Login | Register For Free | Help
Search for: (Advanced)

Mailing List Archive: Cisco: VOIP

VG224 H323 or MGCP

 

 

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jun 29, 2007, 3:04 AM

Post #1 of 26 (5023 views)
Permalink
VG224 H323 or MGCP

I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call
Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP /
Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.



What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224

********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


asobihoudai at yahoo

Jun 29, 2007, 3:08 AM

Post #2 of 26 (5002 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_sheet09186a00801d87f6.html


--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
wrote:

> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> site, we have Call
> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> except for an MGCP /
> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>
>
>
> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jun 29, 2007, 3:18 AM

Post #3 of 26 (4989 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more beneficial.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
et09186a00801d87f6.html


--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
wrote:

> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> site, we have Call
> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> except for an MGCP /
> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>
>
>
> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>




________________________________________________________________________
____________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who
knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


asobihoudai at yahoo

Jun 29, 2007, 3:25 AM

Post #4 of 26 (5005 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
*******************************************************************************************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


lelio at uoguelph

Jun 29, 2007, 4:50 AM

Post #5 of 26 (4994 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I'm going with SCCP. Search for "sccp supplementary" on CCO and you'll see a boatload of new features.

I for one like PLAR support during SRST.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Kassel
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:04 AM
Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP


I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP / Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.



What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224




********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


c3voip at nc

Jun 29, 2007, 5:55 AM

Post #6 of 26 (5010 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
****************************************************************************
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


lelio at uoguelph

Jun 29, 2007, 5:58 AM

Post #7 of 26 (5001 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

any reason why? for us newbies in the vg224 world?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----
From: c3voip
To: 'Paul Choi' ; 'Nick Kassel' ; cisco-voip [at] puck
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:55 AM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP


I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
****************************************************************************
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


c3voip at nc

Jun 29, 2007, 6:12 AM

Post #8 of 26 (5024 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

We have some ADEMCO fire alarm panels that use DTMF tones to communicate and
use DTMF tones with bursts of 50msecs, so that eliminated VG248's since
their fastest DTMF sample size is either 100 or 150ms, so VG224's were
purchased. Most of our gateways that were MGCP capable were configured that
way, but the MGCP config for the ports that these fire alarm panels were
connected to weren't working, so I tried H323 and it worked. Since I have
setup these ports I have tried modems on similarly configured ports and have
gotten better, more reliable performance from the H323-configured ports than
the MGCP-configured ports. I don't have any technical explanation of this,
just my own experience.



-C



_____

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: c3voip; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel'; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



any reason why? for us newbies in the vg224 world?



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----

From: c3voip <mailto:c3voip [at] nc>

To: 'Paul Choi' <mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo> ; 'Nick Kassel'
<mailto:Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> ; cisco-voip [at] puck

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:55 AM

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list
<http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433> &sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
****************************************************************************
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


lelio at uoguelph

Jun 29, 2007, 6:19 AM

Post #9 of 26 (5018 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Interesting, thanks. So then no bad experience with SCCP, just none so far?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----
From: c3voip
To: 'Lelio Fulgenzi' ; 'Paul Choi' ; 'Nick Kassel' ; cisco-voip [at] puck
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP


We have some ADEMCO fire alarm panels that use DTMF tones to communicate and use DTMF tones with bursts of 50msecs, so that eliminated VG248's since their fastest DTMF sample size is either 100 or 150ms, so VG224's were purchased. Most of our gateways that were MGCP capable were configured that way, but the MGCP config for the ports that these fire alarm panels were connected to weren't working, so I tried H323 and it worked. Since I have setup these ports I have tried modems on similarly configured ports and have gotten better, more reliable performance from the H323-configured ports than the MGCP-configured ports. I don't have any technical explanation of this, just my own experience.



-C




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: c3voip; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel'; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



any reason why? for us newbies in the vg224 world?



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----

From: c3voip

To: 'Paul Choi' ; 'Nick Kassel' ; cisco-voip [at] puck

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:55 AM

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
****************************************************************************
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


c3voip at nc

Jun 29, 2007, 6:38 AM

Post #10 of 26 (5040 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

No experience with SCCP on a VG224 yet.



