
me at mpking
May 31, 2012, 1:37 PM
Post #5 of 5
(797 views)
Permalink
|
It's even better when they reorganize it. I go and look for something, and the page layout changes. (I will admit, mostly it's been for the better) Mike On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila < jorge.rodriguez [at] netxar> wrote: > No worries, that wiki site is a bit convoluted and it tends to happen.**** > > ** ** > > Jorge**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Erick Wellnitz [mailto:ewellnitzvoip [at] gmail] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:47 PM > *To:* Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila > *Cc:* cisco-voip > *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] etherchannel for UC on UCS?**** > > ** ** > > thanks! I guess I didn't read carefully on this one. **** > > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila < > jorge.rodriguez [at] netxar> wrote:**** > Physical Links**** > > *Redundant physical LAN interfaces are recommended*.**** > > Cisco UCS B-Series connect to the LAN via UCS 6100, so use redundant 1Gbps > or 10Gbps ports on the UCS 6100.**** > > Cisco UCS C-Series tested reference configurations<http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/Unified_Computing_System_Hardware> ship > with two or six 1Gbps Ethernet ports (two on the motherboard for C210 or > C200 plus on C210 additional four on a PCIe NIC). The recommended best > practice configuration when using this tested reference configuration is:* > *** > > § One or two pairs of teamed NICs for UC VM traffic. One pair is usually > sufficient on C200 due to the low load per VM.**** > > § One pair of NICs (teamed or dedicated) for VMware-specific traffic > (e.g. management, vMotion, VMware High Availability, etc.)**** > > [image: Description: Note]<http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/File:NotePencil.gif> > **** > > *Note*:**** > > On a server with both LOM and PCIe NIC ports, when creating a NIC teaming > pair, use one port from the LOM and one from the PCIe. This splits the team > across the motherboard and PCIe card, and protects against a failure of > either PCIe card or the motherboard ports.**** > > If using specs-based VMware support, other LAN interconnect options may be > used, such as using Cisco VIC in NIV mode instead of multiple physical NICs. > **** > > **** > > > http://docwiki.cisco.com/wiki/QoS_Design_Considerations_for_Virtual_UC_with_UCS > **** > > **** > > **** > > *Jorge Rodriguez Aguila, CCVP-Voice***** > > *Senior Voice/Data Consultant***** > > *Netxar Technologies***** > > jorge.rodriguez [at] netxar**** > > 787-688-8530**** > > **** > > **** > > **** > > *From:* cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck [mailto: > cisco-voip-bounces [at] puck] *On Behalf Of *Erick Wellnitz > *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2012 3:33 PM > *To:* cisco-voip > *Subject:* [cisco-voip] etherchannel for UC on UCS?**** > > **** > > Is etherchannel supported for UC on UCS? I want to make sure I'm not > planning to do anything which might impact performance.**** > > **** > > Thanks!**** > > **** > > **** > > ** ** > > _______________________________________________ > cisco-voip mailing list > cisco-voip [at] puck > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip > >
|