
ilya.rubinchik at abrisdc
Jul 4, 2008, 5:58 AM
Post #4 of 5
(659 views)
Permalink
|
Hi, Norton. Why not to use CE500 or 2960 with PoE in such cases? Kind regards, -- Ilya Rubinchik Systems Engineer Telecommunication Systems Division ABRIS DISTRIBUTION, INC. Tel: UZ: +998711405300 (ext. 2451) Mobile: UZ: +998977128456 Fax: UZ: +998712995155 ICQ # 15508236 MSN: ilya.rubinchik [at] gmail E-mail: ilya.rubinchik [at] abrisdc -----Original Message----- From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Norton, Mike Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 11:02 PM To: cisco-voip [at] puck Subject: [cisco-voip] PoE alternatives Anyone use third-party PoE midspans for powering phones? Particularly with a 2950/2960 switch? I typically have been installing the PoE version of 3550 or 3560 switches for phones. However, I am entertaining the idea of using a 2960 switch with a third-party PoE midspan, because it is much cheaper and we do not really use any of the layer-3 switch features anyway. I also have some future phone installs coming up where there are several existing 2950 switches already in place. In particular, I am looking at Microsemi/PowerDsine for midspans. If anyone can provide their thoughts/experiences with such a setup, or other alternatives, I would appreciate it. P.S. I am aware of the new 2960 model that has PoE, but it is not available in 48-port nor with 1000BaseT uplinks, so by the time I buy two and put SFP modules in, a regular 48-port with midspans is still appealing. -- Mike Norton I.T. Support Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76 Helpdesk: (780) 831-3080 Direct: (780) 831-3076 _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip [at] puck https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
|