_____

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:20 AM
To: c3voip; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel'; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Interesting, thanks. So then no bad experience with SCCP, just none so far?



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----

From: c3voip <mailto:c3voip [at] nc>

To: 'Lelio Fulgenzi' <mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph> ; 'Paul
<mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo> Choi' ; 'Nick Kassel'
<mailto:Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> ; cisco-voip [at] puck

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:12 AM

Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



We have some ADEMCO fire alarm panels that use DTMF tones to communicate and
use DTMF tones with bursts of 50msecs, so that eliminated VG248's since
their fastest DTMF sample size is either 100 or 150ms, so VG224's were
purchased. Most of our gateways that were MGCP capable were configured that
way, but the MGCP config for the ports that these fire alarm panels were
connected to weren't working, so I tried H323 and it worked. Since I have
setup these ports I have tried modems on similarly configured ports and have
gotten better, more reliable performance from the H323-configured ports than
the MGCP-configured ports. I don't have any technical explanation of this,
just my own experience.



-C




_____


From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: c3voip; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel'; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



any reason why? for us newbies in the vg224 world?



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----

From: c3voip <mailto:c3voip [at] nc>

To: 'Paul Choi' <mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo> ; 'Nick Kassel'
<mailto:Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> ; cisco-voip [at] puck

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:55 AM

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list
<http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433> &sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>
****************************************************************************
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>




____________________________________________________________________________
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


ealeatherman at gmail

Jun 29, 2007, 7:09 AM

Post #11 of 26 (5017 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

We have been using SCCP for our VG224 project so far. They are all for
analog phone ports in dorm rooms and a small amount of fax machines. Have
had no problems (jinx) yet with them in SCCP mode, but we aren't doing
anything complicated with them either. We chose SCCP for easy of use with
call manager and features. I'm pretty happy with the platform so far, I just
wish they made a 48 port IOS based model now that the VG248's are getting
priced/phased out.

On 6/29/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
>
> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call
> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP /
> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>
>
>
> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>
>


--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jun 29, 2007, 7:50 AM

Post #12 of 26 (4995 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Our VG224's will be used mainly for faxes and possibly a few modems, but
I'm thinking that the extra features with SCCP could e useful if we need
to use any analog phones in the future, I don't really want to have to
change if circumstances change at all.



________________________________

From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman [at] gmail]
Sent: 29 June 2007 15:10
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



We have been using SCCP for our VG224 project so far. They are all for
analog phone ports in dorm rooms and a small amount of fax machines.
Have had no problems (jinx) yet with them in SCCP mode, but we aren't
doing anything complicated with them either. We chose SCCP for easy of
use with call manager and features. I'm pretty happy with the platform
so far, I just wish they made a 48 port IOS based model now that the
VG248's are getting priced/phased out.

On 6/29/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:

I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call
Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP /
Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.



What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224






--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations

********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


smgustafson at gmail

Jun 29, 2007, 11:19 AM

Post #13 of 26 (4994 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Can someone send me a link to the doc for vg224 SCCP support? The only docs
I can find on "univercd" are about 5 years old. Maybe I am looking in the
wrong place.

On 6/29/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
>
> Our VG224's will be used mainly for faxes and possibly a few modems, but
> I'm thinking that the extra features with SCCP could e useful if we need to
> use any analog phones in the future, I don't really want to have to change
> if circumstances change at all.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman [at] gmail]
> *Sent:* 29 June 2007 15:10
> *To:* Nick Kassel
> *Cc:* cisco-voip [at] puck
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
>
>
> We have been using SCCP for our VG224 project so far. They are all for
> analog phone ports in dorm rooms and a small amount of fax machines. Have
> had no problems (jinx) yet with them in SCCP mode, but we aren't doing
> anything complicated with them either. We chose SCCP for easy of use with
> call manager and features. I'm pretty happy with the platform so far, I just
> wish they made a 48 port IOS based model now that the VG248's are getting
> priced/phased out.
>
> On 6/29/07, *Nick Kassel* <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
>
> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call
> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP /
> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>
>
>
> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
>
>
>
>
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
>
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
>
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
>
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
>
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.
>
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
>
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
>
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
>
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
>
> received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
>
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
>
> International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
>
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> Filter software.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


lelio at uoguelph

Jun 29, 2007, 11:23 AM

Post #14 of 26 (5011 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

this is what i used.

along with a little searching on CCO and the forums.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6441/products_feature_guide09186a0080483a76.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo." WJR

----- Original Message -----
From: Steve G
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip [at] puck
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP


Can someone send me a link to the doc for vg224 SCCP support? The only docs I can find on "univercd" are about 5 years old. Maybe I am looking in the wrong place.


