and there.

alan
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc

Jul 4, 2008, 5:58 AM

Post #4 of 5 (656 views)
Permalink
Re: PoE alternatives [In reply to]

Hi, Norton.

Why not to use CE500 or 2960 with PoE in such cases?


Kind regards,

--
Ilya Rubinchik
Systems Engineer
Telecommunication Systems Division
ABRIS DISTRIBUTION, INC.
Tel: UZ: +998711405300 (ext. 2451)
Mobile: UZ: +998977128456
Fax: UZ: +998712995155
ICQ # 15508236
MSN: ilya.rubinchik [at] gmail
E-mail: ilya.rubinchik [at] abrisdc




-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:02 PM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: [cisco-voip] PoE alternatives

Anyone use third-party PoE midspans for powering phones? Particularly
with a 2950/2960 switch?

I typically have been installing the PoE version of 3550 or 3560
switches for phones. However, I am entertaining the idea of using a 2960
switch with a third-party PoE midspan, because it is much cheaper and we
do not really use any of the layer-3 switch features anyway. I also have
some future phone installs coming up where there are several existing
2950 switches already in place. In particular, I am looking at
Microsemi/PowerDsine for midspans.

If anyone can provide their thoughts/experiences with such a setup, or
other alternatives, I would appreciate it.

P.S. I am aware of the new 2960 model that has PoE, but it is not
available in 48-port nor with 1000BaseT uplinks, so by the time I buy
two and put SFP modules in, a regular 48-port with midspans is still
appealing.

--
Mike Norton
I.T. Support
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
Helpdesk: (780) 831-3080
Direct: (780) 831-3076
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


khalid_khursheed at hotmail

Jul 4, 2008, 1:04 PM

Post #5 of 5 (659 views)
Permalink
Re: PoE alternatives [In reply to]

Hi

What about Cisco CE-500 and 502 series, they are really cheap compared to 2960 & 3560 ?

Regards,

Khalid

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike
> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:02 PM
> To: cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: [cisco-voip] PoE alternatives
>
> Anyone use third-party PoE midspans for powering phones? Particularly
> with a 2950/2960 switch?
>
> I typically have been installing the PoE version of 3550 or 3560
> switches for phones. However, I am entertaining the idea of using a 2960
> switch with a third-party PoE midspan, because it is much cheaper and we
> do not really use any of the layer-3 switch features anyway. I also have
> some future phone installs coming up where there are several existing
> 2950 switches already in place. In particular, I am looking at
> Microsemi/PowerDsine for midspans.
>
> If anyone can provide their thoughts/experiences with such a setup, or
> other alternatives, I would appreciate it.
>
> P.S. I am aware of the new 2960 model that has PoE, but it is not
> available in 48-port nor with 1000BaseT uplinks, so by the time I buy
> two and put SFP modules in, a regular 48-port with midspans is still
> appealing.
>
> --
> Mike Norton
> I.T. Support
> Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
> Helpdesk: (780) 831-3080
> Direct: (780) 831-3076
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_________________________________________________________________
Connect to the next generation of MSN Messenger 
http://imagine-msn.com/messenger/launch80/default.aspx?locale=en-us&source=wlmailtagline

Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.