
ewellnitzvoip at gmail
Aug 13, 2012, 9:21 AM
Post #5 of 5
(383 views)
Permalink
|
Very helpful! Thank you! On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) < rlafount [at] cisco> wrote: > Hi Erick, > > I looked at a call to 1234 from 5417294006 and it fails due to media > negotiation failure with the CTI Port: > > Cisco001MIVR126.log:8250: 8983156: Aug 10 15:36:21.215 CDT > %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:Call.received() > JTAPICallContact[id=3130,implId=186642/1,state=STATE_RECEIVED_IDX,inbound=true,App > name=Huron_IT,task=null,session=null,seq > num=-1,cn=1234,dn=1234,cgn=5417294006,ani=null,dnis=null,clid=null,atype=DIRECT,lrd=null,ocn=1234,route=RP[num=1234],TP=null > > Cisco001MIVR126.log:8339: 8983245: Aug 10 15:36:21.778 CDT > %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:CallID:3130 MediaId:186642/1 Task:73000008035, > CallCtlConnFailed, Inbound call, callctl cause:107, > [919008003:Chi_Phones/(P1-JtapiUser_1) GCID=(1,186642)->ACTIVE]->FAILED > > Cause 107 is media negotiation and this is throw when the CTI Port > attempts to answer the call. > > I looked at the following call (an earlier call to the same number from > the same PSTN number) and it has the same issue: > > 8983068: Aug 10 15:36:20.356 CDT %MIVR-SS_TEL-7-UNK:Call.received() > JTAPICallContact[id=3129,implId=1055625/6,state=STATE_RECEIVED_IDX,inbound=true,App > name=Huron_IT,task=null,session=null,seq > num=-1,cn=1234,dn=1234,cgn=5417294006,ani=null,dnis=null,clid=null,atype=DIRECT,lrd=null,ocn=1234,route=RP[num=1234],TP=null > > I would fix this and see if the issue persists. Depending on the exact > version of 7.x you're running, we didn't really handle exceptions like this > very well. UCCX just assumed it would never hit a condition where the call > failed for reasons outside of its control. As a result, the call looks to > continue processing through the script, even though the actual call has > failed due to the media negotiation. > > Hope this helps. > > Thank you, > > Ryan LaFountain > Unified Contact Center > Cisco Services > Direct: +1 919 392 9898 > Email: rlafount [at] cisco > Hours: M – F 9:00am – 5:00pm > > From: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip [at] gmail> > Date: Monday, August 13, 2012 11:39 AM > To: Ryan LaFountain <rlafount [at] cisco> > Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip [at] puck> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] strange uccx 7.0 issue > > Oops. Here are the files direct from the MIVR directory. > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) < > rlafount [at] cisco> wrote: > >> Hi Eric, >> >> Did you copy the log file content to a text file through RDP or VNC? >> They are all on a single line and impossible to read. >> >> Please copy the actual .log file from the server and send them along. >> I'll be able to parse them pretty easily and will let you know what I see. >> >> Thank you, >> >> Ryan LaFountain >> Unified Contact Center >> Cisco Services >> Direct: +1 919 392 9898 >> Email: rlafount [at] cisco >> Hours: M – F 9:00am – 5:00pm >> >> From: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip [at] gmail> >> Date: Friday, August 10, 2012 5:04 PM >> To: Ryan LaFountain <rlafount [at] cisco> >> Cc: cisco-voip <cisco-voip [at] puck> >> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] strange uccx 7.0 issue >> >> Ryan, >> >> Attached are three MIVR logs from the timeframe surrounding one of the >> calls yesterday. >> >> Any external call to 1234 exhibits the same behavior. Time of call was >> 15:44 >> >> I see a lot of exceptions but I'm really rusty on reading these logs. >> >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Ryan LaFountain (rlafount) < >> rlafount [at] cisco> wrote: >> >>> Hi Erick, >>> >>> With the symptoms you've described I would look for some type of call >>> loop. If that isn't it, send along the MIVR traces and the call >>> information, time, etc. and I'll check 'em out. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> >>> Ryan LaFountain >>> Unified Contact Center >>> Cisco Services >>> Direct: +1 919 392 9898 >>> Email: rlafount [at] cisco >>> Hours: M – F 9:00am – 5:00pm >>> >>> From: Erick Wellnitz <ewellnitzvoip [at] gmail> >>> Date: Friday, August 10, 2012 3:59 PM >>> To: cisco-voip <cisco-voip [at] puck> >>> Subject: [cisco-voip] strange uccx 7.0 issue >>> >>> I have a really strange issue. I have 1 trigger misbehaving across >>> the WAN. >>> >>> The number comes in at the remote site as 1234, should play prompts if >>> the agents are busy or do it's normal agent selection routine. This works >>> fine dialing 1234 from a cisco phone. When an outside caller calls >>> 555-555-1234 the call maxes out our configured maximum sessions in short >>> order and reserves all of the available agents. >>> >>> Anyone seen this kind of behavior before? Any ideas as to what to >>> look for in the logs/traces? >>> >>> It shouldn't be a codec mismatch or I would expect a fast busy. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> >> >
|