On 6/29/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
Our VG224's will be used mainly for faxes and possibly a few modems, but I'm thinking that the extra features with SCCP could e useful if we need to use any analog phones in the future, I don't really want to have to change if circumstances change at all.




----------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman [at] gmail]
Sent: 29 June 2007 15:10
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



We have been using SCCP for our VG224 project so far. They are all for analog phone ports in dorm rooms and a small amount of fax machines. Have had no problems (jinx) yet with them in SCCP mode, but we aren't doing anything complicated with them either. We chose SCCP for easy of use with call manager and features. I'm pretty happy with the platform so far, I just wish they made a 48 port IOS based model now that the VG248's are getting priced/phased out.

On 6/29/07, Nick Kassel < Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:

I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main site, we have Call Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323 except for an MGCP / Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.



What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224






--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations




********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


jim at tgasolutions

Jun 29, 2007, 1:23 PM

Post #15 of 26 (5015 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Interesting...

I just had a problem with the ADEMCO panels..

And the one we worked with had 7 or 8 protocols..

I wish I could remember the one that we used that worked...

But some worked ok, some did not and one was great on an ATA!!!



Jim



From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of c3voip
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 9:13 AM
To: 'Lelio Fulgenzi'; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel';
cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



We have some ADEMCO fire alarm panels that use DTMF tones to communicate
and use DTMF tones with bursts of 50msecs, so that eliminated VG248's
since their fastest DTMF sample size is either 100 or 150ms, so VG224's
were purchased. Most of our gateways that were MGCP capable were
configured that way, but the MGCP config for the ports that these fire
alarm panels were connected to weren't working, so I tried H323 and it
worked. Since I have setup these ports I have tried modems on similarly
configured ports and have gotten better, more reliable performance from
the H323-configured ports than the MGCP-configured ports. I don't have
any technical explanation of this, just my own experience.



-C



________________________________

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio [at] uoguelph]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:59 AM
To: c3voip; 'Paul Choi'; 'Nick Kassel'; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



any reason why? for us newbies in the vg224 world?



------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo."
WJR

----- Original Message -----

From: c3voip <mailto:c3voip [at] nc>

To: 'Paul Choi' <mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo> ; 'Nick Kassel'
<mailto:Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> ; cisco-voip [at] puck


Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 8:55 AM

Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



I have tried both, and for modem and other non-voice
communications I
definitely recommend H323.

-C

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Paul
Choi
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:26 AM
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

Unless your environment/customer has a specific
requirement for you to use one protocol over the
other, use with what you're comfortable I'd recommend.

--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] Charles-Stanley>
wrote:

> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more
> beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
>

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
> > I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> > site, we have Call
> > Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> > except for an MGCP /
> > Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
> >
> >
> >
> > What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for
> VG224
> >
>
>
>
>
>

________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship
> answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
>
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
>
PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly
> confidential, some or all of which may be legally
> privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the
> recipient is prohibited. If you have received this
> message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing,
> distribution of, replying to or any action taken or
> omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited.
> Please advise the sender immediately should this
> e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then
> delete the email and any attachment sent with it
> from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and
> confidential communications should not be sent by
> e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been
> given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and
> that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement
> or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you
> accept the risk of malfunction, viruses,
> unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley
> reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails
> sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business
> purpose in accordance with applicable law and
> regulations.
>

************************************************************************
****
***************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley
> Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co.
> Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services
> Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The
> London International Financial Futures & Options
> Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message
> has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl
> Email
> Filter software.
>
>





________________________________________________________________________
____
________
Moody friends. Drama queens. Your life? Nope! - their life, your
story. Play
Sims Stories at Yahoo! Games.
http://sims.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


jim at tgasolutions

Jun 29, 2007, 1:25 PM

Post #16 of 26 (5008 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I thought SCCP uses Device licenses..
That makes it more costly...

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:19 AM
To: Paul Choi; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more beneficial.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP

I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
et09186a00801d87f6.html


--- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
wrote:

> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
> site, we have Call
> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
> except for an MGCP /
> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>
>
>
> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>




________________________________________________________________________
____________
Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who
knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


lelio at uoguelph

Jun 29, 2007, 5:54 PM

Post #17 of 26 (5006 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

I think it's been covered on the list....VG224 and VG248 do not require
additional licences. It's very confusing. Especially on that document I sent
out earlier regarding supplementary services which says licences are
required.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim McBurnett" <jim [at] tgasolutions>
To: "Nick Kassel" <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>; "Paul Choi"
<asobihoudai [at] yahoo>; <cisco-voip [at] puck>
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP


>I thought SCCP uses Device licenses..
> That makes it more costly...
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2007 6:19 AM
> To: Paul Choi; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I see you can also use SCCP, would this be more beneficial.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Choi [mailto:asobihoudai [at] yahoo]
> Sent: 29 June 2007 11:09
> To: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
> I'd say use H.323. It's supported so why not?
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/gatecont/ps2250/products_data_she
> et09186a00801d87f6.html
>
>
> --- Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley>
> wrote:
>
>> I have some VG224 gateways to install in our main
>> site, we have Call
>> Manager 5.1.1, all of our voice gateways are H323
>> except for an MGCP /
>> Qsig gateway we have connected to our old PBX.
>>
>>
>>
>> What does everyone recommend H323 or MGCP for VG224
>>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ____________
> Be a better Heartthrob. Get better relationship answers from someone who
> knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
> http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545433
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
> PRINT**************************************************
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
> or all of which may be legally privileged.
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
> prohibited. If you have received this message in
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
> to or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
> sender immediately should this e-mail have been
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
> attachment sent with it from your computer.
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
> communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
> the recipient(s) accesses them and that
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
> intended recipient(s).
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
> malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
> to monitor and/or record emails sent and
> received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
> with applicable law and regulations.
> ************************************************************************
> *******************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
> of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
> the London Stock Exchange, The
> International Capital Market Association and The London International
> Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
> McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> Filter software.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jul 2, 2007, 7:11 AM

Post #18 of 26 (4926 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and
added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I
get the following errors constantly coming up.


02/07/2007 13:17 172.30.0.3 172.30.0.3 Error
1514: Jul 02 12:17:18.660 UTC : %CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError:
Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort:0 Port DSL:0 Name of
Device:AN1AE221E77D401 App ID:Cisco CallManager Cluster
ID:CSCCMPUB-Cluster Node ID:CSCCMSUB02

Does anyone know what this means?

The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jul 2, 2007, 8:13 AM

Post #19 of 26 (4950 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and
added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I
get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.



Does anyone know what this means?



The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't
make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a
error.txt file to see if that works.







********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.
Attachments: error.txt (0.27 KB)


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jul 2, 2007, 8:40 AM

Post #20 of 26 (4970 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

The document states

Error Message

%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort
[UInt], Port DSL [UInt]

Explanation Database configuration error was encountered.

Recommended Action Investigate configuration for identified device.

Anyone got any further ideas about this?



________________________________

From: Graham, Darel [mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing]
Sent: 02 July 2007 16:24
To: Nick Kassel
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarm
s2.htm





This is all I could find.



Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.



Darel Graham



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and
added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I
get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.



Does anyone know what this means?



The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't
make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a
error.txt file to see if that works.










********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.



********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


ealeatherman at gmail

Jul 6, 2007, 5:47 AM

Post #21 of 26 (4924 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Nick,

Dunno if you got this one figured out or not. I just setup a bunch of
VG224's and noticed this error in conjunction with failed registration
requests. We hadn't provisioned all the ports on one of the VG224's, so
those ports were constantly sending reg requests to callmanagers and getting
denied. You would also see a ton of red errors in the event viewer if this
is the case. Easily fixed, either go into each port on callmanager and give
it a bare configuration (should just have to give it a device pool) or i'm
assuming you could deactivate the particular ports on the gateway also.

Dunno what that has to do with TAPI but the tsp errors were in synch with
the transient connection attempt errors from that.


Ed
On 7/2/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
>
> The document states
>
> *Error Message*
>
> %CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort
> [UInt], Port DSL [UInt]
>
> *Explanation * Database configuration error was encountered.
>
> *Recommended Action * Investigate configuration for identified device.
>
> Anyone got any further ideas about this?
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Graham, Darel [mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing]
> *Sent:* 02 July 2007 16:24
> *To:* Nick Kassel
> *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
>
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarms2.htm
>
>
>
>
>
> This is all I could find.
>
>
>
> Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.
>
>
>
> Darel Graham
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] *On Behalf Of *Nick Kassel
> *Sent:* Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip [at] puck
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
>
>
>
> Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and added
> it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I get tsp errors
> constantly coming up on the Call Manager.
>
>
>
> Does anyone know what this means?
>
>
>
> The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin
>
>
>
> I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't
> make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a
> error.txt file to see if that works.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
>
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
>
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
>
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
>
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.
>
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
>
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
>
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
>
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
>
> received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
>
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
>
> International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
>
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> Filter software.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************
>
>
> The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
>
> Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
>
> error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
>
> taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
>
> incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.
>
>
> You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
>
> accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
>
> delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
>
>
> You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
>
> interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
>
> received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
>
>
> Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
>
> Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> Registered in England No. 1903304
>
>
> Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
>
>
> Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
>
> International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
>
>
> This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> Filter software.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations


jason.aarons at us

Jul 6, 2007, 5:52 AM

Post #22 of 26 (4907 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Same issue as when ATA 186 Line 2 isn’t configured, sends registration requests frequently -jason



From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Ed Leatherman
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 8:48 AM
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Nick,

Dunno if you got this one figured out or not. I just setup a bunch of VG224's and noticed this error in conjunction with failed registration requests. We hadn't provisioned all the ports on one of the VG224's, so those ports were constantly sending reg requests to callmanagers and getting denied. You would also see a ton of red errors in the event viewer if this is the case. Easily fixed, either go into each port on callmanager and give it a bare configuration (should just have to give it a device pool) or i'm assuming you could deactivate the particular ports on the gateway also.

Dunno what that has to do with TAPI but the tsp errors were in synch with the transient connection attempt errors from that.


Ed

On 7/2/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:

The document states

Error Message

%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort [UInt], Port DSL [UInt]

Explanation Database configuration error was encountered.

Recommended Action Investigate configuration for identified device.

Anyone got any further ideas about this?



________________________________

From: Graham, Darel [mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing]
Sent: 02 July 2007 16:24
To: Nick Kassel
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarms2.htm





This is all I could find.



Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.



Darel Graham



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.



Does anyone know what this means?



The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a error.txt file to see if that works.










********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.






********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations



-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.


aman.chugh at gmail

Jul 6, 2007, 5:53 AM

Post #23 of 26 (4898 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Not sure if this related to this error, but I am having a very hard time
with vg224 setup for MGCP , I cant receieve or send a fax, I can see the
handshake happenning in debug vpm sig but cant complete the fax and it fails
with a line error, if i connect a ata and connect the fax machine it works
fine,has anyone seen this,

Any help would be appriciated

cm 4.1.3
vg 224 : 12.4.8c

Thanks
Aman


On 7/6/07, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman [at] gmail> wrote:
>
> Nick,
>
> Dunno if you got this one figured out or not. I just setup a bunch of
> VG224's and noticed this error in conjunction with failed registration
> requests. We hadn't provisioned all the ports on one of the VG224's, so
> those ports were constantly sending reg requests to callmanagers and getting
> denied. You would also see a ton of red errors in the event viewer if this
> is the case. Easily fixed, either go into each port on callmanager and give
> it a bare configuration (should just have to give it a device pool) or i'm
> assuming you could deactivate the particular ports on the gateway also.
>
> Dunno what that has to do with TAPI but the tsp errors were in synch with
> the transient connection attempt errors from that.
>
>
> Ed
> On 7/2/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:
>
> > The document states
> >
> > *Error Message*
> >
> > %CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort
> > [UInt], Port DSL [UInt]
> >
> > *Explanation * Database configuration error was encountered.
> >
> > *Recommended Action * Investigate configuration for identified device.
> >
> > Anyone got any further ideas about this?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* Graham, Darel [mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing]
> > *Sent:* 02 July 2007 16:24
> > *To:* Nick Kassel
> > *Subject:* RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarms2.htm
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > This is all I could find.
> >
> >
> >
> > Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.
> >
> >
> >
> > Darel Graham
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > *From:* cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto:
> > cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] *On Behalf Of *Nick Kassel
> > *Sent:* Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
> > *To:* cisco-voip [at] puck
> > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP
> >
> >
> >
> > Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and
> > added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I
> > get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.
> >
> >
> >
> > Does anyone know what this means?
> >
> >
> >
> > The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin
> >
> >
> >
> > I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't
> > make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a
> > error.txt file to see if that works.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
> >
> > Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
> >
> > error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
> >
> > taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
> >
> > incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.
> >
> >
> > You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
> >
> > accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
> >
> > delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
> >
> >
> > You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
> >
> > interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
> >
> > received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
> >
> > *******************************************************************************************************
> >
> >
> > Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> > Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
> >
> > Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> > Registered in England No. 1903304
> >
> >
> > Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> >
> >
> > Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> >
> > International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> > Filter software.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************
> >
> >
> > The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
> >
> > Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
> >
> > error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
> >
> > taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
> >
> > incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.
> >
> >
> > You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
> >
> > accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
> >
> > delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
> >
> >
> > You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
> >
> > interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
> >
> > received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
> >
> > *******************************************************************************************************
> >
> >
> > Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> > Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR
> >
> > Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
> > Registered in England No. 1903304
> >
> >
> > Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
> >
> >
> > Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
> >
> > International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.
> >
> >
> > This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
> > Filter software.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip [at] puck
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ed Leatherman
> Senior Voice Engineer
> West Virginia University
> Telecommunications and Network Operations
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip [at] puck
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


mark.turpin at calence

Jul 6, 2007, 6:27 AM

Post #24 of 26 (4975 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Are you trying to do relay or passthrough? Relay has better success
rates given the data I've seen. What do you observe on your PSTN
gateway? Have you looked at debug vtsp in addition to vpm? Here's a
link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk777/technologies_tech_note09186a
008014c1d2.shtml



-mark





From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Aman Chugh
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 7:53 AM
To: Ed Leatherman
Cc: Nick Kassel; cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Not sure if this related to this error, but I am having a very hard time
with vg224 setup for MGCP , I cant receieve or send a fax, I can see the
handshake happenning in debug vpm sig but cant complete the fax and it
fails with a line error, if i connect a ata and connect the fax machine
it works fine,has anyone seen this,



Any help would be appriciated



cm 4.1.3

vg 224 : 12.4.8c



Thanks

Aman



On 7/6/07, Ed Leatherman <ealeatherman [at] gmail> wrote:

Nick,

Dunno if you got this one figured out or not. I just setup a bunch of
VG224's and noticed this error in conjunction with failed registration
requests. We hadn't provisioned all the ports on one of the VG224's, so
those ports were constantly sending reg requests to callmanagers and
getting denied. You would also see a ton of red errors in the event
viewer if this is the case. Easily fixed, either go into each port on
callmanager and give it a bare configuration (should just have to give
it a device pool) or i'm assuming you could deactivate the particular
ports on the gateway also.

Dunno what that has to do with TAPI but the tsp errors were in synch
with the transient connection attempt errors from that.


Ed

On 7/2/07, Nick Kassel < Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley
<mailto:Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> > wrote:

The document states

Error Message

%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port
IsoEthPort [UInt], Port DSL [UInt]

Explanation Database configuration error was encountered.

Recommended Action Investigate configuration for identified
device.

Anyone got any further ideas about this?



________________________________

From: Graham, Darel [mailto: Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing
<mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing> ]
Sent: 02 July 2007 16:24
To: Nick Kassel
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP




http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarm
s2.htm





This is all I could find.



Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.



Darel Graham



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway
and added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command
I get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.



Does anyone know what this means?



The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it
doesn't make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it
to a error.txt file to see if that works.










********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.






********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


Nick.Kassel at charles-stanley

Jul 6, 2007, 6:34 AM

Post #25 of 26 (4860 views)
Permalink
Re: VG224 H323 or MGCP [In reply to]

Ed



Thanks, I did manage to get this sorted the issue was with one of my
subscribers, It wasn't accepting changes after they had been made on the
Publisher, when I changed the config to point to a different subscriber
I was able to register the gateway and endpoints fine with no errors.
Once I had rebooted the subscriber all was fine. I had the gateway
registered without the endpoints configured and I was not receiving any
errors after this although I have now added all the configurations to
the ports except for directory numbers. Once I did this the rest of the
dial-peers were added to the gateway configuration.



If anyone is interested the config I used is as follows, I upgraded the
IOS to vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2



version 12.4

no service pad

service timestamps debug datetime msec

service timestamps log datetime msec

no service password-encryption

!

hostname VG224

!

boot-start-marker

boot system flash slot0:vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11

boot-end-marker

!

enable secret 5 $1$OXkj$FBG.LqI1E5O0bIH1/Gg/d

enable password 7 111918160405041E00

!

no aaa new-model

!

!

!

stcapp ccm-group 1

stcapp

!

voice-card 0

!

!

interface FastEthernet0/0

ip address 172.30.0.11 255.255.240.0

duplex full

speed 100

!

interface FastEthernet0/1

no ip address

shutdown

duplex auto

speed auto

!

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.30.0.1

!

ip http server

no ip http secure-server

!

snmp-server community cstan123456ley RO

no cdp run

!

!

control-plane

!

!

voice-port 2/0

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/1

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/2

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/3

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/4

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/5

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/6

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/7

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/8

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/9

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/10

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/11

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/12

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/13

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/14

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/15

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/16

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/17

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/18

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/19

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/20

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/21

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/22

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

voice-port 2/23

cptone GB

timeouts initial 60

timeouts interdigit 60

timeouts ringing infinity

!

ccm-manager config server 172.30.0.2

ccm-manager config

ccm-manager sccp local FastEthernet0/0

ccm-manager sccp

!

!

sccp local FastEthernet0/0

sccp ccm 172.30.0.2 identifier 1

sccp ccm 172.30.0.3 identifier 2

sccp ccm 172.20.100.2 identifier 3

sccp

!

sccp ccm group 1

bind interface FastEthernet0/0

associate ccm 1 priority 1

associate ccm 2 priority 2

associate ccm 3 priority 3

switchback method graceful

!

!

dial-peer voice 999200 pots

service stcapp

port 2/0

!

dial-peer voice 999201 pots

service stcapp

port 2/1

!

dial-peer voice 999202 pots

service stcapp

port 2/2

!

dial-peer voice 999203 pots

service stcapp

port 2/3

!

dial-peer voice 999204 pots

service stcapp

port 2/4

!

dial-peer voice 999205 pots

service stcapp

port 2/5

!

dial-peer voice 999206 pots

service stcapp

port 2/6

!

dial-peer voice 999207 pots

service stcapp

port 2/7

!

dial-peer voice 999208 pots

service stcapp

port 2/8

!

dial-peer voice 999209 pots

service stcapp

port 2/9

!

dial-peer voice 9992010 pots

service stcapp

port 2/10

!

dial-peer voice 9992011 pots

service stcapp

port 2/11

!

dial-peer voice 9992012 pots

service stcapp

port 2/12

!

dial-peer voice 9992013 pots

service stcapp

port 2/13

!

dial-peer voice 9992014 pots

service stcapp

port 2/14

!

dial-peer voice 9992015 pots

service stcapp

port 2/15

!

dial-peer voice 9992016 pots

service stcapp

port 2/16

!

dial-peer voice 9992017 pots

service stcapp

port 2/17

!

dial-peer voice 9992018 pots

service stcapp

port 2/18

!

dial-peer voice 9992019 pots

service stcapp

port 2/19

!

dial-peer voice 9992020 pots

service stcapp

port 2/20

!

dial-peer voice 9992021 pots

service stcapp

port 2/21

!

dial-peer voice 9992022 pots

service stcapp

port 2/22

!

dial-peer voice 9992023 pots

service stcapp

port 2/23

!

!

!

!

line con 0

line aux 0

line vty 0 4

password 7 09584B05170003

login

!

end



VG224_Stapleton_House#









________________________________

From: Ed Leatherman [mailto:ealeatherman [at] gmail]
Sent: 06 July 2007 13:48
To: Nick Kassel
Cc: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Nick,

Dunno if you got this one figured out or not. I just setup a bunch of
VG224's and noticed this error in conjunction with failed registration
requests. We hadn't provisioned all the ports on one of the VG224's, so
those ports were constantly sending reg requests to callmanagers and
getting denied. You would also see a ton of red errors in the event
viewer if this is the case. Easily fixed, either go into each port on
callmanager and give it a bare configuration (should just have to give
it a device pool) or i'm assuming you could deactivate the particular
ports on the gateway also.

Dunno what that has to do with TAPI but the tsp errors were in synch
with the transient connection attempt errors from that.


Ed

On 7/2/07, Nick Kassel <Nick.Kassel [at] charles-stanley> wrote:

The document states

Error Message

%CCM_CALLMANAGER-CALLMANAGER-3-TspError: Error in TSP. Port IsoEthPort
[UInt], Port DSL [UInt]

Explanation Database configuration error was encountered.

Recommended Action Investigate configuration for identified device.

Anyone got any further ideas about this?



________________________________

From: Graham, Darel [mailto:Darel.Graham [at] Globalcrossing]
Sent: 02 July 2007 16:24
To: Nick Kassel
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/c_callmg/3_2/alarm
s2.htm





This is all I could find.



Not sure how helpful it is, as Cisco doesn't say much.



Darel Graham



________________________________

From: cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] On Behalf Of Nick Kassel
Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 11:13 AM
To: cisco-voip [at] puck
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VG224 H323 or MGCP



Ok, so I decided to go with SCCP, I have configured the gateway and
added it to Call Manager 5.1, now when I turn on the stcapp command I
get tsp errors constantly coming up on the Call Manager.



Does anyone know what this means?



The ios is vg224-i6k9s-mz.124-11.T2.bin



I have tried sending this to the list about 4 times now but it doesn't
make the list so I have saved the error message and attached it to a
error.txt file to see if that works.










********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.






********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU
PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some
or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is
prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying
to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the
sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any
attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential
communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time
the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the
intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of
malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right
to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
************************************************************************
*******************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions
of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of
the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International
Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip [at] puck
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




--
Ed Leatherman
Senior Voice Engineer
West Virginia University
Telecommunications and Network Operations

********************SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE YOU PRINT**************************************************

The information contained in this e-mail is strictly confidential, some or all of which may be legally privileged.
Access to this e-mail by any person other than the recipient is prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, any use, disclosure, copying, printing, distribution of, replying to or any action taken or omitted to be
taken in reliance on this e-mail, is prohibited. Please advise the sender immediately should this e-mail have been
incorrectly addressed or transmitted, and then delete the email and any attachment sent with it from your computer.

You are advised that urgent, time sensitive and confidential communications should not be sent by e-mail. You
accept that any instructions are deemed to have been given at the time the recipient(s) accesses them and that
delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).

You acknowledge that e-mails are not secure and you accept the risk of malfunction, viruses, unauthorised
interference, mis-delivery or delay. Charles Stanley reserves the right to monitor and/or record emails sent and
received via its network for any lawful business purpose in accordance with applicable law and regulations.
*******************************************************************************************************


Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd
Registered Office: 25 Luke Street London EC2A 4AR

Tel: 0207 739 8200 Fax: 0207 739 7798
Registered in England No. 1903304

Charles Stanley Sutherlands and Charles Stanley Securities are divisions of Charles Stanley & Co. Ltd

Authorised and Regulated by the Financial Services Authority, Member of the London Stock Exchange, The
International Capital Market Association and The London International Financial Futures & Options Exchange.

This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by McAfee VirusScan and SurfControl Email
Filter software.

First page Previous page 1 2 Next page Last page  View All Cisco voip RSS feed   Index | Next | Previous | View Threaded
 
 


Interested in having your list archived? Contact Gossamer Threads
 
  Web Applications & Managed Hosting Powered by Gossamer Threads Inc.